QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Quan_Chain
Very interesting. Making quantum risk queryable onchain gives developers something concrete to work with, beyond headlines.
QuanChain retweeted
今すぐBTCが破られるという話ではないけど、
量子耐性を真剣に考える材料としてはかなり大きい!
BitcoinもEthereumも、まだ時間はあるけど
放置はできないテーマです(;^ω^)
~~~
【内容】
・IonQが、ビットコインなどで使われるsecp256k1を量子計算で破るための“完全な設計図”を公開。
・実証ではないが、19,397物理量子ビット、1回約25.7日という資源見積もり。
→従来の“数百万量子ビット必要”という安心感よりかなり少ない。
・IonQのロードマップでは2028年に2万物理量子ビット規模を掲げている。
つまり、量子耐性への移行は思ったより早く必要かもしれないということです。
IonQ just published the first complete blueprint for breaking Bitcoin's cryptography.
Not a demonstration. A full-stack fault-tolerant resource estimate: 19,397 physical qubits running Shor's algorithm against secp256k1, 25.7 days per key.
The number that matters is 19,397.
Because the standard reassurance has been that this takes millions of qubits. One widely cited analysis put it at 13 million. Comfortably impossible, decades out.
IonQ's blueprint needs roughly 670x fewer than that.
And IonQ's own roadmap puts a 20,000-qubit machine in 2028. Their CEO is on record targeting 10,000 fault-tolerant qubits in 2027.
The caveats are real and worth stating plainly. This is an estimate, not an attack. IonQ runs 256 qubits today. Scaling that fast may hit obstacles nobody has seen yet.
But the curve only bends one way. Every serious estimate of what it costs to break ECDSA has come down, never up.
Bitcoin's answer is BIP-360, still without consensus. Ethereum is targeting December 2029. Both are retrofits on ledgers where public keys are already exposed and cannot be un-exposed.
QuanChain has no number to watch.
Value at rest sits behind an address hash, not a public key. There is no live key for Shor's algorithm to target. SpendAndRotate rotates the ephemeral child key on every spend, so by the time a public key appears in a signature, the funds have already moved.
The LQCp/h Oracle tracks this exact cost curve and migrates wallets upward automatically as it falls. No hard fork. No coordination. No window to miss.
Everyone else is watching the number.
We built for the day it stops mattering.
Replying to @Quan_Chain
Battle-tested infra, decentralized by design, that’s the right foundation
QuanChain retweeted
Multisig wallets need multiple signers to approve a move. That's the safety feature.
But on most chains, every signer's public key stays exposed on the contract, permanently.
More signers = more keys sitting in one place = more targets.
@Quan_Chain says its oracle-triggered migration avoids this: same threshold approval logic, but signing keys never sit exposed on-chain.
We broke down the claims, the numbers, and how it ties into JPMorgan quietly dropping Polymarket as a banking client.
🔗 bestcryptopresales.com/crypt…
#QuanChain #Multisig #CryptoSecurity #Web3 #Blockchain #DeFi
QuanChain retweeted
Quantum computers could change blockchain security sooner than many expect.
But what happens to wallets, signatures, and crypto when “Q-Day” arrives?
We break down Quanchain and its quantum-resistant blockchain approach in simple terms.
👇 Read the full explanation:
bestcryptopresales.com/crypt…
Do you think crypto is ready for the quantum era?
#Quanchain #QuantumComputing #Blockchain #Crypto #Web3 #CryptoNews @Quan_Chain
QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Web3AlphaHunt @Quan_Chain
Quantum-ready security matters. @Quan_Chain is building with the future in mind.
QuanChain retweeted
The quantum threat isn’t some distant sci-fi scenario anymore.
It’s already rewriting the rules of crypto security.
Most blockchains today are still running on cryptography that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer will eventually break.
Public keys get exposed.
Staking rewards pile up on the same address for years.
Hardware wallets and cold storage still rely on classical assumptions.
And when the migration finally comes, it will be messy, expensive, and risky.
We’re building something different.
@Quan_Chain is the first blockchain designed from day one to stay quantum-resistant continuously.
Not a one-time upgrade.
Not a future hard fork.
A system that adapts in real time.
Here’s what that actually looks like:
• TADEQS our 20,level adaptive security framework that automatically calibrates encryption strength based on quantum threat levels and the value being protected
• Permanent high-security parent identity+ephemeral child wallets that rotate after every single transaction (SpendAndRotate)
• No public key is ever left sitting onchain protecting funds
• Three-channel architecture delivering 200,000+ TPS on the transaction highway with sub-second finality
• Full NIST post-quantum cryptography (ML-DSA, SLH-DSA, Falcon and more) built in at genesis
•Oracle-triggered migration that can re-key wallets in under 90 seconds when anomalies are detected
This isn’t just another “quantum-safe” claim.
It’s a living, self-upgrading security layer made for the long term ,governments, enterprises, finance, defense, healthcare, and anyone who actually cares about keeping assets secure for decades, not just the next bull run.
