
ALT The Boston Globe Permanent daylight saving time is not the fix we think it is Congress is on the verge of getting rid of the current policy. But morning light and evening light are not interchangeable. By Susan Kohl Malone Updated October 19, 2026, 3:00 a.m. Susan Kohl Malone is an assistant professor at NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing. “Spring ahead, fall back” may soon be a thing of the past. In July, the House of Representatives, Republicans and Democrats alike, voted to end the twice-a-year ritual. I share this instinct as a nurse and a sleep scientist. Changing clock times is not good for us, but the bill now in the Senate would lock Americans out of sync with the sun. The Sunshine Protection Act would make daylight saving time permanent. That sounds wonderful: more light after work and school, longer evenings. But there’s a catch — making daylight saving time permanent does not create a single additional minute of daylight. The sun does not change when it rises and sets…

ALT Miami Herald Permanent daylight saving time in Florida sounds good, but it’s bad for our body By Jennifer Martin October 15, 2026 4:36 PM Congress may finally put an end to the twice-yearly ritual of changing our clocks. Most Americans agree it’s an unnecessary inconvenience, and the disturbed sleep it causes is an annoyance. But before lawmakers make daylight saving time, when we move the clock one hour forward, permanent through the Sunshine Protection Act, they should consider what science tells us about sleep, health and the importance of morning light. The debate is often framed as a choice between “more daylight” during daytime saving time versus “less daylight” during standard time. However, day length varies by season, regardless of what the clock on the wall is telling us. Given that winter days will always be shorter than summer days, the question we have to ask relates to how we align the clock on the wall with the rising and setting of the sun. The attraction of…































