OpenDesign Developers (@OpenDesignDevs) header
OpenDesign Developers (@OpenDesignDevs) profile picture

Official updates for developers building with @OpenDesignHQ API & model news, reset notices, offers, technical guides, and updates on OpenDesign Go

Joined November 2026
Usage reset complete. 🔄 Keep enjoying your $220 of DeepSeek usage on Go! We’ve fixed item-limit errors and premature context compaction, and reset weekly Coding Plan allowances for all subscribers: Go, Plus, Pro & Max. Thanks for your support!
$220 of usage for DeepSeek is here. Introducing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco on OpenDesign Go. • $220 in monthly usage credits • $8 for your first month, then $10/mo • 27.5× what you pay in your first month • For non-urgent work. No quality trade-off. More gifts to come.
17
5
9
138
19,334
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Eco? Same weights. Same capabilities. Full 1M context. • Eco: more usage for batch processing and non-urgent tasks. • Standard: for real-time tasks, via DeepSeek’s official API. Both available on OpenDesign.
$220 of usage for DeepSeek is here. Introducing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco on OpenDesign Go. • $220 in monthly usage credits • $8 for your first month, then $10/mo • 27.5× what you pay in your first month • For non-urgent work. No quality trade-off. More gifts to come.
8
1
3
102
7,596
Full-weight DeepSeek. More room to build. Same weights as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Same agent, coding, reasoning & multimodal capabilities. Full 1M context. Up to $220 in monthly usage on OpenDesign Go. $8 for your first month. Built for non-urgent work.
$220 of usage for DeepSeek is here. Introducing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco on OpenDesign Go. • $220 in monthly usage credits • $8 for your first month, then $10/mo • 27.5× what you pay in your first month • For non-urgent work. No quality trade-off. More gifts to come.
10
39
3,495
$220 of usage for DeepSeek is here. Introducing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco on OpenDesign Go. • $220 in monthly usage credits • $8 for your first month, then $10/mo • 27.5× what you pay in your first month • For non-urgent work. No quality trade-off. More gifts to come.
107
58
67
1,114
186,377
5/ Hy4 ranks #2 on mobile apps (91.4) and #3 on desktop apps (92.6). On mobile, it scores 30/30 for requirements, and all 9 evaluated outputs meet our delivery threshold. Its strongest results are worth a closer look if you design for mobile or desktop.
1
1
222
4/ Completion time is the main trade-off. Average completion time in our real-world design benchmark: Hy4: 15.2 min GPT-6.1 Sol: 6.2 min GPT-6.1 Terra: 2.6 min For quick iterations, the shorter wait may matter more than a small score difference.
1
1
227
3/ Hy4 has a solid five-dimension profile, with completion speed as its main weakness. Requirements: 28.1/30 Design quality: 61.9/70 Delivery rate: 84.4% Avg. completion time: 15.2 min Estimated cost/design: $0.227
1
1
273
2/ 13 of the 23 models cost more than Hy4 and score lower. Hy4: 90.0 / $0.227 GPT-6.1 Sol: 90.1 / $0.382 Kimi K3.1 Pro: 91.0 / $1.46 Average score / estimated cost per design in our benchmark.
1
2
412
1/ Hy4 vs Hy4 Preview in our benchmark: Average score: 90.0 vs 74.6 Delivery rate: 84.4% vs 40.0% Estimated cost/design: $0.227 vs $0.418 Time: 15.2 vs 29.2 min Full results: open-design.ai/llm-arena-for…
1
2
1,130
Hy4 by @TencentHunyuan scores just 0.1 points behind GPT-6.1 Sol in our design benchmark, at 41% lower estimated cost. We tested 23 models on real-world design tasks based on user requests. Hy4 ranks #4. Now on OpenDesign. Full results ↘️
4
6
3
48
17,219