Approved Parliamentary Candidate for @Conservatives | Fellow @CPSThinkTank | Trustee at Mitie Foundation | Chartered Accountant | Husband, proud father of 3

London
Joined February 2009
🇬🇧 It’s time to say adiós to inheritance tax - 🇪🇸 Madrid shows that cutting IHT can help wealth and talent grow - 🇸🇪 Sweden learnt the hard way that death taxes don't pay - IHT is unpopular, unfair and economically destructive Me for @CapX @CPSThinkTank capx.co/its-time-to-say-adio…
10
34
5
139
68,290
40 years ago today, the Big Bang transformed the City. 💥 It opened new markets, made us more competitive, and richer. Share ownership became more accessible, the cost of gilts fell by 72% and the City’s equity turnover exceeded £1 billion in a year. We need another Big Bang.
45
47
10
162
6,343
Same disastrous path as the off balance sheet King...Gordon Brown
🚨 Oh dear, it sounds like they're actually doing it. 💸 Frittering it away and storing up trouble for the future. 💷 'Off balance sheet' borrowing is still borrowing. Taxpayers will pay the price long after this government has been shown the door.
3
3
6
561
Tim Dier retweeted
ICYMI: @TimDier on why the Government needs to demonstrate budgetary restraint – not an increasing reliance on financial wheezes
1
2
4
610
I predicted the Chancellor's Budget would try to use loopholes in his fiscal rules to spend even more taxpayers money. We are walking along a fiscal cliff edge. Sooner or later a Chancellor has to get a grip on the public finances. Doesn't sound like it's going to be this one. 🧵(see below)
82
104
10
436
22,863
CPS paper, literally this morning: the govt is relying on the PuFins to borrow way more while keeping it off the books, thanks to the way they changed the fiscal rules John Healey:
4
11
1
36
6,518
🚨 Oh dear, it sounds like they're actually doing it. 💸 Frittering it away and storing up trouble for the future. 💷 'Off balance sheet' borrowing is still borrowing. Taxpayers will pay the price long after this government has been shown the door.
💰 Hiding debt doesn’t make it disappear. 🚨 Labour’s approach to measuring debt risks encouraging more borrowing and spending - leaving taxpayers to pick up the bill.
2
4
1
20
1,934
Labour madness! Pedagogically explained by @TimDier.
💰 Hiding debt doesn’t make it disappear. 🚨 Labour’s approach to measuring debt risks encouraging more borrowing and spending - leaving taxpayers to pick up the bill.
3
2
172
💰 Hiding debt doesn’t make it disappear. 🚨 Labour’s approach to measuring debt risks encouraging more borrowing and spending - leaving taxpayers to pick up the bill.
1
5
3
18
2,782
Hiding debt doesn’t make it disappear. CPS Fellow @TimDier explains why Labour’s approach to measuring debt risks encouraging more borrowing and spending - leaving taxpayers to pick up the bill. Read the full briefing here: cps.org.uk/research/pufins-t…
1
23
5
52
5,219
📣 Every now and then, someone comes along whose expertise, character and outlook uniquely fit them for a role and they secure it. 🙏🏻I’m thankful @griffitha is Shadow Chancellor and I hope one day he is the real thing, because he will be the real thing indeed. 💡One to follow.
Not properly recognising liabilities is one of the two pathologies of every financial scandal. (The other is recognising revenue which never turns into cash flow). When Rachel Reeves changed the headline debt target in October 2024, she did more than tweak an accounting rule. By switching from measuring public sector net debt (PSND ex BoE) to public sector net financial liabilities (PSNFL), ministers created a channel to spend the same taxpayer money through Public Financial Institutions, or “PuFins”. Debt is still debt but under Labour’s fiddled measure, spending via a PuFin barely registers against the fiscal rules. As this excellent report from the Centre for Policy Studies shows, had the old target been kept, the October 2024 Budget would have broken the debt rule by £6 billion. Under the new one, it passed with £16 billion to spare. Expect next week’s budget to include more examples of this dodge. cps.org.uk/research/pufins-t…
11
16
233
17,467
Not properly recognising liabilities is one of the two pathologies of every financial scandal. (The other is recognising revenue which never turns into cash flow). When Rachel Reeves changed the headline debt target in October 2024, she did more than tweak an accounting rule. By switching from measuring public sector net debt (PSND ex BoE) to public sector net financial liabilities (PSNFL), ministers created a channel to spend the same taxpayer money through Public Financial Institutions, or “PuFins”. Debt is still debt but under Labour’s fiddled measure, spending via a PuFin barely registers against the fiscal rules. As this excellent report from the Centre for Policy Studies shows, had the old target been kept, the October 2024 Budget would have broken the debt rule by £6 billion. Under the new one, it passed with £16 billion to spare. Expect next week’s budget to include more examples of this dodge. cps.org.uk/research/pufins-t…
23
117
20
360
33,897
Instead of nannying wannabe entrepreneurs at taxpayers expense, why not just make the system easier for them to run a small business?
Exclusive: Benefit claimants will be given advice on how to set up their own businesses, turning side hustles into full-time work. A pilot scheme starting next year will give young entrepreneurs advice on setting up a business bank account, registering for VAT and putting together a business plan Pat McFadden tells @Telegraph that young people want to “do their own thing” and that new businesses are one way of tackling the NEETs crisis. telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
1
1
1
11
567
👇🏻
This in today’s @FT from someone who was an adviser to Andy Burnham is quite the comment:
1
2
5
247
We are living beyond our means, passing on an ever-growing mountain of debt to the next generation. It must change. We Conservatives will be honest, cut welfare and wasteful spending to get our country back on track.
457
43
28
157
10,050
The Treasury must be wary of giving us another flawed ‘Project Fear’ in reverse. It’s credibility will be on the line. Cheaper energy would do far more for the UK economy than another decade of debating closer links to the low-growth EU.
18
29
2
120
12,800