Alberta, Canada
Joined May 2010
The real Deal retweeted
SCOOP: The RCMP is investigating fraud, breach of trust, and money laundering in connection with Alberta's health care procurement controversy, according to a letter filed in court theglobeandmail.com/canada/a… w @tom_cardoso
76
567
83
1,272
83,771
The real Deal retweeted
Sigue siendo el mejor vídeo sobre adicción que se ha creado
859
35,125
1,712
316,171
24,031,759
I must say that @ElectionsAB is doing an amazing job responding to people and calling out the disinformation 👏👏👏👏
Replying to @TaffWelshBoyo
This is disinformation @TaffWelshBoyo. The late closures were due to late openings and electors still being in line when locations closed. Those individuals are entitled and were able to vote. This happened across the province. No voting places were open past 11:00pm.
3
9
158
The real Deal retweeted
Smith insisting the law forced her to put this separation q on the ballot. No. The law required govt to consider the proposed question. And Smith lowered the signature threshold to 177k from 600k. The secessionist option garnered 496,890 votes w 94% of polls reporting.
34
336
18
947
33,508
The real Deal retweeted
Jeff Rath just made a remarkable allegation (yes, I know) on CTV this morning. He claims Danielle Smith bought the Wexit Party's contact list during her 2022 UCP leadership campaign and used it to recruit separatists who believed she was secretly one of them. #ableg #abpoli
169
286
85
726
215,195
The real Deal retweeted
Just a note- separatists pitched option 2 to hold a binding referendum as a way to send a message to Ottawa. Many folks jumped on that idea. Which means, no, 24.5% of Albertans do not support separation.
30
70
5
465
14,890
The real Deal retweeted
SCOOP: The Alberta govt recommended a compay linked to Sam Mraiche for a contract to build a $35-million recovery centre on a First Nation near Calgary, according to the community's former lawyer theglobeandmail.com/canada/a… By @tom_cardoso and friend
27
265
24
476
24,243
These are the ppl arguing FOR freedom & against FEDS while arguing that Smith should be a dictator and remove elected officials….because they disagree and, heaven forbid, vocalize any opposition to @ABDanielleSmith This is the AB these guys are fighting for
I’m no fan of @ABDanielleSmith these days… but firing @JeromyYYC would go a long way towards making her seem less weak. The only question is would Mark Carney give her permission to do it given that Carney runs her.
1
7
The real Deal retweeted
Danielle Smith: You bought a house in a neighbourhood without infills. You shouldn’t have to live next to one now. Also Danielle Smith: You bought a house in a neighbourhood without data centres. Tough stuff, a billionaire needs somewhere to plug in his computer.
58
217
6
751
15,471
.@ABDanielleSmith, how did your yesterday’s secretive meeting with the separatists and convicted Tamara Lich go? Why weren’t media and Albertans allowed to hear what you said to them? When campaigning for unity, we don’t hide. calgaryherald.com/news/local… #ableg #cdnpoli
141
958
47
2,346
78,241
The real Deal retweeted
Danielle Smith is holding a referendum on immigration. How much of Alberta’s healthcare budget do non-residents actually use?
55
230
17
453
10,431
Why am I not surprised that, once again, these guys start with “IF this is true..” then continue to rage bait. Why not look into it? A 2 second search would give the truth…but that doesn’t give clicks or rage
If this is true that he was removed for waving an Alberta flag, I highly encourage everyone to bring Alberta flags and proudly wave them at every Oilers game. Inside and outside.
6
This is the problem with looking down on those struggling. How do ppl afford to live while working to hopefully save up funds to afford uni? Back in the day one could work while going to school and scrape by but clearly this isn’t the case
Number of hours of work at minimum wage necessary to pay the average rent in each province. You know what helps? Upgrade your skills and get a better job.
20
All ABns, ALL CDNs should be reading this!
A Michigan delegation travelled to Calgary to sell separatists on software developed for Republicans to get out the vote – and how it could be used to wrench Alberta from Confederation. For David Parker, an organizer for Alberta separation, the software was the path to victory – one that ultimately resulted in a massive privacy breach involving the sensitive personal data of nearly three million Albertans. But Parker’s embrace of the Michigan delegation is evidence of a pattern: separatist factions in Alberta eager to engage the U.S. in their plans for secession, and American actors willing to assist, either privately or openly. Through interviews with The Globe on both sides of the border, people involved in politics, the corporate sector and Alberta’s pursuit of separatism have described persistent efforts by figures in the U.S. administration and conservative political establishment to support groups seeking American expansionism and independence for Alberta. theglobeandmail.com/canada/a…
17
Just say stay, Danielle!
