💯% Full-time Ford fan. Feel free to make my opinions yours…
Joined August 2021
- Tweets9.4K
- Following4.1K
- Followers2.3K
- Likes13.2K
Mr. Ray retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Nick Shirley just Posted this Video exposing another Somali Daycare for getting shut down and REOPENING under a different name
When they reopened… they got $2.4 million dollars
‘We The People’ want a REFUND.
Do you support this?
YES or NO?
If at 14th you don’t succeed try try try again…
FSD 14 has been out for less that 24 hours and is already making safety critical errors.
Phantom braking was supposed to be solved years ago.
FSD is not "sentient" or "alive" as Elon claims, it's just a dangerous tool he uses to pump $TSLA stock.
2
286
Mr. Ray retweeted
Elon Musk dropped radar from Teslas to save costs not lives. At night, a Tesla without radar 👇 smashed into a stationary car with flashers on due to earlier accident. Musk’s cameras-only path = unsafe! Why $TSLA is involved with 734 documented fatalities.
Being a NRA firearms instructor in the State of CT I’m always looking for gun safety videos to show students examples of safe/unsafe/stupid gun handling practices as well as examples of what’s considered lawful/unlawful use of a firearm.
I’ll be using this clip as example of unlawful behavior because of the plot twist. It absolutely blows my mind this was the @CTRP_CSP trooper in charge of the firearms licensing unit for the State of CT.
But make no mistake, even when on your own property, if you ever escort anyone actively leaving your property while chest bumping them and being aggressive the entire way while holding a weapon in your hand you’d be the one subject to arrest and even being potentially shot by a LEO or even a third party (defense of another person’s life situation.) Nor is it legal for you stand on the sidewalk in front of your house brandishing a gun. Yikes!
youtube.com/shorts/fXRkasnjW…
Mr. Ray retweeted
I am profoundly alarmed about the future of the @DNC and the country by yesterday’s NYC anointment of a candidate who failed to disavow a "globalize the intifada" slogan and advocated Trotskyite economic policies.
I fear it is evidence that our party is following the most problematic aspects of Britain's Labor Party. It didn’t work there, and it won’t work here.
@Harvard and other universities' moral weakness after Oct 7 in condoning hateful, anti-Israeli, and even antisemitic, rhetoric and activity opened the Overton window in ways that contributed to yesterday’s outcome.
I hope candidate @ZohranKMamdani , who showed great ability to learn and adapt during his campaign, will continue to evolve in ways that provide much needed reassurance to people committed to a free from prejudice, market economy as an American ideal.
An important task for Mamdani now is to provide reassurance that his moral energy and formidable political skills can be productively directed for the City of New York at this difficult moment.
If you want to be the smartest person in the room on 2A issues @fourboxesdiner is a great person to follow …
2A "SENSITIVE PLACES" EXPLANATION. I wrote this to a Four Boxes Diner fan so I thought I would post it here too! This explains when government can ban guns in a specific location consistent with 2A based on US's historical tradition of gun regulations. Let me know if this makes sense. The below is superior to the other theories folks have advanced elsewhere!
Mark's Explanation:
In short, if a government does not provide comprehensive security with limited points of entry, metal detectors and armed guards, then it cannot be a constitutionally-acceptable government-mandated gun free zone. The only time the government can take away your fundamental 2A right to keep and bear arms in a specific location is when the government itself assumes the full responsibility for protecting you with armed defense; short of this, you have a right to protect yourself.
If you look at our Founding history, the three "sensitive places" mentioned in Bruen (polling places, legislative chambers and courthouses) all had armed guards. Sheriffs, sergeant at arms, and bailiffs.
Today, with the rise of small, concealable handguns (less of a problem at the founding where everyone carried unconcealable rifles/shotguns/long guns), to have comprehensive security, the gov't must provide metal detectors and limited entry points in addition to armed guards. At the founding, you did not need metal detectors b/c the main weapons were big and not concealable. Today, with handguns being ubiquitous, you need the metal detectors for comprehensive security, which is what we see at airports, courthouses and Congress.
Note, the government does NOT have to provide comprehensive security at a location. However, if they want to ban guns in a location, then they MUST provide comprehensive security. No government-provided armed security means the government cannot deprive you of your 2A rights.
Finally, the practical benefit to the comprehensive security approach to the "sensitive places" question is it is an objective test: has the government ACTED to make a place "sensitive" or have they just paid lip service to the question by labeling a place as "sensitive" without treating it as such. If the government has not provided the same level of security as is provided by the government to protect the judges in a courthouse, then it is not comprehensive security and, by extension, a gun ban would not be constitutional in that specific location.
1
117
Music to my ears…
“For too long, the Second Amendment, which establishes the fundamental individual right of Americans to keep and bear arms, has been treated as a second-class right. No more.
“It is the policy of this Department of Justice to use its full might to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.”
4
164
Mr. Ray retweeted
TRUMP KEEPS WINNING AT SCOTUS...but why do I have to keep correcting the record about Justice Barrett? In the TDA case, Barrett did not endorse the lefty views in favor of the illegals. She merely signed onto a few paragraphs (Parts II & III-B) of the dissent stating that SCOTUS should decide big issues in the normal course rather than in a rush on the emergency docket. No biggie.
