Bob P

I grow infinitely tired of the first sentence here. I don't know what goes on with the Candace situation, I don't watch podcasts. With that in mind, let me offer you all some sense. In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. End of story. Anyone making the statement this idiot just made needs to reflect. And yes, it's idiotic, so spare me the self righteous virtue signaling. You do not condemn someone to guilt before seeing the evidence and going through a thorough process to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a human right. So, Kristan, I know you find logic and consequence challenging, evidenced by your failure as a pro life advocate, but bear with me here. When a high profile political and religious figure, of which Charlie was both, is assassinated, no stone can be left unturned. Everyone close to him, every business relationship, every random quack letter with a threat, EVERYTHING must be investigated. When this much money, power, and influence are involved, those closest must be met with ultimate scrutiny. Not as accusation, but as thorough investigation. I find it ridiculous that such common sense must be stated. As far as the ever obvious clown show arguments, let's put something to bed. I don't trust our government. I don't trust any other government. When the most influential evangelical Christian on the planet is bankrolled by Jewish influence, which is a completely opposed theology, openly states that Israel is ethnically cleansing GAZA, as in, openly makes accusations of genocide, against the opposing religious influence that bankrolls his existence, one must factor this in. When donors, funding operatives, and world leaders are in the DMs, one must take that into account. I am not saying Israel killed Charlie. I literally have no idea. I am saying how on earth can you rule any involvement out? Even secondary involvement. You think this is so irrelevant that it doesn't merit investigation? You think screeching "conspiracy" makes you sound rational or well intentioned? It doesn't. It makes you sound like a tone deaf sycophant with no desire for truth. And oppressive, thought policing tyrant. I also believe that Erika Kirk has acted EXTRAORDINARILY strange in the wake of Charlie's death. Does that mean she killed him? No. Does that even mean something is off? No. People act weird all the time. What it does mean, is taking videos of Charlie in a casket and posting to social media is odd. The interviews are odd, the mannerisms are odd. The behavior is all odd, and there are odd things in the history. And that should ALL be taken into consideration. Again, on what planet is having eyes and ears and opinions on behavior some sort of thought crime? Again, I haven't even spoken about this topic, and I have no clue who killed Kirk, and indeed I hold no position on it, but I find the shaping of narratives and the silencing of dissent, and the "mis and disinformation" campaigns akin to... COVID? Are you people are completely lost? Given that this is the biggest political assassination since Kennedy, maybe people should stop being retards and look at the whole picture. Is it possible some random transgender freak pulled off the greatest hit of our lifetimes? Sure. Is it likely, given the circumstances? Not at all. Trust your government at your own peril. If you are incapable of having conversations on this topic, maybe sit at the children's table this Thanksgiving. In closing, you will likely never know who killed Kirk. But someone will fall.