Nearly there. Just one last push...
Joined June 2009
- Tweets59K
- Following1.8K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes40K
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Whenever I see this woman now I feel a kind of revulsion. It's partly because she's in everything and I'm sick to death of her, but it's mostly because she somehow represents to me the modern soft liberal progressive regime in Britain.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
🚨⚠️ A migrant living in a London hotel accused of sexually assaulting a woman in a West End bar cried in court as he complained that his English is 'limited'.
Bashir Hotak, 23, was staying in a hotel in east London at the time of the alleged sex attack in Simmons Bar, Leicester Square, on June 29.
He appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court charged with sexual assault and assault by beating.
He was assisted by a Persian interpreter in the Dari dialect and began to cry when asked to enter pleas.
After a break, Hotak's solicitor said he could no longer represent him.
When told he needed to find new representation Hotak said: 'How? I'm not well, I have very limited English, I'm being seen by doctors and I'm on a lot of medication.'
Amanda Barron, chairing a bench of three magistrates, told him: 'You Google law firms near where you live, it's not difficult.
'You've had the opportunity of a lawyer today and he can no longer act for you.'
She adjourned the hearing until November 10 and bailed Hotak on condition he does not contact the alleged victim or go to Simmons Bar in Leicester Square.
Ms Barron said: 'Your lawyer is no longer acting for you, I'm going to give three weeks in order to be back at court which gives you time to find a new lawyer.
'It's up to you, it's your life, your responsibility.
'If you break either of those conditions you will be arrested by police and brought to court in custody and the bail position would be reviewed.'
Hotak, of east London, is charged with sexual assault on a female and assault by beating. He did not enter pleas during the hearing.
He was seen laughing and sticking up his middle finger as he left court.
Credit Predator awareness
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
THREE PAKISTANI TAXI DRIVERS IN ROCHDALE, MOHAMMED SHAHZAD, NAHEEM AKRAM AND NISAR HUSSAIN, RAPED A SCHOOLGIRL BETWEEN 2001 AND 2006. ONE OF THE ATTACKS WAS FILMED IN THE BACK OF HUSSAIN'S TAXI.
For decades, social workers and police have known that Pakistani men were using the taxi trade to rape little White girls in towns and cities across the country. Instead of taking action, they protected these men. Successive governments have allowed it to continue.
In June 2025 Baroness Casey's national audit into group-based child sexual exploitation found that the taxi licensing system had been exploited by the rape gangs and told the government it needed urgent reform. The government accepted it. Rochdale was one of the towns she was writing about.
Rochdale Council had licensed three men who raped a child. The likelihood is that it knew of many more men just like these three. Its own social workers knew taxi drivers were having 'sex' with children.
They called one of the girls a 'prostitute'. The child was just ten years old.
Greater Manchester Police knew the same. Since 1976 a council has had the power to take a badge off any driver it is not satisfied is fit and proper. There was no need for either a conviction or even a charge.
It would be a lie to say the police failed to act. They did act. They closed down investigations and protected the rape gangs.
Hundreds of towns and cities like Rochdale had the power to intervene. They had the knowledge. They knew children were being gang raped and trafficked across the country through a network of Pakistani gangs. They all made a political decision to sacrifice little White girls at the altar of multiculturalism and trade them for bloc votes from the Pakistani Muslim communities.
Shahzad, Akram and Hussain drove Rochdale’s children for years after the council and the police knew what was being done to her in the back of a taxi.
Rochdale Council will not say if or when it ever took their badges off them. No one knows just how many taxi drivers are members of the rape gangs.
Heidi Alexander has been Transport Secretary since November 2024. Casey warned her in June 2025. She told the Commons the government was “taking this very seriously”, was reviewing whether councils follow existing guidance, and would hold those that do not to account.
The councils are the problem she is asking to mark their own homework.
In January 2026 Alexander's department proposed moving the badge from district councils to transport authorities. That was their solution. In Greater Manchester that would move Oldham’s licensing from the council that covered it up to the office Andy Burnham held while it was being covered up.
In October 2026 the government said it was still deciding which model to use. It has also promised national minimum standards and a power to suspend a driver on the spot. Councils have had the power to suspend a driver on the spot since 1976.
Why does a politician get to decide who drives the children at all? Especially when that politician relies on the bloc vote these men control for them to stay in power?
AND TODAY. 263 councils in England decide who drives their children. Every one of them has had the power since 1976 to take a badge off a man without a conviction. Rochdale did not use it. Rotherham did not use it. Oldham did not use it. No law makes a council use it. Nothing Heidi Alexander has proposed would make them.
A man banned from working with children can be handed a badge this week in any town in England. The councils that licensed the rape gangs are licensing the next ones.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Fear not Afghan women, grooming gang survivor, beheaded gay and married 9 year olds everywhere.
