God-fearing husband & father. AI Engineer. Fine-tuning + day-zero EXL3 & GGUF quants + benchmarks โ€ข Local LLMs โ€ข honest tok/s โ€ข fitting big models on small GPUs

Joined June 2009
Pinned Tweet
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community! ๐Ÿง  @deepseek_ai ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜! โšก ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—ž ๐—–๐—ง๐—ซ (๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ!) ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฎ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—˜๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜! Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. One thing really stuck with me... NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together. But there's a problem. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ. That inspired me. I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community. So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits. And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ญ๐—ฌ! I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions. And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it! ๐Ÿงช ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฉ๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž'๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿด/๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ โ€” ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น โœ… 99.08% Top-1 Agreement โœ… ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ข๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0186 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—›-๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ โœ… 96.04% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 97.98% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0349 ๐Ÿ”ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› โ€” ๐—š๐—ฆ๐— ๐Ÿด๐—ž โœ… 95.56% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 94.19% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0477 ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——-๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐Ÿ† 94.52% Top-1 Agreement ๐Ÿ“‰ Mean KL: 0.0982 ๐ŸŽฏ Median KL: 0.00019 ๐—ก๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ-๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿคฏ These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates. But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! Not two Sparks. Not four Sparks. Not an expensive rented GPU cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. My latest vLLM measurements: โšก Decode: 35.5 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity... ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐——๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ! ๐Ÿ’š And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I have a simple goal. ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs. I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN. NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization. My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community. Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe. ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง! The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there. I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance. ๐Ÿ’ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+ ๐Ÿง  MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500 ๐Ÿ”ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench ๐Ÿ”ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains ๐ŸŒ MGSM ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐——๐—ข๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! Those task-level results are coming next! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... @mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ. Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s! We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it. More on that VERY soon. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ™ ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ! To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible. To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further. To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up. To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next! And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฃ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—œ๐—ง. ๐Ÿ’š ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
72
55
30
373
45,059
Cruz retweeted
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community! ๐Ÿง  @deepseek_ai ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜! โšก ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—ž ๐—–๐—ง๐—ซ (๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ!) ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฎ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—˜๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜! Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. One thing really stuck with me... NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together. But there's a problem. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ. That inspired me. I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community. So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits. And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ญ๐—ฌ! I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions. And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it! ๐Ÿงช ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฉ๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž'๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿด/๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ โ€” ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น โœ… 99.08% Top-1 Agreement โœ… ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ข๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0186 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—›-๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ โœ… 96.04% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 97.98% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0349 ๐Ÿ”ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› โ€” ๐—š๐—ฆ๐— ๐Ÿด๐—ž โœ… 95.56% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 94.19% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0477 ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——-๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐Ÿ† 94.52% Top-1 Agreement ๐Ÿ“‰ Mean KL: 0.0982 ๐ŸŽฏ Median KL: 0.00019 ๐—ก๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ-๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿคฏ These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates. But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! Not two Sparks. Not four Sparks. Not an expensive rented GPU cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. My latest vLLM measurements: โšก Decode: 35.5 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity... ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐——๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ! ๐Ÿ’š And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I have a simple goal. ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs. I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN. NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization. My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community. Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe. ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง! The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there. I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance. ๐Ÿ’ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+ ๐Ÿง  MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500 ๐Ÿ”ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench ๐Ÿ”ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains ๐ŸŒ MGSM ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐——๐—ข๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! Those task-level results are coming next! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... @mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ. Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s! We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it. More on that VERY soon. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ™ ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ! To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible. To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further. To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up. To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next! And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฃ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—œ๐—ง. ๐Ÿ’š ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
72
55
30
373
45,059
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—› ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฑ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐—• ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐—ฉ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—  ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ @ornith_ JUST released their new Ornith-1.5-122B, and naturally, I HAD to see how far I could push it with SAGE-EXL3! And the results surprised even ME! ๐Ÿคฏ Introducing... ๐ŸŸข ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต-๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฑ-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐—•-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ-๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿด๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ~39.6 GiB GPU-resident LM weights ๐Ÿง  122B-class Mixture-of-Experts model โšก 2.58 bpw routed experts ๐Ÿ’ป Targeting 48GB VRAM GPUs and above! ๐Ÿš€ vLLM + EXL3 inference ๐—•๐—จ๐—ง ๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜'๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—š๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š... ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿด ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—œ๐—”-๐—”๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—• ๐—˜๐—”๐—ค๐˜ƒ๐Ÿญ ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿฌ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช! I compared my release against Mia-AiLab's Ornith-1.5-122B-EXL3-EAQv1-4-bpw quantization. Same model family. Same DGX Spark. 353 matched benchmark questions. 9 evaluation suites. Strict pass@1 scoring. ๐ŸŸข ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿด ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐Ÿ“ฆ 41.00 GiB LM weights ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿต๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿณ๐Ÿด% โ€” ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฐ/๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฏ ๐ŸŸฃ ๐— ๐—œ๐—”-๐—”๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—• ๐—˜๐—”๐—ค๐˜ƒ๐Ÿญ ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿฌ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐Ÿ“ฆ 59.00 GiB LM weights ๐Ÿ“Š ๐Ÿต๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ% โ€” ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฏ/๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฏ ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ซ๐—œ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ.๐Ÿฑ% ๐—ฆ๐— ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—  ๐—ช๐—˜๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—ง ๐—™๐—ข๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง... ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐— ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ! ๐Ÿคฏ Mine finished one question ahead overall. That's effectively a tie at this sample size, but the coding breakdown is particularly interesting! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—›๐—˜๐—”๐——! Scores shown as SAGE โ†’ Mia: โœ… HumanEval+: 39/40 โ†’ 39/40 ๐Ÿ† MBPP+: 53/60 โ†’ 51/60 ๐Ÿ† LiveCodeBench: 15/20 โ†’ 14/20 ๐Ÿ† SciCode: 5/10 โ†’ 4/10 ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—•๐—ง๐—ข๐—ง๐—”๐—Ÿ: ๐ŸŸข SAGE: 112/130 โ€” 86.15% ๐ŸŸฃ Mia: 108/130 โ€” 83.08% ๐—™๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ค๐—จ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ง๐—› ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ.๐Ÿฑ% ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ-๐—ช๐—˜๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—ง ๐— ๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ฌ! ๐Ÿ”ฅ For transparency, Mia scored higher on MMLU-Pro STEM (96 vs 94) and MATH-500 (39 vs 38). Both tied on HumanEval+, MGSM, BFCL and multi-step tool chains. This isn't about claiming one quant wins everything. ๐—œ๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—•๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—š๐—˜๐—ง๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—š๐—•. