∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
Strong Viewer Discretion advised
Video shows Bangladeshi Jihadis lynching innocent Hindu factory worker Dipu Chandra Das amidst Chant of "Allah o akbar"
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
The primary motive of Shailendra King Balaputradeva's diplomatic mission to Pala King Devapala to set up a lofty Vihara at Nalanda was to secure Pala support or at least neutrality as Balaputradeva's own throne was usurped. Gives us the idea of power that Palas had in SE Asia.
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
Bangladesh was Hindu majority even after 6 centuries of Muslim rule.
It became Muslim majority in less than 100 years under the British due to their demographic re-engineering policies.
Mymensingh: Hindu majority in 1851
Sylhet: Hindu majority in 1881
Khulna: Hindu majority in 1941
Dhaka: Hindu parity in 1821
Murshidabad: Hindu majority in 1829
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
Debunked?
(Started with Yamnaya males of half Indian-Caucasian descent/CHG who had stormed into Europe, genocided its males & took remaining females, leading to whites as war babies
cambridge.org/core/books/abs…)
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
Got to know about the existence of Manga on the Chinese invasion against Arunasva. Thanks to @vikilic0
Very good representations of Kannauj, Chinese envoys, Yuan Changs capture by shaktas.
Sad to say that we are best at doing Motu Patlu than this.
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
Let me educate you, what the history of Kerala actually said.
-The kings of Malabar said that Mohamedans can only settle in kerala if they respect cows.
-Ibn Battuta recorded that the one thing forbidden in the land of kerala was slaughtering cows. Anyone doing so was punished with death.
Portuguese officer Duarte Barbosa wrote that the punishment for killing a cow was burning hand in hot oil & then death.
Soldiers had to take oath that they will protect cows and Brahmans.
Hindus of Vijayanagar Empire made it the mission of their life to protect cows.
So yeah the History of the state of kerala says Hello back to you.
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
It's the other way.
Except Varendra region of NW Bdesh, Wari-Bateshwar & Bikrampur of Dhaka it was full of swamp land jungles even 200 years ago.
WB is much older. urban centers goes back to chalcolithic era. Increaes manifold during Mahajanapada era & ofcourse Gangaridai.
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
The very basis of two nation theory was the denunciation of any shared past and the association with a global ummah. Bengal was partitioned basis this very tenet. Your intelligentsia of that time considered " Bengali to be the language of the Hindus". Did some Muslim intellectuals of the time hold a different view. Yes. But were they successful? No.
Your intelligentsia which pushed the Dvijatita tattva, actively sabotaged the Swadeshi or for that matter any movement, sided with the Brits to partition Bengal ( Curzon gets a bad rep , deservedly so, yet the plans were set in motion much before basis your intelligentsia's prodding), had no time or interest to discuss the said shared heritage , the progression from Palas to Senas, the progression of art , music , fashion et al , in periodicals owned by them. They concentrated on only the history of the religion they had pledged allegiance to.
No amount of whataboutery or a 50k worded , poorly constructed salad would change this.
Bengalis have the right to claim Hindu heritage which East Pakistanis don't.
Enough lives lost, enough of crimson rivers.
The hounds that were unleashed , reined in briefly on my people are hunting again.
Fix that.
And no , you donot have a right to claim any part of our history which is Sanatani, which is Hindu.
Rewriting history doesn’t protect heritage, it just comforts the echo chamber. So, a few corrections:
1.IVC is not “Hindu property”.
The Indus Valley Civilization is pre-Vedic and pre-dates what we today call Hinduism by well over a thousand years. Genetic studies show that IVC-related ancestry is the single biggest component in most South Asians – Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, everyone. 
You don’t get to ring-fence a Bronze Age civilisation for one modern religion and declare everyone else squatters.
2.Textiles are geography and craft, not scripture.
Kautilya’s Arthashastra mentions fine cloth/dukula and muslin from Bengal and Pundra – that’s a region, not a religion. 
Jamdani is a Bengal weave, rooted around Sonargaon and along the Sitalakhya, with Dhaka as its historical centre. 
No religious text gave anyone a loom diagram. Artisans did that – Hindu, Muslim, whatever – over centuries of shared skill.
3.Heritage in Bengal is layered, not exclusive.
The word jamdani is Persian, the great flourishing was under the Mughals, the weaving tradition itself is older than Muslim rule, and today it is globally recognised as Bangladeshi intangible heritage. 
That’s what real history looks like: layers, exchanges, and continuity – not a purity chart.
You’re free to say “Hindus are protecting their heritage.” But when you claim Solah Shringar, sarees, and even the IVC “belong” to Hindus and that Muslims of Bangladesh and Pakistan somehow forfeited any claim to this shared civilisational past, that’s not “protection”. That is sectarian politics dressed up as history.
Culture in this region is older than our current flags and louder than our religious silos. Jamdani belongs to the hands that weave it and the river that sustained it – not to any one community’s hashtag.
∂яαgση࿗ retweeted
Before calling it “filthy,” at least understand the context. Draupadi didn’t “choose” five husbands. She was given to them because of a vow taken by Kunti a tragedy of circumstances, not a fantasy of desire.
1. Mahabharat NEVER glorifies polyandry
It is shown as a dharma sankat a moral crisis, not an ideal.
Even Draupadi questions it.
Even the Pandavas feel bound by helplessness.
The story is meant to show how fate, mistakes and vows create complex situations.
2. This isn’t about Indian culture “normalising” anything
If one exceptional incident made a whole dharma “filthy,”
then every religion in the world collapses under the same logic:
– Greek gods had multiple partners.
– Roman epics show incest.
– Biblical kings had dozens of wives.
– Islamic kingdoms had harems.
No culture is free from unusual stories.
But Hindus don’t justify it they contextualise it. You are confusing narration with endorsement.
3. Purity in Hindu dharma is not about “body count” It is about antaḥkaraṇa inner intention and moral clarity.
Draupadi is worshipped not for marriage count but for her courage, dignity, and refusal to bow to injustice.
Mahabharat shows human complexity, not ideal behaviour.
If you read it to find dirt, you’ll only find your reflection.
