I can’t let this moment pass because it will never repeat. I woke up this morning without her for the first time. ❤️ you Mom.

NBA Rule 4, Sec. III defines "Gather" as: "b) A player already in control of the ball while dribbling The gather occurs when the player does any one of the following: Puts two hands on the ball, or otherwise permits the ball to come to rest while in control of it. Puts a hand under the ball and brings it to a pause. Otherwise gains enough control to hold it, change hands, pass, shoot, or cradle it against their body." He took 4 steps after his right hand was under the ball. You don't know the NBA dribble rules.

So, it seems that the USAO for CDCA has been reading my Substack. When I worked in EDCA, those guys stole my work then too. shipwreckedcrew.substack.com…

The "gather" is a bit more than that: Two Hands: Put two hands on the ball. Ball Comes to Rest: Permit the ball to come to rest in one hand while maintaining control of it (palming or carrying). Hand Under the Ball: Place a hand under the ball and bring it to a pause. Sufficient Control: Otherwise gain enough control of the ball to hold it, change hands, pass, shoot, or cradle it against their body. Ball "otherwise gained control" and then took 4 steps.

It is now a revenue stream. Now a no-show is a no-cost easy $50+. Only the wait staff don't get paid.

Sometimes it takes longer for some young people to understand the power of compounding than it does for others.

Don't ask an economist to offer an opinion about the law. The chances of Calif collecting from individuals who left the state is very remote.

Since 14 of 14 District Judges in NDCA were appointed by Obama or Biden, did it really matter which one it was?

LOL - yeah, that’s the way “searches” are done.

But, as Scalia noted, the remedy was "release" to do the one thing he was forbidden by law from doing -- living in the U.S.

It's a polemic. That's what political opponents say. Politics ain't beanbag. El-Sayed wants to play cute with his associations, he's going to get jabbed by hyperbole.

You're comm'ing with a guy who prosecuted Bank Secrecy Act cases. I likely know the KNC standards better than you do. WFB didn't ask for my ID. Had they done so they would have seen the name on the account and my last name were the same. I could have written a paper check out to them, and they would have taken that. But they would not allow me to deposit the cash I had only 60 seconds earlier taken from their ATM machine into my son's account. Impose a cash limit to discourage money laundering? Fine -- put in place a limit. But the limit can't be less than what their own ATM dispenses to me, and I then carry to a teller to make a deposit. I'm not taking anything. I'm not putting the bank at risk in any way. Major banks are stupid on KYC standards. Some of the biggest idiots at banks I've ever met are in bank security responsible for KYC rules. They are so afraid of Comptroller regulators they impose stupid rules that federal law enforcement laughs at when they say "Aren't we doing a great job?" That's why 99% of all STRs end up in the trash.

Then DOJ/DHS would have evidence of their naturalization in their A-File. Nearly all naturalized citizens were Green Card holders -- meaning they had an A-File. When they seek naturalization, that goes into their A-File. DOJ/DHS created the 20,000 person list from A-Files. It is highly unlikely that the 20,000 names include naturalized citizens -- DOJ/DHS said in the complaint they screened those out.

Bonta didn't change the judge. It was changed by a Local Rule that applies to all civil cases filed in that Court. Every federal court has a variation of the same rule.

Starlink enabled.

Seems clear to me now that the theory is going to be that she was NOT related to the person she claimed was her father, so she could NOT get derivative citizenship via his naturalization whether he ever was naturalized or not. She has been an undocumented alien in the US her entire life because her real father remained in Great Britain when she came to the U.S. with a different family who lied about her being their daughter. This is why they wanted DNA of her sister, and already had DNA of her husband/brother. There is reporting that this all kicked off recently over a group text message on her sister's phone -- LIKELY obtained in connection with the fraud investigations in Minneapolis that involve her sister. THAT's why they wanted her phone so badly -- to find the same message on her phone. She's probably in the group chat that was found on her sister's phone. The message must reveal some information about them not being part of the same family. If she acknowledged knowing that was the case, then she has lied numerous times as an adult about what she knew about her lineage and whether she was naturalized. Lying about citizenship is a federal crime.

You are being removed for false information in your visa application. You lied to get into the country. Quit gaslighting.