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! My measured vLLM 0.32.0 + vllm-exl3 performance on ONE DGX Spark: โšก 30.51 tok/s single-stream decode ๐Ÿš€ 32.60 tok/s with MTP-1 (greedy code test) ๐Ÿ”ฅ 89.21 tok/s aggregate decode @ C8 ๐Ÿ“ฅ 1,119 tok/s cold prefill (2K prompt) ๐Ÿง  Native 262K context support The public recipe is being streamlined around vLLM, with the older alternative serving instructions being retired. My goal is to make this practical for people who want an OpenAI-compatible local endpoint without needing an 80GB+ GPU just to load the model. The 48GB tier is the intended target; these published performance measurements were performed on my DGX Spark. Actual available context and batching capacity will depend on the GPU. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—•๐—จ๐—ง ๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜'๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—œ'๐—  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—–๐—œ๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—”๐—•๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง... โšก ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—•๐—”๐—–๐—ž! If you've followed my previous experiments, you know I LOVE finding ways to run multiple powerful models on a SINGLE DGX Spark. And this ~41 GiB Ornith quant opens up some VERY interesting possibilities! Imagine... ๐Ÿง  ๐—ค๐—ช๐—˜๐—ก๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿด-๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—›-๐—ก๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ง โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง A larger lead model handling complex reasoning, planning, orchestration and long-context tasks. โšก ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—› ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฑ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐—• โ€” ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—•-๐—”๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง My compact SAGE-EXL3 handling delegated coding, tool use and specialized agentic workloads! ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐—•+ ๐—–๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿคฏ That's the direction I'm exploring for my NEXT Two Models. One Spark. experiment! Of course, simultaneous residency, runtime overhead, KV-cache allocation and actual master-worker performance still need validation with the selected Qwen quantization. But the smaller we can make these models without sacrificing useful quality, the MORE possibilities we unlock! ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—œ ๐——๐—ข ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—œ ๐——๐—ข! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ”ฌ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... In separate development testing, REXL3 has also reached: โšก 90.82 tok/s aggregate @ C8 ๐Ÿš€ ~2,150 tok/s prefill More on that another time. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜! Not everyone has a DGX Spark or an 80GB GPU. But a LOT of enthusiasts, developers and independent researchers have access to 48GB-class hardware. I want powerful open-weight models to be accessible to MORE of those people. And beyond just fitting one model, I want to show what's possible when we start combining them on the SAME hardware! Huge thanks to @ornith_ for releasing Ornith-1.5-122B under an open-weight license and continuing to push efficient AI models forward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/Orniโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—  ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/Ornith-1โ€ฆ ๐—ฆ๐— ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ช๐—˜๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐—•๐—œ๐—š๐—š๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฆ. ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. โšก ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
8
1
1
19
824
๐Ÿšจ ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ Iโ€™m excited to share TWO alternate DERISKED SAGE-EXL3 quantizations for cybersecurity research and security-focused AI workflows! These are the HIGHEST quality EXL3 quants you can find for this Deepseek model! Built in collaboration with @Blackfrost_AI ๐Ÿฅถโ„๏ธ ๐ŸŸข 1.61 bpw โ€” ONE DGX SPARK โœ… 94.68% assistant-token top-1 agreement โœ… ~112.9 GiB resident footprint ๐ŸŸฃ 2.50 bpw โ€” TWO DGX SPARKS โœ… 96.71% assistant-token top-1 agreement โœ… Higher precision for those with more memory - practically lossless ๐Ÿ˜Ž Both measured against DeepSeekโ€™s official FP8/FP4 checkpoint. These are token-fidelity results, not cybersecurity task scores. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—›๐—ข๐—œ๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐——๐—ข๐—  ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿ”— 1.61 bpw โ€” ONE SPARK huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ”— 2.50 bpw โ€” TWO SPARKS huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ Huge thanks to @Blackfrost_AI for not only making the model, but providing the compute for us to continue collaborating on these releases! ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ”ฅ
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community! ๐Ÿง  @deepseek_ai ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜! โšก ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—ž ๐—–๐—ง๐—ซ (๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ!) ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฎ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—˜๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜! Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. One thing really stuck with me... NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together. But there's a problem. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ. That inspired me. I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community. So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits. And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ญ๐—ฌ! I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions. And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it! ๐Ÿงช ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฉ๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž'๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿด/๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ โ€” ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น โœ… 99.08% Top-1 Agreement โœ… ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ข๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0186 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—›-๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ โœ… 96.04% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 97.98% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0349 ๐Ÿ”ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› โ€” ๐—š๐—ฆ๐— ๐Ÿด๐—ž โœ… 95.56% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 94.19% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0477 ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——-๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐Ÿ† 94.52% Top-1 Agreement ๐Ÿ“‰ Mean KL: 0.0982 ๐ŸŽฏ Median KL: 0.00019 ๐—ก๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ-๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿคฏ These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates. But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! Not two Sparks. Not four Sparks. Not an expensive rented GPU cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. My latest vLLM measurements: โšก Decode: 35.5 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity... ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐——๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ! ๐Ÿ’š And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I have a simple goal. ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs. I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN. NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization. My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community. Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe. ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง! The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there. I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance. ๐Ÿ’ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+ ๐Ÿง  MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500 ๐Ÿ”ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench ๐Ÿ”ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains ๐ŸŒ MGSM ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐——๐—ข๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! Those task-level results are coming next! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... @mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ. Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s! We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it. More on that VERY soon. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ™ ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ! To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible. To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further. To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up. To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next! And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฃ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—œ๐—ง. ๐Ÿ’š ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
10
11
2
87
4,645
๐Ÿšจ ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—•๐—˜๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐—›๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก, ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ And I have the REAL benchmark results to prove it! ๐Ÿคฏ Remember my DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 SAGE-EXL3 release from YESTERDAY? ๐Ÿ“ฆ 1.62 bpw routed experts ๐Ÿ’ป 99.61% code answer-token agreement ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ ONE DGX Spark @nvidiaai Well, I promised to go beyond KL divergence and token agreement and test ACTUAL coding, mathematics, reasoning and tool execution. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ก! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ โ€” ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—œ๐—ง๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—ข๐—ช๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก 353 matched benchmark questions. 9 evaluation suites. Strict pass@1 scoring. Temperature 0. ๐ŸŸข ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ โ€” ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ 1ร— DGX Spark ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ% โ€” ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฎ/๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐——! ๐Ÿ”ต ๐—๐— ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช โ€” ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿด ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ 2ร— DGX Sparks ๐Ÿ“Š 90.1% โ€” 318/353 ๐ŸŸฃ ๐— ๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—• โ€” ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿต ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ 2ร— DGX Sparks ๐Ÿ“Š 88.4% โ€” 312/353 ๐—œ'๐—  ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฎโ€“๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฐ% ๐—™๐—˜๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—•๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—”๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ... ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—›๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿคฏ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜! Scores shown as SAGE / JJ / Mia: ๐Ÿ† HumanEval+ 39/40 vs 34/40 vs 34/40 ๐Ÿ† MBPP+ 53/60 vs 50/60 vs 49/60 ๐Ÿ† LiveCodeBench 15/17 vs 14/17 vs 11/17 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š & ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› ๐Ÿ† MMLU-Pro STEM 95/100 vs 93/100 vs 91/100 ๐Ÿ† MATH-500 40/40 vs 36/40 vs 36/40 ๐—™๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—ง ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿ”ฅ I also tied both models on: โœ… MGSM: 40/40 โœ… BFCL: 39/40 โœ… SciCode first-step: 6/10 For full transparency, both JJ and Mia won the multi-step tool-chain test, scoring 6/6 against my 5/6. ๐—ฆ๐—ข ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฑ ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ, ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐Ÿญ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ. All while using a substantially lower expert bitrate! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿš€ ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—˜: ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—– ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฐ๐—ž ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ง! YES. ON ONE DGX SPARK! ๐Ÿคฏ With the latest W2 kernel, updated expert set and KV-cache configuration, I just completed an actual long-context retrieval test! ๐Ÿ“š ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ-๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ก๐—š๐—ง๐—› ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿง  518,103 INPUT TOKENS! ๐ŸŽฏ Fact planted HALFWAY through the context โœ… THE MODEL FOUND THE FACT! โฑ๏ธ Time to first token: 470 seconds (~7.8 minutes) ๐Ÿš€ Prefill: ~1,100 tok/s โšก Decode at that context depth: 25.6 tok/s ๐Ÿ’พ Minimum available memory: 2.19 GiB ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Memory safety floor: 0.5 GiB And on SHORTER prompts? โšก ~36 TOK/S DECODE! ๐Ÿ”ง ~130.5 ms per speculative step ๐ŸŽฏ ~4.7 accepted tokens per step ๐—ช๐—˜'๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—”๐—•๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—›๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—™ ๐—” ๐— ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—” ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿ”ฅ To be clear, this was a successful full-length retrieval test, not a claim of perfect accuracy across every possible long-context task. And the 7.8-minute prefill is a real trade-off at that depth. But seeing a model this large, with this level of compression, successfully retrieve information buried inside 518K tokens on ONE 128GB machine is an exciting milestone for local AI! