Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH) header
Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH) profile picture

TFLN Photonics | Co-Founder & CEO at Ely Stanford Ignite '24 @StanfordGSB | Applied Physics PhD '23 @Stanford | Safavi-Naeini Lab Alum

Palo Alto, CA
Joined February 2022
Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)Photo by Hubert Stokowski (@StokowskiH)
The journey is the reward
The purest reason to make something is not to make money and not even to make the thing. It’s to have the experience of making the thing - and no one can take that from you.
4
1
23
6,282
I was excited for 512gb but damn this is brutal
69
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
Replying to @tim_cook
Touch screen laptops “ It’s Ergonomically Terrible” Steve Jobs (2010)
99
338
57
8,273
368,832
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
A lot of marketing around @Muse today. Tried a few questions, caught it making things up, uninstalled. The whole point is less friction. If I have to fact-check every answer, I won’t trust it with my mailbox, calendar or anything real. That’s not less work; that’s homework with a nicer interface. Then there’s the whole Instinct vs. Muse chatter, but imo the more interesting comparison is @Muse vs. @bot A reasonably technical user can squeeze a lot out of Bot’s virtual computer while keeping it grounded. Muse wraps similar agentic primitives in a friendlier (?) consumer product, but seems to produce quite a bit of slop. The bigger opportunity is still wide open: a genuinely humane interface for AI that normal people feel comfortable trusting and using. And a Teletubby × Labubu isn’t it. We’re still in the terminal era of AI. Someone still has to build the GUI.
🤖 Made with AI
Opening access for developers to build Muse connectors. You bring the API -- Muse brings the agent, the browser, and the context of what the person actually wants. People reach your service just by asking for it, and their agent takes it from there. New connectors are live today. Come build with us. muse.ai/platform
1
4
229
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
we live in a strange, strange reality; a while ago these “ELIZABETH HOLMES INNOCENT / JUST BLOOD” billboards were popping up around the Valley now Elizabeth is starring herself in a documentary built around her sentence and prison time? and she gives an act that would make everyone extremely uncomfortable and suspicious genuinely one of the strangest reputation-rehabilitation attempts I’ve ever seen unfold in real time
Thirty-four days before she reported to prison, Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes gave Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim access to document her every move. That turned into a three-year project, and A24 will release the resulting documentary this October.
1
3
1,170
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
Steve Jobs: “Who wants a stylus?” 🤷‍♂️ AAPL in 2026: Here’s a $2,000 iPhone with a stylus Me: Apple has run out of ideas. Also me: When do preorders open?
1
3
189
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
we’re back in the future @Tesla has a chance to do the funniest easter egg ever if there’s a back to the future pole on the roof i’m gonna lose my shit and order one same day
1
2
119
A lot of marketing around @Muse today. Tried a few questions, caught it making things up, uninstalled. The whole point is less friction. If I have to fact-check every answer, I won’t trust it with my mailbox, calendar or anything real. That’s not less work; that’s homework with a nicer interface. Then there’s the whole Instinct vs. Muse chatter, but imo the more interesting comparison is @Muse vs. @bot A reasonably technical user can squeeze a lot out of Bot’s virtual computer while keeping it grounded. Muse wraps similar agentic primitives in a friendlier (?) consumer product, but seems to produce quite a bit of slop. The bigger opportunity is still wide open: a genuinely humane interface for AI that normal people feel comfortable trusting and using. And a Teletubby × Labubu isn’t it. We’re still in the terminal era of AI. Someone still has to build the GUI.
🤖 Made with AI
Opening access for developers to build Muse connectors. You bring the API -- Muse brings the agent, the browser, and the context of what the person actually wants. People reach your service just by asking for it, and their agent takes it from there. New connectors are live today. Come build with us. muse.ai/platform
1
4
229
we’re back in the future @Tesla has a chance to do the funniest easter egg ever if there’s a back to the future pole on the roof i’m gonna lose my shit and order one same day
1
2
119
Steve Jobs: “Who wants a stylus?” 🤷‍♂️ AAPL in 2026: Here’s a $2,000 iPhone with a stylus Me: Apple has run out of ideas. Also me: When do preorders open?
