@BasedSamParker AND @DiligentDenizen ARE LYING AGAIN, WHAT A SURPRISE. They ARE TOO DUMB OR TOO CORRUPT --THEY ARE NOT PROPERLY EXPLAINING WHAT IS HAPPENING. Their suggestion that the FBI is concealing ballistics evidence in the Tyler Robinson case is NOT TRUE AT ALL. They are either TOO DUMB OR TOO CORRUPT. HERE ARE THE ACTUAL FACTS. The FBI proposed additional microscopic testing on the damaged bullet fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy. Because that testing could involve bending or manipulating the fragment, potentially altering its condition, THE DEFENSE OBJECTED. Why? Because Robinson's attorneys want their own forensic expert to examine and photograph the fragment BEFORE the FBI conducts any potentially destructive testing. THAT IS A LEGITIMATE EVIDENCE-PRESERVATION CONCERN. I have zero issues with that. The defense also requested permission to have an expert observe the FBI examination or have the procedure videotaped. The FBI declined those requests under its established laboratory policies. But there is a reason for these policies. Forensic laboratories restrict outside observers for legitimate reasons, including contamination prevention, evidence integrity, security, and maintaining controlled examination procedures. And refusing to videotape an examination is NOT the same as refusing to disclose the underlying evidence for independent scientific review. The ATF's initial ballistic comparison had already been disclosed. Its conclusion regarding the damaged bullet fragment was INCONCLUSIVE, meaning the rifle was neither identified nor excluded. The prosecution also notified the defense about the proposed FBI testing and the possibility of altering the evidence. THEY NEVER HID THIS. HOW EXACTLY IS NOTIFYING THE DEFENSE, DISCLOSING THE PROPOSED PROCEDURE, AND ALLOWING THE ISSUE TO BE LITIGATED IN COURT EVIDENCE OF A SECRET COVER-UP? "Your honor here is what we would like to do" SAM PARKER: COVERUP!!!! What a dumbass. This is called LITIGATION OVER EVIDENCE, that is all it is, not a fucking coverup. DAMN, do you do nothing but lie? They are bringing the disagreement before a judge who will rule, that is not a coverup, THIS IS NOTHING. Maybe buy a clue what the fuck you are talking about before making dumbass accusations which you either clearly do not understand, or you clearly make up out of thin air. GARBAGE IN GARBAGE OUT. The defense is asking for something not typically allowed and you are framing it as a coverup, what garbage you people are, this is precisely why we have a judge, damn you people never tell the truth. There are numerous legitimate reasons forensic laboratories strictly control independent physical examinations, outside observers, and videotaping. Allowing additional personnel or equipment into a controlled laboratory environment can introduce DNA contamination, cross-contamination, foreign fibers, fingerprints, accidental damage to fragile evidence, alteration of microscopic ballistic markings, loss of trace materials, disruption of chain-of-custody procedures, unauthorized access to sensitive evidence, examiner distraction, interference with delicate instruments, laboratory safety hazards, security breaches, and disputes over who may have altered or contaminated evidence. This would be a DEFENSE DREAM; did you consider this you dipshits? I could frame this: "DEFENSE IS TRYING TO TAINT THE EVIDENCE" Videotaping introduces separate concerns involving camera placement, lighting interference, incomplete recording angles, exposure of confidential information, recording authenticity, secure storage, and additional disclosure obligations. Improper handling of a damaged bullet fragment could permanently alter the very microscopic characteristics experts are attempting to compare, potentially compromising future examinations. These risks are not inevitable, and properly supervised independent examinations and recordings can also strengthen scientific accountability. It can and most likely will be done. But what you are failing to address is this: The defense is being reasonable and doing their job, the FBI is being reasonable and doing their job, they are asking a judge to decide, you are being what you are, GRIFTERS. Of course you would frame it like this, your low iq followers will immediately eat this up and say "COVERUP" PATHETIC.