Glasgow, United Kingdom
Joined May 2019
- Tweets102K
- Following2.8K
- Followers2.8K
- Likes265K
Ruby red 🐭 retweeted
WHERE IS THE REAL BILL GATES? 👀
Take a very close look at these two photographs of Bill Gates. The first is dated 2018, the second 2026. Eight years separate them, yet the differences in their facial appearance raise some fascinating questions. Look particularly at the eyes, their positioning, the facial proportions and the underlying contours of the head.
Would you immediately recognise these as the same man?
And there's a much bigger story behind this comparison.
THE 2013 DEATH CLAIMS: Circulating Ancestry family-tree records list Bill Gates and Melinda Gates as having died in July 2013. Accompanying allegations claim they were hanged in India following accusations involving childhood vaccinations and serious injuries and deaths. These are extraordinary allegations, with the screenshots themselves providing no independent proof of the deaths.
THE GUANTÁNAMO CONNECTION: Further reports allege that a replacement Bill Gates was subsequently arrested, faced a military tribunal at Guantánamo Bay and was executed. The accusations circulating in those reports include child trafficking, sexual offences involving minors, murder, money laundering and public-health endangerment. These remain allegations rather than verified court proceedings.
THE EPSTEIN EMAIL: A particularly disturbing detail appears in a released Epstein email dated 4 February 2011, file EFTA01157206. The sender refers to a question Jeffrey Epstein had allegedly asked Bill Gates: "how do we get rid of poor people as a whole". What exactly was meant by that question? The email does not establish Gates's response, but the wording deserves scrutiny.
THE FACE SHAPE: Compare the overall proportions. The 2018 face appears broader through the upper cheeks, with a fuller lower facial structure. In 2026, the face appears considerably longer and narrower, with more prominent contours around the cheeks and jaw.
THE EYES AND EYEBROWS: Perhaps the most interesting part of this comparison. The eye line in the right-hand photograph appears noticeably higher. Look at the spacing around the eyes, the upper eyelids, the eyebrow shapes and the relationship between the eyes and the bridge of the nose. These are precisely the details worth examining closely.
THE FOREHEAD AND HAIRLINE: Compare the forehead proportions, the temples and the hairline. The right-hand photograph presents a very different upper facial appearance. How much can be attributed to ageing, hairstyle, photographic perspective or enhancement?
THE NOSE, MOUTH AND TEETH: Study the nasal bridge, the nostril contours and the distance between the nose and upper lip. The mouth appears differently shaped, although the expressions are not identical. Neither photograph allows a reliable comparison of the teeth.
THE CHEEKS, JAWLINE AND CHIN: The 2018 image shows fuller cheeks and a softer jaw contour. The 2026 image reveals deeper folds, more pronounced cheek definition and a narrower-looking chin. The difference in facial fullness is particularly noticeable.
THE NECK: Look at the transition between the jaw, chin and neck. The 2026 image presents a leaner appearance, although posture and clothing affect the comparison.
These are two dramatically different-looking photographs.
WHERE IS THE REAL BILL GATES? 👀
Ruby red 🐭 retweeted
Since Covid trust in governments, business leaders and (MSM) journalists has gone down the drain.
@IcicLaw @lakaruppropet1 @SHomburg @PenguinX01 @ProfessorWerner @AndersonAfDMdEP @JacobNordangard @franersees
nitter.gq/Bringselius/status/211…
Människor har aldrig förr haft så låg tillit till samhällets beslutsfattare. Det visar den globala undersökningen Edelman Trust Barometer (nedan ur rapporten 2025). Om man vill förstå protesterna runt om i världen är det värt att beakta.
edelman.com/
Ruby red 🐭 retweeted
Media aren't immune.
BBC and ITV did not tolerate internal dissent on the safe and effective.
🇬🇧 “[You are] peddling SILLY CONSPIRACY THEORIES.”
VP reporter @WillColeshill ambushes Sky News correspondent John Craig regarding the “safe and effective” Covid vaccinations.
Ruby red 🐭 retweeted
David Linden just showed us exactly how the SNP sees ordinary people.
When a local woman raises concerns about immigration pressures Linden’s immediate reaction is to assume she means “brown people.”
That’s not anti-racism.
That’s a racial stereotype.
He reduces a policy debate about numbers, housing, services, crime, and social cohesion to skin colour then labels anyone who notices the consequences a racist.
So the question needs to be asked publicly:
@DavidLinden what exactly do you mean by “brown people”?
• Do you mean asylum seekers from specific countries?
• Do you mean anyone non-white?
• Do you mean Eastern Europeans too, or only certain groups?
• And why do you automatically translate “immigration concerns” into a racial category?
People in Glasgow East are talking about overcrowded housing, pressure on GP surgeries, schools, and changes in their streets.
They’re not drawing colour charts.
If your only response is to racialise their concerns and call them racist, you’re not defending minorities you’re dismissing working-class Scots and shutting down debate.
Explain the phrase.
Define it. Or stop using it as a shield.
The SNP’s entire strategy on this issue is “if you notice problems, you’re a racist.”
Linden just made that explicit.
Ruby red 🐭 retweeted
What is a parasite cleanse? And why is it complicated? I don't pay attention to these things.
Ruby red 🐭 retweeted
I’ll translate. A Pakistani MSP who, as a Muslim, doesn’t drink alcohol, is telling Scotland that it’s to make pubs safer spaces for folk like him?
Have I been transported in to a parallel universe?
