Suarez

Why Western Feminism is so anti-white male: Western feminism is so anti-white male in particular because it was partially white women’s attempt to save face and not disrupt the flow of resources to themselves. 40% of slave owners in the US were white women and the ones who didn’t own any, still benefited from that labour, and the spoils of colonialism and even raised their sons to be a cog in the Western machine of war ,meaning they were just as accountable as white men, despite being freed from doing the dirty work. So in an attempt to distort the history that classifies them as oppressors, they’ve attempted to reduce the weight of that role by claiming (or at the very least exaggerate) to also having been victims/oppressed, further and further isolating white men in a position to appear solely as the oppressors . So back then they had resources and privilege flowing to them because they were white, and now they have resources and privilege flowing to them because they are “victims” (women) ,and society priorities helping the unfortunate, hence why the biggest beneficiaries of DEI were white women despite African American men and women being more disadvantaged . This leaves no space for white men to also be seen as victims despite how much they might suffer, because if everyone is a victim (People of Colour, Jews ,LGBTQ and Women) then who is the oppressor ? It’s almost as if they’ve been playing chess all along, using feminism and feigning alliance with women of colour to avoid accountability, while maintaining their position of privilege.

Her company insurer rn

There’d definitely be a group of women who continue breeding men in private. Then they’d unleash them on states who’s resources they wish to conquer