LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24) header
LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24) profile picture

Happily retired. A concerned Citizen and Veteran just humbly enjoying having a voice.

Mid-Atlantic
Joined January 2024
Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)Photo by LegioInvictus (@LegioInvictus24)
Trump sat down with 60 Minutes Sunday after the midterms and gave a clearer read on where he stands than he has in weeks. On immigration, he said the deportation push was “too tough” in some cases. He took credit for closing the border and removing “the bad ones,” but said the administration also removed people who had jobs and whose only violation was coming here illegally. He noted some were “good people working in a landscaping company, or working in a hotel” and that “in some cases, paying taxes.” He said he would “love to do something on immigration” with Democrats. Trump’s immigration move is the same one he’s made before. He pulls back slightly so his base can show it still wants the pressure kept on. Democrats will call it a concession. It isn’t. It’s an opportunity to reignite the mandate for mass deportations. If he or the country weakens on immigration, there will never be another Republican president. That’s why Democrats want amnesty. Democrats will push full-steam ahead with impeachment and more. Trump knows that. Asked if they would try again, he said he “can’t imagine it” after what he called the best two years in the history of the presidency. He’s practically goading them to do it. He knows how bad that looks for them. But the Democrats are stuck because that’s all they have to offer. They’ll do nothing to make America more affordable. All they’ve done since winning the midterms is tell Trump and his allies to lawyer up. On Iran, Trump stood by the decision. He said if he had to do it again, the answer would be an “emphatic yes.” The war needs to end decisively and soon, but it was the right call to finally address Iran’s hostility and nuclear weapon development. What needs to end tomorrow is the Ukraine war. Trump can help negotiate that without congressional approval. He should. Democrats will hate him for it. That’s how you know it’s the right move for him. The next two years will test which of these positions go the way Trump has set them up to proceed. But the most likely result of the Democrat Congress will be stagnation. They can’t overcome his veto. They can’t remove him. They can’t make America more affordable. Republicans need to find a way to capitalize off of that can’t and show the American people in 2028 the MAGA policies a new GOP majority in Congress, and President Rubio (perhaps), can actually accomplish. The GOP might have lost the midterms, but they still have the winning policies. They just have a problem making them into laws.
1
7
17
1,451
LegioInvictus retweeted
The steal is designed to make it difficult/impossible for the public to get their hands on the evidence. We already know that from 2020. And if you do get evidence, judges won’t let it into the courtroom. But none of that means you just give up.
No way in hell. Iowa did not vote for communism because of gas prices (that were the same or less than under previous admin) or a war to end a nuclear threat (w/ no boots on the ground). I know Iowa. Iowa raised me. Iowa educated me. The math isn’t mathing here. Let’s audit this election to make sure the results are honest before we hand over the Hawkeye state and America to Communists. Do not certify until you VERIFY the vote.
23
85
4
274
9,180
LegioInvictus retweeted
How do you know Pete Hegseth is not part of the globalist DC cabal? Because its members are all calling for his impeachment instead of Trump’s these days. @SecWar has our military finally on the correct course after Marxist king Obama absolutely destroyed our troops moral with militant LBGTQ+ agenda. Not to mention Barack saw to it the upper ranks and promotions were those with his far left radical views.
At the War Department: We Stand. We Fight. We Defend the Republic.
5
13
331
LegioInvictus retweeted
The broad U.S. population needs to pay attention to one problem that has now come into existence in greater numbers than I would have anticipated. Major U.S. cities are now governed by avowed socialists. New York -- (1) LA -- (2) Seattle -- (18) D.C. -- (19) Socialist adjacent: Chicago (3) This is being driven in significant measure by younger college grads and immigrants. The broader population needs to watch closely what those mayors do, and how those cities suffer at their hands.
