In 2001-02, Allen Iverson won the scoring title at 31.4 PPG on 31.7 TSA (-2.8 rTS. ) According to TS Points Added - cost his team 1.8 points per game. Ranked 214th of 216 in shooting PAC, accounting for the massive 38% of team possessions carried, says he was worth +1.2 points per game, ranked 60th of 216. This begs the question: at what point does scoring load start to pay for inefficiency? Is there a third dimension to measuring shooting production? Introducing (P)oints (A)bove (C)ost

WHEWWW

The Thunder went extremely under on ALL the PNR that included him and Wemby. The Spurs' three-guard lineups won't work as expected without a consistent perimeter threat. for all the value Castle bring value via defensive POA versatility, POA, rim pressure, and connective passing He is a wing masquerading as a PG His high turnovers and non-threatening spacing do limit the Spurs. Ty Jerome on the Spurs for example is box office no? That role is the missing piece, not necceralriy growing as a self creator (though that would be amazing) No this is funny enough. More props to Wemby for being on a generational trajectory. In one of his worst offensive games he was arguably the best player on the court simply because of his defensive impact on a possession-by-possession basis. All the bets lineups last reg season consisted of either vasell or champ, fox is extremely valuable on O due to his ball retention, spurs as a whole need to mash steals

dam

Needs it own piece but man Failed Wardell by not adjusting to the times or regression of Draymond Been needed a 6'10 rim running 5, not a rookie Wiseman and not porzingus or even Looney (goat)

Looking forward to this brothers analysis all season

Amazing reasesrch and application being done.

Two of the most dominant ollege players ever on Memphis Funny enough concerns with boozer being utilized as the 5 are "solved" with edey Ye this is going to be fun