Sam retweeted
The world’s most accomplished tech founders and business leaders are betting hundreds of billions on AI with extraordinary conviction. Meanwhile much of the investing world thinks they’re making a massive mistake. The irony is hard to ignore. An investment industry where very few have historically managed to beat a passive index is now questioning the judgment of the people building the technology and running the businesses that will put it to work. Maybe the investors are right. Maybe the builders are. But I can’t remember a time when the stakes were this high and the two sides saw the future so differently.
Sam retweeted
HAPPENING NOW in downtown Chicago, outside the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the historic center of onion futures trading
If this ban is lifted we will support onion futures on @feytrade
#freetheonion 🧅
Sam retweeted
The games we've long wanted, which didn't exist because they'd cost several times more to make than they'd earn back, will soon become possible. As will the games developers wanted to build, but couldn't with the resources available. It'll be a new golden age of gaming.
Sam retweeted
WHY THE MARKET MAY STILL BE MISUNDERSTANDING $ASTS
The biggest takeaway from $SPCX buying the old 800 MHz Nextel spectrum is not that AST suddenly became less attractive, it is that Elon just validated the exact scarcity AST has been built around from the beginning.
Low band spectrum is incredibly valuable for direct to device because it penetrates buildings and travels farther than higher frequency spectrum, which is why SpaceX was willing to buy a block that T Mobile had spent years trying to divest.
When the largest launch company in the world calls this type of spectrum the “last critical piece” for complete phone coverage, it reinforces that the real bottleneck in satellite cellular is not simply putting satellites in orbit, it is getting access to the right spectrum once they are there.
Thats where I think AST remains misunderstood because AST did not build its network around owning a giant standalone spectrum portfolio the way SpaceX increasingly is. Its model is built around partnering with terrestrial carriers and using spectrum they already control, which gives AST access to low band frequencies from partners like AT&T and Verizon without needing to spend billions assembling those licenses itself.
SpaceX is effectively spending enormous amounts of capital to recreate a spectrum position that AST can access through carrier relationships, so I would not look at this and conclude AST has suddenly lost the direct to device race when the transaction actually proves how valuable those carrier partnerships are.
The other important piece is that SpaceX buying more spectrum does not solve the physical bottleneck AST still has to execute against, which is getting enough BlueBird capacity into orbit to turn carrier spectrum into usable bandwidth.
AST already has demand, carrier relationships and access to frequencies that work well for direct to phone service, while the remaining question is how quickly it can launch enough satellites to convert that spectrum into real capacity.
Thats why I keep coming back to the idea that AST’s biggest risk is execution rather than demand, because every new spectrum transaction like this makes the scarcity of the underlying resource more obvious while leaving the company’s core path unchanged.
So I actually think the SpaceX deal strengthens the long term AST thesis even if the headline initially looks competitive because it tells us that the most valuable players in the industry are now racing to secure the same low band assets AST has been architected around for years.
SpaceX is spending billions to assemble spectrum, carriers are increasingly looking for satellite partners and governments want resilient direct to device coverage, which all point toward the same conclusion that low band cellular from space is becoming strategic infrastructure rather than a niche service.
The market still tends to view AST as another satellite company trying to compete with Starlink, while I think the better framing is that AST owns one of the few architectures capable of turning scarce carrier spectrum into direct broadband capacity from orbit, and that scarcity is becoming more valuable every time somebody else pays billions to secure it.
.@OpenRouter co-founder Alex Atallah on the "everyone is building the same thing" take:
"This reminds me of this tweet I saw... Everybody's building an agent loop with notifications, third-party connectors, context management, memory, sandboxes, agentic web search, an always-on agent on top."
"This product is showing up everywhere. It is showing up everywhere, but these are just the new table-stakes primitives."
"A 2005 version of that tweet would be: 'Oh, everybody's building the same thing. A database, a users table, a sign-in page, a sign-up page, a profile page, a logout page. Everything's the same.'"
"There's like a lot of differentiation really. There's table-stakes needs for AI just like there's table-stakes needs for the web."
@alexatallah @amasad
.@OpenRouter co-founder Alex Atallah, in his first podcast since Stripe acquired the company, joins @Replit co-founder Amjad Masad and a16z's Erik Torenberg on why the future of AI is independence and specialization.
In this conversation, Alex walks through how the Stripe deal unfolded, why he wasn't originally looking to sell, and why "payments and inference are going to blend together."
Pre-OpenRouter, the typical AI workflow had one model provider to choose from, and little pressure on that provider to lower prices. Now enterprises are diversifying across labs and open-weight models, and every board is asking about AI costs and benchmarks.
Amjad argues if your company depends on one AI lab, it can turn into your competitor. So Replit is building the layer that lets enterprises use any model and any cloud, without being locked into either.
Alex and Amjad are split on personal agents – Amjad runs one agent across his whole company and loves the cross-domain joins, while Alex says general agents cause you to sacrifice understanding, and argues 10 specialized chiefs of staff beats one superagent.
0:45 How the Stripe deal unfolded
5:05 Why mixing models beats one model
7:25 Forcing the labs to compete on price
8:50 Enterprises want open-weight models
10:30 Every board asks about AI every month
12:25 Why companies must own their intelligence
14:15 Replit as the independence layer
15:10 Everyone is building the same agent
16:35 Why Amjad built bring-your-own-cloud
18:10 Amjad's agent that runs his whole company
19:55 Why 10 specialized agents beat one
23:35 Machines, not humans, should specialize
27:30 Guardrails for agents talking to agents
31:10 Models training their own replacements
33:45 Most tasks don't need a frontier model
40:50 Training small models on Qwen 8B
43:25 The Rust cycle is coming for AI
45:10 Fusion models: frontier quality at half the cost
YouTube: youtu.be/ekK8urKHPMQ
@alexatallah @OpenRouter @amasad @eriktorenberg
The users deserve @feytrade




















