Grumpy Git. Who is sick and tired of having to watch what I say or think cos it might not be politically correct or might offend someone.
Bridgend, Wales
Joined April 2011
- Tweets49.9K
- Following33
- Followers415
- Likes111K
Corrupt and Biased @bbcquestiontime #FionaBruce @BBCNews @BBCBreakfast @SkyNews @itvnews @GMB @LBC @BBCPolitics @hzeffman @NickFerrariLBC @bbcnickrobinson @bbclaurak @ChrisMasonBBC @BethRigby @TrevorPTweets @SamCoatesSky @JeremyVineOn5 @lewis_goodall @theJeremyVine @DailyMail etc
Since 1st January 2025, Zia Yusuf has made more appearances on BBC Question Time panel than any other guest
And just one fewer than all eight Reform UK MPs combined appearances for the same period
@ZiaYusufUK @bbcquestiontime
??? @BBCNews @BBCBreakfast @SkyNews @itvnews @GMB @LBC @BBCPolitics @hzeffman @NickFerrariLBC @bbcnickrobinson @bbclaurak @ChrisMasonBBC @BethRigby @TrevorPTweets @SamCoatesSky @JeremyVineOn5 @lewis_goodall @theJeremyVine @DailyMail @Daily_Express @TheSun @GBNEWS @Talktv
So far this week @Nigel_Farage has failed to run a press conference and failed to follow protocol to attend the budget.
And he wants you to believe he can run the country? 😂
What a surprise @Nigel_Farage lying again and then denying lying even when he is shown what he actually said.
MarkH retweeted
Well the Healey Budget hasn’t set the world on fire judging by the headlines today. So I think we can all say job done. Mediocre budget, mediocre Chancellor. Mediocre kind of sums it all up. I remember Rachel’s powerful speech and delivery for the last two budgets. Miss her.
MarkH retweeted
So to get this straight. That Wetherspoon’s in Gosport explained what happened, poppies were not actually banned, and yet some ‘patriots’ went down there tonight to hold a demo demanding something that has already been sorted out. Complete and utter performative nonsense.
Hopefully a very long custodial sentence for @TRobinsonNewEra 🤞
🚨🇬🇧 They say, “Tommy was protecting his family.” “They did it to him first.”
Two excuses. A jury heard and rejected both.
The Mail wrote about a public figure on holiday. Tommy hired private investigators to photograph journalists’ homes, then told a million followers “I will find you.”
That isn’t the same thing. And it isn’t protection.
Here’s what the jury actually heard.
What happened
In August 2024, while England was rioting, Robinson was on holiday in Cyprus, posting about the riots to his followers. The Mail found him there and ran a story: “Stoking riots from his sunbed.”
Over the next three days he went after the two reporters, Jacob Dirnhuber and Andrew Young.
🔺5 August: a direct message to Dirnhuber. “I’ll be knocking at your door.”
🔺5 August: a phone call to Young. Robinson told him he’d be coming to his home and that he’d “have to move house.”
🔺6 August: a post naming Dirnhuber, saying he and the other Mail journalists had “today been located.”
🔺7 August: a video to around a million followers. He said he had details of where they and their families lived. He told them to abide by “men’s rules.” Then: “The men, on the other hand, I will find you.”
He also hired private investigators to photograph their homes. He admitted it in court.
The result: Dirnhuber moved house. Young was given a close protection officer.
The law
The charge was harassment causing fear of violence. The prosecution had to prove a course of conduct that made each man fear violence on at least two occasions, and that Robinson knew or ought to have known it would.
That last part is an objective test. What Robinson says he meant doesn’t decide it. What decides it is what a reasonable person would expect a million followers to do with “I will find you.”
His defence
He said he was protecting his family. That is a real defence in law, if the conduct is reasonable for protecting someone. Police had given him four threat-to-life warnings. The jury heard all of it.
Why it failed
He admitted the aim was pressure. Telling a million people where journalists live doesn’t protect your children. It endangers theirs.
🔺He didn’t dispute that they were frightened. Asked in evidence, he said no.
🔺He never complained to the press regulator. He never asked the Mail to change or remove the story. The legal route was there. He skipped it.
🔺His own words. “Men’s rules” is not the language of protection.
One is journalism, however much you dislike it. The other is a threat.
The jury
He chose this. At the magistrates’ court he was offered a trial there. He opted for a jury instead, saying he wanted 12 members of the British public to hear the evidence.
They did. They convicted on both counts.
Sentencing is on 16 December.
MarkH retweeted
Kate Kane, Harry’s childhood sweetheart, is not some gold-digging dolly bird who came along for the money & fame. She was there long before the millions & the limelight. She’s his wife & mother to their 4 children. Real love, loyalty & commitment deserve respect, not ridicule.
Jesus I'm bloody ugly. But compared to that bloke I'm Adonis. And he's got the nerve to knock @HKane gorgeous untouched naturally beautiful wife.
Deep sleep knowing they had the right verdict and hopefully the Judge will deliver a long sentence with no time off.
Can I just ask 'what's wrong with his wife' I think she's gorgeous. And @HKane is definitely punching well above himself to land her.
Does @Perry4649479921 mean stand tall on a chair. We don't do rope here now, do we???
MarkH retweeted
Erm.....
I stand at over 6 foot, have a job, live in the UK and pay tax.
I'm also not a drug addled, gurning, far right, several times convicted cunt.
Ok, I might be a cunt, but the rest stands
🤣😂🤣😂 couldn't happen to more deserving itty bitty @TRobinsonNewEra
NEWS! Patriots furious after British justice system applies British laws to British man in Britain newsthump.com/2026/10/28/pat…