Islam is perfectly safe, according to Jane who learnt all about it from the safety of a book.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Muslim students at the University of Oxford threatened to beat Tommy Robinson to DEATH for criticizing Islam.
They faced no consequences.
Meanwhile, Tommy is the one currently facing trial for “harassment.”
The double standard is crazy.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
A doctor rapes a patient.
The victim reports it.
THE DOCTOR ADMITS IT.
He tells a hospital committee that it was a "one off" and he will not do it again.
THE MANAGEMENT SAYS THAT IS OK.
And allow him to carry on working.
THE POLICE TAKE NO ACTION.
The hospital concerned is the BLACKPOOL VICTORIA HOSPITAL.
The same hospital where a 75 year old patient was raped to death and no one was ever convicted for it.
Are women worth nothing to the NHS?
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c172…
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
The electorate aren’t goldfish. Our memories are long enough to recall June 2024, when you declared that trans-identified men with penises should be able to use women’s public bathrooms. It took a Supreme Court ruling to force you to uphold women’s rights, and now you pose as our bold champion? Please.
The time for talk has long passed. This government is putting its money where its mouth is when it comes to supporting women and girls.
We'll back practical action to confine misogyny to the history books - in public services, workplaces, and online.
theguardian.com/society/2026…
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
The England I was born into, that I spent my life building got captured by the far left. By those who said men were women and that jews should be ethnically cleansed from Palistine.
I'm not bitter Jones, I'm fucking furious.
And if the worst thing that anybody has ever called you is bitter...
People aren't arrested for being labled bitter, they're arrested for being labled far right. For being tagged as Nazi adjacent. For being framed as extremist because they hold views outside of your bitter, britle little bubble.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Even the Guardian is now flirting with plagiarism denial
This narrative might get me murdered by a deranged Arday supporter, but the silver lining is that the left-wing establishment has never been so discredited
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
I think the discomfort is less to do with the antiwoke movement and more to do with how you fear being perceived because of the people who happen to agree with you on this one issue.
Many of us don’t have the luxury of caring how others perceive us.
As I’ve already explained, many of the GCs you dismiss as far right are working class who have watched their neighbourhoods and communities change beyond recognition. There are parts of London that make me think Ireland is the most salvageable country on earth.
These people don’t have another ten years to waste waiting for Labour or the Greens to get their shit together and call a spade a spade.
So when Reform or the Conservatives come along and start addressing concerns that the left has spent years either dismissing or demonising people for raising, of course you’re going to find those with otherwise liberal views supporting them.
What exactly did you expect?
You claim to understand women’s struggles regardless of who they are, where they’re from or which God they believe in, yet so much of what I see from you is contempt for women who don’t share your political allegiances.
You cannot claim to understand people while refusing to understand the circumstances that have shaped their politics.
And that’s exactly where I think you’ve failed.
In Ireland, we’ve had gay men murdered in recent years in attacks involving men who came here from outside Europe. I’ve been contacted by gay men who say they’ve been attacked, chased and harassed by newcomers.
Do you seriously think these gays have the luxury of waiting for the left to stop calling them bigots for raising concerns and start taking their experiences seriously?
Do you think the working class women who feel their communities have become less safe are concerned about whether their opinions might upset somebody at a feminist conference?
It is an extraordinarily privileged position to sit comfortably above all of this, deciding which political concerns are respectable and which people deserve to be cast out of the movement.
As with gender ideology, the consequences of migration policy are not distributed equally. Working class communities experience the changes most directly, while the people lecturing them about tolerance and writing essays are insulated from those consequences.
And the irony is that people like you have spent so long throwing the label far right at anyone who refuses to toe your political line that you’ve helped make the term practically meaningless.
Which is a whole other can of worms.
You don’t have to agree with these people. You don’t have to vote the way they vote, but if your entire understanding of their politics begins and ends with the assumption that they’re ignorant, hateful or morally defective, you haven’t understood them at all.
You’ve just found a convenient excuse not to listen.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Brother of Rotherham grooming gang member accused of raping a 12 year old girl blames the girls and social services for what his brother did.
Check his hard drive. They are doing it again, because you didn't hang them last time.
What an absolute idiot. “Is these young girls… with their mini skirts… it’s their fault….” This argument is supported by Zakir Naik.
That's exactly how they think though. It's actually a crime in certain like-minded countries for women to dress immodestly.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Maugham’s latest campaign simply proves that the Good Law Project is a grievance engine... can you think of anything more tragic than a grumpy old man picking a fight with fairy lights?
spiked-online.com/2026/10/27…
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Just JCJ deep in conversation. With herself. I tried once to have a sock and, despite trying extremely hard, only managed to sound exactly like me. But at least I never engaged myself in conversation.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
London, 2026. A woman in a full burqa driving the 88 bus to Parliament Hill Fields. She can barely see, she can barely breathe, she can't be identified in an emergency. This is not integration. This is the end of Europe.