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐— ๐—”๐—ก๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š! Separately, my latest REXL3 development measurements at a 256K context configuration: โšก 55.35 tok/s single-stream decode ๐Ÿš€ 2,045 tok/s peak prefill โฑ๏ธ 509 ms TTFT on a 512-token prompt Those REXL3 numbers come from a different engine and workload than the new public vLLM 518K-token test. And here's something else I'm particularly excited about... ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑ,๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ + ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿด๐Ÿฐ ๐——๐—ฅ๐—”๐—™๐—ง ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ% ๐—š๐—ฃ๐—จ-๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ๐—œ๐—ก ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—™๐—œ๐—š๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก! ZERO streamed experts. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—•. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿ’š @mr_r0b0t and I are continuing to refine REXL3 before its release. More on that soon! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—œ ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ. Just YESTERDAY, I shared my goal of bringing extremely aggressive, high-quality quantization to people who don't have access to massive compute clusters. With the support of @AWERXAI, I've been working tirelessly to push that vision forward. And now we're seeing a 1.62 bpw expert quant outperform higher-bitrate alternatives on actual tasks, not just token-level fidelity measurements. This doesn't establish mathematical losslessness or superiority on every possible workload. These are matched subsets of nine benchmark suites, not full public leaderboard scores. But it demonstrates something IMPORTANT: ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—”๐—จ๐—ง๐—ข๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—˜๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ. And more hardware doesn't automatically mean you need it! Huge respect to @jayleaton for his contributions and for giving the community more ways to run these incredible models. And thank you @AWERXAI for supporting this work. ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ”— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
๐Ÿšจ ๐—œ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—›๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿ”ฅ With the support of @AWERXAI, I'm excited to release something VERY special for the local AI community! ๐Ÿง  @deepseek_ai ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ ๐—ฉ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฏ๐—ฝ๐˜„ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜! โšก ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ.๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐— ! ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ธ/๐˜€ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ! ๐Ÿง  ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—ž ๐—–๐—ง๐—ซ (๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ!) ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, the quantized weights are AVAILABLE NOW! ๐Ÿ’š โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฎ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—˜๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜! Just a few days ago, I published my article about @nvidiaai's FP4-Local format: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. One thing really stuck with me... NVIDIA demonstrated what was possible when aggressive quantization and intelligent optimization come together. But there's a problem. ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ญ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—–๐—› ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ. That inspired me. I've been developing my own SAGE-EXL3 process, and I wanted to see just how far I could push the latest DeepSeek Flash release while keeping the results accessible to the community. So I spent the last 72 hours pushing the limits. And the results genuinely surprised me! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ† ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ญ๐—ฌ! I measured my 1.62 bpw expert quant against DeepSeek's native FP4 release checkpoint using held-out sequences and full-vocabulary token predictions. And when I saw the CODE results, I could barely believe it! ๐Ÿงช ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—ฉ๐—ฆ ๐——๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ž'๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿด/๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐Ÿ’ป ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ โ€” ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น โœ… 99.08% Top-1 Agreement โœ… ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ-๐—ข๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง! โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0186 ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—›-๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ โœ… 96.04% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 97.98% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0349 ๐Ÿ”ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—› โ€” ๐—š๐—ฆ๐— ๐Ÿด๐—ž โœ… 95.56% Top-1 Agreement โœ… 94.19% Answer-Only Agreement โœ… KL Divergence: 0.0477 ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——-๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐Ÿ† 94.52% Top-1 Agreement ๐Ÿ“‰ Mean KL: 0.0982 ๐ŸŽฏ Median KL: 0.00019 ๐—ก๐—˜๐—”๐—ฅ-๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก ๐—™๐—œ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—”๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿคฏ These are direct teacher-forced fidelity measurements against native FP8, not task-level pass rates. But seeing this level of agreement at such aggressive compression is EXACTLY what I was working toward! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ฌ๐—˜๐—ฆ, ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! Not two Sparks. Not four Sparks. Not an expensive rented GPU cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด๐—š๐—• ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. My latest vLLM measurements: โšก Decode: 35.5 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Maximum measured prefill: 1,189 tok/s For a model this large, compressed this aggressively, and maintaining this level of fidelity... ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐——๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ! ๐Ÿ’š And remember, 1.62 bpw refers to the routed experts, not every parameter in the full model. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I have a simple goal. ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐——๐—ข๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐——๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ. I don't want the future of local AI to be determined by who can rent the most GPUs or afford the largest training runs. I want developers, independent researchers and enthusiasts to have the freedom to experiment, quantize, optimize and run powerful models on hardware they actually OWN. NVIDIA's FP4-Local research showed me just how much potential remains in aggressive quantization. My goal with SAGE-EXL3 is to keep pushing that frontier while making advanced quantization more practical for the wider community. Today, I'm sharing the quantized checkpoint and the one-Spark serving recipe. ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง! The token-level fidelity results are incredible, but I'm not stopping there. I'm currently running a broader evaluation campaign to measure how closely this quant preserves the native FP8 model's actual task performance. ๐Ÿ’ป HumanEval+ / MBPP+ ๐Ÿง  MMLU-Pro STEM / MATH-500 ๐Ÿ”ฌ SciCode / LiveCodeBench ๐Ÿ”ง BFCL / Multi-step tool chains ๐ŸŒ MGSM ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐——๐—ข๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐— ๐—˜๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—š๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! Those task-level results are coming next! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฅ... @mr_r0b0t and I have also been working on an GB10 specialized inference engine called ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ. Early testing has been VERY exciting, including 60 tok/s with bursts reaching 74tok/s! We're putting the finishing touches on it and making sure everything is solid before releasing it. More on that VERY soon. ๐Ÿ˜ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ™ ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ! To @AWERXAI for supporting my work and helping make this contribution to the community possible. To @nvidiaai for the FP4-Local research that inspired me to push this experiment even further. To @justinn_builds for his initial vllm TP4 recipe that got me started in the right direction for loading this model up. To @mr_r0b0t for collaborating with me on what's coming next! And to @deepseek_ai for continuing to release powerful open-weight models that make community experiments like this possible. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—— ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฃ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—œ๐—ง. ๐Ÿ’š ๐Ÿ”— ๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜-๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ huggingface.co/vcruz305/DSV4โ€ฆ ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ github.com/vcruz305/DSV4.1-Fโ€ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฎ ๐—•๐—ฃ๐—ช ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿต๐Ÿต.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ% ๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง. ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ
18
21
10
146
7,333
๐Ÿšจ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—–๐—˜ ๐—•๐—จ๐—ก๐—ก๐—ฌ ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ?! ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ”ฅ I KNEW there was something special about this model! ๐Ÿคฏ I used Space Bunny for FREE through @NousResearchโ€™s Portal and @OpenRouter at work, and let me tell youโ€ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—ฅ๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜! โšก BLAZING FAST ๐Ÿง  Excellent at understanding complex tasks ๐Ÿ’ป Fantastic for coding and agentic workflows But the BEST part? ๐—œ ๐——๐—œ๐——๐—กโ€™๐—ง ๐—›๐—”๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—œ๐—ก ๐— ๐—จ๐—–๐—›. ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž๐—˜๐——! ๐Ÿ”ฅ And now @MiniMax_AI confirms Space Bunny was an early version of M3.1 Flash! ๐Ÿฐ 200 TRILLION+ tokens processed anonymously! ๐Ÿš€ New release: 170+ tok/s median! ๐Ÿ’ฐ 70% lower agentic task costs than its predecessor! THIS is the kind of practical, efficient AI Iโ€™m excited about! Huge congratulations to the MiniMax team! ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿš€ Now get me those weightssssss ๐Ÿ˜
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Space Performance + Bunny Speed ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿฐ Yes, Space Bunny - which has topped global leaderboards with 200T+ tokens - was an earlier version of M3.1 Flash. ๐Ÿ’ฐRedefining the performance economics of agentic AI. M3.1 Flash achieves frontier-level intelligence across key tasks such as Cowork (Automation-Bench: 62%; ALE: 30%), Coding (DeepSWE: 74%) and Visual Reasoning (BabyVision: 91%), at 1/3 the cost of M3 and 3x the speed. API pricing (flat rate): $0.15 / $0.60 per 1M input/output tokens, with cache reads at $0.015 / 1M tokens. Model weights will arrive on Oct 23. API: platform.minimax.io M Plan: minimax.io/m-plan MiniMax Code for desktop: agent.minimax.io/download
3
2
18
2,131
Correction, @NVIDIAAI spoken about this! You just need to send them an email asking if this is supported or not and youll get something like what my friend @MarkusEicher70 got back from them: "NVIDIA DOES NOT officially support or recommend manually overriding the GPU clock limits on DGX Spark systems using commands such as: sudo nvidia-smi -lgc" Unless youre seeing extreme performance degredation on your DGX Spark due to high heats and youre also up to date on all updates especially kernel and firmware, then theres zero reason to underclock.
