Pinned Tweet
$SRES.V is now winding down and the stock is up 63% today.
The stock is up over 100% since I pitched it.
Just a Value Investor retweeted
You know micro-cap investors are about as cautious as they can be right now when calf diarrhea preliminaries this good aren’t even enough for a double-digit move at the open
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Buffett ran a 30X+ leveraged trading operation?
Salomon is a window into how Warren Buffett thought about and managed a traditional market-making business. Richard’s FT article is worth a read. So are Buffett’s letters to Salomon shareholders.
Here’s Buffett’s first letter:
35 years ago this summer, Warren Buffet saved the storied investment bank Salomon Brothers. I spoke with Mr. Buffett and those who helped him out of the crises such as Eric Rosenfeld and John Macfarlane.
Here's the full story
ft.com/content/03686827-1e80…
Just a Value Investor retweeted
A wise man once said:
"Lot of people seem to forget that a stock that doubles in three years is a 26% CAGR, independent of which year the returns actually come."
~@ragingbullcap
Just a Value Investor retweeted
I am not a fan of this and I tend to be very self-doubting and probably over-criticizing myself for a poor hit rate.
This year I am trying to keep it very simple. Just few ideas with mainly long-term focus and some actionable. Mostly following closer what I alrady own.
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Replying to @ShmuelLon
1. I don't really get how one can criticize the growth story here. Total revenue was +40% (well above the industry) YoY in Q1 and operating income doubled. Options standalone was +43%. If you do want to zoom in on growth over the last 6-months, which is what appears is motivating your post, the answer to your question is that growth is coming from higher spreads --> trailing 3-month RPC up 9% since Jan. So they are consciously trading 50-100 bps of market share for better monetization. They are also growing in every other segment and have untapped operating leverage. There's certainly not an issue with growth component to this story.
2. Not sure how you are calculating earnings but it's not anywhere near 50x.
110m fully diluted * $37 = ~$4.1B mc less $550m cash = $3.6B EV. D&A is not a real expense here. Their EBITDA bridge is a good reflection of cash earnings, which is $264m annualizing Q1, and ~$230m if you expense all SBC. That's 15x EBITDA, assuming zero growth, which is punitive to underwrite because you can literally calculate the transaction revenue growth from the monthly disclosures (see we already know its growing), high margin non-transaction fees consistently grow across the industry, and margins expand as fixed costs get leveraged.
But even that still understates the multiple:
- Burning ~$35m annually in building out the futures business. Eventually that stops, either because the investment into that segment worked (in which case this is generationally cheap) or because it didn't and they stop funding it. If you treat that expense as investment (it is), the normalized earnings power of existing business steps up, and the implied multiple comes down to 13.5x.
- The retained Rothera stake isn't reflected in the financials yet. MIAX share based on HOOD's current event contract volumes is already some $40m of pure profit, and its growing rapidly. Whether you capitalize that interest and back it out of the EV or treat it as additional income, that drops the multiple down even further.
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Solitron Devices $SODI reported fiscal Q1 results today.
Revenue and earnings higher. Link to PR
sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…
Just a Value Investor retweeted
From Li Lu's book:
At the beginning of the new year in 2016, I watched the movie "The Big Short". Adapted from the novel of the same name by Michael Lewis, the film tells the legendary story of the few investors who first discovered the 2007-2008 subprime mortgage crisis and the loopholes in the entire financial system of the United States, and started shorting to profit. I have personally experienced many of the events involved in the film; I have more or less intersected with the various characters in the film, so watching it gives me a more immersive sense of reality, which also triggers some thoughts.
From 2005 and 2006, I personally discovered the product of credit default swaps (CDS) due to accidental reasons. After doing some research, I was also planning to enter on a large scale and sell short through CDS. Later, after several conversations with Charlie Munger, this idea was gradually dispelled. The reason for Charlie’s objection is also very simple: if my analysis is correct, it means that in the end, either the counterparty of these products, those large financial companies may not be able to cash out due to bankruptcy; or these large financial institutions are approved by the government. The taxpayers' money has been saved. At this time, the money you earn is actually taxpayers' and government's money, so you are not at ease. Later, the results really confirmed Charlie's judgement. The money earned from the largest short position in history was actually obtained directly or indirectly from taxpayers around the world. So I have never regretted not earning taxpayer money.
Investment itself is a prediction of the future. Although the prediction is correct, it will bring some pleasure to some extent, but the results of different ways of making money are still different. Later, after the publication of this book by Michael Lewis, I had several exchanges with Charlie and talked about the decision at that time. He said that if you made a lot of money doing CDS at that time, you may still be looking for a new CDS today. A big short opportunity. Human nature is like this.
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Here is this week's special situations digest.
281 situations in activist campaigns, M&A/divestments, management changes, and other corporate events.
Make sure to check it out
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Rashee Rice finally understand what it feels like to get unexpectedly hit at a high rate of speed and have the man responsible leave the scene
Just a Value Investor retweeted
His orders look to always involve fractional shares, so he is likely not doing manual orders and the stake is determined by something else (like kelly criterion or other). Lots of position sizes ranging from tiny to huge, meaning he could be covering all sides of the bets or he simply is betting according to edge.
I think he's cross "time" arbing the btc mkts which is very profitable if you know the option value of btc price at x date. Then you just pick off prices that are wrong. Looking at his activity, he's obviously automated this.
On Poly, there's lots of opps coz markets that are correlated - like "btc by dec 4th > 100k" & "btc by dec 5th > 100k" - become disrupted by the current retail betting base. As in, a bettor comes along and market orders "btc by dec 4th > 100k", crossing the spread so moving the price, but "dec 5th > 100k price" doesn't change because the retail bettor didn't cross the spread on that market, however they are obviously correlated mkts so at least 1 of the prices on either outcome has to be the wrong price. That would result in at least 1 +ev bet.
This is like 1 out of 20 things i've thought of how to gain edge on polymarket, alas I have no coding skill so tradfi quants, you can have at it.
PS: I manually put on a cross market arb @ 8% return ending in a month just now. Lots of opps there.
This trader has been blocked from all exchanges
I have no other explanation for why he trades Bitcoin price predictions so successfully on Polymarket
> Joined a month ago
> 70.9% win rate
> 1329 historical positions
> $586k total profit
And the most interesting thing is that all of his trades are related to the price of Bitcoin. That's why I'm not afraid of traders who trade on all types of markets; I'm afraid of traders who trade on a single market
He still have some active positions and you can check them - polymarket.com/@blubberbuste…
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Sometimes you don't even have to get past the first page to know it's a pass
My favorite part of ChatGPT deep research is looking through the links it uses. I tend to get more value out of the links it finds than the actual response.
Just a Value Investor retweeted
Analyst: ... "𝘐𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘺?"
CEO: "𝘐 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘥".
😆




























