Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen) header
Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen) profile picture

@tv7israelnews |TFTN | @JISS_Israel | @FDD | HGS | Christian, Husband, Father | 🇮🇱🇳🇱🇺🇸 | Proverbs 1:7

Jerusalem
Joined August 2011
Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)Photo by Jonathan Hessen (@JonathanHessen)
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Report: new Qatari proposal • Accept that Iran will enrich uranium to 3.67% • Down-blend the 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium inside Iran • Lift the U.S. naval blockade on Iran
32
43
25
180
80,945
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Where did Republicans go wrong? @M_S_Billingslea argues the GOP’s problem wasn’t turnout, and calls for a return to Reagan’s conservative principles. ▶️ Watch TV7 Editor's Note with host @JonathanHessen: youtu.be/CJNYjISvFhQ #Republicans #GOP #TV7IsraelNews
4
1
3
268
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Syrian officials told the Associated Press that Damascus will join the Mecca Pact. Syria’s accession to the pact was expected to be discussed and approved at the meeting scheduled for late November or December. It seems things have moved faster than anticipated.
14
113
22
532
85,647
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
My @FDD colleague @miadmaleki has done the most detailed open-source analysis on how to enforce Iron Gate. nitter.gq/miadmaleki/status/2119…
The United States is building a land blockade around Iran to close the regime’s last supply routes and complete its economic strangulation. CENTCOM has established Task Force Iron Gate to extend the existing naval blockade to Iran’s land borders and Caspian Sea routes. The task force was ordered by CENTCOM commander Admiral Brad Cooper on November 7. It consists of approximately 20 civilian and military personnel based in Tampa who will coordinate with the Treasury, State Department, intelligence agencies and other American institutions. This is not a physical blockade involving American soldiers stationed along Iran’s borders. Iran has nearly 5,900 kilometres of land frontiers shared with seven countries, plus approximately 740 kilometres of Caspian coastline. Physically sealing that territory would be impossible. Iron Gate will instead use intelligence, satellite monitoring, financial tracking, sanctions and diplomatic pressure to disrupt the movement of weapons, dual-use technologies, sanctioned materials and illicit revenue. The task force is the next layer of the economic siege already being enforced at sea. CENTCOM says the naval blockade has prevented the Islamic Republic from exporting more than $25 billion in crude oil. Enforcement continues against vessels entering or leaving Iranian ports, while humanitarian shipments remain exempt. That blockade attacked the regime’s principal source of hard currency. Iron Gate targets the routes it began using to survive and rebuild. A Reuters investigation uncovered a covert network of more than 5,000 entities connected to Iran’s Defence Ministry. Since January 2025, the network imported at least $2 billion in explosives, rocket-fuel ingredients, titanium, precision machinery, aircraft components and heavy trucks capable of supporting missile operations. These supplies entered through several remaining corridors: ▪️ Russian-linked shipping across the Caspian Sea. ▪️ Truck routes through Iraq, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Azerbaijan. ▪️ Air-cargo routes originating largely from China. Those imports allowed the Islamic Republic to replenish missile and drone inventories while American and Israeli strikes damaged its production facilities. Iron Gate is designed to make that military recovery slower, more expensive and less reliable. The operation could target trucking companies, shipping networks, banks, front companies and foreign intermediaries. Neighbouring governments may face sanctions or political pressure if their territory continues functioning as a supply corridor for the regime. Recent American pressure on Iraq to close all but two crossings with Iran demonstrates how the system could work. The United States does not require checkpoints on every road. It can pressure neighbouring governments to tighten borders, freeze payments and block the companies transporting sanctioned goods. The Caspian Sea will be the hardest route to restrict because it directly implicates Russia. Russian shipping and ports offer the regime a northern corridor that cannot be closed easily without confronting Moscow’s willingness to facilitate Iranian military procurement. The Islamic Republic will respond through shell companies, forged documents, bribery, covert flights and smuggling. Its borders are too extensive to seal completely. But complete closure is unnecessary. Every delayed shipment, sanctioned intermediary and restricted crossing raises the cost of rebuilding the regime’s military. The naval blockade deprives the Islamic Republic of revenue. Iron Gate targets what it can import with the money that remains. The objective is full-spectrum economic and military pressure without a ground invasion: deny the regime the oil revenue needed to finance terrorism and proxies, then deny it the materials required to rebuild its missiles, drones and weapons factories. The Islamic Republic survived the naval blockade by shifting its supply network inland. The United States is now moving to close the escape routes.
4
53
2
190
15,718
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
How Americans are countering Palestinian antisemitism is amazing!