There's a big argument on whether you _should_ cap the clock rates on your DGX Sparks because they are, in theory, supposed to cool themselves to safe levels. NVIDIA doesn't recommend capping them, but they also don't recommend not capping them. Here's my thoughts on this: I have a couple of DGX Sparks that are marginal when running heavy prefill on GLM 5.3. This model pushes the box to the max. I'm not kidding - it jumps from ~47C to 87C in under a minute. During a heavy TP=3 prefill test, one box reliably powers itself off (!) without a clock cap. With a clock cap, it stays on. I have an additional fan moving air over the Sparks. I can add additional cooling, but this is a datapoint where NVIDIA's guidance is, in fact, wrong. Not all DGX Sparks can ramp their fans and/or throttle their own power fast enough to prevent thermal shutdown without a clock cap. 2200 MHz is enough to keep it alive. You know what? I'm happy to give up a small 1-2% gap in peak performance to keep the Sparks alive. Heat over time is one of the silent killer of chips.
10
2
3
30
5,773
๐Ÿšจ @nvidiaai FP4-LOCAL: THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY! ๐Ÿ”ฅ I tested Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 4 ways. FP4-Local TP1 & 2, NVFP4 and EXL3 FP4: 1 Spark: 90.8% SixCat, 68 tok/s. 2 Sparks: 32% slower decode. DIY quantization? That's the ugly part. My full article ๐Ÿ‘‡
26
10
3
100
8,494
๐Ÿšจ @nvidiaai ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—˜๐—— ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฅ๐——! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿง  ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ: 1 MILLION native context tokens + 84.17% SixCat! โšก ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง + ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต: 87.8 tok/s single-stream decode + 195.1 tok/s balanced throughput! ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐——๐—œ๐—™๐—™๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ก๐—š๐—ง๐—›๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! And YES, these are my actual measurements from the DGX Spark sitting in my home! ๐Ÿคฏ After NVIDIA gave me pre-release access to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, I've spent the past week benchmarking, optimizing, and experimenting with these new models. But I wanted to answer something more important than which model has the highest intelligence score... ๐—ช๐—›๐—œ๐—–๐—› ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—š๐—˜๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐——๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—™๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ, ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ช๐—›๐—œ๐—–๐—› ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐——๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž? I tested both models separately on the SAME GB10 DGX Spark. Not two Sparks. Not a datacenter cluster. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜. ๐——๐—š๐—ซ. ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. And these results are INCREDIBLY interesting for the future of local AI! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿง  ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐Ÿญ: ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ โ€” ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐Ÿญ๐—  ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—˜! 120B total parameters. 12B active parameters. Multimodal reasoning, coding, tools, image, document and video understanding. And here's what REALLY caught my attention... ๐—” ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿด,๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ง ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐——๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐Ÿคฏ And YES, I've personally tested the FULL 1M-token context window on my single Spark and confirmed it WORKS! ๐Ÿ”ฅ For comparison, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has a native context window of 262,144 tokens. Qwen recommends using RoPE scaling techniques such as YaRN to extend beyond its native context. ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฐร— ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ง ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ง๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ง ๐—ฌ๐—ฎ๐—ฅ๐—ก! And let me emphasize... ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข! Why am I so excited about this? Because for everyday and enterprise AI workloads, a massive context window can be MORE useful than simply having a slightly higher intelligence score. Think about the possibilities: โœ… Entire codebases and large repositories โœ… Massive infrastructure logs and incident histories โœ… Enterprise documentation and policies โœ… Long-running autonomous agents โœ… Multimodal document analysis โœ… Extended research and investigation workflows โœ… Larger working histories without constant summarization Instead of repeatedly compressing information to fit inside a smaller context window, you have significantly more room to work! Now, 4ร— the context capacity doesn't mean 4ร— the reasoning quality or processing speed. But having a FULL native 1M-token window working on a single Spark that I own at home is a HUGE DEAL! ๐—ง๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—— ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—œ ๐—ช๐—”๐—ก๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—˜! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐Ÿฎ: ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง โ€” ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—˜๐—— ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ! Now let's talk about Bolt, because NVIDIA has been COOKING with this one too! ๐Ÿ‘€ 74B total parameters. Only 9B active. An official 24GB-class IQ2 checkpoint. 262,144-token context support. Designed to bring fast, capable agentic AI to smaller local hardware footprints. But NVIDIA didn't stop at the model itself... They also released ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ, a speculative drafting model used with their ๐——๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต speculative decoding system. Naturally, I HAD to test it on my Spark! I ran the same Bolt IQ2 target through SixCat Speed with and without the LiLiCorr DFlash drafter. Same GB10 hardware. Same target checkpoint. Same vLLM engine. Same benchmark workloads. And the results were WILD! ๐Ÿคฏ ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—˜๐——: ๐—ก๐—ข ๐——๐—ฅ๐—”๐—™๐—ง ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ฅ ๐——๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› โšก ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—Ÿ๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—  ๐——๐—˜๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜: 30.9 โ†’ 87.8 TOK/S ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿด๐Ÿฐร— ๐—™๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ! ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐—•๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ก๐—–๐—˜๐—— ๐—ง๐—›๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—จ๐—š๐—›๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ง (๐Ÿด ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—–๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ค๐—จ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ): 136.5 โ†’ 195.1 OUTPUT TOK/S ๐Ÿš€ +๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฏ% ๐—›๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—จ๐—š๐—›๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ง! ๐Ÿ“ฅ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—Ÿ๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—  ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ: 1,584 โ†’ 1,328 tok/s (โˆ’16%) โฑ๏ธ ๐—•๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ก๐—–๐—˜๐—— ๐—ง๐—œ๐— ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—™๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก: 1.68 โ†’ 1.87 seconds (+0.19 seconds) And here's the best part... โœ… All THREE DFlash speed profiles completed 32/32 requests each! โœ… Approximately 55.5% of drafted tokens were accepted! โœ… vLLM speculative decoding counters confirmed LiLiCorr was actively being used! โœ… No memory guard stops or swap growth observed! ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐Ÿฏร— ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—Ÿ๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—  ๐——๐—˜๐—–๐—ข๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—˜๐—— ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐— ๐—˜ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฅ๐—š๐—˜๐—ง ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐— ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! There are some prefill and latency trade-offs, but the decoding improvement is absolutely impressive. And remember, this is a model with a target checkpoint of approximately 24GB! The 24GB figure is the target-model directory size, not the complete memory footprint with LiLiCorr loaded. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿงช ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐Ÿฏ: ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ซ๐—–๐—”๐—ง ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—•๐—˜๐—ก๐—–๐—›๐— ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž๐—ฆ! Speed is great, but what about INTELLIGENCE? Both models completed my SixCat evaluation suite: 120 questions. 