Billy Jo (@bjunjo) profile picture

Turn judgment into capital and content at https://nitter.gq/t.co/Cfq6lFF8Fe

🌐
Joined October 2020
Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)Photo by Billy Jo (@bjunjo)
True wealth: 1.Mission that motivates you 2.Good quality of sleep 3.Unlimited time spent at the gym 4.Good relationships with family & friends In general, follow good energy.
8
5
45
10,639
Most people keep using the same passwords and write them down somewhere in their notes. That said, self-custody is not an ideal solution for many.
That I disagree with. You’re overestimating how technical most people are. You’re in an echo chamber. Most people can barely keep track of the mundane, you really think they’re gonna do the whole dice roll thing and whatever else is needed to self custody well?
1
1
236
Billy Jo retweeted
The ideal passive portfolio is a broad collection of highly asymmetric long-term bets.
319
544
89
8,005
634,672
S&P500(달러기반) > 서울 아파트 (원화기반) 아파트는 갭 (레버리지)를 낄 수 있음 좋은 자산이 될 수 있으나 1가구 1주택으로 몰아가는 세재개편 및 부동산 활용한 금융을 막아가고 있는 상황. 앞으로 금융자산 선호가 높아지고 아파트는 buying 보다 living의 개념으로 바꾸어 나갈듯
S&P 500 returns since 2009: 2009: 🟢 +22.57% 2010: 🟢 +13.24% 2011: 🟢 +0.97% 2012: 🟢 +14.23% 2013: 🟢 +29.08% 2014: 🟢 +14.69% 2015: 🟢 +1.40% 2016: 🟢 +13.67% 2017: 🟢 +20.80% 2018: 🔴 -5.18% 2019: 🟢 +31.32% 2020: 🟢 +17.40% 2021: 🟢 +30.63% 2022: 🔴 -18.63% 2023: 🟢 +26.79% 2024: 🟢 +25.73% 2025: 🟢 +18.14% 2026: 🟢 +12.57% Can we really expect this level of growth over the next 17 years?
1
4
497
After DOGE, Elon came to a conclusion most people missed. He tried to reform the state from the inside. He failed. And he said it plainly: the government can't fix its own deficit. Nobody in power actually wants to cut. The machine protects itself. So he drew the only logical conclusion. If the state can't be reformed, there are only two ways this ends. Either global bankruptcy. Debt keeps compounding, interest payments eat the budget, and the system collapses under its own weight. Or robots. AI and robotics grow the economy so fast that the debt becomes manageable, and abundance makes the old fights over scarcity irrelevant. Here's the part almost nobody sees. For two centuries, capitalism has had a marketing problem. Its gains are real but slow and invisible. 2% growth a year doesn't feel like anything. Your life gets better over 30 years and you never connect it to the system that did it. Meanwhile, the left's promises feel immediate and concrete: a check, a subsidy, a benefit. That's why the left wins on promises even when it can't deliver them. Capitalism produces the wealth, socialism takes the credit. Robots break that asymmetry. When productivity doubles in a few years instead of a few decades, people will see it. Things get cheaper, services get better, opportunities appear, in real time. For the first time in history, people will connect capitalism and their rising standard of living directly, almost instantly. The causal chain becomes visible. And that changes everything politically. So there are two scenarios. Scenario one: we stay in the current inertia. No breakthrough, or a breakthrough we regulate to death. The debt wins. Living standards stagnate, then fall. A frustrated electorate turns to whoever promises the most, and that pushes toward a hard collectivist left. But collectivism fails, as it always does. And when it fails, the most organized, most disciplined collectivist force left standing isn't the old left. It's radical Islamism. Bankruptcy, then communism, then something worse. Scenario two: robots win. Abundance arrives, and it arrives visibly. The link between free enterprise and prosperity becomes obvious to everyone. And this is the key point: it becomes obvious to everyone, including the minorities the left was counting on. Because their long-term incentive is the same as everyone else's. A kid in the suburbs gains infinitely more from a booming, abundant West than from a bankrupt state handing out promises it can't keep. Abundance is the most powerful integration machine ever built. That's the Western renaissance. The West doesn't need to win the culture war by arguing. It needs to win it by delivering. And for the first time, it has the technology to deliver fast enough for people to notice. The race isn't left vs right anymore. It's robots vs bankruptcy.