30
159
4
585
11,445
LegioInvictus retweeted
Ed Martin calls this one of the most consequential moments since the Revolutionary War. That's a hell of a declaration, but look at what he's describing: Americans buried under prosecutions, crushed by legal bills, threatened with professional disbarment, and financially ruined while Washington's legal establishment congratulates itself on defending institutional norms. And here's the goddamn problem. Winning an occasional court battle means precious little when the machinery that can destroy someone's life remains perfectly intact. John Eastman, Jeff Clark, Cleta Mitchell, Jim Troupis. Careers disrupted, years consumed by legal warfare, reputations battered, and fortunes spent fighting proceedings that can inflict devastating punishment long before a final judgment. Meanwhile, the same institutions keep operating, the same officials keep collecting paychecks, and the same politicians keep promising accountability. What a magnificent fucking arrangement. Martin describes examining communications involving Lisa Monaco and Jack Smith and confronting federal judges whose conduct convinced him that the legal establishment desperately needs scrutiny. His response is specific: reform institutions that can be repaired, dismantle abusive structures, pursue judicial impeachment where misconduct warrants it, organize legal support networks, and challenge institutional narratives that have escaped serious examination. That's where congressional responsibility enters the picture. Lawmakers possess oversight authority. The House possesses impeachment power. Government officials can be investigated, disciplinary processes scrutinized, and institutional abuses exposed. Those powers exist for a fucking reason. Yet Washington has perfected the art of responding to enormous constitutional concerns with another speech, another hearing, and another fundraising email promising that accountability is just around the corner. Enough of that bullshit. Every demonstrated abuse of prosecutorial authority deserves investigation. Every judicial violation warrants appropriate consequences. Every professional disciplinary system must answer for politically discriminatory enforcement. And every citizen facing the overwhelming resources of government deserves meaningful constitutional protection. The Constitution cannot enforce itself. Neither can a courtroom victory repair years of financial devastation. The demand is simple: document misconduct, expose abuses, reform broken procedures, enforce constitutional restraints, and hold responsible officials accountable through lawful means. Because another thousand speeches about defending the republic won't accomplish a goddamn thing if the people entrusted with protecting its institutions refuse to confront their failures. The next constitutional crisis deserves something Washington has become spectacularly skilled at avoiding. Actual fucking accountability. (article below)
1
19
53
1,553
LegioInvictus retweeted
While I was analyzing the election results, this happened. Explains a lot. It also means that JD Vance will NOT be getting my vote in 2028 - not that that matters, but still. JD is a skilled politician, but his loyalty is to his own advancement and that doesn't work for me. Especially when he flirts with antisemites like Tucker Carlson for the same reason. So I guess it's Rubio. Smart as hell and understands communism, and we need that. I doubt Hegseth will run in any case.
This is what I believe happened in the 96 hours before, during and after Election Day. I have little insider information, this is just me connecting some dots. I could be wrong: 1. The Trump Administration knew it would be a wipeout. 2. The Vance team coordinated with Susie Wiles so there would be a concerted information campaign to blame the loss on Pete Hegseth because of Iran and to oust him, thereby clearing a JD Vance competitor from the field (plus maybe Rubio too). 3. Trump was unaware of this campaign, which included Susie scheduling a Saturday Camp David meeting with Vance/Susie loyalists with Trump out of town (that meeting got cancelled). 4. Vance dropped his "It wasn't me" X post on Wednesday morning (which directly blamed Trump's decisions but also impliedly blamed Hegseth and Rubio), but not before a whole bunch of people (me included) had already started backing Hegseth. 5. Hegseth himself dropped an info campaign that was clearly in anticipation of unfriendly folks in the admin trying to pin the loss on him. 6. It all came to a head in the Oval Office where Trump had to choose between Susie and Hegseth. Trump chose Hegseth and ousted Susie. This is all conjecture on my part, but it feels right. I base my assessment in part on the fact that there were media people telling me that the Vance team was POd at my "Hegseth 2028" article and they tried to discredit me in the media as being paid by Hegseth to post that article (which is an absolute lie). (Note the similar attacks on Laura Loomer.) Politics is a nasty, nasty business. As you see efforts to impeach Hegseth in the days and weeks ahead because he does his job so well, please consider my theory.
1
17
1,543
LegioInvictus retweeted
To recap: 1. Contesting the election leads to leftists declaring the current government/administration being illegitimate resulting in rioting and civil unrest. 2. Conceding the legitimacy of the election cements cheating/fraud and leads to the end of our country as we know it. We end up living in a perpetual Truman Show. The only logical course of action for the administration is to contest the results (assuming there is valid evidence to do so) and take on the left while still holding the levers of power in the executive branch and the military. Losing the legislature and the White House in two years gives the left the levers it needs to accomplish its ultimate mission: the destruction of the Republic. It’s far more strategically advantageous, although disruptive, to do it now while Trump and Hegseth are at the wheel of both the executive branch and the military. Waiting to try to win back power in rigged elections is an uphill fight.
