The dilemma of woman is that she must risk herself to lead the best possible life for herself, and yet cannot afford to take too many risks. A girl’s path is narrow - if she take no risks, that is in itself a risk, because she misses her window and opportune timing until the culmination of her inaction leads to a most reactive and scrambling desperation upon the realisation she wasted too much time and took too long - a terrible position to be working from. The “do nothing and wait” approach to life encourages passivity and cowardice and thus a sense of learned helplessness. It teaches a girl to become a spectator of her own life, rather than a conqueror and thereby active participant in her own destiny. Such a woman realises she must preserve herself, and yet has done so so rigidly that she has no forward motion, meaningful spiritual growth nor progression towards her heart and soul’s truest desires, and thus blames God and the world for her “bad luck”, because the things she never stuck her neck on the line for - the things she never fought for - did not simply drop into her lap. Take too many risks, be too reckless, and you ruin yourself. Take no risks, be too rigid, and you ruin yourself. Almost all paths for woman lead to destruction - but there is a third way, my dear, and that is the love of wisdom. To gain a love for all that is true and correct and good from a young age, generally around when you experience that crisis of self in your teens, to gain a love of conquest, and then apply your discernment to your desire to take informed, intelligent risks. So rather than be a girl who does nothing, you move decisively. You are neither passive nor reckless, but you are patient. She checks herself and so she asks herself “am I doing the right thing for the right reasons here?”“is this truly aligned with my highest self?” She does not waste herself on inadequate men, nor refuse to give herself to the adequate - but crucially, she surrenders on her own terms. If paradise requires surrender and it is a girl’s destiny (and secret desire) to do so, then she may as well dictate the terms of her surrender so that she may do so beautifully in the highest and most meaningful way. This is what it is to be a girl who gets it right. Nobody can promise you that your dreams will come true and that everything will work out well for you, because some things are down to God and luck - however - you must do your bit to ensure God and luck can assist you as much as they possibly can by playing your part, meaning you must be willing to discern as much as you are willing to fight - you must risk - you must apply yourself fully. You must not be an observer of your own life, wasting time by doing nothing, pretending your idle waiting is a something, and yet you must also not ruin yourself by being reckless. Be cautious, but be mindful, observe, think, and research thoroughly, but not endlessly - and when you know what you know and cannot know it any better - then just do it - fucking do it - love violently, dare to blossom and risk yourself, sweet creature.

The number one argument against the prevalence of female intuition is her propensity to choose extremely poorly when it comes to men. You cannot claim blamelessness for your poor choices because “people change” and men are deceitful, whilst also claiming to be shrewd, deeply emotionally intelligent, empathetic and intuitive. If you are emotionally intelligent, intuitive, have a strong theory of mind driven empathy and can exercise proper reason, you will rarely if ever be wrong about someone due to the exceptional calibre of your discernment. And yet when it comes to women, the sex is notorious for choosing poorly when given sufficient freedom to do so. Claims of competence come with an equal burden of responsibility: if you are as insightful as you claim to be, where is the evidence of that in your own life, and why have you not applied it to your own affairs? If women were anywhere near as intuitive and emotionally intelligent as they tout and claim to be, they would be far less traumatised, dissatisfied and deceived, because they would make better life decisions and mate choices. Most women are not all that intuitive, they are merely highly emotional, and when that broken clock is right twice a day and the odd hunch pays off, they call it intuition and highlight all the times their feelings were right, whilst glossing over and forgetting the many more times they were wrong. A developed intuitive function is that repeatedly accurately discerns character and predicts events is a form of spiritual evolution, and thereby rarer and not the norm, although, yes, it can accurately be characterised as feminine despite its rarity within women, for it is much easier for women to unlock than it is for men, given they are not as constrained by the straitjacket of rationality as men are.

To my everything, My everything. Signed, Your everything.

I’m reading this rather ominously and simultaneously, in two different ways that both agree and disagree with it. I agree with it in the sense that when I see how browbeaten men who have let their wives tyrannically seize authority in the household, in that I think if he was stricter and did not tolerate her disrespect, he would not be in such a situation. And I disagree with it in the sense I often see genuinely decent men trying their best going unappreciated for their efforts, being pecked, prodded and squawked at, whilst I see other men, who are much colder, immoral, unappreciative and arrogant and often even criminal adjacent if not outright criminally deviant, with an attractive, reverent well behaved woman who pours her heart out to him only to get mistreated by him. How do I resolve these disagreements? Simple. You get the wife you deserve in terms of dominance, but not in terms of morality. If you are a genuinely kind hearted man but you’re too soft and lenient, your woman will mistreat you. If you are an absolutely horrible man, even abusive, but you maintain discipline, your woman will treat you much better. I am not advocating that men do this nor encouraging it - I am merely making a social observation about the two most common kinds of dynamics I see in romantic relationships. I actually think mistreatment of one person by the other is common in most relationships - that one party in their liberty taking familiarity seemingly takes it upon themselves to exploit the other - a perversion of what true love is meant to be, which is to outdo one another at giving whilst protecting each other from the bad intentions of others, and the very worst aspects of yourselves.

It is pain that fails to corrupt you which serves as the basis for purifying you. This is why it is often amongst those who have been hurt the most you will find the kindest.

If she is more obsessed with how she treats you rather than how you treat her, she is a special soul you should look after. Simply put: this is a woman with genuine empathy who really loves you and wants to pour light into you - she isn't just obsessed with how you make her feel.

Women are natural extremists, for they are both more loyal, and less loyal than man simultaneously. They are less loyal in the sense they are more easily dissatisfied, and more readily prone to betrayal rather then reconciliation once they feel dissatisfied, but more loyal in the sense that if they revere a man, they truly revere that man, and absolutely nothing bad you can say about him can turn her against him. You could slander him or reveal the very worst secrets about him, and she either wouldn’t believe it, or just straight up wouldn’t care. Nothing you say can damage her view of him. He is the exception to her every rule.