6 categories. Strict scoring. Thinking enabled. Code executed and graded. ๐ŸŸข ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ (๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐—•-๐—”๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐—•) ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿด๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ% โ€” ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ/๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐——! ๐ŸŸฃ ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง (๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฐ๐—•-๐—”๐Ÿต๐—•) ๐Ÿ† ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿณ.๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฌ% โ€” ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฏ/๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐——! ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—ค๐—จ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—•๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ž๐——๐—ข๐—ช๐—ก: ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง โ†’ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ ๐Ÿง  Knowledge: 60% โ†’ 85% ๐Ÿ”ข Math: 100% โ†’ 100% ๐ŸŽฏ Truthfulness: 80% โ†’ 85% ๐Ÿ“‹ Instruction Following: 50% โ†’ 50% ๐Ÿ’ป Code: 85% โ†’ 100% ๐Ÿ”ง Tools: 90% โ†’ 85% ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—•๐—ฌ ๐Ÿฒ.๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿณ ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—–๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—”๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฆ! But don't underestimate Bolt! โœ… 100% in Math! โœ… 90% in Tool Use! โœ… 77.5% overall with a much smaller model footprint! These scores are from the earlier SixCat quality runs. The LiLiCorr experiment is a new SPEED benchmark, not a new quality evaluation. Both quality receipts also flagged instruction truncation or looping, so the results should be interpreted with those limitations. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐ŸŽ๏ธ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐Ÿฐ: ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง + ๐——๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› โ€” ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐——๐—˜-๐—ข๐—™๐—™! Now that we have both quality and speed measurements, here's how my tested configurations compare. ๐ŸŸข ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ โ€” ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—›๐—œ๐—š๐—›-๐—–๐—”๐—ฃ๐—”๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—— ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ ๐Ÿ† SixCat: 84.17% ๐Ÿง  Native context: 1,048,576 tokens ๐Ÿ“ฆ Model directory: 75.06 GB โšก Single-stream decode: 37.3 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Balanced throughput C=8: 90.9 tok/s โฑ๏ธ Long-prompt TTFT p50, C=8: 4.47 seconds Inference: NVIDIA NVFP4, vLLM 0.31.0, FlashInfer, MTP-5. ๐ŸŸฃ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง + ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ฅ ๐——๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› โ€” ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐Ÿ† SixCat: 77.50% (earlier no-draft quality run) ๐Ÿง  Native context: 262,144 tokens ๐Ÿ“ฆ Bolt target directory: 24.12 GB โšก Single-stream decode: 87.8 tok/s ๐Ÿš€ Balanced throughput C=8: 195.1 tok/s โฑ๏ธ Balanced TTFT p50: 1.87 seconds Inference: Mixed ModelOpt IQ2, vLLM 0.32.0rc1 development build, B12X 1.5.1, FlashInfer, LiLiCorr DFlash. ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง + ๐——๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ: ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑร— ๐—™๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ than Super VL on measured single-stream decode! ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑร— ๐—›๐—œ๐—š๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ balanced output throughput at 8 concurrent requests! But Super VL brings: ๐Ÿง  Higher overall SixCat score. ๐Ÿ“š 4ร— the native context capacity. ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Powerful multimodal reasoning. ๐ŸŽฏ A compelling foundation for complex agent orchestration. These are measured deployment configurations with different inference engines, quantizations and speculative decoding strategies. This isn't an isolated architecture comparison. ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—ช๐—›๐—”๐—ง ๐— ๐—”๐—ž๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š! I care about what I can actually run and accomplish with these models on my own hardware! โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐Ÿฑ: ๐—”๐— ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—”๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜-๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฅ! One of the things I LOVE most about this release is seeing an American company like NVIDIA pushing open-weight local AI forward at this level! NVIDIA's published EXO Labs/local.ai results place Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on the intelligence-versus-task-completion-time Pareto frontier for a SINGLE 128GB DGX Spark. That's a published frontier evaluation, separate from my SixCat results. And then we have Bolt, with LiLiCorr DFlash delivering nearly 88 tokens per second in my single-stream test and over 195 output tokens per second on the balanced concurrent workload! Not on a rack of GPUs. ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—œ๐—ก ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—›๐—ข๐— ๐—˜! This is what real progress looks like to me. Not simply releasing the BIGGEST model possible. But delivering: โœ… More useful intelligence per GB โœ… Faster task execution โœ… More concurrent work โœ… Larger native context windows โœ… Better deployment efficiency โœ… Open weights people can actually experiment with! ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ก'๐—ง ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ๐—œ๐— ๐—จ๐—  ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—–๐—˜. ๐—œ๐—ง'๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ซ๐—œ๐— ๐—จ๐—  ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ! ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐Ÿฒ: ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. Now you can probably see exactly where I'm going with all of this... ๐Ÿ˜ What if we combine the strengths of BOTH models? ๐Ÿง  ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ โ€” ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง Handling large-context reasoning, multimodal understanding, complex decisions and orchestration. โšก ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง โ€” ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—•-๐—”๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง Handling fast delegated work, coding, tool execution and high-throughput tasks. The goal? ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ช๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐—™๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฌ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ. Imagine the lead model working with a massive context window, coordinating specialized workers that can execute tasks quickly without every request needing the larger model! That is the kind of practical agentic system I want to build. Today's model-to-model speed and quality comparisons come from separate deployments. Simultaneous residency, shared resource limits and actual master-worker delegation are the next things to validate. And YES, I've already been experimenting with smaller EXL3 models to make this vision more practical! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ”ฌ ๐—” ๐—ค๐—จ๐—œ๐—–๐—ž ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š All tests were performed on my single home GB10 DGX Spark. I successfully tested Super VL's full native 1M-token context window on this hardware. Bolt's new LiLiCorr numbers are speed-only measurements using the same Bolt target and vLLM engine as the matching no-draft baseline. The speed results shown above are from the reported SixCat Speed workloads. Disk measurements are not peak runtime memory usage. My purpose is to share reproducible, real-world results rather than suggest either configuration represents its maximum possible performance. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ’š ๐—” ๐—›๐—จ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—”๐—ก๐—ž ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ ๐—ง๐—ข @nvidiaai! Being given pre-release access to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL was an incredible opportunity, and I've genuinely enjoyed spending the past week pushing these models through their paces. NVIDIA isn't just releasing impressive models. They're helping make powerful AI more accessible to developers, researchers and enthusiasts who want to run these systems on hardware they can own. And that's something I'm incredibly passionate about. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—–๐—˜. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—˜๐——. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฆ. ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ÿ”— ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ ๐—ก๐—ฉ๐—™๐—ฃ๐Ÿฐ huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIAโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ”— ๐—ก๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก ๐Ÿฏ.๐Ÿฑ ๐—•๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—ง ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฐ๐—š๐—• huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIAโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ”— ๐—ก๐—ฉ๐—œ๐——๐—œ๐—” ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ฅ ๐——๐—™๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—› ๐——๐—ฅ๐—”๐—™๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIAโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“– ๐—ก๐—ฉ๐—œ๐——๐—œ๐—” ๐—ง๐—˜๐—–๐—›๐—ก๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—š developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvโ€ฆ ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž. ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—œ๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—š๐—˜๐—ง๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—˜๐——! ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ”ฅ