3,362
8,141
898
47,790
8,666,678
은퇴 후 생활비는 배당보다 "월급처럼 조금씩 팔기"가 더 심플한 것 같다. S&P500이든 비트코인이든 보유량의 연 4% 안팎을 한 달에 한 번 파는 방식이다. 세금과 건강보험료는 따져야 하지만, 배당 구조를 얹으면 오히려 더 복잡해지고 꼬인다. 심플한 게 결국 오래 간다.
30대 파이어족이 대한민국을 탈출한 진짜 이유 33세의 나이에 주식 배당 소득과 유튜브 채널 운영을 병행하며 파이어를 선언한 크리에이터가 태국 치앙마이와 조지아 등 해외 거주를 선택한 이유와 자산 방어 전략 핵심 논점과 파이어 포트폴리오 운용 구조는 다음과 같음: 1. 30대 파이어의 자산 축적 및 배당 파이프라인 초기 시드 형성: 유튜브 채널 성장 기획(기획, 촬영, 편집 총괄 PD) 사업을 운영하며 월 1,000만원 이상의 사업 소득을 창출해 종잣돈을 빠르게 확보 배당 현금흐름: 주식 배당 투자를 통해 당해 연도 배당금 6,350만원 수령(연간 약 7,000만원 예상) 절세 배당 구조: 국내 주식형 커버드콜 ETF 중심의 비과세 배당을 활용해 금융소득종합과세 및 건강보험료 산입 기준을 구조적으로 방어 2. 해외 체류(치앙마이·조지아)를 선택한 제도적 배경 준조세(건강보험료) 부담 회피 사업 소득과 금융 배당 소득으로 인해 국내 체류 시 월 100만원 이상의 지역가입자 건강보험료가 부과되는 상황 3개월 이상 해외 체류 시 국민건강보험법상 급여 정지(납부 유예/면제)가 가능한 제도를 활용해 월 100만원 이상의 고정 지출을 절감 지리적 차익거래 건강보험료 절감분만으로도 동남아(치앙마이)의 월세와 한끼 3,000~4,000원대 식비 등 전체 현지 생활비가 충당되는 구조 형성 세법상 비거주자 지위 활용 국내 세법상 183일 이상 해외 거주 요건을 충족해 비거주자로 전환할 경우, 미국 주식 양도소득세 면제 및 현지 세제 혜택(조지아의 소상공인 1% 소득세 또는 말레이시아의 상속·증여세 면제 등)을 활용하려는 자산가들의 글로벌 이동 트렌드 제시 3. '활동형 파이어'로서의 일상과 콘텐츠 운영 조기 은퇴 후 무위도식하는 것이 아니라, 코워킹 스페이스를 기반으로 증시 라이브 방송, 책 집필, 영상 편집 등 주도적인 디지털 창작 활동을 유지 시간과 장소에 구애받지 않고 글로벌 어디서든 노트북 하나로 비즈니스와 투자를 지속할 수 있는 디지털 노마드형 1인 기업 체제 구축 앞서 살펴본 싱글파이어의 '무주택 월세 파이어'나 서대리TV의 '건보료·세금 리스크'와 결을 같이하면서도, 국내 제도적 규제(배당세, 건보료, 연금 개편)를 국내 안에서만 풀지 않고 '해외 체류를 통한 건보료 정지 및 글로벌 지리적 차익거래'라는 또 다른 축으로 회피하는 30대 파이어족의 실전 전략을 보여줌 출처 : 유튜브 윤석종
1
17
2,862
지도만 보고 따라가면 생각을 안 하게 되고, 그러면 인생이 꼬인다. 내비는 보조일 뿐 주 수단이 되면 안 된다. 아는 길과 내 감각을 믿자. 잘못 들어선 길은 결국 기회비용이다. 이미 할 일을 해 둔 사람만 덜 아프게 돌아간다.
