Will Horne retweeted
Both candidates for governor weighed in on our recent childcare investigation, along with the state's child care association and the former leader of the Georgia department that oversees daycares.
Read all the reactions here: ajc.com/news/2026/10/georgia…
Will Horne retweeted
This is the thing. We could implement a lot of the proposed (well-intentioned) solutions to gerrymandering, and we'd still have gerrymandering. And even if we DID somehow prevent it, our winner-take-all system is responsible for a lot of the problems we blame on gerrymandering.
Proportional representation solves the gerrymandering problem at its core. @imillhiser @voxdotcom vox.com/politics/507376/supr…
cool kids read the whole investigation too
I get it. You're busy. You don't have time to read a 3k word investigation.
We've got you covered: Here are our 5 big takeaways from our investigation into daycares: ajc.com/news/2026/10/georgia…
(Also please read the long version too thanks)
Will Horne retweeted
New investigation out today with @SAHogan and @justinJprice:
Children suffered burns and beatings. Georgia calls it quality daycare.
ajc.com/news/2026/10/georgia…
Will Horne retweeted
If you like Pokémon, perhaps I can introduce you to another turn-based RPG with switching out, deep stat analysis, field conditions, and a whole host of oddly named and shaped little guys to choose as your comfort character. That's right, it's Baseball.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
This is the same dynamic that led to all of the job market candidates in my PhD program in ~2015 studying the arab spring, right as the discipline pivoted to focusing hiring on other targets.
Will Horne retweeted
Scherzer and Verlander retiring the same week is the baseball version of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson dying on July 4th for guys my age.
Will Horne retweeted
You need to read these "negative wage/employment effects of AI" papers very carefully.
Here are two ways a paper can present the same result.
Is this a decline in wages for AI-exposed workers? imho i would not conclude AI-exposed workers are worse off.
Will Horne retweeted
OpenAI employees who agree with this analysis (which seems very reasonable to me) need to understand that their company’s lobbyists and the Leading The Future superpac their executives are funding is doing everything possible to make this coordination not happen.
I don't know what my probabilities are on literal extinction, but I think there are a number of ways AI could go poorly for humanity, and at the current frankly terrifying pace humanity will be quite lucky if we manage to find and stay on the narrow path between all the bad outcomes.
I am heartened by the many costly actions OpenAI has taken recently (detailed in several recent posts), but regardless of what you think of OpenAI, this is not a problem that can be solved by any one company (or country) in isolation. We need coordination to be able to approach future capability increases with an appropriate degree of caution and humility, and we need it yesterday.
Will Horne retweeted
I think you can connect the decline on overall literacy and the return of 'orality' to the fact so many people presume every news story is explicitly moralistic and not just 'here is an interesting thing happening in the world today that you may not know about'
Will Horne retweeted
The role of anti-incumbency over policy is a key point. And is indeed a good argument for advancing structural reform of political institutions. Lower the stakes, make multiple coalitions possible.
Don't disagree. But the only way to build up a political coalition -- at least in modern politics -- is to run against the incumbent party. You don't win on policy ... you win on anti-incumbency.
Dems are doing that this year. If they win in 2026 and take the White House in 2028 (also by running on anti-incumbency), they must address structural reform.
If they don't, it'll just be a repeat in two years of the anti-incumbent pendulum swings we've seen repeatedly for the past 3 decades.
Will Horne retweeted
I am not an AAUP member, but I think it is a really bad idea for the American Association of University Professors to be endorsing candidates, especially in a factional Democratic primary.
Will Horne retweeted
It's OK to go to events organized by people you disagree with, including conferences led by, yes, billionaires and conservatives.
It's arguably even GOOD to talk to all those people you disagree with there, learn about their perspective, and try to convince them of something.
Enough people have asked me about the Peter Thiel-Dialog story that I think it's worth saying what it is, or at least what I saw it to be. So:
–Dialog is a conference. I went once in 2018 and once in 2022. No one ever asked me to keep it or my presence a secret.
–My understanding was Thiel was one of its founders but no longer involved by the time I went. I never saw or talked to him in connection with Dialog.
–Nor did I see the other names I’ve heard mentioned, like Ted Cruz or Elon Musk or Joseph Gordon-Levitt or Jared Kushner. Dialog was not sold to me as a bunch of big names, which is part of why I went. I don’t need to go to a conference to hear what Ted Cruz thinks.
–You could be a Dialog member, but I wasn’t. I don’t think joining got you much except guaranteed invitations to future Dialogs. There were occasional dinners and webinars, but I never went to one. I would not have described it as a secret or a society.
–The panels were largely self-organized, so people would propose panels and hold them. I went to one on being a working parent and another on whether crypto had any real use cases and another on how to accelerate scientific breakthroughs. You’d usually have 8 or 10 people in a room. It was all very TED-talk adjacent.
–In 2018, I found it very optimistic, with an idealistic hacker-ish vibe. In 2022, I found the conversations and vibe more curdled and resentful. I didn’t enjoy it, and I didn’t go back. (That did prove a pretty good signal of where tech’s politics were going though, maybe I should’ve paid more attention.)
–That said, Dialog was a pretty ideologically diverse crowd. I met some people there who were *extremely* far left and far right. I met some real eccentrics and weirdos. I appreciated that about it.
– I’m a journalist, I go to lots of things in the hopes of getting to know people, hearing new ideas, finding podcast guests, etc.
–Being at something does not mean I endorse it, or everyone at it, or everyone who organized or founded it. I try to go to things where I don’t share the politics and perspectives of the crowd, for obvious reasons.
–I am surprised how credulous some people have been on this story. You have to believe some weird things about the world to believe Julián Castro and Peter Thiel are somehow engaged in a common project. Secret societies, I imagine, need a lot of trust to function, but the people being named here do not trust each other and do not have aligned agendas.
So that’s what I saw at Dialog. I’ll just end by saying it’s a weird experience to have a conference you haven’t thought about for years become the center of a new conspiracy theory.
wired.com/story/leak-exposes…
There is absolutely no reason it should take weeks to know who won an election in an advanced democracy (absent the race being so close it needs a recount)
Replying to @lxeagle17
This is a reminder that there are real consequences to counting votes late. When citizens wake up, they expect they'll see some results that decently reflect the election outcome.
Seeing this — and then seeing Pan surge in the last 45% of the vote — destroys trust in elections.
Will Horne retweeted
You're right to push back on that. The unexamined life *can* be worth living. Here's why it's probably right for you




