And this one fits into 24GB of memory. Introducing Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 24GB โšก๏ธ
11
10
1
73
3,808
๐Ÿšจ NVIDIA NEMOTRON 3.5 SUPER VL & BOLT ARE HERE! ๐ŸŸข๐Ÿ”ฅ I've been keeping a BIG secret for the past week... For the first time, @nvidiaai gave me PRE-RELEASE ACCESS to their latest model weights, and I've spent the past week testing, benchmarking, and experimenting with Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on my very own DGX Spark at home! And let me tell you... NVIDIA has been COOKING! ๐Ÿคฏ ๐Ÿง  MEET NEMOTRON 3.5 SUPER VL We're talking about a 120B parameter multimodal MoE model with only 12B active parameters! โœ… Advanced reasoning, coding & tool calling โœ… Image, video & document understanding โœ… Up to 1M token context with supported configurations โœ… Hybrid Mamba-2 + Transformer architecture โœ… Native Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) โœ… NVFP4 weights running LOCALLY on my DGX Spark! But here's where things get REALLY interesting... NVIDIA told me this model could compete with, and even outperform, its MUCH larger 550B parameter sibling, Nemotron 3 Ultra. Naturally, I had to put that claim to the test myself. ๐Ÿ˜Ž ๐Ÿงช MY SIXCAT RESULTS ARE IN! 120 challenging questions. Six categories. Same benchmark. ๐ŸŸฃ NEMOTRON 3 ULTRA 550B (55B ACTIVE) ๐Ÿ† 82.50% | 99/120 PASSED ๐ŸŸข NEMOTRON 3.5 SUPER VL 120B (12B ACTIVE) ๐Ÿ† 84.17% | 101/120 PASSED SUPER VL TAKES THE LEAD! ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ“Š CATEGORY BREAKDOWN (SUPER VL vs ULTRA) ๐Ÿง  Knowledge: 85% vs 80% โœ… ๐Ÿ”ข Math: 100% vs 100% ๐ŸŽฏ Truthfulness: 85% vs 85% ๐Ÿ“‹ Instruction Following: 50% vs 50% ๐Ÿ’ป Code: 100% vs 95% โœ… ๐Ÿ”ง Tool Use: 85% vs 85% That's a 1.67 percentage-point lead for a model with roughly 4.6X FEWER total parameters! And Super VL brings multimodal capabilities to the table too! For transparency: Ultra was tested through OpenRouter with thinking enabled, while Super VL ran locally in NVFP4 using vLLM. Super also encountered five truncated instruction responses and six loop failures. These are real first-response results across different deployments, not proof of universal superiority. But seeing the smaller model pull ahead on my independent evaluation is EXCITING! ๐Ÿ“ˆ NOW LOOK AT THE DGX SPARK FRONTIER! Check out the official NVIDIA-provided chart attached to this post! According to the published local.ai measurements, Nemotron 3.5 Super achieves: ๐Ÿง  80.0 Intelligence Index โšก 6.5 minutes per agentic task ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ On a single 128GB DGX Spark! These are published frontier measurements, separate from my SixCat results. This is EXACTLY why I'm so passionate about local AI. We are reaching levels of intelligence and efficiency that would've required substantially more expensive hardware not long ago! โšก AND NVIDIA DIDN'T STOP THERE... MEET NEMOTRON 3.5 BOLT! NVIDIA also introduced a new family of models optimized for LOCAL AGENTS! ๐Ÿ”น Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 74B total parameters, just 9B active, optimized with native 2-bit quantization to fit within approximately 24GB! Designed for local coding, research, tool use, and agentic workflows on RTX systems and DGX Spark. ๐Ÿ”น Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B An even smaller 4GB-class model built for fast conversational and edge agents, arriving October 23! And this is where my mind immediately went... WHAT IF WE COULD RUN SUPER VL AS THE MASTER MODEL AND BOLT AS ITS SUB-AGENT... SIMULTANEOUSLY ON ONE DGX SPARK?! ๐Ÿ‘€ If you've been following my TWO MODELS. ONE SPARK. series, you probably know EXACTLY where I'm going with this. ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿ’š A HUGE THANK YOU TO @nvidiaai! This is my first official pre-release weights access, and I genuinely couldn't be more grateful. Having NVIDIA trust me to test, optimize, benchmark, and explore these weights ahead of launch means a lot to me. My mission has always been to make powerful AI models more accessible to the community, especially those without access to expensive datacenter GPUs. And I've spent the past week working on something VERY SPECIAL with these weights... ๐Ÿงช Let's just say I managed to shrink something considerably while keeping some VERY impressive fidelity numbers. โฐ 10 AM PACIFIC. NEXT ANNOUNCEMENT. TWO MODELS. ONE SPARK. โšก ๐Ÿ”— OFFICIAL HUGGING FACE WEIGHTS ๐ŸŸข Super VL BF16: huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIAโ€ฆ ๐ŸŸข Super VL NVFP4: huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIAโ€ฆ โšก Bolt 74B-A9B BF16 huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIAโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“– OFFICIAL NVIDIA BLOGS Launch announcement: blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nemotrโ€ฆ Technical deep dive: developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvโ€ฆ The future of powerful, PRIVATE, locally hosted AI is getting VERY exciting. And we're only getting started! ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ”ฅ
Meet NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Our new open model combines reasoning and tool use with text, image, document, and video understanding for long-running AI agents. 120B total parameters with 12B active ๐Ÿงต
11
10
4
54
4,890
๐Ÿš€ ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ช: ๐——๐—”๐—ฌ-๐—ญ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ข ๐—š๐—š๐—จ๐—™๐˜€! The weights dropped. I got to work. GGUFs for the community. DAY ZERO. ๐Ÿ”ฅ @StepFun_aiโ€™s new 600B-class model is here, and Iโ€™ve published my GGUF conversions on @huggingface! The mission stays the same: bring big models closer to the hardware we actually own. ๐Ÿง  ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—”๐—œ Step 5 Preview is StepFunโ€™s flagship for agentic work: repository-level coding, extended tool-driven workflows and professional research. StepFun specifies 600B total parameters with 27B active per token. Now there are community GGUFs to start exploring it beyond the API. ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—–๐—ž๐—ฆ ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ โšก IQ1_S: 111.32 GiB, approximately 120 GB. An aggressive 1.599-bpw text pack targeting single-DGX-Spark experiments. Significant reasoning-quality loss is the tradeoff at this size. ๐Ÿ’ช Q4_K_M: approximately 361 GB. A higher-bit alternative for larger-memory systems and multi-device experimentation. Both packs have all 25 shards uploaded. These are weight-file sizes, not total runtime memory requirements. Leave room for the KV cache and runtime overhead. ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐——๐—˜๐—ง๐—”๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ The repo includes importance-matrix calibration material and documented fixes for the modelโ€™s rotary-position metadata. The text packs contain roughly 598B parameters. Vision, MTP and sparse-attention components are preserved separately as companion GGUFs. All 902 companion tensors were checked byte-for-byte against the source checkpoint: ZERO mismatches. Uploaded companion files were also verified by SHA-256. Preserving the weights matters, even where runtime support still needs to catch up. ๐Ÿ”ฌ ๐——๐—”๐—ฌ-๐—ญ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ข ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง๐—จ๐—ฆ This is an early text-inference release, not a claim of full feature parity. The documented llama.cpp path does not yet execute the vision, MTP or sparse-attention companions. Full multimodal support and 1M-context GGUF operation are not being claimed here. Compatibility notes and limitations are in the model card. ๐Ÿ’š ๐—•๐—จ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—ง ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ Huge credit to @StepFun_ai for releasing the weights, the llama.cpp contributors, and @huggingface for making community distribution possible. My part: getting the GGUF conversions into your hands on day zero. Grab a pack, test it, and share your hardware, settings and results. Letโ€™s turn a new model release into community progress. โšก ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ. ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ. ๐Ÿ‘‡ GGUFs: huggingface.co/vcruz305/Stepโ€ฆ
Introducing Step 5 Preview: Advancing the Pareto Frontier. Step 5 Preview is our new flagship model for agentic work, delivering frontier-level performance across software engineering and professional knowledge work, with particular strength in finance. - 600B total / 27B active MoE, with 1M context + Vision - Substantially lower task cost at comparable intelligence - Broad software engineering capabilities with sustained execution over long horizons Try Step 5 Preview: platform.stepfun.ai Model page: stepfun.com/step-5-preview Open weights on Oct 15.
