youtube.com/live/aU1EHyQmXpE… Join me live to discuss @Apple announcing #M6 #MacBookPro and #iMac, #iPhone18e rumors and more details on the #iPhoneDuo durability controversy! Berlin 5pm New York 11am New Delhi 8:30pm Likes, comments and other forms of support are much appreciated!

on some irrational hatred, even if it plays at least partially into it. The main reason is the ideological divide on the Palestine conflict, the status of Hamas as a terror group, etc. The internet is just totally brain-broken on Israel Palestine.

By this logic we are saying that the CDU and SPD here in Germany aren’t accepting AFD/Germans as equal citizens because they refuse outright to form a coalition with them. There is a lot of shit wrong with Israeli politics but the refusal to partner with Ra’am is not just based…

Not sure how they can do this without causing issues with core Android UX paradigms. I agree that this is the correct approach (for most Apps at least) though.

If these density numbers are correct than the A20 Pro efficiency superiority is just straight up magic shit 😆

It’s not physical media, it’s not a question about what’s an open platform and what’s closed, etc. PCMR just wants all games without any understanding that exclusive games help define platforms, build a solid player base and then finance future game development.

N3P makes even less sense. Yeah, Apple made the S cores a bit smaller but I don’t get how they got an extra GPU core and two ANEs on a die that is smaller without density gains. I know these two graphs don’t account for all parts of the chip, so who knows

The only way this makes sense to me is that using NanoFlex and other optimizations Apple didn’t prioritize maximum density on the A20 Pro, minimizing the Self Heating Effect as much as possible. But that’s just comparing between N2 and N2P. The lack of density improvements from…

I respect what Geekerwan does but this density claim about N2 on the A20 Pro makes no sense to me.

which wouldn’t make any sense, or Gurman doesn’t understand how important of a distinction there is between regular single layer OLED and a proper Dual Layer Tandem OLED. “Just” OLED can end up being disappointing like the 60Hz iPad mini, Tandem OLED definitely won’t be.

I don’t know why but there is something fascinating about Gurman not using the term Tandem OLED here. It’s the only tech that’s expensive (and good) enough to justify this price change and it’s already available on iPad Pro. Either there is a chance it’s somehow not Tandem OLED…

Might start watching her again if she brings this kind of energy to her videos too. I am getting tired of reacting to Marques 😅😅

like the one on iPhone 16 for the exact same considerations. The internet’s desire to see in everything some kind of conspiracy theory is really weird.

Do people truly not understand that basically any screen can be 120Hz? Apple does not do 120Hz without the efficiency and the VRR capabilities of LTPO, which this screen is not. There is no “limiting” going on here. Apple didn’t do 120hz on similar or even better LTPS screens…

I get that but how stupid does one have to be to make it this obvious. He is already letting our random sounds like a deflating balloon (he kinda looks like one too). In what sane world would you be doing this shit a week before the midterms 😆

So he has just officially lost his last brain cell, hasn’t he? Article 25 when?

mechanical part, then it will contribute to wearing out that mechanical part faster. IP68 is not a magical energy shield.

That’s not how water/ dust resistance works. When your USB C port is wet, no water and dust resistance is gonna allow you to plug in and charge without worry. It you put a ton of dirt and dust on your device, not bothering to shake it out before you go back to using a complex…

youtu.be/_0G4OG39XjI?is=AhW-… It’s kinda insane how instantly DOA Googlebooks are. What an absolute disaster and a waste of hardware and engineering efforts.

Gurman has gotten some smaller stuff wrong in the recent product release cycles so I still hope that his prediction about the OLED MacBook Pro coexisting with the miniLED M5 Pro and Max versions turns out to be false. The M6 14” miniLED MBP is enough for a cheaper alternative.