Literary critic in a library. Egoism and the avant-garde. Anarchistique. Views all my own.
Joined November 2015
- Tweets29.8K
- Following2K
- Followers2.3K
- Likes122K
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Anthropic
2025 revenue: $4.6 billion
2025 net loss: -$42 billion
IPO valuation: $2 trillion
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Can we vote Amodei out of power? Ha ha. Jk. I know he owns our ballots. Just look at these smug billionaires whose laughter is the poison of our planet.
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Incredible that a reputable journal like the Review of Educational Research asked - seriously - if I would review a meta-analysis of major learning-style instruments. It's like the JAMA asking for a review of different aura reading methods! Shame on you RER!
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
The people who are pro-AI in education but are not themselves AI researchers imagine that a technology designed to invite human passivity and, worse, subjection can be used entirely differently w/proper education.
These same people ignore that students are fine w/passive use.
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Students worry AI is about to kill their future ft.trib.al/aeFWjFc
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
HE: A bull is just a male cow.
ME: False. "Bull" is a word to describe intact adult male of various bovine species.
HE: Intact?
ME: (with eyes glistening from fever) UNCASTRATED.
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Day 30 of tweeting "AI is Just Software" every day until people stop perpetuating a legally-useful delusion on behalf of giant corporations that are losing a tooooon of money
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
This should be illegal.
The harms of this tech (enabling scams & fraud) obviously outweigh any potential benefits right now.
Politicians should outlaw this as a matter of urgency.
We believe voice is the most natural way to interact with intelligence, so we created Dessa, the most authentic full-duplex speech model ever built. Talking with it feels like talking with a person…full of emotion, nuance, pauses, and a natural cadence.
block.xyz/dessa
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Academics should get used to the idea that the parts of the internet we most value - preprint archives, journals, encyclopedias - don't have big cybersecurity budgets and might well not survive what's coming.
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
🔥 🔥 🔥 Australian authors and industry reps fight potential copyright exemptions for AI theft.
“We cannot be so indoctrinated by tech exceptionalism as to believe the largest companies on the planet cannot possibly obey our laws.”
artshub.com.au/news/news/aus…
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
It's so funny seeing everyone suddenly take this seriously now Torsten's on it - @arakharazian put it out nearly two months ago.
Here it is in my September 8 2026 concentration risk newsletter.
wheresyoured.at/concentratio…
Circularity in AI Shows Up in Token Spending Too
"Ramp data show that 80% of the top 1% of AI spenders are VC-backed, compared with only 13% of the median spender, suggesting that the circularity seen among AI hyperscalers and model providers also extends to token spending, as the startups buying the most compute are paying for it with venture capital rather than organic earnings, see chart below.
If the AI payoff is slow to materialize or never arrives, VC returns would come under pressure, since the capital funding today’s token spending would have little to show for it, and a pullback in venture funding could in turn weaken demand for compute." Apollo
IT'S ALL ONE TRADE REMEMBER
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
AI - the next wave of American imperialism.
Google felled an estimated 250,000 to 400,000 trees in Finland for planned AI data centers, through its Finnish subsidiary Tuike Finland.
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
Tell me you haven’t read Montesquieu without telling me you haven’t read Montesquieu, amirite?
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
there's evidence that the use of AI in schools is delivering the opposite of "intellectual flourishing"—maybe in some bubbles the use of these models is leading to more reading and philosophical debates but I'm inclined to think that's an exception to the rule
NomDeNonWayne retweeted
I'd prefer publishers focused on literary qualty, not politics, because they are mostly bad at the latter, better at the former. A huge % of excellent writers historically are not on or of the left, and I don't know why we'd want or expect them to be.
