Denmead, Hampshire, England
Joined May 2015
Transparency Task Force retweeted
🔴 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 | 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄: 𝟕𝐏𝐌 𝐔𝐊 | 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 Due to the level of interest and demand surrounding my upcoming interview with former CIA officer and whistleblower John Kiriakou, we've brought the live broadcast forward to 7pm UK time tomorrow, Wednesday 21 October. John exposed the CIA's torture programme and subsequently went to prison. He knows first-hand what happens when an individual challenges the power of the state. We'll be discussing whistleblower retaliation, the weaponisation of legal processes, institutional accountability and the extraordinary personal price people can pay for speaking the truth. We'll also be examining the treatment of whistleblowers on both sides of the Atlantic, including the questions arising from the tragic death of Simon Andriesz. 𝐓𝐖𝐎 𝐃𝐈𝐅𝐅𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒. 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐎𝐔𝐒 𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍. Who holds powerful institutions accountable when the people exposing wrongdoing become the targets? 📅 Wednesday 21 October 🔴 LIVE at 7pm UK | 2pm New York | 11am Los Angeles 📺 𝐇𝐎𝐖 𝐓𝐎 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇 To watch the interview live tomorrow, visit the RT programme schedule using the link below and select the live broadcast at 7pm UK time. rtrunews.com/schedule/ I hope you'll join us. #Whistleblowing #JohnKiriakou #CIA #Accountability #SimonAndriesz
2
4
229
Transparency Task Force retweeted
“Hester Bais, a Dutch lawyer and whistleblower who has exposed large-scale banking fraud involving interest-rate derivatives, added: “The proposal for just an internal FCA review troubles me deeply. The FCA’s proposal sends entirely the wrong signal. If a regulator can investigate itself whenever its own treatment of a whistleblower is questioned, then where does the whistleblower go when things have gone disastrously wrong?”” thebanker.com/content/2185f8…
4
61
1
111
2,703
Transparency Task Force retweeted
Replying to @mickmor16921994
Trying to expose these things & trying to support/ help people being turned over by banks is not a mission its just what you're faced with if you understand the Rules & how properly employing them can protect people. The very Rules @TheFCA & their predecessors wrote to protect consumers. Surely they should respect the fact I do understand them & apply them for the protection of vulnerable people. But no, instead I am seen by @TheFCA as an enemy, their vindictive actions ended my career, I can live with that I built a new one, I'm not a great businessman but I am an entrepreneur I'll always find a way to make a living. If I have to sweep a street to pay the bills I will. The point was simple, I have a business, I have a career but when I'm at 7 days a week trying to support vulnerable people, I was exhausted, just asking for help. I'm still at that level, but dealing every day with people in such distress takes its toll. People say take it easier don't take too much on. I say give me 10 requests where vulnerable/ suicidal people are in danger of losing their businesses, homes, marriages, family's & sanity tell me which 5 I should ignore and which 5 I should help because I have the time. I simply asked @TheFCA for help' I asked them to do their job, so I don't have to write off all the spare time in my life doing it for them. I'm still asking that because I want/ need a life back but in the interim some of us will keep trying to get SMEs/ consumers justice regardless. But I di not expect this response... @BankConfidenti1 @TransparencyTF
8
1
9
272
Transparency Task Force retweeted
🔹 The reported PRA review of Barclays’ total-return-swap treatment for private-credit exposures raises legitimate questions about how banks are measuring and capitalising risk in a rapidly growing & it has to be said - a lightly regulated sector. 🔹If derivatives used to finance private-credit loans were logged in a way that understated their risk, the bank would have held less capital than the economic exposure warranted and reported higher profits as a result. 🔹That is precisely the kind of outcome supervisors are meant to prevent. 🔹Private credit already sits outside the full banking regulatory perimeter, yet banks have built substantial direct and indirect exposures to it. 🔹When those exposures are further intermediated through derivatives whose classification is open to interpretation, transparency declines and the risk of under-capitalisation rises. 🔹Barclays’ defence that the treatment is consistent with the rules and was signed off internally and by advisers is noted, but rules can be applied aggressively, and as we have learned to our immense detriment - external advisers do not bear the capital consequences. 🔹The fact that the review was triggered by an insider rather than ordinary supervision is not reassuring - or given my own experiences - rather alarming. 🔹Given the recent losses banks have already suffered on private-credit-related failures & the redemption pressures seen in the sector, the public interest lies in a clear, timely account of what the PRA finds - not only for Barclays but for the industry. 🔹Until then, the combination of opaque exposures, favourable accounting treatments, and growing bank-shadow-bank linkages remains a source of legitimate & considerable concern. @Wftproof @tyillc @Muinchille @kenoflynnTD @JMcGuinnessTD @centralbank_ie theguardian.com/business/202…
3
15
1
31
2,040
Transparency Task Force retweeted
Sad to see the Canary close after 11 years. It says Lloyds closed its account in June and Metro Bank froze another in September without giving reasons, and debanking with no explanation is a serious worry for independent media.