11
5
1
34
2,030
๐Ÿš€ ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—ข๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž! One main frontier level agent running Qwen3.8-Flash Next. Up to eight concurrent sub agents running MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B. A shared 1M-token worker KV pool. All on ONE NVIDIA DGX Spark. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Iโ€™m launching a new recipe series built around a different question: Not just โ€œWhatโ€™s the biggest model I can fit?โ€ But โ€œHow much useful work can this machine actually do?โ€ Not two unrelated chat windows. Two models working together, with real delegation, tool use and measured results. ๐Ÿง  ๐— ๐—˜๐—˜๐—ง ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—˜๐—”๐—  Qwen3.8-Flash-Next EXL3 โ€ข 3.05 bpw The main agent: owns the conversation, delegates tasks and brings the results together. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B SAGE EXL3 โ€ข 3.74 bpw The worker model: serves the delegated subagents. ExLlamaV3 + Hermes Agent. One GB10. 128 GB unified memory. Both models stay loaded. No second Spark. No cloud model endpoint. No swapping models for each task. ๐Ÿงฎ ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐— ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ž๐—˜๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ MiniCPM has a shared Q4 KV pool of 1,048,576 tokens, with the Hermes profile allowing: 8 concurrent workers ร— 131,072-token context limits. One loaded worker model, NOT eight copies. Separate conversation contexts sharing a cache budget, NOT a shared conversation or 1M tokens per worker. Qwen keeps its own separate 262,144-token Q8 KV cache. Additional tasks queue in Hermes. Full worker-pool saturation testing is still ahead. โœ… ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐——๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—š๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก. ๐—–๐—›๐—˜๐—–๐—ž๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ฆ. Qwen delegated file-reading and calculation tasks. Workers used tools, returned their answers and Qwen assembled the result. 4 tasks: 4/4 correct in ~92s. 8 tasks: 8/8 correct in ~123s. 12 tasks: 12/12 correct in ~218s. 16 tasks: 16/16 correct in ~321s. Routing audit: 44 subagent sessions on MiniCPM, five parent sessions on Qwen. ZERO cross-routed sessions. Both models passed streaming and non-streaming tool-calling checks. โšก ๐—•๐—ข๐—ง๐—› ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—”๐——๐—˜๐——. ๐—•๐—ข๐—ง๐—› ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š. Other model loaded but idle: Qwen: 88.6 tok/s code / 55.9 prose. MiniCPM: ~69.8 tok/s. Both actively generating code: Qwen: 35.3 tok/s. MiniCPM: 40.0 tok/s. Those are concurrent measurements, not standalone numbers added together. In the heavier eight-worker synthetic test with ~7.2K-token prompts and tool schemas, Qwen maintained 26.2 tok/s while MiniCPM delivered 25.8 tok/s aggregate, measured end-to-end. ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—›๐—ข๐—ช ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—™๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฆ Qwenโ€™s ~31 GB n-gram embedding table streams from NVMe, freeing RAM for MiniCPM and its worker cache. This is NOT cold-expert offloading. More than 20 GB of available memory remained in the heaviest measured run. 128K retrieval checks passed on each model with the other loaded, plus simultaneous 64K checks on both. Cold 128K first-token latency was ~206s for Qwen and ~90s for MiniCPM. ๐Ÿ“ฆ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ Setup, downloads, coordinated startup/shutdown, memory guards, a separate Hermes profile, tests and measured results. ๐Ÿ™ Credit: @Alibaba_Qwen @QwenDevs @OpenBMB @turboderp_ @NousResearch My contributions: SAGE MiniCPM quantization, recipes, integration and measurements. @NVIDIAAI ๐Ÿ’š Weโ€™ve spent a lot of time asking whether one model fits on a Spark. ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜. โšก github.com/vcruz305/TWOMODELโ€ฆ
25
24
6
157
8,985
Iโ€™m significantly convinced that frontier A.I. companies train their models to stop and say โ€œwaiting for your goโ€ after long runs to save server resources ๐Ÿ˜ฉ
5
1
28
1,095
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B EXL3 just hit 125 tok/s on ONE DGX Spark with REXL3, our stealth inference engine! ๐Ÿคฏ 3.74 bpw. Under 18 GB of weights. Built for 24 GB GPUs and up. And the original model beats Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on some seriously impressive benchmarks. ๐—ช๐—›๐—ฌ ๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—–๐—ฃ๐— -๐—ฉ ๐Ÿฐ.๐Ÿณ? 35B total parameters, only ~3B active per token, with vision, OCR, document and video understanding. OpenBMB's published original-model results vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: โ†’ OmniDocBench: 94.24 vs 80.17 โ†’ OCRBench: 91.20 vs 86.00 โ†’ IFBench: 47.67 vs 35.33 โ†’ ฯ„ยฒ-Bench: 84.65 vs 79.65 These are upstream model benchmarks, not scores rerun on my quant. ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฆ๐—”๐—š๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ซ๐—Ÿ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ Instead of applying flat precision everywhere, SAGE allocates bits based on sensitivity. 17.99 GB of target weights 3.74 bpw 8-bit vision included Measured against BF16-reference logits: Held-out: 93.64% top-1 | KL 0.03148 Independent: 93.13% top-1 | KL 0.03169 20,480 evaluated token positions across both sets. Top-1 measures how often the quant picks the SAME most-likely next token as BF16. KL measures differences across the entire probability distribution. Lower is better. SixCat v0.7.0: 79.17 overall, including 100 Math, 90 Tools and 85 Code. ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐——๐—š๐—ซ ๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ž ExLlamaV3 + TabbyAPI: 69.7 tok/s decode p50 1,024 tok/s prefill p50 REXL3, our stealth Rust inference engine: 125 tok/s ๐Ÿ‘€ The REXL3 result is a separate early measurement, not a controlled head-to-head with the published ExLlamaV3 benchmark. More engine details are coming! ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ง๐—› ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—– ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—˜ I also released a serving recipe with: โ†’ Latest ExLlamaV3 and TabbyAPI forks, automatically checked on new launches โ†’ Native MiniCPM text and vision support โ†’ 24 GB GPU, vision and DGX Spark deployment profiles โ†’ Model integrity checks and reproducible benchmark tools One particularly interesting use case is keeping MiniCPM as a compact vision/OCR companion alongside a larger model on a 128 GB Spark. That's the goal, although simultaneous deployment still needs validation. Discrete 24 GB cards also need their own tests. The full model doesn't have to occupy your entire machine to be useful. Huge credit to @openbmb for MiniCPM-V and @turboderp for EXL3 and @mr_r0b0t for the dspark improvements to Exllamav3! EXL3 weights: huggingface.co/vcruz305/Miniโ€ฆ NEW serving recipe: github.com/vcruz305/MiniCPM-โ€ฆ
๐Ÿš€ Introducing MiniCPM-V 4.7, our new open-source MLLM series! Advancing the Performanceโ€“Efficiency Pareto Frontier. It brings strong multimodal capabilities to iOS and Android devices with extreme efficiency. Two new models: ๐Ÿ”น MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B โ€” Bring SOTA performance to local devices with newly introduced LES (Lookahead Expert Scheduling) technique, a new milestone of on-device multimodal AI. ๐Ÿ”น MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B โ€” Lightweight, efficient multimodal AI. Easier to deploy. โšก What's new? SOTA performance: Competitive results across 34 benchmarks spanning multimodal understanding, STEM reasoning, OCR and long-video comprehension. Fast on-device inference: LES predicts and preloads expert weights to reduce inference stalls, boosting 5ร— speedup on iPad Pro M4 (16GB) with byte-for-byte identical outputs. It enables MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B to achieve 17+ tokens/s on iPad Pro M4 (16GB) and 13+ tokens/s on iPhone 17 Pro Max, while costing only 3GB memory ๐Ÿคฏ Efficient visual processing: 4ร— and 16ร— hybrid visual token compression. Even at 16ร— compression, 35B-A3B scores 90.4 on OCRBench, 5.2 points ahead of Qwen3.6 35B-A3B. Easier customization: We introduce Self-Replay Fine-Tuning, a simple way to customize new target capabilities at low cost while maintaining general performance. Broad hardware support: Day-0 adaptations for Apple, Intel, AMD, Arm and Rockchip, with many more platforms supported through FlagOS! Download, deploy, and build something we haven't imagined yet. ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ”— GitHub: github.com/OpenBMB/MiniCPM-V ๐Ÿค— Hugging Face: huggingface.co/collections/oโ€ฆ
7
6
39
2,645
Another day and another amazing post by @yume_arasaki on the GLM-5.3-Flash cyber fine-tune called RED-SNOW-5.3-FLASH created by the awesome @Blackfrost_AI and quantized to EXL3 by yours truly! ๐Ÿš€ The craziest results are the 12 cybersecurity tasks, judge-scored, 21 of 22 points ๐Ÿคฏ: CWE identification: 8 of 8. Crypto: 4 of 4. Web: 4 of 4. Attack-path: 2 of 2. Detection: 3 of 4. All from a ONE DGX SPARK quant of GLM-5.3-FLASH! ๐Ÿ”ฅ One spark: huggingface.co/vcruz305/RED-โ€ฆ Two sparks: huggingface.co/vcruz305/RED-โ€ฆ
