RedhillCladdingScandal

Genuine question, how are you funding the API costs if there are no subscriptions or user-provided keys?

Freebuff changed my life for real

Has anyone actually checked the rate limits on these free tiers yet?

Will more preorders be available on Amazon UK too?

Yes, NH! What Scott has posted is the latest - we have initial acceptance from the Cladding Safety Scheme (which is the new version of the Building Safety Fund) and now we need to put the project plan in place for full Government funding. Will ask for proper comms to be sent out

Thanks for your fantastic help so far Scott, looking forward to continuing to work together 💪🏻

I was following the legislation closely but didn’t realise this watering down at the time. Our freeholder is valued at £144m but because they own 175 buildings they’re off the hook, despite only a fraction of them having safety issues. A real shame @team_greenhalgh

I thought that might be it 😞 thank you for confirming!

Thanks @nearlylegal! The other big confusion I’ve seen floating around is regarding number of buildings on the LL cert. Some seem have interpreted this as # of buildings with safety issues, but our LL has listed total number of buildings they own, do you know which is right?

Even if they subsequently issue a certificate e.g. a week after the deadline? What if they miss the deadline for some leaseholders but for others it is sent within the deadline? The legislation is so confusing

Well done!! This community never ceases to amaze. We’ve come so far and we will fight on until full justice is served!

Ah. I see your point. This is the only place I’ve seen this extra specification. I hope it’s a mistake in this particular graphic? We will all fight on to ensure no leaseholder of any kind is left behind 💪🏻

Hey, I can see from your tweets you’re really worried about this, but I don’t think you have reason to be. Those sub-letting are still leaseholders, so you’ll still benefit exactly the same as the rest of us. I’m not sure why you think you wouldn’t?

It IS up to the Govt because they failed to legislate the industry for decades and allowed them to cut corners. We’re not asking the taxpayer to pay, we’re asking the Govt to forward fund to protect innocents (as it has done before) THEN recover money from those responsible

Wrong. It’s like buying a car & discovering that the mechanism to deploy the airbags doesn’t work; then the car would be recalled & fixed FREE OF CHARGE. No survey exists pre-purchase that would have revealed these defects. And leaseholders don’t own the cladding, just the inside

We were when the fund reopened for the second tranche in May, but it has now closed again. Our MP was extremely helpful in lobbying MHCLG on our behalf, recommend getting in touch with them and asking for help working with the government department. Hope that helps, good luck!

Your department is a disgrace @mhclg. Fools led by liars @team_greenhalgh @RobertJenrick @ChrisPincher. Wake up and listen to the screams of agony from thousands of desperate people. YOUR failures are hurting innocents. #EndOurCladdingScandal #NotJustCladding #EnoughIsEnough

So @mhclg, a Government Ministry, responds to a fact & data driven @thesundaytimes article with spin, lies & no evidence to back its own non-sensical claims. Are they oblivious to the thousands crying out in despair?! Or do they just not care? #BuildingSafetyCrisis @Lees_Martina