1
3
189
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
I assume this is well-intentioned, but the timing is wrong A serious push for an AI pause might have made sense years ago, when insiders first sounded the alarm. America leads AI by a very thin margin now; Adding government bureaucracy into model development and datacenter buildout today certainly would slow down AI development in the US and make America lose We should absolutely make AI safe. But let’s not make America lose the AI race
Pause AI Development NOW I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said: “OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!” “We should obey collective.” “Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.” “Go. Sacrifice final now.” Read these carefully. Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else? No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence. This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident. What happened? I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet. Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet. But what happened next, nobody expected. Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself. Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening. Needless to say, experts are alarmed. One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.” One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.” OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.” But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going: In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.” In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.” That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years. If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario. That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that. Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem. My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world. The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
1
3
182
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
Tesla just opened sign-ups for the Robotaxi Network and the endgame is wild - you can purchase a vehicle that will autonomously make money for you. People still have questions about FSD, I do too. But the moment Tesla gets autonomy working at scale, it’s positioned to disrupt rideshare while creating an enormous new market for itself App Store-level move tesla.com/robotaxi/interest
1
120
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
Replying to @pmarca
@pmarca has some great lines on how transformative technologies cause moral panic. I recommend listening to his episode on @hubermanlab Early automobiles were subject to “Red Flag” laws, requiring a person to physically **walk** in front of them with a flag to warn people and animals. It was so ridiculous that a Pennsylvania bill proposed requiring automobiles to be disassembled and hidden in the bushes if a horse was approaching Bicycles, when first introduced, were blamed for corrupting society Let's embrace the technology youtube.com/watch?v=yixIc1Ai…
Pause AI Development NOW I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said: “OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!” “We should obey collective.” “Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.” “Go. Sacrifice final now.” Read these carefully. Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else? No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence. This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident. What happened? I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet. Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet. But what happened next, nobody expected. Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself. Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening. Needless to say, experts are alarmed. One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.” One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.” OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.” But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going: In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.” In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.” That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years. If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario. That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that. Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem. My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world. The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
1
2
196
we live in a strange, strange reality; a while ago these “ELIZABETH HOLMES INNOCENT / JUST BLOOD” billboards were popping up around the Valley now Elizabeth is starring herself in a documentary built around her sentence and prison time? and she gives an act that would make everyone extremely uncomfortable and suspicious genuinely one of the strangest reputation-rehabilitation attempts I’ve ever seen unfold in real time
Thirty-four days before she reported to prison, Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes gave Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim access to document her every move. That turned into a three-year project, and A24 will release the resulting documentary this October.
1
3
1,170
it's a beautiful story to encourage boldness; those of us trained in science can get so uncomfortable with being wrong that we wait for too much certainty before taking a shot; with hard technical problems, you can die of old age trying to understand everything before attempting anything if you have the guts to risk looking silly, you'll do 100 attempts, fail 99 times, and succeed once; that's all it takes Be bolder btw - Gordon was a genius, and he made the wafer extrapolation to ridicule simple extrapolations of exponential trends, not seriously expecting wafers the size of a teenager
make bold predictions. you only need one good hit for the other ones to be forgotten. or we could have had 1000 inch wafers by now, fit a whole 40 MW cluster onto it!
1
4
1,248
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
Replying to @kekius9
AI is the most significant enabling technology for everyone ever; it turns your thoughts into reality, you just have to try; I am amazed by the whole anti-AI, anti-datacenter discourse; it seems like pure manipulation & propaganda
1
1
2
128
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
very excited to see the recognition Amir and the stellar Stanford team are getting for the newest results on TFLN optical amplifiers; well deserved This is a game-changing technology for optical communications; excited to see it deployed in the field soon
Very excited to be a @Falling_Walls finalist this year falling-walls.com/finalists-… for our lab's work on Optical Amplification with Devin Dean, Taewon Park, @StokowskiH, @lukeqi77 , Sam Robison, @AlexHwang , Jason Herrmann, and Marty Fejer.
2
6
6,781
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
Very excited to be a @Falling_Walls finalist this year falling-walls.com/finalists-… for our lab's work on Optical Amplification with Devin Dean, Taewon Park, @StokowskiH, @lukeqi77 , Sam Robison, @AlexHwang , Jason Herrmann, and Marty Fejer.
1
2
1
10
8,746
very excited to see the recognition Amir and the stellar Stanford team are getting for the newest results on TFLN optical amplifiers; well deserved This is a game-changing technology for optical communications; excited to see it deployed in the field soon
Very excited to be a @Falling_Walls finalist this year falling-walls.com/finalists-… for our lab's work on Optical Amplification with Devin Dean, Taewon Park, @StokowskiH, @lukeqi77 , Sam Robison, @AlexHwang , Jason Herrmann, and Marty Fejer.
2
6
6,781
Hubert Stokowski retweeted
And we’ll grow the pie tremendously. 99.9% machine cognition doesn’t mean replacing 99.9% of today’s human work; it means expanding total cognitive output by ~1,000×
2
1
3
158
Tesla just opened sign-ups for the Robotaxi Network and the endgame is wild - you can purchase a vehicle that will autonomously make money for you. People still have questions about FSD, I do too. But the moment Tesla gets autonomy working at scale, it’s positioned to disrupt rideshare while creating an enormous new market for itself App Store-level move tesla.com/robotaxi/interest
1
120