Longing for a time you were never in and a place you’ve never been with a person you’ve never met - such is the power of the imagination, of the spirit, of the force of desire of the soul exploding, sprawling and unfolding into every direction as it imposes itself onto reality to remake it! To remember what you have never known but deeply tasted and make that fantasy reality, because if you can see it and imagine it, then no matter how difficult the path nor how seemingly impossible the odds - it is real - real within your heart and mind, and so with God by your side, the persistence of your efforts would see that vision made material, until the unreal is so real it becomes surreal!

It is generally wise for women, especially young women, to limit the access that men have to them. If you are an even moderately attractive or intelligent young women, men are going to repeatedly proposition you in some pretty strange and undesirable ways until your threat detection pattern recognition builds up a natural distrust and contempt for men. It also just causes background stress and anxiety to have to be on your guard around men all the time. Much potential nonsense, upset and danger can be averted by minimising your engagement with men as much as possible. Of course, if you are ambitious and want to accomplish anything worth accomplishing as a woman, then men are pretty unavoidable, as they are the vast majority at the highest levels of competence hierarchies, and thus if you are going to properly apply yourself in a way that makes avoiding them unfeasible, you should generally carry yourself in a way that makes you seem uninteresting and otherwise unapproachable. Aim to be efficient and bland, rather than interesting and likeable. Don't be pleasant, sweet or complimenting, because they will your warmth as a sign of receptivity to their lust driven overtures, and start to fantasise you are attracted to them. Do not accentuate your sexuality by dressing to entice them for whatever meagre dopamine hits that may bring you. Aim to go largely unnoticed by all except who you need to be noticed by - do not be conspicuous. If you are too interesting, likeable and play even small attention games, you will end up in many awkward and undesirable situations. Some of these situations be genuinely dangerous, whilst others may just lose you opportunities in your unwillingness to reciprocate warmth or forfeit your dignity. The men with ill designs on you will be many, whilst the ones you can genuinely appreciate, feel safe around and trust will be few. Truth be told, women do not really have any business working alongside men, and so if you are going to regardless, these are the sorts of protective measures you should be taking.

The dilemma of woman is that she must risk herself to lead the best possible life for herself, and yet cannot afford to take too many risks. A girl’s path is narrow - if she take no risks, that is in itself a risk, because she misses her window and opportune timing until the culmination of her inaction leads to a most reactive and scrambling desperation upon the realisation she wasted too much time and took too long - a terrible position to be working from. The “do nothing and wait” approach to life encourages passivity and cowardice and thus a sense of learned helplessness. It teaches a girl to become a spectator of her own life, rather than a conqueror and thereby active participant in her own destiny. Such a woman realises she must preserve herself, and yet has done so so rigidly that she has no forward motion, meaningful spiritual growth nor progression towards her heart and soul’s truest desires, and thus blames God and the world for her “bad luck”, because the things she never stuck her neck on the line for - the things she never fought for - did not simply drop into her lap. Take too many risks, be too reckless, and you ruin yourself. Take no risks, be too rigid, and you ruin yourself. Almost all paths for woman lead to destruction - but there is a third way, my dear, and that is the love of wisdom. To gain a love for all that is true and correct and good from a young age, generally around when you experience that crisis of self in your teens, to gain a love of conquest, and then apply your discernment to your desire to take informed, intelligent risks. So rather than be a girl who does nothing, you move decisively. You are neither passive nor reckless, but you are patient. She checks herself and so she asks herself “am I doing the right thing for the right reasons here?”“is this truly aligned with my highest self?” She does not waste herself on inadequate men, nor refuse to give herself to the adequate - but crucially, she surrenders on her own terms. If paradise requires surrender and it is a girl’s destiny (and secret desire) to do so, then she may as well dictate the terms of her surrender so that she may do so beautifully in the highest and most meaningful way. This is what it is to be a girl who gets it right. Nobody can promise you that your dreams will come true and that everything will work out well for you, because some things are down to God and luck - however - you must do your bit to ensure God and luck can assist you as much as they possibly can by playing your part, meaning you must be willing to discern as much as you are willing to fight - you must risk - you must apply yourself fully. You must not be an observer of your own life, wasting time by doing nothing, pretending your idle waiting is a something, and yet you must also not ruin yourself by being reckless. Be cautious, but be mindful, observe, think, and research thoroughly, but not endlessly - and when you know what you know and cannot know it any better - then just do it - fucking do it - love violently, dare to blossom and risk yourself, sweet creature.

The number one argument against the prevalence of female intuition is her propensity to choose extremely poorly when it comes to men. You cannot claim blamelessness for your poor choices because “people change” and men are deceitful, whilst also claiming to be shrewd, deeply emotionally intelligent, empathetic and intuitive. If you are emotionally intelligent, intuitive, have a strong theory of mind driven empathy and can exercise proper reason, you will rarely if ever be wrong about someone due to the exceptional calibre of your discernment. And yet when it comes to women, the sex is notorious for choosing poorly when given sufficient freedom to do so. Claims of competence come with an equal burden of responsibility: if you are as insightful as you claim to be, where is the evidence of that in your own life, and why have you not applied it to your own affairs? If women were anywhere near as intuitive and emotionally intelligent as they tout and claim to be, they would be far less traumatised, dissatisfied and deceived, because they would make better life decisions and mate choices. Most women are not all that intuitive, they are merely highly emotional, and when that broken clock is right twice a day and the odd hunch pays off, they call it intuition and highlight all the times their feelings were right, whilst glossing over and forgetting the many more times they were wrong. A developed intuitive function is that repeatedly accurately discerns character and predicts events is a form of spiritual evolution, and thereby rarer and not the norm, although, yes, it can accurately be characterised as feminine despite its rarity within women, for it is much easier for women to unlock than it is for men, given they are not as constrained by the straitjacket of rationality as men are.

