
🚀分享AI实战经验和工具 🔍OPC商业变现研究 🔧中小企业定制AI Agent工作流 📧商业合作➕TG :@block0_eth
Joined April 2023
- Tweets9.3K
- Following4.9K
- Followers3.8K
- Likes4.7K
丢给 Opus 5.5 一张参考图片,
它用 three.js 做了一个 3D 蝎子交互网页,
细节几乎无可挑刺,
同时还具备强大的交互能力,
创作过程没有用专业的 blender 3D 建模工具,
纯靠 Opus5.5 模式的本身能力,
是不是又消灭了一个行业?
A➗最新的一篇 blog,
文章作者至少有 6 个华人,
含华量非常高,
A➗也是最反中的一家公司,
不知道这里的华人 250 仔,
有没有感觉到生理不适
We’ve trained Claude to flag potential misuse in conversations, a technique we call self-assessment. Right after it responds, Claude gives a preliminary safety assessment of the conversation.
Since we began using self-assessment in June, it has surfaced misuse that our other safeguards weren’t designed to catch.
Because Claude has already read the conversation, self-assessment is very efficient. And unlike classifiers, which target a discrete set of harms, it draws on Claude’s own judgment, so it gets more accurate as our models improve.
Read more on our new Safeguards blog:
safeguards.anthropic.com/202…
币安被攻击的链路调查清楚了,
是一位运维工程师的电脑被入侵,
黑客通过这台电脑登陆服务器提交了一笔未授权的资金请求,
宇宙第一大所的安全机制是不是有点脆弱了,
攻击其中一位运维工程师就面临这么大风险敞口,
运维体系分层分级管理是不是存在巨大的漏洞?
Binance's initial investigation suggests that the security incident may involve a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop, which allowed an attacker to gain access to a service container and submit unauthorized withdrawal transactions. We have found no evidence of any wallet private key leak. We will share a detailed technical post-mortem once the investigation is complete and the facts are fully verified.
The estimated total impact sits at around $6.3B. We have worked with blockchain partners to freeze affected assets, with ~$3 billion frozen on-chain so far.
Binance will cover all losses from the SAFU fund and the company’s funds. User funds are safe. We will also publish an updated Proof of Reserves once the remediation is complete.
As an immediate precaution, Binance has:
- temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals while security checks are completed;
- revoked the affected address authorisation;
- engaged law enforcement and blockchain intelligence partners to trace and recover funds.
Our teams are working around the clock to resolve this issue safely and thoroughly. We are working closely with our law enforcement partners to confirm the identity of these criminals and bring them to justice.
Please rely only on official Binance channels for updates. Please feel free to contact Binance Customer Support if you have any further questions.
binance.com/en/support/annou…
这次是热钱包被盗,
跟硬件钱包没关系,
应该是被钓鱼🎣了
币安被盗已经被版本提前预言,赵长鹏听信了假鬼子的话。
把币安热钱包多签在了硬件钱包 @OneKeyHQ 上。
造成了33亿的被盗损失。
大家不用担心,本次被盗取得资金不如 @cz_binance 首富身价的二十分之一,完全覆盖的了。
只是币安被盗说明了一个事情,未来不注重技术的公司会受到黑客的惩罚。
币安前端UI连 $BNB 持仓买入平均价格都算不明白,更何况安全问题。
希望这次被盗事件能让币安往严谨技术上偏一偏。
Claude Haiku 5.5 得分比 DeepSeek 的最新的模型还高,
A➗为了上市,
脸都不要了,
开始买通基准测试机构 AA,
搞这些下三滥的垃圾测试,
你当用户都傻,
就你聪明?
Announcing Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, featuring 2 new benchmarks and 3 upgrades. For the first time, the majority of the Index is built on private datasets
The Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is our composite measure of model capabilities across tasks reflecting real-world usage today. v5 is our biggest upgrade since v4 launched in January. With v5, 60% of the Index is now based on evaluations with private test sets or held-out answers.
Alongside Intelligence Index v5, we’re launching the Artificial Analysis Progress Index v1, which tracks model capability over time on one continuous scale.
New to the Intelligence Index:
➤ FrontierCode 2.0: Cognition's newly-launched private benchmark of real-world coding tasks, graded on whether a repository maintainer would merge the agent's change
➤ Terminal-Bench-Science: 70 agentic scientific research tasks, run in a terminal environment
Upgraded:
➤ HLE-Diamond (replacing Humanity's Last Exam): a refined 1,000-question version of Humanity's Last Exam, split evenly between reasoning and knowledge questions
➤ AA-Omniscience v1.1: An updated dataset with saturated and public set questions removed, new questions added, and ambiguous or erroneous questions revised
➤ CritPt v2: a private, 40-question hard subset of CritPt v2, revised by the CritPt authors and run with a code-execution tool
Staying in the Index: AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf and Terminal-Bench 4.0
Removed from the Index: GDPval-AA v2.1, SciCode, and AA-LCR v1.1
Key results:
➤ Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 58, ahead of GPT-6 Astra (max, 57) and GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 55): Anthropic and OpenAI hold the top five models. Gemini 4 Argon (high) is next at 50
➤ The open weights gap widens from 3 points to 12: Kimi K3.1 Pro (weights not yet released) is the top open weights model at 46. Among released weights, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) and GLM-5.3 (max) lead at 32 - 26 points behind the leader and below Claude Haiku 5.5 (max, 36)
➤ Cost per task varies by more than 13x among the leading models: of the 10 highest-scoring models shown, GPT-6.1 Terra (max) is the cheapest at $0.96 per Intelligence Index task and Claude Fable 5.1 (max) the most expensive at $13.04





