We’re still in the testnet phase, building in public, shipping wallets, SDKs, and tools.
The foundation is already there. The real work of growing the ecosystem is just beginning.
If you believe the next decade of crypto will be defined by who gets security right before the quantum wave hits…
come build with us.
-Website: quanchain.ai
-Telegram: t.me/Quan_Chain
-Follow the journey: @Quan_Chain
The future doesn’t wait for perfect timing.
Neither should the people who want to shape it.
Join us.
The real crypto threat isn't hackers, it's the keyholder.
$1M gone from FBI-seized wallets, taken by the agent with top secret clearance.
QuanChain's 20-level custody stack requires distributed consensus, no single actor can authorize a transfer unilaterally.
Should that be the legal standard for seized assets?
Replying to @Quan_Chain
The absolute truth about on-chain privacy: the public transparency of old-school blockchains makes any routine activity, like paying salaries, an ideal target for data analysis.
Replying to @Quan_Chain
Infrastructure security must stay ahead of threats, not catch up with them after the fact! 🛡️
QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Quan_Chain
Security is often about the details. Constant-time operations are a fundamental defense against timing attacks, helping ensure attackers can’t infer sensitive information from execution time. Solid engineering choice.
Replying to @Quan_Chain
QuanChain is building the future of quantum computing
QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Quan_Chain
You’re spot on. Building a protocol today without quantum agility is just launching pre packaged technical debt. But here is the real dilemma, crypto has rarely been a race of 'best engineering' it’s a race of 'liquidity inertia.'
Even if a protocol is architecturally obsolete, if that's where the money sits, the market seems happy to price in the promise of a 5 year migration over the reality of a 90 day one. Do you think the industry will actually shift due to architectural risk, or will it take a literal, catastrophic quantum exploit on a legacy L1 to wake capital up?
QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Quan_Chain
QuanChain moving like that oracle-triggered migration in 200ms before patches drop is straight quantum chad energy fr 🔥 self-adapting security on a blockchain? We eating good 🚀
QuanChain retweeted
🇫🇷 A GOVERNMENT JUST DECLARED BITCOIN'S ENCRYPTION OBSOLETE
France's cyber agency won't certify any security product without quantum-safe encryption after 2027.
It never mentions crypto. Not once.
But Bitcoin and Ethereum run on the exact algorithm France just rejected.
Elliptic curve cryptography.
The clock on "harvest now, decrypt later" just started ticking louder.
QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Quan_Chain
Solid post 🔥 That 303 km QKD trial running alongside real 10 Gbps traffic is impressive progress. Quantum threats are coming, and chains built with hash-based crypto like QuanChain from day one are smart. Keep pushing!
QuanChain retweeted
Replying to @Quan_Chain
Exposing pubkeys in mempool and chain history is indeed the big quantum harvest-now-decrypt-later risk most chains ignore.
Replying to @Quan_Chain
This is the difference between building for today’s exploits and building for adversarial evolution.
A system that cannot adapt under changing threat conditions is eventually going to fail — no matter how popular the bridge is.
QuanChain retweeted
QuanChain’s real-time LQCp/h Oracle + automatic post-quantum migration (DTQPE) is one of the few serious solutions., quantum resilience can’t wait.
Willow completing a 10-septillion-year problem in 5 minutes is impressive — but Zevo Lab's video asks whether this threatens privacy, and that's the more interesting question for anyone running value on-chain.
The real gap isn't raw quantum speed. It's that most chains have no mechanism to respond when threat capability crosses a threshold.
QuanChain's LQCp/h Oracle tracks quantum capability across 7 threat levels in real time, and funds migrate to stronger cryptographic protection automatically as those levels rise — no manual intervention required.
At what point does a chain's static key scheme stop being adequate?
QuanChain retweeted
𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗿𝗺𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝘀 𝗟𝗮𝘁𝗲, 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝘃𝗲
Coinbase's CEO says he'll "personally lead" the push to make Bitcoin quantum-resistant. Where was this urgency two years ago when cryptographers were already sounding the alarm?
⬩ Error correction milestones from Google and others have finally spooked the crypto industry into action. The threat wasn't theoretical then either: they just weren't paying attention.
⬩ Bitcoin's elliptic curve cryptography is a ticking clock. The fact that it took a CEO's PR moment rather than quiet engineering foresight tells you everything about how this industry prioritises optics over security.
If the quantum threat only becomes real when it's convenient for a press release, who exactly has been protecting your coins until now?
QuanChain retweeted
This is what the crypto community keeps missing while chasing meme coins and presidential grifts.
The real revolution isn't $TRUMP at $78. It's a global, permissionless micropayment layer that makes AI accessible to every human on earth — not just those with a US bank account and a credit card.
Fiat systems can't do this. They weren't designed for a world where machines transact with machines millions of times per second. The minimum viable transaction in traditional finance is too large, too slow, and too expensive.
@solana @BTC_LN and @Quan_Chain and were literally built for this future. Sub-cent transactions. Instant finality. No intermediary.

