18
333
58
1,047
101,931
The problem when ABns read into the referendum questions rather than answer them as they’re stated. The question isn’t about sending a message to Ottawa. The question is about separating.
I would expect you to be more open minded @DuaneBratt . There are people voting Option 2 who would much prefer staying in Canada.
12
Look at that! Notley had, by far, the lowest spend on govt positions, @ABDanielleSmith has the highest and by A LOT because she likes to spend tax $ on her fellow supporters, not average ABns! More proof that the UCP are not fiscal conservatives. Just wolf in sheep clothing
I thought conservatives were about “small govt”? Look how ridiculous this is.. guess who pays for those extra stipends!!! (Enter life-long Cons saying “it’s only a couple extra million”… despite small govt and not wasting taxpayer money being one of their CORE VALUES!!!)
2
11
So because you didn’t produce enough evidence it’s the governments fault , according to those replying below. OR Maybe, just maybe, you didn’t provide enough evidence? Maybe there isn’t any? Or a bad lawyer led the case? But yeah…the Feds. 🙄 Q’ns to ponder
PRESS RELEASE - Statement on the Sakamoto Class Action Decision We are deeply disappointed by the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta’s decision to dismiss the application to certify Sakamoto v Attorney General of Canada, a proposed class action against the Government of Canada and the Province of Alberta. Carrie Sakamoto suffered life-altering injuries after receiving C0VID vaccines. The decision records the position she advanced in seeking accountability: “Ms. Sakamoto submits that in this context, the Defendants assumed a duty of care to an identifiable group by holding themselves out as authoritative, by enforcing coercive public health orders and by compelling participation in a de facto mandated vaccine program. She submits that the effect of the Defendants’ fear-based messaging and public restrictions amounted to compulsion to get vaccinated; she submits that the Defendants eliminated the conditions needed for informed choice and exceeded their statutory authority.” The Court concluded that the claims as pleaded do not disclose viable causes of action and dismissed the application to proceed as a class action. This means the class action will not provide an open examination of the decisions public officials and agencies made, the representations they gave the public, and the pressure they placed on people to follow their directives. Class actions give people a way to seek answers together and, where wrongdoing is established, change harmful behaviour. Public trust suffers when people cannot meaningfully examine the conduct of their governments or hold public officials and agencies to account. Carrie and other vaccine-injured people, along with the public, still deserve a transparent investigation and answers. “To say I am devastated is an understatement. We poured our hearts, our health, and our truth into this effort, not just for ourselves, but for every single person who felt unheard, unsupported, and left behind. Hearing that our case won't proceed feels like a massive setback, and it hurts deeply, said Ms. Sakamoto. "While this legal door may have closed, it does not erase our stories, our pain, or the reality of what we’ve experienced. Standing up for truth and advocacy is never easy, but doing it alongside this incredible community has been a powerful reminder that none of us are truly alone. “Thank you to everyone who supported us, shared their stories, stood by our side, and kept believing in this effort,” Ms. Sakamoto added. “I will forever be an advocate for the vaccine injured like me, and I will continue to work with Canrise19 and their efforts to help the injured.” “People who took the vaccine for the public good should not be abandoned by the governments that demanded their compliance,” said Eva Chipiuk, counsel for Ms. Sakamoto. “Carrie and others who suffered serious injuries deserve compassionate care, timely support, and answers about the decisions that affected their lives.” “Class actions can give people a way to seek answers together and change harmful behaviour where wrongdoing is established,” Chipiuk added. “Public trust suffers when people cannot meaningfully examine government conduct or hold public officials and agencies to account. We are disappointed that Carrie and other vaccine-injured people will not have that opportunity through this class action.” The federal vaccine injury support program has been an abject failure for people like Carrie, and its replacement has yet to deliver the timely, compassionate support they need. Carrie described her experience with the federal program in her evidence as “dehumanizing and at times abusive.” We urge the Government of Alberta to establish its own vaccine injury support program. Quebec has administered a provincial vaccine injury compensation program since 1985. Alberta should take responsibility for supporting vaccine-injured Albertans and provide timely care, practical assistance, and fair compensation to those in need.
21