1
5
624
연금은 지수 대신 우주·로봇에 집중하기로 했다. 앞으로 30년은 우주와 로봇으로 연결된 사회가 될 거라고 보고, AI 때문에 소수의 기업만 크게 벌고 나머지는 좀비 기업이 늘어날 거라는 게 내 관점이다. 미국 지수 투자는 일반인에게 부동산 대신 인플레이션을 막아 주는 좋은 대안이다. 하지만 투자자의 본질은 진짜 가치를 만드는 기업을 찾는 일이라고 생각한다.
2
1
2
394
Bitcoin is supposed to be boring because it’s money in itself. It’s the same thing as saying “dollars are boring”
So I slept on it. Woke up with the realization that Bitcoin is just not interesting to me. It used to be kind of interesting 5 years ago. Now it's just mostly boring. The things going on with AI is infinitely more interesting than Bitcoin.
1
401
It all comes down to money. When the bills come, people reveal who they really are.
What you see happening in France is essentially what will happen throughout the whole of Western and Southern Europe at some point Europe regulated away all new and existing businesses so they with the money and the talent moved elsewhere (like US and Asia) When money flees a continent, the businesses, then the people and the government run out of money Meanwhile cost of living keeps growing → people get poorer and → people need more government welfare → meaning the government has to borrow more money to pay for that → borrowing for worse and worse rates → which pushes down the Euro → meaning less spending power for its people → making Europeans even poorer
288
Exhanges get hacked. Cold wallets get drained. Where are we supposed to store BTC?
$BTC: Binance needs to replace the missing assets. Whatever cannot be restored through recoveries or existing company holdings needs to be BOUGHT BACK. The exact purchase amounts have not been announced. The estimated impact is $6.3 BILLION, with approximately $3 BILLION already frozen. The Frozen Funds will be Re-Minted and sent back to Binance while the Frozen funds will remain frozen forever. The full $6.3 billion represents 3.91% of all Binance holdings, once Tether/ Circle re-issue the frozen $3 billion, the remaining hacked amount falls to $3.3 BILLION, or 2.05% of total Binance assets. So in case nothing gets additionally frozen in the next days, simply translates into: Binance is forced to re-purchase $3.3 BILLION of stolen assets and that includes a big amount of Bitcoin. And in another way of translation this would mean, the Hacker holds $3.3 Billion worth of BTC and he won’t sell it as Hackers prefer BTC, and on top Binance needs to purchase Crypto and BTC worth $3.3 Billion. So overall, and mathematically correct this hack brings an inflow of $3.3 bn. This is why hacks are less harmful than liquidations such as FTX. Let the bears celebrate the panic. I remain VERY bullish. In my view, the bull market continues, my longs from $80,400 and my spot holdings from $60,000 remain open, and this hack does NOT shake me out. I entered this market prepared for volatility. Let the bears celebrate today’s drop. Yesterday Bitcoin was $2,000 above my long entry. Today, it is $2,000 below it. And I haven’t made a big deal out of it, ignore the volatile fluctuation and I’m trusting @cz_binance for 100%. The bull market needs to continue and I feel sorry for everyone who is capitulating based on this FUD.
1
1
713
From RE, who’s getting the real money? It’s the government. They tax you for buying home, holding it, and you must get their permission to renovate your property. Gov gets the ultimate benefits of RE along with rent-seeking banks.
You've already lost the real estate game The boomers own everything, and now they're going to make you give them the next 50 years of your life to sell you their 60 year old home Play a new game Buy Bitcoin
1
324
Billy Jo retweeted
Telling people to dump Bitcoin to buy "Super Intelligence" is the ultimate VC category error. "It’s a dead network that does nothing except store value." Yes. That’s literally the entire point. Gold hasn’t pushed a software update in 5,000 years. It commands an $18T market cap precisely because it does nothing except sit in a vault and refuse to be diluted. Money isn’t a Series B SaaS startup. It doesn’t need quarterly feature roadmaps, enterprise pivots, or hype. Predictability is the feature. Here’s the part they completely miss: AI is an engine of exponential abundance. It drives the marginal cost of code, content, and intelligence toward zero. Bitcoin is absolute mathematical scarcity. You don't sell the yardstick to buy more fabric. And when autonomous AI agents actually start transacting 24/7 at machine speed without bank accounts or KYC, what do you think they settle in-depreciating AI capex, or an immutable digital scarce asset? AI creates the abundance. Bitcoin is the pristine collateral you store it in.
