
ALT left side, there's Axar patel of India and On right side there's Sir Jadeja... both r lefties either batting or bowling. Sir jadeja was too crucial for India... Axar is also jadeja was important because he had proved why : he was and he deserves all that.... Axar had also played many important knocks for India or had turned the whole game with the magic of his fingers. Both r greats.... one is veteran and one is youngster U can't compare leopard and chittah both r great in their own way both of them have their strengths and weaknesses so there's no point of comparisons but still Axar was also seen under his shadow or used as an 2nd option.... And if not second then.....

ALT There should be any comparisons but still we ; These pictures define that I had developed an campaign which will tell why there should not be any comparisons between veteran cricket players and modern youngsters. Cricket is an global support followed by each and everyone. Virat kohli is compared to tilak verma. Rohit sharma is compared to sanju samson and his captaincy is compared with surya kumar yadav's captaincy which is quite pathetic. Axar patel is compared with ravindra jadeja. But there should not be any kind of comparisons. Every one knows but every does this post is for all of us. Even actors singers everyone is compared.






















