Pinned Tweet
Today's #Census results reveal that 42% of the 10 million foreign-born residents in England arrived in last decade.
Foreign born population:
1851: 0.6%
1901: 1.5%
1951: 4.2%
2001: 8.3%
2011: 12.7%
2021: 16.6%
This cannot continue, as I explained in my @NewCultureForum lecture:
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo retweeted
WATCH my full report at The Battle of Ideas - interviewed attendees and speakers. @RosieDuffield1 @RafHM etc..
Join @EllieHodgesxx as she interviews attendees and speakers at the Battle of Ideas festival.
@acadofideas @Fox_Claire
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo retweeted
France is on fire. Is Britain next?
The French riots are "just a rehearsal" for what may happen if Marine le Pen is elected president next year
That's the view of @ColinBrazierTV, who also discusses demographics & the future of the British right
WATCH: youtube.com/watch?v=dRGOQLTb…
V much enjoyed debating whether UK should pay slavery reparations. Of course not
The descendants of slaves have a far better quality of life than if their ancestors had never left Africa
Caribbean people live 10+ yrs longer & are 10 times richer than W. Africans
#BattleFest – at London, England
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo retweeted
On today's show:
* Burnham's Brexit stitch up. Is the PM a Liar?
* Time to end UK asylum system & revoke refugee status?
* Khan to replace Smith as UK's top surname
WATCH: youtu.be/x7QPLw70pUw
With @RafHM, @alexanderpstory, @michaelmurph_y & @SpeechUnion's Celeste Warren
🤖 Made with AI
The Empire strikes back
Is Britain being colonised? My opponent in this debate was outraged at the concept
But what else do you call the transformation of towns & cities by peoples with no desire to integrate but who instead wish to replicate their homelands here
Mass immigration has been the greatest act of harm in British history.
Me on @GBNews:
In this debate I was told that Reform's policy to halt the asylum system & revoke refugee status of many already here is "extreme"
No. What is extreme is allowing rapists, murderers, gang members, extremists & terrorists into this country
Genuine asylum seekers do not leave their wives, daughters, mothers and sisters behind. Those arriving here are, at best, economic migrants. Many are far worse.
We do not want to import an army of young, fit and idle men from culturally incompatible lands.
We need more no nonsense policies like this. Policies that prioritize the interests of decent British people over economic migrants and criminals.
The quickest way to reduce the number of undesirable migrants is to:
1. Restrict benefits to British citizens only
2. Citizenship eligibility extended from 5 to 15 years
3. Citizenship candidates must prove they won't be a burden on the state
Undesirables will self deport ASAP
I asked what a Muslim convert thinks of England.
"The best. Because I have my heart problem, everything is free. The best when it comes to benefits."
"I don't care who is the government, as long as I am receiving benefits."
Watch the full documentary: youtu.be/EYHWpMswzOI
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo retweeted
The next government must adopt a policy of REMIGRATION
Britain has been brought to its knees by a 'parasitic class' - but we can RECOVER!
So says @DouglasCarswell in this candid interview in which he outlines his 9-step plan to SAVE BRITAIN
WATCH: youtube.com/watch?v=jTC4NohP…
Burnham and Labour are "appalled" at the Green party's hatred and racism. Really?
In May Andy Burnham would not rule out working with the Green Party.
Yet we all knew how vile the Green Party was then.
The reality is that much of the same hatred exists within the Labour party. They simply don't display their racism as boldly or blatantly (most of the time).
🚨"Whichever candidate is likely to stop Reform, the left will vote there"
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo says due to changing demographics and tactical voting, the left are making it even harder for a divided right to get elected.
@RafHM | @jkyleofficial
The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images
Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph revealed the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people
The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote".
In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks.
That was the only way that "nature" could win.
However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo.
The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House.
The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear
This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural.
Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain"
Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar.
The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists.
Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths.
Me on @GBNews: – at London, England
'Bank notes are one of the rare occasions when we get to come face-to-face with our history.'
Historian Rafe Heydel-Mankoo and PETA's Jennifer White debate replacing British icons with wildlife on bank notes.
🇬🇧 Become a Friend of GB News: gbnews.com/support
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo retweeted
THE SUFFRAGETTES WERE TERRORISTS. Prof. Janice Fiamengo. @FiamengoJanice
Demographics is destiny. Once the indigenous population becomes a minority, it is game over for traditional British culture & society
The Tories & Labour have betrayed this country & its people
Never forgive. Never forget.