A brutal year for Bitcoin is just getting started. Give me three minutes to explain why you should dump it now. Outflows from ETFs are signal and will continue. We will test the 57k low again in the next 12 months. Why? Because there are far too many dynamic places to put your money that are creating MUCH more value. Why put your resources into a dead network that offers nothing beyond a store of value? What's the point of place the BTC be if Bitcoin's Ponzi-scheme nature has gone away!?! The viral nature of bitcoin was it's power... if you didn't own you were MOCKED! Now? Completely reasonable, heck, SMARTER, to ignore bitcoin and place other bets! No one is trying to convince people to buy Bitcoin anymore... the memes and NFTs are gone. No one is saying $ BTC can change the world, because it won't — and BECAUSE AI HAS! Just sell and shift from Bitcoin to Super Intelligence because one provides little to no value, and the other provides unlimited upside for humanity. This should be obvious to everyone right now. Bitcoin will never break its all-time high again.
16
14
5
125
5,859
Bitcoin is useful and beneficial for those who had no access to transfer their wealth across time & space
A brutal year for Bitcoin is just getting started. Give me three minutes to explain why you should dump it now. Outflows from ETFs are signal and will continue. We will test the 57k low again in the next 12 months. Why? Because there are far too many dynamic places to put your money that are creating MUCH more value. Why put your resources into a dead network that offers nothing beyond a store of value? What's the point of place the BTC be if Bitcoin's Ponzi-scheme nature has gone away!?! The viral nature of bitcoin was it's power... if you didn't own you were MOCKED! Now? Completely reasonable, heck, SMARTER, to ignore bitcoin and place other bets! No one is trying to convince people to buy Bitcoin anymore... the memes and NFTs are gone. No one is saying $ BTC can change the world, because it won't — and BECAUSE AI HAS! Just sell and shift from Bitcoin to Super Intelligence because one provides little to no value, and the other provides unlimited upside for humanity. This should be obvious to everyone right now. Bitcoin will never break its all-time high again.
3
381
Why many Korean households are unhappy. A lack of understanding in personal finance and over-investment in housing = misery. Just buy S&P (better BTC) and buy a house you can afford or just rent it
Living in a $500k home with $2m invested: happiness. Living in a $2m home with $500k invested: misery.
4
412
Or buy STRC/SATA/SATS and let it pay your car
Most popular answer: pay off the car. My answer: keep the 7% loan, buy the bitcoin. 7% vs. an asset I expect to do 25% a year isn't close. nitter.gq/ts_hodl/status/2113669…
354
AI is more severe than COVID. Those 20th Century job will be gone soon. Must adopt new tech and adapt the new environment. We're entering the 1st generation of the Digital Age. PCs and smartphones were prelude.
Wake up. Every profession deemed white-collar, the middle class dream, is about to be decimated by AI, at a much faster pace than anticipated, with monstrous social consequences.
312
Buy a Tesla with FSD and drive it for 10 years. Buy a small apartment near public library and park. Be friends with a couple of restaurant owners in the city. Life is set.
Underrated life advice: Keep your personal burn rate low. Cheaper car. Smaller house than the bank says you can afford. No payment you'd panic about if work got weird. Low expenses aren't about being cheap. Low expenses give you options. And options = freedom.
2
322
200Week Moving average. When Bitcoin crashes to the level I buy more. But no need to do that just DCA and enjoy life
Replying to @bjunjo
Automatic DCA plus lump sum on crashes is the combination most people preach but few execute, because the two rules fight each other emotionally: DCA says buy regardless, lump sum on crashes says buy more when it hurts most. The reason it works since the dawn of Bitcoin is not magic — it is that crashes have historically been the moments when weak hands transfer coins to strong ones at a discount. The discipline is pre-committing the lump-sum trigger in writing before the crash, not deciding during it. What is your written trigger, a percentage drop or a price level?