Pro-Palestine activists tried to cancel Jewish-owned restaurants in Philadelphia today with a boycott ride. Instead? Massive lines wrapped around the block to support them. You try to intimidate our local businesses, the community shows up in force. You love to see it! 🇺🇸
8
48
1
377
9,320
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
214
892
31
6,369
259,124
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
I reviewed 110 financial documents and reports of main Iranian land and sea transportation companies along with regional custom data. Here is what @CENTCOM new Task Force Iron Gate — announced today to squeeze Iran’s land borders and the Caspian — is actually up against. Since April 2026, a U.S. naval blockade has shut Bandar Abbas and Chabahar, ports that handled roughly 163 million tons of cargo and about 80% of Iran’s trade. But Iran has seven back doors: Iraq, Turkey, the Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Together they carried about $22 billion in trade in 2024–25 — $15.3B out, $6.8B in. Since the blockade, every one of these corridors shows traffic surging. That is the gap Iron Gate has to close. A thread with the numbers, corridor by corridor. (1/10)
261
279
119
845
218,528
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Secretary Rubio on April 1, 2026: “We were on the verge of an Iran that had so many missiles and so many drones that no one could do anything about their nuclear weapons program in the future.” Rubio called that prospect: “An intolerable risk.” He argued Iran could not be permitted to protect its nuclear ambitions behind an overwhelming arsenal of conventional weapons. realclearpolitics.com/video/…
The “intelligence” that Kennedy is referring to are Israeli talking points pushed by Israeli lobbyists like Dubowitz. In the lead up to the war Israeli gov officials & lobbyists were pushing this nonsense but there was zero actual intel to support these outlandish claims.
104
58
4
381
114,017
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
CENTCOM forces disabled a commercial vessel in the Gulf of Oman, Nov. 7, after the ship’s civilian crew ignored repeated warnings and attempted to violate the naval blockade against Iran multiple times. A U.S. military aircraft fired precision munitions at the stern of St. Kitts-flagged M/V Huda, disabling the ship after CENTCOM forces directed the crew to abandon targeted spaces. The cargo vessel tried to depart regional waters after visiting an Iranian port. Read the full release online: centcom.mil/MEDIA/PUBLIC-REL…
367
1,459
147
7,921
1,205,898
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
.@SecRubio: “It would have been very easy to do what multiple presidents before him have done, which is just ignore the Iran thing, leave it for the next guy." “But this president didn't do that. He confronted it because what Iran wants to do is not just destroy our country; it's destroy our way of life and threaten our children,” he added.
193
490
55
2,583
331,441
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
I've lost count of how many times I've said this publicly over many months. Midnight Hammer prevented the nuclear breakout; Epic Fury prevented the missile breakout they needed to reconstitute the nuclear program and reach a zone of immunity.
Wow. Senator John Kennedy. How is this not everywhere. Seriously. This is insane. Listen to what he’s actually saying.
96
492
22
2,375
79,855
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
👀
The U.S. government remains committed to countering any attempt by Iran to develop a nuclear weapons program. If you have information on Iran’s nuclear personnel or technologies, send us a tip.
1
3
6
944
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $20 million and possible relocation for information about Iran’s nuclear program, including its facilities, equipment, and associated personnel, such as those in the scientific community, or the movement of any of the above. Submit a tip: rewardsforjustice.net/reward…
10,521
5,248
6,342
19,475
9,743,978
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Secretary of State @marcorubio speaks at CPAC Mar-a-Lago 🇺🇸
269
1,581
145
7,415
3,256,428
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
A gentle but firm reminder.