The Canary will be closed for the foreseeable future. As of today (Monday 19 October), the Canary will be closed indefinitely. After multiple attacks this year, from Lloyds debanking us to former employees spreading malicious lies on social media, the situation has become unsustainable, both financially and operationally. After 11 years, we take this action with deep sadness and regret. The extent of the lies, defamation, and harassment by ex-staff - coupled with the constant attacks by the state and those who’d see us destroyed - has become too much. However, it is not over. This week, we will publish what really happened at the Canary and push back against the vicious campaign against our team and us. We may be down, but we’re not out yet.
2
11
20
676
Transparency Task Force retweeted
We look forward to reading the #CovidInquiry on the #Care sector later today. We submitted all of our 48 reports to the inquiry. We were the only UK #Whistleblowing Organisation publishing real time reports throughout the pandemic. We identified 48 different issues from our anonymised helpline data. Our reports were widely covered by the media at the time. Many will recall that our helpline was fielding a 60% increase in calls and that we extended the helpline hours from 10am to 10pm. We owe a huge depth of gratitude to all our volunteers for they made this possible. Our thoughts are with all those who have lost loved ones in the #CovidCareHomeScandal We hope the truth will prevail
20
29
709
Transparency Task Force retweeted
Secretary @SecScottBessent. Director @FBIDirectorKash. @HSBC paid $1.92 billion. No one went to jail. I was the whistleblower. 14 years later, @BankofAmerica admits it willfully broke the law, pays $1.2 billion, and no one goes to jail. 3.6 million Americans read my letter. You haven’t responded. So I’m asking on camera: who is going to be charged?
358
5,406
196
11,630
131,647
Transparency Task Force retweeted
The use of fabricated & forged documentation by banks to pursue alleged debts raises profoundly serious questions about the administration of justice in Ireland. See Steve’s post below. 👇 I repeat for new followers that in one recent case, a @talktoBOI Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) elicited an acknowledgement that no loan agreement had been signed by the borrowers. The case also involves allegations of forgery supported by a reputable expert witness. 🔹Nevertheless, Bank of Ireland pursued the alleged debt, subsequently transferring it to Mars Capital when met with resistance. 🔹Extraordinarily, the High Court judgment omitted reference to the DSAR evidence, despite its presence on the court file. 🔹Forgery is a criminal offence. So too is the knowing use of forged instruments with the requisite fraudulent intent under the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001. 🔹Why are banks permitted to pursue enforcement proceedings without the courts properly confronting evidence that calls into question the authenticity of the underlying debt documentation? 🔹And what of the judges who deliver judgments without addressing such potentially decisive evidence? 🔹The hidden credit line scandal, fraudulent derivatives sales and disputed mortgage documentation expose wider concerns about the enforcement of potentially invalid debts through Irish courts. 🔹Judicial independence is not immunity from scrutiny & a court ruling or judgment cannot transform a forged document into a legitimate debt. 🔹When banks pursue alleged debts through questionable documentation, the judiciary must be a safeguard against injustice, not the mechanism through which it is perpetuated.