The problem is that identifying the trap, does not mean it is not a trap. So yes - they had a plan to box the President in & tie his hands so he has to go along with the results no matter what or they are going to set fire to the streets. That is still sedition. And either way they win. If he tries to address the fraud then they riot & declare his govt illegitimate & implement their plan & get away with stealing the election. If he does nothing because he does not want to trigger their plan, then they still get away with stealing the election. This was always about manipulating the information battle-space to force the outcome they want. No one should make it easy for them. But surrender is not an option.
2
6
22
660
The silver lining is Democrats will do absolutely nothing to stop the macroeconomic forces fueling the populist outrage that’s beginning to boil over across the country. They don’t even know what’s causing it.
51
46
5
1,061
12,474
LegioInvictus retweeted
You just keep coming back for another round of getting dragged through the mud. Fine I’ll do it again. Everything up to this point you have said is zero factual based? You keep treating every court dismissal as proof nothing happened, while the actual noncitizen voting cases that get charged and the jurisdictions that refuse basic safeguards keep getting waved off as anecdotes. Losing on standing or timing doesn’t erase the record. It just means the people who wrote the rules don’t have to answer for them. It’s the same old same old. Journocrats. You said it. They spent years calling every Republican loss proof the brand was toxic. Now the same outlets treat a midterm wipeout as pure voter wisdom with no further questions. Pick a lane, you can’t have it both ways. “Not like this.” You lost states and districts Trump carried by double digits and the margins were large. Talarico’s early votes beat Paxton’s total. That is case, but it doesn’t make it good. It also doesn’t erase the decades-long track record in the cities and states Democrats have run: the places that still lead in murder rates for years, still have and will have open-air drug markets, still have highest homeless , and still cycle money through nonprofits and consultants right back into the same campaigns. The results don’t improve in the places lead by democrats. The body counts and wasted money are the only things that go up. Ha, ha had to laugh at your education claim: red states lag because of funding. Yet multiple Southern states have posted real gains while higher-spending systems stalled. Here’s a news flash for you: adopting a program doesn’t prove the blue model works when the Dems systems keep underperforming relative to the money they spend. More dollars without better outcomes is just insanity. Here is another laugh: Mayor’s party has zero impact on crime was your theory . The highest-murder cities still overwhelmingly have Democratic mayors and progressive prosecutors, decade after decade. The cities with high the body counts don’t care. Red-state statewide crime averages get dragged up by the big cities inside them that Democrats have run for decades. Those cities still have the highest murder and violent-crime rates. Pointing at the state total doesn’t prove a mayor’s party is not responsible when the actual concentration of serious crime remains in the places under long-term Democratic control. No evidence of widespread fraud is the slogan after every case gets dismissed on standing or procedure. You claim “a lot of Republicans have been arrested for voter fraud lately.” Guess what genius, that doesn’t match the record. Most of the recent large-scale fraud arrests have been noncitizens and Democrats. You also can’t erase the documented noncitizen voting prosecutions or the fact that the same places that write the loosest rules keep electing the people who benefit from them. The bigger issues are being waved away rather than examined. If the people living under long-term Democratic rule already knew better, the cities those politicians have owned for decades wouldn’t still lead in the problems they claim to solve. You however, can keep treating every loss as toxicity and every win as enlightenment. The rest of us will keep reading the actual outcomes and avoid the Democrat insanity at all costs. I’ve given you enough of my brain cells. You’re the typical know-it-all with no knowledge. Last reply to you.
Replying to @zeroDEIUSA
Ah yes, more conspiracy, more accusations, and more claims with zero factual basis. Also lack of even basic understanding of voting dynamics and how elections even work. Journocrats, ok... Yes midterm elections punish the party in power, but not like this. Y'all lost states and districts that Trump one by double digits, and the numbers weren't even close. James Talarico got more early votes that Ken Paxton got total. Education systems lag more in red states because of lack of funding. Though, several southern states have had increased scores because they have adopted programs already in use by blue states. The political affiliation of the mayor has zero impact on crime rate, which has been proven again and again. Red states have more overall crime and higher drug use rates, they also take more in government funds than they return. Say this with me: There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. That is why you have lost every single court case involving it. That is why the Republicans have yet to charge any people in power with it. Strangely, a lot of Republicans have been arrested for voter fraud lately. If people already know better why don't y'all win every election?