My latest podcast: youtu.be/6DDzjzkxZ8I?is=HPEl…
Clip 👇 – at London, England
Those on the Left who decry the rise of ethno-nationalism should realise that THEY are responsible
Mass immigration, the suppression & demonisation of a legitimate & historic English ethnic identity, & the elevation of multiculturalism over English & British culture led us here
Rafe Heydel-Mankoo retweeted
In addition to Tucker Carlson praising Trump in public while detesting him privately, here's more evidence that he's a clickbait merchant who doesn't believe what he says online
In this old video Tucker says it's "wrong" & "odious" to believe the USA should NOT have fought WW2
Video courtesy of @TheMilkBarTV
Tucker Carlson: “It’s the larger point that [Pat] Buchanan is making - that perhaps American involvement in WWII was a mistake - that people are upset about, and that I think you can take him to task over, beat him over the head with, because I think it’s wrong and, in some ways, an odious point.”
Tucker's track record in recent years is to be deliberately controversial (pro-Putin, pro-Hitler and now pro-Islam) in order to maximise engagement and earnings.
What would Young Tucker think?
Here is what many are missing:
Tucker Carlson does not believe much of what he says
He is a clickbait grifter manipulating his audience to maximise earnings
Evidence: When he was at Fox he was 100% Team Trump & said the 2020 election was stolen
But, in private, emails and messages revealed that Carlson detested Trump and thought the idea Trump had won the 2020 election was a ridiculous conspiracy theory and accused Trump's lawyers of "lying".*
"I hate Trump passionately", he said, calling him "demonic". Yet, on camera Carlson was Trump's biggest cheerleader.
He is up to the same tricks again.
Lacking any scruples or principles whatsoever, he will parrot whatever line maximises engagement with his content, no matter how damaging the consequences.
He has calculated that being pro-Putin, pro-Hitler and most recently pro-Islam will generate more revenue than if he is anti-Putin, anti-Hitler and anti-Islam like most others.
This makes him a dangerous menace, as there are so many gullible people who believe what he says.
* Any Google search will bring up countless sources backing up my claims regarding Tucker Carlson's private views about Trump (but here are a few examples):
* nbcnews.com/politics/donald-…
* whyy.org/articles/tucker-car…
* abcnews.com/Politics/fox-new…
In addition to Tucker Carlson praising Trump in public while detesting him privately, here's more evidence that he's a clickbait merchant who doesn't believe what he says online
In this old video Tucker says it's "wrong" & "odious" to believe the USA should NOT have fought WW2
Video courtesy of @TheMilkBarTV
Tucker Carlson: “It’s the larger point that [Pat] Buchanan is making - that perhaps American involvement in WWII was a mistake - that people are upset about, and that I think you can take him to task over, beat him over the head with, because I think it’s wrong and, in some ways, an odious point.”
Tucker's track record in recent years is to be deliberately controversial (pro-Putin, pro-Hitler and now pro-Islam) in order to maximise engagement and earnings.
What would Young Tucker think?
Tucker Carlson is a dangerous menace
If Britain did not enter WW2, it would be living at the point of a gun
No Britain in WW2 would also mean that Germany & the Axis Powers would control Europe, USSR, Middle East oil fields, Africa & Asia
Stalin and Kruschev both said that if Britain had not been in the war, Hitler would have defeated the Soviet Union, because he would have been able to devote 100% of his forces to the Eastern Front, rather than just 70%
Not only would the Nazis then have free rein, over years or decades, to extinguish the Jews and enslave the Slavs, but most Europeans would be living under the Nazi jackboot. Life in Europe would have been the stuff of nightmares.
Tucker Carlson has no problem with any of that. He seems perfectly happy for tens of millions of Europeans to be killed / enslaved and for perhaps hundreds of millions to be subjugated....perhaps up to today.
As for Britain, as master of Europe, Hitler would have turned Britain into a subservient vassal state, potentially with a Quisling or Vichy-style government led by Oswald Mosely or David Lloyd-George.
Britain's long-standing policy had always been to maintain the balance of power in Europe.
With Hitler in control, however, Britain would have lost control over its foreign policy and would have had to do the bidding of the Nazis. Had Britain resisted, it would have been blockaded and starved into submission.
World War Two was devastating for Britain. But the consequences of not entering are simply too awful to contemplate.
Tucker Carlson would do well to remember that Britain could have avoided much economic hardship if the United States had relieved Britain of all or much of its debt obligations after it entered the war.
The future for the USA would also have been very different had it had to face a Nazi Germany in control of the entire world outside the Western hemisphere.
And it is ridiculous to blame mass immigration on Britain's entry into World War Two. Mass immigration started under Blair, more than 50 years after WW2 ended. There is no connection.
As for the British Empire, it would not have lasted much longer even if Britain had stayed out of the war.
Below is a clip from an interview I gave in response to Tucker Carlson's interview with history enthusiast Daryl Cooper.
Cooper claimed Churchill was the "villain" of the Second World War and argued that Britain should have asked for a peace deal with Hitler after the fall of France.











