OpenDesign Developers

$220 of usage for DeepSeek is here. Introducing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco on OpenDesign Go. • $220 in monthly usage credits • $8 for your first month, then $10/mo • 27.5× what you pay in your first month • For non-urgent work. No quality trade-off. More gifts to come.

Your weekly allowance is reset. Keep building with OpenDesign Go ↓ open-design.ai/pricing/?od_l…

Usage reset complete. 🔄 Keep enjoying your $220 of DeepSeek usage on Go! We’ve fixed item-limit errors and premature context compaction, and reset weekly Coding Plan allowances for all subscribers: Go, Plus, Pro & Max. Thanks for your support!

More details 👉 open-design.ai/pricing/?od_l…

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Eco? Same weights. Same capabilities. Full 1M context. • Eco: more usage for batch processing and non-urgent tasks. • Standard: for real-time tasks, via DeepSeek’s official API. Both available on OpenDesign.

$220 of usage for DeepSeek is here. nitter.gq/OpenDesignDevs/status/…

Full-weight DeepSeek. More room to build. Same weights as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Same agent, coding, reasoning & multimodal capabilities. Full 1M context. Up to $220 in monthly usage on OpenDesign Go. $8 for your first month. Built for non-urgent work.

yes, you can use it through API go.open-design.ai/?utm_sourc…

They’re listed separately because the serving modes differ. Eco is OpenDesign’s lower-priority, higher-allowance option for bulk, non-real-time work. Standard uses DeepSeek’s official API with higher priority and per-token billing. You can use Standard on OpenDesign too! open-design.ai/pricing/?utm_…

Yes, same weights as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Same agent, coding, reasoning & multimodal capabilities. Full 1M context.

Get $220 in monthly DeepSeek usage. Start for $8 ↓ open-design.ai/pricing/?utm_…

Try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco on OpenDesign Go and Plus now↓ go.open-design.ai/?utm_sourc…

6/ Tencent Hy4 is now on OpenDesign across Go, Plus, Pro & Max. Save up to 40% on your first month with a new monthly subscription. Find your plan ↘️ open-design.ai/pricing/?utm_…

5/ Hy4 ranks #2 on mobile apps (91.4) and #3 on desktop apps (92.6). On mobile, it scores 30/30 for requirements, and all 9 evaluated outputs meet our delivery threshold. Its strongest results are worth a closer look if you design for mobile or desktop.

4/ Completion time is the main trade-off. Average completion time in our real-world design benchmark: Hy4: 15.2 min GPT-6.1 Sol: 6.2 min GPT-6.1 Terra: 2.6 min For quick iterations, the shorter wait may matter more than a small score difference.

3/ Hy4 has a solid five-dimension profile, with completion speed as its main weakness. Requirements: 28.1/30 Design quality: 61.9/70 Delivery rate: 84.4% Avg. completion time: 15.2 min Estimated cost/design: $0.227

2/ 13 of the 23 models cost more than Hy4 and score lower. Hy4: 90.0 / $0.227 GPT-6.1 Sol: 90.1 / $0.382 Kimi K3.1 Pro: 91.0 / $1.46 Average score / estimated cost per design in our benchmark.

1/ Hy4 vs Hy4 Preview in our benchmark: Average score: 90.0 vs 74.6 Delivery rate: 84.4% vs 40.0% Estimated cost/design: $0.227 vs $0.418 Time: 15.2 vs 29.2 min Full results: open-design.ai/llm-arena-for…

Hy4 by @TencentHunyuan scores just 0.1 points behind GPT-6.1 Sol in our design benchmark, at 41% lower estimated cost. We tested 23 models on real-world design tasks based on user requests. Hy4 ranks #4. Now on OpenDesign. Full results ↘️