Replying to @JennyPw12rugv
The use of false fabricated documents in the courts by @NatWestGroup & @LloydsBank is not an occasional, or one off issue. It is systemic, I have been investigating false documentation put forward in reviews & to the courts by @NatWestGroup & @LloydsBank & their lawyers such as TLT, Eversheds etc. for years. That's why you rarely see the bank managers in court, the bank disclosure 'experts' fabricate the files, extract & alter the PDFs etc. Then lawyers who have never been on the credit systems sign the disclosure statements of truth & the bank relies on remote witnesses to mislead the courts. In the Perks v RBS case Paul Sinclair KC told the court it took 17 days to print off the 2,000 plus RMP documents (see below). One of our whistle-blowers told @johnmcdonnellMP that if a printer is available you could print off the whole credit history in less than 30 minutes. In fact it took the lawyers 17 days to print off the credit applications, jumble the order up, extract the crucial Print Connection Summary documents (contain the Hidden credit Line evidence) and then mislead the court about liabilities. Time for the forgery to & the legal gravy train to stop & the miscarriages of justice in cases like Broomhead v RBS & @ClaytonPerks to be overturned. @premnsikka @labourlewis @IanByrneMP @NeilForPoole @Steffanaquarone @normanlamb @efgbricklayer @TransparencyTF @appgonifandffs @BankConfidenti1 @james_glanville @mickmor16921994 @CarshaltonArt @MLorrM @johncock_wayne
4
32
2
50
1,121
Transparency Task Force retweeted
For the full lowdown:
My book Rigged, exposing an establishment cover-up at the highest level on both sides of the Atlantic followed by a whole series of miscarriages of justice, has already sold out its initial print run and been reprinted in the UK. Now it's being published in the United States:
1
4
7
521
Transparency Task Force retweeted
In Perks v RBS TLT stated on 21 October 21 that they could not produce the Print Connection Summaries (PCS) I demanded to show the Interest Rate swap credit line as a live 'hard' facility. They are not saved in RMP its a live system they said. Screen Print 1. They have disclosed the RMP in full they said & we would get nothing more. Screen Print 2 When I explained it was not true, an application to recover them would be made, on 28 October just 7 days later & 2 weeks before the trial, they found 217 historical PCS. Screen Print 3 It had no doubt taken a week to fabricate the PCS documents, over 70 of which I can prove are fake as they contain facilities that were not in place at the alleged date of the PCS print out. The PCS dates had been removed instead they produced an excel spreadsheet allegedly confirming the date of each PCS document. They must have been in a panic as they produced one document 30 times over for allegedly 30 different date credit applications. We had the list of credit applications & there were circa 30 in total, not 217. If you have been up against @TLT_LLP in court representing a bank, I suggest you check the disclosure very carefully this firm has form. @efgbricklayer @BankConfidenti1 @james_glanville @ArturNadol7566 @MLorrM @mickmor16921994 @TransparencyTF @paulpygmy02
2
5
8
233
Transparency Task Force retweeted
The group chat is full of voice notes and the deadline is tomorrow. Upload them to Zendocs and get each one as text with timestamps, plus a summary of the key points. Copy the dates and tasks into your notes instead of replaying every note.

7
7
1
44
575,869
Transparency Task Force retweeted
Whistleblower Everett Stern lost everything for telling the truth about HSBC. He says that is why no one at Bank of America is saying a word about the $5 billion they didn’t report. “….A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. …Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them….” - @EverettStern1 to @SecScottBessent
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
3
98
1
330
5,873
Transparency Task Force retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent, My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov. The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison. I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return. I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something. Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act. Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged. Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working. A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats. This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried. There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go. Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him. I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them. This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one. Three things would change the math overnight. Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined. End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one. And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them. Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine. I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it. Respectfully, Everett A. Stern HSBC Whistleblower Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
3,179
30,571
2,529
94,505
3,709,143
Transparency Task Force retweeted
Today we remember Daphne Caruana Galizia and stand with her family, Malta's journalists and those defending #MediaFreedom 9 years on from Daphne's assassination, the need for accountability, the rule of law and a safe environment for journalists in Malta remains as clear as ever
On the ninth anniversary of the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, the Diplomatic Missions in Malta from the Media Freedom Coalition remember her courage and her commitment to transparency and accountability. We reaffirm our shared commitment to media freedom, journalist safety, accountability and the rule of law. We encourage Malta to continue its progress towards the full and effective implementation of the recommendations of the Public Inquiry into the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, helping to ensure that journalists in Malta can work freely and safely, supported by appropriate institutional safeguards. As Malta’s friends and partners, we stand ready to support these efforts and to share relevant experience and expertise, including on journalist safety, media freedom and institutional accountability, so that the lessons of Daphne’s assassination may serve as an opportunity to strengthen institutions and promote lasting progress We stand with Daphne’s family, Malta’s journalists and all those working to uphold these fundamental democratic values.
