Sphinctus (@Sphinctus) header
Sphinctus (@Sphinctus) profile picture

Co-host of the Virtual homework podcast with @Picantelive. #1 Slaking Fan. ex-Game Store Owner. I ruin my life playing too many games.

Chicago
Joined May 2010
Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)Photo by Sphinctus (@Sphinctus)
Sphinctus retweeted
Lunchables ham is made out of white people
410
16,782
616
131,198
1,295,887
There's no reason we can't build smart, walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods More of this please
90
30
12
1,214
167,247
how about a Disney t-shirt of Goofy hitting a three pointer and itโ€™s airbrushed with ACTIVE SHOOTER in comic sans
50
1,248
21
40,214
1,081,249
The Goddess Restock.
4
22
1
363
13,111
Sphinctus retweeted
I bet this took a while to type since you have sausage fingers fattie. Didnt read a word.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"โ€”whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnโ€™t sharp enough down the stretch. Iโ€™m sure thatโ€™s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollsterโ€”one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weโ€™d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheโ€™s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementโ€”by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, โ€œI told you soโ€: youโ€™re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letโ€™s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
614
3,399
666
78,203
3,886,908
Sphinctus retweeted
Civil war ? Bro we are force feminizing you and shipping you to Atlanta
Ok Iโ€™m finally starting to get a little worried. Looks like weโ€™re gonna have to do the civil war thingy maybe ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿฅณ
9
1,212
3
16,599
100,359
Sphinctus retweeted
they bout to put elonโ€™s soul in a waymo like heโ€™s an evangelion
53
6,540
78
48,706
372,021
For Woke 3.0 Iโ€™m going to prestige and reset as cis and work my way back up to Nonbinary
58
3,067
30
42,854
451,525
Sphinctus retweeted
When Democrats take power again, we need to take a two-pronged approach to cleaning up our institutions and communicating about it. This will rely on investigations, single-issue bills, and an aggressive social media presence from our strongest Democratic communicators. First, Democrats need to launch investigations into the insider trading, pay-for-play, and pardon economy that Donald Trump has created. We need answers to some very serious questions. Did Trump ACTUALLY remove tariffs on Vietnam and then get a golf course announcement just weeks later? But these investigations can't happen in isolation. They need to be paired with single-issue bill after single-issue bill that directly addresses whatever corruption is being uncovered. For example, if Democrats uncover 28,000 insider trades coming from the oval office, we introduce a bill banning executive branch officials from trading individual stocks. Force Republicans to vote on it. If they vote against it, make them explain why. Then, it's necessary to have our strongest communicators flooding the zone about the corruption, and what we're doing. Flipping Steve Bannon's strategy back on him. Imagine if we had Jon Ossoff, AOC, James Talarico, Abdul El-Sayed, and our strongest Democratic communicators making face-to-camera videos every single day explaining exactly what's happening. "Here's the corruption we're investigating. Here's the evidence. Here's how we're going to stop it." I think this is how you connect the dots in voters' minds between the way they vote and having a responsive government that's actually trying to address corruption and rewire the system. Then we move to gerrymandering, affordability, paid family leave, and other reforms. Single-issue bill after single-issue bill, forcing Republicans to take public positions on these issues while Democrats communicate directly with the American people. I know this might sound idealistic, but we already have the tools at our disposal. I see people like Talarico, AOC, and Ossoff pulling insane numbers on social media. There's no reason that same infrastructure can't be used to explain congressional investigations, proposed legislation, and exactly what Democrats are doing with the power voters gave them.
265
1,541
85
7,779
145,831
JD Vance cutting himself like a 16 year old in his bedroom
78
9,098
93
99,366
631,208
Sphinctus retweeted
they're giving barron trump double Ds
43
4,250
47
62,627
681,373
Sphinctus retweeted
now that weโ€™ve won, we should imprison laura loomer
2,005
3,014
327
56,350
1,559,163
Niggas said that Charlie Kirk shit was gonna start a revolution and they lost South Carolina and Texas a year later its tears in my fucking eyes dude
346
30,428
295
390,357
3,669,093
WHERE CAN I GO BUY WINE AT RNNNN
1
1
43
metal card progress
3
8
250
9,094
YOU GETTING PUT IN THE CONTRAPTION
I hope everyone is learning Arabic.
1
19
OPEN THAT LESBIAN BAR BACK UP, BOYS!!!
53
3,683
40
57,113
978,196
When dems win they gonna put the kirk shooting on 70MM imax
37
3,441
68
41,433
456,865
Sphinctus retweeted
LIBBING TF OUT
1,038
7,073
452
56,817
1,050,416