Detroit, MI
Joined July 2020
- Tweets19K
- Following416
- Followers558
- Likes38.6K
reason for degradation of morals-loss of concept of honour/integrity/reputation. eg; the reason for way the housewife is dead(at least will be) is the lack of dignity society attributes to it. the closest synonym people have is 'slave' and the most charitable is 'sacrifice of
'feminism', which verbally castrate and criticise any woman embodying traditional feminine traits. the reason why a man is(was) so willing and rather insistent on providing and protecting his family is less because of some inherent biological trait to be responsible, but
if you cannot handle an individual breaking physical contact you initiated you should not be around said individuals. gender segregation needed.
rewatching this game, wemby gon have his hands full with duren fasho. it might just be me but he moves so much better now, faster, better handle, allat.
he always had good reads in p&r, some good passing chops but actually being an effective initiator opens up so much. also ausar is the best matchup on ant itl
ًً retweeted
“I don’t think he’s lying”
- Jrue Holiday on Jason Kidd calling Jaylen Brown the Celtics best player
(Via @SiriusXMNBA / h/t @ClutchPoints )
exhibit A of how people twist things to support their already held belief. this libtard uses an video depicting a muslim male not wanting to touch a woman as an example of 'misogyny', because he must feel he is superior to her, yet question her on the same ruling being applied to
ًً retweeted
this is what is so amazing about sexual misconduct accusations
any evidence is proof that the allegation is true, even evidence that the allegation is not true
accuser’s story stays the same? must be true bc the story is consistent
accuser’s story keeps changing? must be true bc trauma fries your memory
accuser never spoke to the accused again? must be true bc there was clearly bad blood
accuser dated the accused and remained best friends for years after? must be true bc victims often comfort their abusers
it’s more or less an entirely unfalsifiable allegation, which is why it’s the perfect thing to deploy before an election or when someone is up for a promotion
in 20 years, everyone will just be born with an allegation
This is not the gotcha men think it is.
My last year at university during my last psych classes we covered trauma.
Victims of trauma, sexual or otherwise, always and I mean ALWAYS seek comfort from their abusers and seek to rationalize what happened. Again, not only sexual trauma. Children from abusive homes almost always end up pining for the affection of the abusive parent. It’s a real pattern.
ًً retweeted
You see this all throughout liberal treatments of the past. No curiosity about why we developed any of the norms we did. The answer is already known. Those people were stupid and backwards and sexist. They made rules about sexuality to control women, who they hated. There was never any logic to it that made any sense. There’s nothing interesting to discover. Everyone who lived before 50 years ago was a degenerate.
It’s truly a childlike understanding of human psychology, of history, of sexuality, etc, etc.
ًً retweeted
Wait... female suicide rates are way higher in countries considered to be bastions of feminism and progressivism?
ًً retweeted
There is a category of “rape by deception” or “rape by trick” that is a crime, but it is narrow.
The most common example is “stealthing” where a woman consents to sex with a condom, but the man secretly removes it. This can be classified as rape, though it may vary by jurisdiction.
Another example is a situation where a woman believes she is consenting to sex with one man, but is actually having sex with a different man, as occurred in “Revenge of the Nerds” and several real life cases.
Another example was a case where a man told a victim that he was a doctor, that she had a disease, and that the cure could only be administered through intercourse with someone who had antibodies (this is a real case).
In the UK, a transwoman who fails to disclose her trans status to a male partner can be guilty of rape by deception.
However the standard for rape by trick is high and the category is narrow. It is not automatically rape by deception merely any time a man lies to a woman when he is trying to seduce her.
It is not rape for a man to get a woman to sleep with him by lying about how successful he is or how much money he has. It is not rape for a man to get a woman to sleep with him by telling her he loves her when he doesn’t.
The fact that the frat boys were flattering Jane Doe to her face while ridiculing her in their group chat behind her back has no bearing on the question of whether she consented to sex with them.
Not every interpersonal cruelty is or should be a crime.
Hot take but I think there should be a criminal classification of violent versus non violent rape, with the second thought of more like how fraud is. As in, it's kind of like theft or robbery without the force. And society generally does need to punish all types of fraud more, because not doing so erodes the glue that holds a society together.
ًً retweeted
Women’s worldview is premised on a utopian ideal — how the world should work, “how things ought to be” — which is also why they’re naturally left leaning. What really offends them at the end of the day is having to accept how the world really works. Camille Paglia gives the classic example of a girl going to a frat party and a boy asking her to go up to his room. If you accept, you’re consenting to sex. This is totally obvious if implied, but it infuriates feminists to no end. Affirmative consent in the form of a verbal agreement is the libtard ideal but it makes sex unsexy and not worth it and everyone knows this.
ًً retweeted
If it is conceded that young women, and especially adolescent girls, may acquiesce to sexual acts they neither desire nor truly will, out of fear, pressure, or an inability to resist, then the liberal fiction of the sovereign, self-determining individual begins to unravel precisely where its consequences become most grave.
Why, then, should “freedom” consist in abandoning them to navigate such environments independently, rather than recognising the protective function of family, authority, hierarchy, and moral form?