1
3
315
Automatic DCA-ing Bitcoin is the way. It’s been that way since the dawn of Bitcoin. And yes buy lump sum when it crashes. Stay the course
Replying to @UncleDividends
I still remember buying Bitcoin after those brutal 70–80% crashes. I remember the fear, the uncertainty, and the sleepless nights. Especially after the FTX collapse. Back then, buying Bitcoin felt like taking an enormous risk. But I was beginning to understand what I was buying: an asset with a limited supply, no central authority, and a completely different approach to preserving wealth. I also understood something important: the reward might take years, not months. I started with just $20 a month. Today, I invest more than 60–70% of my income into Bitcoin. When the market crashes 30–40%, I do everything I reasonably can to accumulate more. What changed? Not Bitcoin. I changed. I stopped expecting quick returns. I stopped trying to predict the perfect bottom. I learned to think in years, not weeks. And most importantly, I learned that conviction means very little without patience, discipline, and risk management. We work hard to build our savings and secure our families' futures. Trusting a new form of money with that wealth takes time. Sometimes years. That's why I don't expect Bitcoin adoption to happen overnight. Bitcoin taught me that volatility is the price of uncertainty, but patience comes from understanding. What once terrified me now looks like an opportunity. Not because Bitcoin can't fall further. It absolutely can. But because I finally understand why I'm holding it. The biggest transformation wasn't in my portfolio. It was in my mindset.
1
2
7
834
Here's why I've been telling people that the 'retire early' part of FIRE is missing a big point. It's about financial independence that allows you to work on the things you want to do
<파이어는 허상이다> 어떤 의사가 쓴 글인데, 개인적으로 나는 구구절절 공감함. --- 나는 내성적인 게으름뱅이로 집에서 아무런 목표 없이 한량처럼 뒹굴거릴 때가 제일 행복하고 가치 있게 느껴져. 물욕도 없고 과시욕도 없고 취미생활도 다 저렴한 것뿐. 한 때 파이어를 꿈꾸고, 그것을 목표로 공부와 노력도 해봤고, 실제로 주변에 파이어를 한 사람도 만나봤어. 그리고 내린 결론은 파이어라는 것도 일종의 존재하지 않는 이상향에 불과하다는 거야. 파이어는 존재하지만 그게 우리가 상상한 그것은 아닌거지. 대개 근로소득의 가치는 너무 과소평가하고 파이어 이후의 은퇴생활은 너무 과대평가하는 경향이 있더라고. 