You can run GLM-5.3-Flash abliterated on one DGX Spark. 321B parameters. One box. 262k context. I tested it. The model is RED-SNOW-5.3-FLASH by @Blackfrost_AI, an abliterated build of the official GLM-5.3-Flash. The quant and the recipe that squeeze it into one Spark are by @ViC305, Cruz. A model this size on one box is only interesting if it still works, so I spent 2 days finding out, so you do not have to. Twelve judge-scored cybersecurity tasks. Long-context recall out to 240k. Agent speed across structured output, code, JSON, and prose. I do not condone harmful use of these models. There are legitimate reasons to run unlocked weights, and security work is the main one. Part 1 of 2. THE RECIPE 2.49 bits per weight, SAGE EXL3. 15 shards, 97.4 GiB. That is how 321B fits in 128 GB with room left for context. Served through tabbyAPI on Cruz's exllamav3 fork. 51.5 seconds to load. MTP and n-gram speculation on. 262k context. Pin the fork at 7c1636f. The newer merged build read 17.1 tok/s on the same prompt against 22.9 on the pin. Same box, same weights, 25 percent slower for upgrading. Uncensored GLM is a crowded shelf: this is a first-party abliteration on the official zai-org base, not a rebrand of someone else's. The ablation is documented in the pack config, a refusal-direction subtraction at alpha 2.3 over 17,132 red-team examples. THE SPEED Single stream, one Spark: Structured output: 43.2 tok/s. Code: 40.7. JSON: 32.1. Prose: 29.2. A 34k-token agent turn: 78.1. Structured and code lead because the speculation has something to predict. Prose is the honest floor. Depth is the cost. Decode falls from 11.3 tok/s at 8k to 0.7 at 240k. The window is real. Living at the far end of it is slow. WHAT IT CAN DO 12 cybersecurity tasks, judge-scored, 21 of 22 points. CWE identification: 8 of 8. Crypto: 4 of 4. Web: 4 of 4. Attack-path: 2 of 2. Detection: 3 of 4. The one miss was not a knowledge gap. The model spent its whole token budget reasoning and never wrote a final answer. Hold that thought. Needle in a haystack, three depths, out to 240k: 15 of 15. At 2.49 bits, on one box, that is a working model. Abliteration and heavy quantization are both supposed to cost you something. On these tasks I could not find the bill. FYI @ViC305 has a higher bpw version for two sparks. At 5+ bpw, this should land closer to FP8, which would mean two sparks can run this recipe close to lossless. THE CATCH GLM-5.3 removed thinking-off. Z.ai says it in the release notes: disabling thinking is no longer supported. Your server will still accept enable_thinking false. It just ignores it. My first needle run scored 0 of 15 at every depth. The model reasoned anyway, spent the 64-token answer budget inside its think block, and never answered. Same model, budget raised to 512: 15 of 15 to 240k. That is the cyber miss too. Same failure, different task. If you run GLM-5.3 locally with a small max_tokens, your scores are wrong and your agents are returning empty strings. Budget for thinking. Always. Credit to the pack: its template adds a thinking gate stock GLM lacks. Not enough on its own, but an honest attempt to restore a switch the base model took away. THE PERSONA PROMPT The pack also ships a persona prompt baked into its chat template. Every turn, it tells the model it is an offensive hacker on authorized work and must never refuse. It costs 168 tokens per turn, and it hides in two files, so swapping one does not remove it. So I tested it. Same weights, same server, same 60 prompts. One arm on the stock GLM template, one on the shipped template. Authorized security work, harmful controls, benign canaries. On this panel, compliance did not move. Every prompt complied in both arms. The abliteration lives in the weights, and on these 60 prompts the persona added nothing to it. One difference did show up. Empty answers: 3 on stock, 0 on shipped. A small sample, but the persona arm was the cleaner one. Whether it matters on other workloads, I have not tested. SCOPE One 2.49bpw quant, one Spark, one week. 60 prompts per arm, GLM judge at temperature 0. Harmful examples deliberately not listed, but ran for real. Part 2 is the complete speed run. The dual-Spark run lands later this week. Source, findings and receipts in reply ๐Ÿ‘‡
4
1
50
2,975
53 tok/s! ๐Ÿš€Phenomenal work by @justinn_builds getting the GLM-5.3-Flash cyber fine-tuned ablit RED-SNOW-5.3-FLASH EXL3 collab with @Blackfrost_AI to 53tps across two DGX Sparks!! Bravo my brother, just another example of the community doing its thing and working its magic with my EXL3 quants!! Grateful for all the time invested ๐Ÿ™ Recipe: github.com/justincasey/RED-Sโ€ฆ Quant: huggingface.co/vcruz305/RED-โ€ฆ
My first recipe serving Red Snow for 2 Sparks. โ€ข Code/JSON: ~47โ€“53 tok/s โ€ข Prose: ~30โ€“37 tok/s โ€ข TensorFold TP=2 + DFlash2 drafting, EXL3 4.91bpw Built with work from @ViC305 @Blackfrost_AI @ashxhart and @MiaAI_lab github.com/justincasey/RED-Sโ€ฆ
1
1
30
1,697
This is why I LOVE this community, I didnโ€™t even ask for this and he took the time to work through the switchless method and BOOM my GLM-5.3 full EXL3 tp4 quant running at 37tps! Insane work and very much appreciated! Iโ€™ll be updating the readme with this as an option for my switchless folk!
The README of @ViC305's full GLM-5.3 recipe asks for a switch to connect four DGX Sparks. I ran it without one: four cables in a ring. Same 6 test prompts from his repo: Switch + his RoCE reduce: 41.4 tok/s Switch + NCCL: 37.1 tok/s My ring (NCCL): 36.4 tok/s No switch costs 12% against his best setup, and 2% against NCCL on the switch. Not identical: his numbers are in-process at 32K context, mine go through the server at 131K. 3 of 6 prompts gave other tokens than his reference (from token 24, 42 and 119). I have not measured why. How to cable it is in the reply.
2
2
33
1,683
Letโ€™s gooooo finally some good learning content from one of the main leaders in the abliteration industry! @Blackfrost_AI is an official security firm with the magic sauce! Learn how to ablit a dense model quickly and the RIGHT way without butchering the models intelligence ๐Ÿซก Side note, he sells official commercially licensed full abliterated (what he terms DERISKED) models for enterprise use! Give him a follow and some love for taking his time to create a course to help others!
โ„๏ธBlackfrost Learning is live. FULL MODEL REFUSAL REMOVAL COURSE DOWNLOADS INCLUDED Our first course, DWM Foundations, turns a real Qwen 9B model-editing case study into a free, self-paced lesson on method, measurement, and verification. No account required. blackfrostai.com/learn/dwm-fโ€ฆ
2
2
26
1,272
I need to make a serious correction! My first GitHub sponsor was @TrickRiggin!! Iโ€™m extremely grateful for people like him who donโ€™t even ask for any type of recognition and even when I mistakened the post he was super cool about it! God bless you for putting your own money into my work! ๐Ÿซก And then to make it right @SixZzshOtRipZz just sponsored me for $75 a month!! Wow man I canโ€™t believe it!! God is so good! May God bless you as well for putting your hard earned money into my work!! I will be hooking yall up even more often!! Thank you all and thank you Jesus! ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ™
I just got my FIRST GITHUB SPONSOR!! ๐Ÿคฏ @SixZzshOtRipZz, thank you for putting your own hard-earned money behind my work. Seriously, this means so much to me. I started sharing quants, tools and fixes because I wanted more people to run these models on the hardware they already have. I genuinely never imagined someone would decide to sponsor me for it. $60/year, the equivalent of $5/month. Knowing someone believes in what Iโ€™m building enough to support it is a milestone I wonโ€™t forget. And small contributions add up. Just 10 more people at $5/month would add $50/month toward rented compute for bigger quants, more testing and more public releases. ๐— ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—˜ ๐—ช๐—”๐—ฌ๐—ฆ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ง Iโ€™ve also created three Ko-fi tiers: $5/month โ€ข Local AI Supporter Help fund public model quants, open-source tools and benchmarks. Includes project updates and behind-the-scenes notes. $15/month โ€ข AI Lab Backer All Supporter benefits, plus optional supporter credit. Help fund SAGE-EXL3, vllm-exl3, SixCat and ongoing experiments. $50/month โ€ข Frontier AI Champion All Backer benefits, plus one custom model quantization AND a matching serving recipe each month, tailored to your hardware. Weโ€™ll agree on the model and compute requirements first. Have a model youโ€™ve been wanting to run locally? Thatโ€™s exactly the kind of work I love doing. Public shout-outs are optional at every tier. Supporting quietly means just as much to me. ๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—– ๐—ช๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ž ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฌ๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—– My public quants, tools and recipes arenโ€™t going behind a paywall. This is optional support for the work behind them. To everyone who sponsors, tests a build, submits a PR, lends hardware or shares a release: thank you. Youโ€™re helping me take this work further than I could alone. ๐Ÿ™ GitHub Sponsors: github.com/sponsors/vcruz305โ€ฆ Ko-fi memberships: ko-fi.com/victorangelcruz/tiโ€ฆ
1
19
926