Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber) header
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber) profile picture

Moloch omnia regit.

Joined April 2021
Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)Photo by Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) (@Rationaliber)
Why the Libertarian Party is crazy and why that won’t change anytime soon:
Okay! Let’s have a mini-lecture about why this happens! 1/
1
1
413
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
Replying to @esjesjesj
Name one? How about a few? Rockefeller lowered the cost of kerosene through efficient refining and distribution. Ford made automobiles affordable through mass production. Carnegie reduced steel production costs through industrial innovation. Walton lowered retail prices through bulk purchasing and efficient logistics. Dell made computers cheaper by eliminating retail intermediaries. Kamprad made furniture affordable through flat-pack manufacturing and distribution. Bezos intensified retail competition through Amazon. Koum made international messaging practically free through WhatsApp. Page and Brin made search, navigation, email, and translation available without direct charges. And that's barely scratching the surface. In fact, it would be considerably more challenging to find a billionaire who earned their fortune through voluntary trade without lowering costs, improving quality, increasing productivity, or making something more accessible. That's how fortunes are generally made in competitive markets. You create value for others, and the more people you serve, the greater your potential reward. You don't even have to buy from these businesses to benefit. Their competitors must improve their offerings or risk losing customers. These clout chasers destroy their credibility daily without so much as flinching. They enjoy the accumulated benefits of capitalist innovation while confidently demanding evidence that any of it ever happened. The economic illiteracy would be impressive if it weren't so commonplace.
23
79
7
1,199
22,403
There’s more truth in this than it would first appear.
this is because it's far easier to go into NGOs or federal/state contracting and simply steal from the government. that skims the cream of clever off the criminal classes. why play small ball heist caper when you can steal billions and get awards and galas for it?
1
11
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
India did pro-capitalist reforms and immediately became richer than sub-Saharan Africa, which they were poorer than until the early 2000s. It's insane how good capitalism is.
168
1,299
105
10,952
264,598
Aella out here just asking the obvious questions that undermine everyone’s narratives
Replying to @adamscochran
In what class do they teach the answer
1
25
What is going on with this? Why do people keep replying to me, then instantly blocking me? It was funny once, but this feels like a trend.
2
1
21
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
No one knows how to train a model that won’t lie to you, but some people think they can create an aligned superintelligence
34
38
9
404
13,860
The American experiment is not dead. Both the Left and the Right will tell you that the other side wants to end democracy and institute permanent hegemony. They’re both right. But they can’t, because the system is designed to pit them against each other.
A Letter to America, From a Frenchman Who Loves You Yesterday, the Prime Minister of Poland posted this: "Restoring the rule of law is our duty. After years of PiS-led lawlessness, this is a difficult process, sometimes painful, and it requires decisive action. There is no other way." Read it slowly. "There is no other way." In today's Europe, that is the sentence a government says right before doing something it could not do through the normal rules. I'm French. I'm the grandson of a farmer from Brittany. I taught myself to code at twelve, spent a year in Silicon Valley when I was young, and today I build a tech company between Paris and San Francisco. I'm writing to you because I watch what is happening to my continent, and I'm afraid you are about to take the same road. Let me tell you what "rule of law" means in Europe now. When Donald Tusk came to power in December 2023, one of his first moves was to take over Poland's public broadcaster. Rather than pass a media law the president would veto, his government used corporate law to replace its leadership, and the state news channel briefly went dark. When that was blocked, it put public TV into liquidation. When the Constitutional Tribunal ruled against the government, the government stopped recognizing its rulings. Tusk himself said openly that restoring the rule of law would sometimes require decisions that would not fully meet the criteria of legality. And Brussels? For years, the European Commission froze billions in EU funds to Poland over "rule of law" concerns under the previous conservative government. Once Tusk was in, it unfroze the money and closed its proceedings. That's the lesson. In Europe, the rule of law is no longer a principle. It is a label. When a conservative government reshapes the courts, it's an assault on democracy. When a pro-Brussels government ignores a court, it's "restoring the rule of law." It isn't only Poland. In Romania in December 2024, the Constitutional Court annulled the first round of a presidential election after the wrong candidate came first. In France, a TV channel, C8, lost its broadcasting license in 2025, and this week a member of parliament declared that shutting down CNEWS, the most-watched news channel in the country, is "a priority." In Germany, domestic intelligence labeled the main opposition party extremist. In Brussels, the Digital Services Act gives unelected commissioners the power to fine platforms up to 6% of global revenue, and its first fine ever went to X, with more investigations into "disinformation" still open. There are no gulags here. Let me be precise about that. But there is a reflex: an elite that knows better than the people, that decides what the people are allowed to read, and that corrects their vote when it comes out wrong. Now let me tell you why you are the first power on earth. It's not oil. It's not size. It's not luck. Europe has had all of those. You are number one because you built your entire system on a radical idea: the individual comes before the state. Your First Amendment doesn't say "speech shall be protected unless it's disinformation." It says Congress shall make no law. Your Constitution protects private property against the government that wrote it. And your culture lets people fail and try again. In France, a founder who fails carries it for life. In America, a founder who fails is called experienced. In Europe, we passed a law to regulate artificial intelligence before we had an AI industry. You built the industry. That's not an accident. That's what happens when a society trusts its citizens more than its bureaucrats. Your system is not perfect. Your politics are loud, ugly and polarized, and I see it. But it is fairer than ours, because it was designed by people who distrusted power, including the power of good intentions. That distrust is the most valuable thing you own. So here is what worries me as I watch you vote on Tuesday. From Paris, when I look at the Democratic side, I recognize the European reflex. I saw an administration lean on social media platforms to take down posts; Mark Zuckerberg later wrote to Congress that the government had repeatedly pressured Meta to censor content and that he regretted not pushing back. I saw a proposal to tax unrealized gains, meaning taxing wealth you haven't even sold. I hear calls to end the filibuster, add seats to the Supreme Court, and add new states to the Senate. Each one can be defended on its own. Together, they look like what Europe did: when you can't win under the rules, you change the referee. And a majority that rewrites the rules in its favor doesn't plan on being a minority again. The twentieth century already ran the collectivist experiment, and it ran it to the end. Every time a state decided that individuals were a means to a collective goal, and that some category of people stood in the way of justice, it ended in camps and mass graves. Tens of millions dead. But it never started with camps. It started with good intentions, a moral elite, and a list of things that were too dangerous to say, too much to own, too misinformed to count. I'm not telling you Democratic voters are Bolsheviks. Most of them are your neighbors and they want good things. I'm telling you the reflex is real, that I live under it every day, and that you are the last big country on earth built to resist it. When Europeans want to build something, we look at you. When we leave, we go to you. If you become us, there is nowhere left to go. Keep your First Amendment. Keep your property. Keep your right to fail. Vote on Tuesday. From Paris, with love, and with fear.