4
1
9
316
Yes, this.
Governor-elect Byron Donalds (R-FL) said Republicans must get back to being focused “just on the cost of living for the people of this country.” Byron is right that cost of living matters. It always does. But Florida already proved that whats more important is election integrity They locked down the rolls, required ID, and kept the process clean enough that the numbers did not move in a straight line the way they did everywhere else. The rest of the country did not get that.
1
5
170
LegioInvictus retweeted
The best part is, Elon already had his money
Scott Galloway says he owned a Tesla, but sold it because of Elon. "Not before taking a giant dump in the passenger seat. True story." He's gone from suggesting Elon be executed to telling stories of taking dumps in a car he owned because it was made by Elon's company. This is a broken, deranged and utterly toxic individual.
14
11
153
1,684
This is why podcasters like Jack are getting criticized. They look at a chart and say 14 million Republicans stayed home instead of looking at the actual numbers. GOP vote stayed basically flat from 2022. Democrats materialized roughly 20 million new House votes in a midterm. Armor of God. Integrity first.nitter.gq/JackPosobiec/status/21…
Here is the party difference between 2024 and 2026 Democrats won the turnout race 14M Republicans stayed home
40
36
3
152
2,175
The counties didn't necessarily flip (from red to blue), but the map gives an equally unlikely depiction of this many counties shifting to higher numbers of votes for Democrats. It's simply not believable about a number of states. There is no way all 77 counties in Oklahoma showed higher numbers of votes for Democrats. A few of them probably did, but only a few. Nor is it believable that every county in Kansas saw such a shift, or Iowa, or Ohio, Michigan, or Indiana, for that matter.
Statistically impossible & just blatantly engineered.
2
5
14
490
Great questions and I won't guess either. We will see.
Once again. Foreign interference in the election has been tracked & documented. Will they wait 45 days to make this report? Will they report everything? Will it bee too late when they do? Will anyone do anything about it? What are the options? History suggests the President will be talked out of using his constitutional power but I am not going to guess. Not am I going to surrender. And I am not a quitter.
1
6
12
249
Truth, and to enrich themselves and their families.
Most Republicans members of Congress are mediocre and useless. Zero desire to win, they just want to be there and get invited to DC parties.
3
2
33
364
LegioInvictus retweeted
"If Democrats take the House and Senate in 2026 and the White House in 2028, the country we hand to our children will be the country the European Union built for itself… a country whose courts are instruments of the regulatory state, whose dissidents are debanked, whose opposition leaders are prosecuted into ineligibility, whose elections are annulled when they come out wrong, whose speech is regulated by Brussels and licensed by London, and whose parliaments cannot override any of it because their own courts have been captured by the same network that is now coming for ours. America was built to be the exception to that model. The Constitution was the exception. The independent judiciary was the exception. The First Amendment was the exception. The federalist structure was the exception. Every one of those exceptions is what the program above is designed to liquidate. The time to wake up is now."
1
7
1
25
971
They are absolutely NOT going to do this (I'd love to be wrong) because their jobs of allowing all the activities in TX to occur in the setting up of the fraud wasn't an accident. The election could have been secured by the R House, Senate and governor. They did nothing to do that and allowed it to happen.
In Galveston County official results show Ken Paxton beat the freak. Many Texans are now looking to Govt Abbott & LTG Dan Patrick to hear them & do a statewide audit - not a risk limiting audit that only counts a fraction of the votes but a real 100 percent audit that includes the cast vote records and verification of citizenship. If the leaders still in power do not do the right thing, if they ignore what is blatantly obvious & once again bury the fraud, then are we to understand that they have been bought off? Why else would you cower when your entire state & the Republic is at stake?
