Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin) header
Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin) profile picture

Accountant and serial disliker of politicans of all flavours.

Somewhere under the rainbow
Joined March 2023
Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)Photo by Pete Smiff (@RegSimpkin)
Today is Social Media Day — What social media post will forever remain unmatched?
22
858
10
32,531
1,335,264
So the Andy Burnham has condemned Russell Brand as horrifying and praises the bravery of the women who came forward. What about the victims of the grooming gangs that came forward? Why no praise for them?
307
1,304
28
8,536
58,798
Of course. What other solution could there possible be?
37
72
6
602
15,537
I've been watching old footage of left wing celebrities, and for some reason I can't find any pre 2015 videos of any of them expresing their firm belief that men can get pregnant. I assume JK Rowling had all this footage destroyed.
18
129
1
1,253
10,833
Good old banter!👏👏 Joggers being met with the Rocky theme tune.❤️
83
262
35
1,151
36,309
You'd think some people would keep their heads down when it comes to sex crimes.
"Praise the brave women who came forward". And how about "Jail the women who lied and of whom he was found Not Guilty". Balance media, please, as you write your cheques for interviews.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
A not guilty verdict means only that guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt, not that accusers lied. Poster Jonathan King was convicted in 2001 of six sexual offences against boys aged 14-15. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_… theguardian.com/uk/2001/nov/21… law.cornell.edu/wex/not_guilty
2
1
12
216
So the police here telling us it doesn’t matter who you are if you commit a sexual crime you will be prosecuted. Two words. Grooming gangs.
154
964
23
4,423
21,144
No coming back from this.
Replying to @RegSimpkin
coming from pete sniff
1
51
Wow.
Replying to @RegSimpkin
you deserve the same legal treatment.. No evidence.. coached, lying testimony those whores belong in prison
1
1
1
2
213
Pete Smiff retweeted
Between the Brand-stanning and the whining about no longer being able to watch strangling and incest porn, it's been a standout week for creepy blokes telling on themselves. – at Ware, East
9
42
2
332
8,117
It's been quite the eye-opener watching people who routinely rage about the lack of grooming gang convictions suddenly take such profound offence at historic rape convictions being secured on the strength of victim testimony. Which, of course, is precisely how the majority of grooming gang convictions are secured in the first place.
69
162
12
1,065
27,508
Fascist? Hang on I thought I was a Maoist?
Replying to @RegSimpkin
And I were you I would stayed down the hole you came from as we don't need fascists like you in society.
2
42
Thanks Dad.
Replying to @RegSimpkin
I'm not supporting anyone. I'm just here to say...fuck off smiff
1
76
Can't argue with that
Replying to @RegSimpkin
Get a real profile pic you cunt
66
How was your first night Russell?
28
39
3
309
4,671
Lots of rabid feminists & liberals wading into the Russell Brand saga citing evidence & facts. Well excuse me but I prefer to get my information from more reputable sources on here like ‘TruePatriot83560 - proud Dad / anti vaxxer 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿’.
10
9
212
3,859
I'm seeing a large number of replies to this that seem to prove my point.
If you're defending Russell Brand, there is every chance you are an arsehole.
22
5
174
2,328
Inevitable really.
Replying to @RegSimpkin
A cuck says what?
60
I'm not sure how we get from A to B here but hey, I'm just a nasty little Mao-ist apparently.
Replying to @RegSimpkin
people like you think mao is a good guy and he killed millions.
47
Always nice to get fan mail.
Replying to @RegSimpkin
Or not a bot sheep your 4 eyed ugly cunt
1
1
122