1
22
People call Trump a terrible fascist oligarch. They have no clue what they’re saying. Trump is friggin’ *tame.* But he opens the door to what will follow.
For those confused as to what’s happening in Poland right now… Imagine if Democrats won Congress, declared the Supreme Court didn't count anymore, ignored its rulings for 3 years, and then, a year before the next election, picked 8 new justices of their own, including a man their leader called his "right-hand man," and when the Republican president refused to swear them in, they swore themselves in and mailed him the paperwork, and when the Chief Justice said that wasn't legal and wouldn't seat them, they waited for a Friday night when the president was on a plane to Africa and had federal security officers who answer to a Democratic cabinet member walk 7 of them into the court through a back gate connected to the Democratic leader's own offices, where one of them announced she had "suspended" the Chief Justice, a move that even a law professor who openly can't stand him said had no legal basis, and then riot police blocked the Chief Justice from entering his own court, the court's website was taken over, the Attorney General moved that same night to strip his immunity so he could be prosecuted, the president had to turn his plane around mid-flight to come home, and the same people who spent years lecturing everyone about respecting the courts went online to say this was the rule of law, that it was painful, and that there was "no other way," which is roughly where Poland is tonight.
13
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
trick-or-treat
273
1,120
56
20,356
308,128
It’s so funny to hear this commentary. Altman says something that is strictly true and uncontroversial, but everybody’s mad because they’re reading something else into it. And maybe that’s there, but they’re not saying what it is.
1
41
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
Exactly
1,824
4,898
274
42,406
2,787,561
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
Them: "A lion can still kill a human in unarmed combat. Intelligence isn't everything!" Me: "A lion can kill a human if the lion, despite its lack of strategic cognition, happens to attack the human before the human has time to prepare. A human who is allowed to pick their own time to attack a lion, and use serious technology, and bring allies, will win nearly 100% of the time. On a macro scale, lion populations have gone from millions before agriculture, to maybe 25,000 in the wild and 10,000 in captivity. Humans have an individual combat advantage when they are given time to prepare. Human society has an absolute logistical advantage compared to lion society. Humans individually and collectively have higher strategic intelligence with which to pick their fights and time them. And now it is impossible for lions to reverse their situation, because the lions were too unstrategic to do anything about humans before the humans explosively replicated and teched up. If lions collectively wanted their posterity to not end up mostly nonexistent or in cages, lions would have needed the collective intelligence to group up and stop early primates while lions still *had* an individual combat advantage. Lions would have needed to do that *before* primates got smart enough to invent pit traps and slingshots and fight them to a standstill, because a status-quo standoff gives later primates the time in which to invent agriculture and guns; the primates have advantage in their speed of change, progress, and adaptation. Do you understand that this analogy does not say what you think it does?" Them: "You're the one who doesn't understand what I'm saying. I'm saying that a lion can maul a smart person, end of story. So being smart isn't as high-status as you like to imagine." Me: "But lions being higher-status than humans - as you define that by reference to unarmed unprepared individual combat only - doesn't prevent the human side from gaining an overwhelming logistical advantage...?" Them: "I don't care about logistics. I care about status."
41
18
11
488
35,847
LOL such truth-telling as cannot survive even the possibility of disagreement (she blocked me from responding before I even saw her response). How incredibly fitting.
1
9
Holy crap. Ben Affleck is a lot smarter than I thought.
Ben Affleck reveals he called Matt Damon after seeing OpenAI’s video generation technology for the first time. “Dude, we’re f*cked.” Affleck says AI can already generate incredibly realistic videos, but questions whether the people developing it truly understand the filmmaking industry.
45
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
Replying to @MadisonMills22
12
105
7
1,154
164,415
Rational Libertarian (ai/nke) retweeted
“Since wealth is the only thing that can cure poverty, you might think that the left would be as obsessed with the creation of wealth as they are with the redistribution of wealth. But you would be wrong.” — Thomas Sowell
29
597
15
2,652
38,007