9
49
2
169
4,147
LegioInvictus retweeted
REVENGE. That's the word Abdulrahman El-Sayed's former security chief, Jordan Domingue, used to describe one of the senator-elect's political objectives. And the rest of his warning is a fucking nightmare for the Democratic establishment: politicians who backed El-Sayed's primary opponents could find themselves in the crosshairs of his new Habibi PAC. Domingue specifically named Elissa Slotkin. He also warned that Democrats who supported El-Sayed out of political convenience, while refusing to embrace his ideological agenda, could find themselves targeted. What a magnificent fucking shitshow. El-Sayed campaigns on getting money out of politics, wins his Senate seat, and promptly establishes a political fundraising operation. Now his former security chief is describing a potential revenge campaign against fellow Democrats who committed the unforgivable political sin of supporting somebody else. Apparently, the great crusade against dirty political money comes with a convenient exception for financing your own goddamn political vendettas. And here's where the Democratic establishment's breathtaking stupidity becomes especially entertaining. El-Sayed openly declared that winning one Senate seat was never the ultimate goal. He wants to transform politics. He has his new PAC, his ideological ambitions, and a growing confrontation with the party establishment that helped elect him. Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer is facing an incoming senator who favors Chris Van Hollen for Senate majority leader. Brilliant fucking work, Chuck. Washington Democrats spend fortunes constructing political coalitions, protecting incumbents, and maintaining their precious little leadership arrangements. Now they're confronting the possibility that their newest political investment will help bankroll challenges against their own members. Imagine the sheer humiliation of spending millions building a political majority, only to watch the people you helped elect start discussing which of your colleagues deserve political execution. And the most delicious part? The Habibi PAC's actual spending will reveal just how serious this internal war becomes. If Domingue's warnings prove accurate, Democrats could find themselves raising money to defend politicians against attacks financed by the very ideological movement their party helped empower. What an absolutely glorious clusterfuck. The establishment wanted another reliable vote. El-Sayed wants to transform the party. His former security chief is warning about revenge, and the fundraising machinery is already taking shape. Congratulations, Democrats. You've spent years sharpening political knives for Republicans. Now you might want to check who's sitting across your own fucking conference table. (article below)
10
39
1
151
5,746
This is concerning. I hope he doesn't fall into the Reagan amnesty deal trap with the Democrats which was a disaster.
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says some people want every single solitary illegal alien deported by the mass millions, while others want a "deal" for only the workers committing no other crimes "[They want] the people here for 10-15 years, work a deal for them...good people, work in an landscaping company, or work in an hotel...paying taxes." "I think [the deportation policy] might be too tough." "I get hurt because we also took people that had good jobs that created one violation or breaking of the law. And that was that they came into the country illegally. Now, there is a large part of the country that think that they should be put out." Trump didn't outright endorse any immigration deal, but said he WOULD work with Democrats on immigration Odds are, Dems would just push for mass amnesty for every illegal alien, and THAT'S A NON-STARTER!
3
5
30
424
LegioInvictus retweeted
10 STATE FORENSIC ROLL UP. I just published my 10-State 2026 Midterm Forensic Roll-Up covering 37.88 million certified ballots across all 960 counties in TX, FL, PA, GA, NC, AZ, IA, KS, OK & NV. There is not a single claim "conclusive proof" of anything. The voting pipeline is obscure and flawed on purpose. I know we have a lot of people parked in 2 separate camps right now, which I think is not good. 1. No way GOP lost everything in a single election, overwhelming evidence, etc... FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD.... 2. The GOP ran shitty candidates across the board and did nothing but show their asses to the voters and got their comeuppance. To #1 I say: We have uncovered over $100 billion in democrat sponsored fraud in everything from Healthcare, to Tax credits over the last 2 years. It was so bad they are passing laws to keep investigations from happening (Stop Nick Shirley Act) We don't think there was ANY CHEATING? Down ballot votes are very, very compelling. To #2 I say: Yes, in some cases that is true. The GOP as a whole, told us to piss off they had more important things to do. Now, the exit poling across the board showed that MAGA didn't break and non MAGA republicans didn't break either. I think BOTH THINGS ARE TRUE. States snuck in 20 million voters without proof of citizenship, mostly through giving illegals drivers licenses and then had them check a box saying they were citizens. They didn't validate citizenship so they could do this. The color revolution says so. 19m to 19m. 97% approval rate. AND THE GOP LET IT HAPPEN. The main roll up report shows reproducible federal & state data pointing to 5 convergent signatures, starting BEFORE a single ballot is cast. It's very math heavy but there are plain-english sections in every report.
34
102
15
333
10,558