그리고 현실적으로 파이어를 하려면 집(자가) 결혼, 출산 등 일부 혹은 전부를 희생해야할 때가 많아. 우선 세후소득이 500만원인 사람이 20년동안 버는 돈을 현재 가치로 환산하면 (이 때 편의상 중간에 소득이 줄거나 올라가는 건 배제하고 할인율은 2% 먹일게) 10억 정도야. 파이어를 하는 것만으로도 생애소득 10억과 그 10억에 따른 자본소득을 포기하게 되는 거지. 나같은 전문직이나 대기업 사원들은 저 금액이 2~3배까지도 커질 수 있어. 나중에 본인들 급여와 잔존근로연수 예상치로 한 번 ai 시켜서 계산해봐. 파이어를 하는 사람들은 현재의 생활비에 맞춰서 여유자금까지 포함한다 하더라도 예산이 빠듯한 경우가 많은데 인생의 예상치 못하게 큰 돈이 들어가는 이벤트를 만나게 됐을 때 근로소득에 비해 그 대응력이 무척 떨어지게 돼. 근로소득자는 생활비가 근로소득에 묶여 있기 때문에 기존 저축이 털리거나 대출을 받아 메꾸더라도 삶의 질에 큰 영향이 안 미치는 반면 파이어족은 돈으로 돈을 버는 구조상 종자돈을 팔아 이벤트를 막는 것 자체가 소득이 크게 감소하는 사건이 되고 만다. 그리고 그 다음이 바로 문제지. 내가 퇴직할 때의 내 인적 자본 가치, 내 근로소득은 파이어 기간이 길어짐에 따라 거의 무가치해진다. 나는 전문직 면허라는 해자(moat)가 있음에도 불구하고, 만약 내가 5~10년 정도 일을 쉰다고 하면 과연 어느 병원에서 날 뽑아줄까? 뽑아주더라도 지금 내가 버는 소득과 근로조건보다 훨씬 열악한 조건에서 일을 할수밖에 없다. 애초에 파이어를 했던 목적에서 훨씬 멀어지게 되는거지. 그리고 내 남은 인생은 지금의 반복이 아니야. 나는 늙고 약해지고 병도 걸리고 정신적으로도 약해지겠지. 그런데 만약 내 파이어 목표에 따라 집(자가) 결혼, 출산 등 일부 혹은 전부를 희생했다면? 내 사회적 안전망은 완전히 작살난 상태이다. 일본에서 돈이 있어도 노인들에게는 집을 안 팔고 세도 안 내준다는 얘기를 혹시 들어봤어? 같이 살진 않더라도 가족이 있는 노인조차 기피대상인데 독신 노인이라면 더 비참해지지. 그리고 직업 특성상 아픈 사람들을 많이 상대하는데, 이 때 보호자가 없으면 외롭고 비참한 걸 떠나서 병원과 의료진 입장에서는 완전히 천덕꾸러기, 골칫거리가 되고 만다. 또 하나, 사회적인 시선. 우리는 낯선 사람들을 만날 때 그 사람의 꼬리표를 보고 판단한다. 직업은 무엇인지, 어디 사는지, 누구 아빠인지, 누구 남편이지, 누구 지인인지 등등. 근데 그 상식적인 궤를 완전히 벗어난 삶을 살게 되면 본인은 괜찮아도 가까운 사람들이 힘들어지게 된다. 이것도 일본 사례긴 한데, 파이어를 재정적으로 성공한 일본인 남성 가장이 자신의 배우자와 자녀들이 아빠와 남편을 너무 부끄러워하고 수치스러워해서 견디지 못하고 재취업을 한 사례가 있어. 실제로 파이어를 성공한 사람을 만나본 건 두 가구 뿐이긴 해. 한 가구는 그래도 잘 안다 할 정도는 될 지인인데, 생각보다 우울해 보이고 인생의 목표를 잃어버린 거 같아 보였다. 무의미함과 권태로움은 파이어 이후 은퇴한 삶에서 해결해야할 주요한 리스크라고 생각했어. 나머지 한 가구는 건너 건너 소개로 만나봤는데, 열정적이고 행복해 보이지만 본인의 파이어 경험을 강연하고 책을 쓰고 블로그 유튜브 그런 걸 하면서 살고 있었다. 본인은 소득보다는 경제적 스트레스에 시달리지 않으면서 의미 있게 일을 하고 있다고 하긴 했는데 내 입장에서는 그냥... 직업을 자기개발 강사로 바꾼 사람 같아 보였어. 나는 내 타고난 성정과, 단기간에 고소득을 올릴 수 있는 직업, 그리고 만약의 사태 때 근로소득자로 돌아갈 수 있는 전문직 면허 소지자라는 점에서 누구보다도 파이어에 어울릴 사람이라 생각했지만, 실제로 파이어에 성공한 사람들 사례(온오프라인 다 합쳐서)와 위에 언급한 문제점 등을 고민해 봤을 때 파이어에 설령 성공한다 할지라도 별로 행복하지 않고 오히려 불행해질 확률이 높아진다고 결론을 내렸다. 그래서 오늘도 꾸역꾸역 토하면서 일을 하고 있어. 참고로 파이어를 포기하고 난 결혼도 하고 집도 사고(대출o) 애도 낳았어. 이제 파이어도 못하고 애들이 독립할 때까지 소득을 창출할 생각을 하면 타고난 게으름뱅이로서 한숨만 나오지만, 대안은 없는 거 같다. 인생은 불로소득보다 의미가 더 중요한 것 같기도. 아무튼 파이어를 꿈꾸는 사람들은 이런 부분에 대해서 충분히 고민해보는 게 좋을 거 같아.
1
2
396