𝚃ｅ𝚣ｚ𝙰ｌ𝚊ｐ 👀 retweeted
Ik heb voor 8 Europese landen de officiële cijfers over zedendelicten naar herkomst naast elkaar gezet.
Steeds hetzelfde patroon: een veelvoud t.o.v. de autochtone bevolking, gecorrigeerd voor leeftijd en geslacht. Gesorteerd op het gemiddelde over alle landen.
Bovenaan:
Afghanistan ~4,0x
Midden-Oosten en Noord-Afrika ~3,8x
Irak ~3,5x
Syrië, Afrika bezuiden de Sahara, Marokko, Somalië ~3,2 tot 3,4x
Onderaan:
EU ~1,2x
Oost-Azië ~0,85x
Westerse landen ~0,7x
De patronen:
1. Herkomst bepaalt het beeld, niet het land
Over alle 70 datapunten verklaart de herkomstgroep 59% van de verschillen (R² = 0,59). Het land, en daarmee de meetmethode, verklaart maar 23%. Wie zegt “dat komt door de manier van meten” verklaart dus het kleinste deel, het grootste deel is herkomst!
2. Overal dezelfde volgorde
In elk land met data zitten dezelfde groepen bovenaan. Meestal 2 tot 7x het autochtone niveau, in Finland bij Irakezen 9,5x.
3. Het is geen “migranten”-effect
Oost-Aziaten zitten overal rond of onder de baseline, EU-burgers rond 1 tot 1,9x, westerse migranten in Nederland precies 1,0x. Herkomst maakt het verschil, niet migratie als zodanig.
4. Meetmethode bepaalt de hoogte, niet de richting
Landen die op nationaliteit tellen (VK, Duitsland, Finland) komen hoger uit dan landen die op herkomst tellen (Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen). Wie naturaliseert verdwijnt uit de groep, wat overblijft zijn vooral recente aankomers. Maar ook met de strengste methode blijft de oververtegenwoordiging staan.
5. Inkomen en opleiding verklaren het niet weg
Zweden corrigeert ook voor inkomen en opleiding. Centraal-Azië (vooral Afghanen) zakt dan van 9,4x naar 5,6x. Kleiner, niet weg.
6. Hoe ernstiger het delict, hoe groter het verschil
Denemarken, Midden-Oosten en Noord-Afrika: 2,5x bij alle zedendelicten, 4,9x bij verkrachting. Afrika bezuiden de Sahara: 2,5x tegen 7,0x.
7. Waarom ontbreken Frankrijk, Italië en anderen w.o België? Niet weggelaten. Ze publiceren de cijfers niet zo dat je de vergelijking kunt maken.
Frankrijk: etnische statistiek wettelijk sterk beperkt, alleen Frans tegenover buitenlands. Buitenlanders zijn 13,5% van de verdachten van zedendelicten, bij circa 7% van de bevolking.
Italië: alleen Italiaans tegenover buitenlands. 42% van de verkrachtingsverdachten is buitenlander, bij 8,7% van de bevolking.
Zwitserland: nationaliteit alleen voor alle misdrijven samen, niet per delict.
Oostenrijk: geen gepubliceerde tabel, alleen losse Kamervragen.
België en Ierland: geen nationaliteit van verdachten per delict.
Kanttekeningen:
dit zijn verdachten, aanklachten of veroordelingen, afhankelijk van het land. Aangiftebereidheid kan per groep verschillen. In absolute aantallen heeft de meerderheid van de daders een autochtone achtergrond. Het gaat om het risico per persoon. En R² beschrijft hoe consistent het patroon is, niet waarom het bestaat.
Conclusie:
acht landen met één duidelijk patroon. En dat patroon wordt voor het grootste deel verklaard door herkomst.
Consequentie:
Bij het verlenen van de gunst van een verblijfsvergunning kunnen land bepalen wie daar wel en wie daar niet in aanmerking voor komt.
Bronnen:
VK: The Economist (okt. 2026), op basis van MoJ/ONS via Migration Observatory
Duitsland: BKA, Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2024 (T40, T62); Destatis
Spanje: INE, Estadística de Condenados 2024-2025; INE, Estadística Continua de Población
Finland: Tilastokeskus, StatFin 13yy en 11rg (2021-2025)
Zweden: Brå, rapport 2021:9, tabellbilaga 1 (2015-2018)
Denemarken: Danmarks Statistik, STRAFNA4, STRAF40, FOLK2 (2021-2025)
Nederland: CBS, 81947NED, 37325, 85656NED, 85510NED (2018-2025)
Noorwegen: SSB, siktelser og innvandringsbakgrunn (dec. 2024)
Frankrijk: SSMSI/INSEE. Italië: ISTAT. Zwitserland: BFS. Oostenrijk: BMI/Parlament.
Eigen berekening.