To my everything, My everything. Signed, Your everything.

I’m reading this rather ominously and simultaneously, in two different ways that both agree and disagree with it. I agree with it in the sense that when I see how browbeaten men who have let their wives tyrannically seize authority in the household, in that I think if he was stricter and did not tolerate her disrespect, he would not be in such a situation. And I disagree with it in the sense I often see genuinely decent men trying their best going unappreciated for their efforts, being pecked, prodded and squawked at, whilst I see other men, who are much colder, immoral, unappreciative and arrogant and often even criminal adjacent if not outright criminally deviant, with an attractive, reverent well behaved woman who pours her heart out to him only to get mistreated by him. How do I resolve these disagreements? Simple. You get the wife you deserve in terms of dominance, but not in terms of morality. If you are a genuinely kind hearted man but you’re too soft and lenient, your woman will mistreat you. If you are an absolutely horrible man, even abusive, but you maintain discipline, your woman will treat you much better. I am not advocating that men do this nor encouraging it - I am merely making a social observation about the two most common kinds of dynamics I see in romantic relationships. I actually think mistreatment of one person by the other is common in most relationships - that one party in their liberty taking familiarity seemingly takes it upon themselves to exploit the other - a perversion of what true love is meant to be, which is to outdo one another at giving whilst protecting each other from the bad intentions of others, and the very worst aspects of yourselves.

It is pain that fails to corrupt you which serves as the basis for purifying you. This is why it is often amongst those who have been hurt the most you will find the kindest.

If she is more obsessed with how she treats you rather than how you treat her, she is a special soul you should look after. Simply put: this is a woman with genuine empathy who really loves you and wants to pour light into you - she isn't just obsessed with how you make her feel.

Women are natural extremists, for they are both more loyal, and less loyal than man simultaneously. They are less loyal in the sense they are more easily dissatisfied, and more readily prone to betrayal rather then reconciliation once they feel dissatisfied, but more loyal in the sense that if they revere a man, they truly revere that man, and absolutely nothing bad you can say about him can turn her against him. You could slander him or reveal the very worst secrets about him, and she either wouldn’t believe it, or just straight up wouldn’t care. Nothing you say can damage her view of him. He is the exception to her every rule.

The greatest and most enduring joy a woman can know in this life is to share it with a man she genuinely looks up to. Looks fade and children grow up, but reverence for the beauty and greatness of a soul is forever

Those who bite the hand that feeds Should no longer be fed. If you are ungrateful. You can feed yourself And if you starve, then you starve. It is what you deserve.

High truth preference people can't be friends with low truth preference people, because the former even with the best of intentions will inevitably offend the latter, whilst the latter will consistently irritate and annoy the former with their dishonest denials and delusions.

The common female fantasy is that a man far superior to her will choose her because she kept herself relatively unblemished, and then relieve her of all her burdens. She sees her ideal man as a relatively finished product who is the solution to all her problems that uniquely desires her. She is not interested in his becoming, but her own, in the woman she can become through him in how she relates to and experiences herself through him, rather than a primary focus on the man he can become through her. To her, a man is a consolidating principle, he brings everything together for her - that's how she sees him - that's what he is to her. Women who wish to build with a man then are generally superior, for the simple reason they are willing to suffer with him to create something with him, and thereby bind deeper with him because they are invested in him, rather than simply arriving as expectant beneficiaries of all his prior luck and effort - looking to be chosen, and calling that selection a gift, blessing or miracle. They realise that to become part of a man at the deepest level they must not merely reap, but also sow. That they must architect their own becoming through architecting his, by looking to invest in him rather than extract from him and calling that love. It is two very different orientations, and thus ways of looking at men. Most women see men as investors, few see them as investments. Architect tier women are thus the exception, rather than the rule for the very simple reason that greatness is the exception, rather than the rule. Which is why although the vast majority will not find what I say here to be all that relatable, it is in fact - true.

If a man is socially conservative but learns to cook and cook well, and it is not due to some extreme natural passion for the craft or in relation to his vocation, then it is because he does not expect to marry.

Women who hate their fathers want to have fights with every strong man they encounter and think this makes them tough. But real courage would be going balls deep into why you have intimacy, trust and attachment trauma, not being arrogant to random men who have never wronged you.

In life man faces 3 deaths: the 1st death is cowardice, he becomes domesticated and risk averse, but tells himself he's civilized, the 2nd death is to become useless, to produce nothing of value and lose the ability to self-sustain, the final death is apathy - the loss of hope.