10
15
963
Transparency Task Force retweeted
All water companies in England failed to report more than 50,000 sewage dumpings within the time required. Water companies routinely ignore laws, have more than 1,200 criminal convictions, no exec prosecuted, no licence cancelled. Govts do nothing. news.sky.com/story/englands-…
24
357
16
507
9,487
Transparency Task Force retweeted
🔹By way of “minor update” - the senior counsel who represented me while concurrently being retained by @centralbank_ie and @GardaTraffic - (both retainers undisclosed) clearly warranted a complaint being made against them to @LSRAIreland. 🔹Particularly when said senior counsel gave written assurances to me on two occasions that no conflict of interest existed at the time of writing or at any time previously. 🔹Well it turns out that said barrister also in fact represents @LSRAIreland in matters related to professional disciplinary tribunals etc. 🔹So the regulator of the legal profession will be managing the complaint about a senior professional that they themselves engage when they wish to hold legal professionals to account. 🔹We will now have insight into how @LSRAIreland will handle conflicts of interest at an institutional level. 🔹Read above all again and may we ask the question - who will call all of this out? 🔹Please share this post widely & ask for it to be reposted. @Wftproof @WinkSabee @stevemiddi1 @kenoflynnTD @JMcGuinnessTD @ArturNadol7566 @SamanthaLaDuc @MaryLouMcDonald @SenatorMcDowell @JohnEdwardLee @Muinchille @NiamhParker4
It has come to my attention today that the former Attorney General Paul Gallagher SC acted for Quinn Insurance Limited in proceedings concerning the alleged & rather inexplicable failures by its auditors @PwC (where Dara O’Reilly of Quinn Group had trained). The same Paul Gallagher SC who was previously involved in 🔹the State's rescue of its banks, 🔹subsequently defending Anglo / IBRC against the Quinn family (referring to Brenda Quinn age 20 as highly intelligent etc) 🔹It had been established that PwC auditors (lead auditor Kevin Egan) somehow failed to identify serious deficiencies in Quinn Insurance Limited’s financial position. 🔹Egan remained with PwC until 2024. There is no public evidence in the sources examined that he was personally subjected to a published disciplinary sanction or barred from practising. 🔹How did the claim of €900 million get settled for €53 million given the catastrophic consequences of the auditor’s actions? 🔹How was it appropriate for Gallagher to act for QIL? 🔹I am dwelling on the permissibility of all these separate retainers of Gallagher? Did the 🔹underlying transactions, 🔹confidential information, 🔹duties and interests overlap in ways that compromised, or created a legally significant risk to, independent representation. 🔹To put in context, for seven years, I was represented by someone who failed to disclose existing retainers with @centralbank_ie and @GardaTraffic - so counsel failing to disclose conflicts in Ireland is occurring on a regular basis it seems, but 🔹in the Quinn / Anglo affair, the Quinn family knew of Gallagher’s role for Anglo/IBRC in opposition to them - which makes it all the more peculiar that Gallagher was then later permitted to act for QIL eliciting what by any reasoning was a paltry settlement for his client - - no doubt warranting PwC to break open the champagne…. 🔹The particularly troubling question: discovery of course was never (or could never be) completed. The projected 150 million documents could have included material relevant to: 🔹The relationship between PwC and Quinn Group management, including the role of former PwC accountant Dara O'Reilly; 🔹The subsidiary guarantees supporting wider group borrowings and how they came to be put in place despite Barclays being fully aware of impact; 🔹The financing of Bazzely and other Quinn CFD vehicles. 🔹The information available to Kevin Egan and PwC's audit teams. 🔹PwC's internal consideration of regulatory reporting obligations. 🔹Communications between PwC, the Financial Regulator and other financial institutions. 🔹Was this a commercially rational settlement? 🔹The countervailing public-interest considerations were equally substantial as recognised by Haughton J.: the importance of testing audit failures, identifying responsibility for the insurer's financial condition, examining the conduct of directors and third parties, & understanding how financial risks were transferred to policyholders and ultimately the public.
4
30
4
49
3,418