More Marco Rubio from President Trump’s Cabinet meeting on March 26, 2026 “The people that run this country are radical Shia clerics. These are religious fanatics. Look what they are doing now at their weakest point. This is the weakest Iran has ever been. And look at what they’re doing. They’re attacking embassies. They’re attacking hotels. Imagine what these people would do if they had a nuclear weapon. That is an unacceptable risk for the world” We're doing what's right not what's popular. That's what effective public servants should do. We've lost the midterms. To turn back now without resolving the issue would be ridiculous. #MAGA
1
3
99
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Victor Davis Hanson just rejected JD Vance’s claim that the Iran war cost Republicans the midterms. “It’s not the war.” Now, he says President Trump needs to hit Iran “very, very hard.” “Pickaxe Mountain.” “For two or three weeks.” Hanson is convinced that Trump “did the impossible” in the beginning of the Iran war, “but they didn’t explain it.” “They didn’t say to the American people, 7 presidents said you can’t let them get a nuclear weapon.” “They’re closer than ever before.” “This is an existential threat.” “When the war broke out, he had over 50% approval.” “And they had a spectacular success for the first 38 days.” “There were mistakes, but the biggest problem was we had almost won.” “Then once they stopped in 38 [days], they were not quite done yet.” “They hadn’t prepared for the Hormuz.” Then, he says they failed by letting negotiations drag on for months on end. “We still have eight months before the midterm.” “Six months.” “Five months.” “Four months.” “Three months.” “They got into a haggling with people who don’t tell the truth and have no intention to negotiate.” And now, he says Iran’s leaders are celebrating. “These people are sky-high, high-fiving themselves that they stopped Trump with the midterms.” “And they’re not going to negotiate.” @VDHanson
355
1,323
87
4,612
338,187
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
News: Experts who supported military action against the Tehran regime’s nuclear, missile, and military threats and the current economic warfare campaign aren’t suddenly going to agree that it was the wrong call because of the election, which was about many issues. Leadership requires making tough but necessary calls. If the regime falls next year, those who are calling for (wildly undemocratic) cancelations, silencing, and “holding people accountable” will have been wrong. So go have a drink or a walk, calm down, and let’s meet on Monday on the battle space of ideas. Unless you’re speaking based on foreign or other problematic funding or don’t really believe what you say, you have a right to be heard as much as I do.
11
9
4
39
6,889
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
This video explains a lot of what we've seen playing out over the last two years. And the last 72 hours. Vance is in fact intensely loyal to someone. It's just not Trump.
216
742
86
2,800
330,540
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Dear @JDVance, You warned on Wednesday that the next few months would bring a lot of gaslighting. Then you wrote the first draft. Your post says any honest conversation must start with the war. Great. Since April you have been the administration’s lead negotiator, which makes you the owner of the track that turned a seven-week bombing campaign into an eight-month stalemate. Every week of ceasefire that was not a peace kept the Strait a question mark and kept diesel where eighty-seven percent of voters said they could feel it. Had you spent the spring arguing for the one hour the President says it would take instead of extending the stalemate, the war would have been over by summer, the pump would have said so, and you would be writing a different post. You promised no forever war. You then built a ceasefire with no exit, and sat on it for seven months. Tell voters what settlement you believed was achievable, what deadlines mattered, and what the administration planned to do if negotiations failed. You say you know a great many of the smartest people in politics, but not one of them has a name. (Tucker?) At least one of them cannot count (also Tucker?), because on your list of four things, items one and two are the same item, and item three is a bumper sticker. Item four is the only entry that names a country, and it is not the country we are at war with. (BTW I can guess where item four came from. Days ago @TuckerCarlson wrote that the administration was considering striking Pickaxe Mountain under pressure from Netanyahu, on the strength of Israeli intelligence. That is your fourth item, written out in full. No one had to poll for it. It was posted.) The poll itself. “Change our relationship to Israel” is broad enough to mean several incompatible things. What did those voters actually say? Did they spontaneously mention Israel? Were they offered a list? What percentage selected that answer? Were they objecting to this war, particular Israeli policies, American assistance, or the alliance itself? Why not publish the questionnaire, the sample, the percentages, and the crosstabs. By contrast, the networks published their exit polls. The issues voters were asked about were the economy, democracy, immigration, corruption, the Iran war and artificial intelligence. Israel did not need a column, because voters were not voting about Israel. The sole evidence that the American electorate rendered a verdict on Israel is a phone call between you and a man you will not identify. Contrast your response with @realDonaldTrump’s. Asked about your post, he acknowledged the war’s electoral cost and said he would make the decision again because long term it's the only answer. Agree or disagree, he defended his decision. In July, you yourself said America would have fought this war without Israeli influence. You explained that the president independently opposed an Iranian nuclear weapon—and that you agreed. Now your post finds room for an unnamed pollster’s undefined grievance against Israel, but none for an accounting of your own decisions as the administration’s lead negotiator. Name the pollster. Publish the questions and the results. Tell voters which decisions you supported, which you opposed, and which you would reverse. The President answered for his decision. That is leadership. If you want to be a leader, you need to be able to answer for yours.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
424
1,945
161
7,651
268,550
Jonathan Hessen retweeted
Egyptian prosecutors are pursuing the "maximum penalty" for Christian convert Said Mansour Rezk Abdelrazek on undisclosed charges. Abdelrazek's lawyers say he is being prosecuted for refusing to "renounce Jesus." ✍️ @DanielleGreyman jpost.com/middle-east/articl…
59
602
200
1,025
90,586