Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack) header
Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack) profile picture

A tremendous slouch. Former payments and fintech analyst. Investor and writer. Dad and aspiring pro golfer. This is not financial advice.

St Louis, MO
Joined April 2025
Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)Photo by Bob's Payment Stock Substack (@bobspaysubstack)
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
M2020. Top Recaps - Part 1. Stripe is not only the payment engine for Muse, they are actually core to Meta's economics. The 300bps linked card is providing meta with ~100bps of revenue. Card networks are enabling the economics of Agentic. This works beyond Stripe merchants, and beyond Link wallets. The linked card creates alignment with Meta and Stripe. While Stripe may be capable of creating an alternative payment network, they can't create the economics (merchant acceptance of a 300bps card for stripe and non-stripe merchants). Big retailers are set to block this card (and "wallet") due to price, most of the large merchants require customer auth with merchant. The merchant friendly solution to Muse and agent integration is form @LoginID_io. A fantastic merchant friendly integration to their Auth. Expect a presentation w/ MRC.
13
9
11
208
72,579
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
I restarted writing my weekly newsletter called Fintech on File covering key trends and news in fintech. New weekly versions will be posted each weekend going forward. Below is what the latest edition covered: Fintech on File #6: Mastercard and Visa took stablecoin products live Oct 15, absorbing them as another rail. Also Ramp at $60B, Kraken buys an EU bank, and Stripe says agentic commerce went vertical in September. Subscribe: ottavi.substack.com/p/fintec…
1
2
290
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Prepare yourselves for an absolute onslaught of “strength of schedule” propaganda coming out of SEC Media Days this week!
239
134
42
2,144
145,396
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
WSJ is reporting $BAC $JPM and $WFC are considering an acquisition of one of $FISV’s debit networks in order to generate higher interchange revenue—owning the network exempts an issuer from the cap on debit interchange reserved for large banks under the Durbin amendment. The article doesn’t read as a deal being imminent and notes reservations by management teams, suggesting this may be a ‘kick the tires’ type of situation. A network in the hands of $JPM $BAC or $WFC would be problematic to $V for the obvious reason a big chunk of volume could potentially move away from them. It happened at a much smaller scale with $COF moving its debit portfolio from $MA to Discover. Hard to see how the politicians would react. The banks would be exploiting a loophole to violate the spirit of the law, but that’s already happening now with $CHYM and $XYZ. However, a more powerful network could create greater competition. An immediate impact would be that merchants and PSPs pay a lot more in interchange, which they’ll be none too pleased about. Would not be surprised at all to see $V $MA and others under some pressure tomorrow. Again, based on the article, a deal seems less than 50-50, but it’s just more uncertainty for the group, which is never good.
3
4
6
39
38,443
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
OTD: 07/04/2003🇺🇸 Albert Pujols takes Kerry Wood deep after a high & tight heater. Mike Shannon proceeds to give one of the greatest calls of all-time. RIP Mike🕊️
5
83
5
844
34,855
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
$PYPL PayPal blocker - Branded Rate. In my survey of MRC merchants, everyone thought highly of PayPal, ranking them #1 in fraud and operations. Their top issue by far was cost of branded "they can't charge 3.8% premium for a service that is not at parity to cards (ApplePay/ShopPay) running at 2.8%" and "we will do nothing new with them until they fix pricing". While merchants aren't about to turn them off, they certainly have no motivation to encourage use. As I see it PayPal has 2 stark options. Go up market and be the "amex of eCom" keeping the pricing or #2 grow the TPV and drop rates below card, with a plan to expand into BNPL and other VAS. This pricing issue also impairs Venmo at POS. Price needs to be ~50bps to compete w/ blended debit. Right now, no matter what innovation they create, the GTM is challenged. Beyond the pricing, merchants were crystal clear: "We will do nothing with PayPal, that addresses only 10% of our customer base, that's just not how campaigns work".
1
2
19
4,230
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Massive rotation into fintech. Market appears to be saying oil down, inflation down, rates down, consumer + lending + fintech up. Confirmation via crypto and crypto-linked stocks being down as well. $DAVE $AFRM $CHYM $KLAR $RKT
1
3
1
13
1,998
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
A good review of the most recent developments in settlement talks b/w merchants and $V and $MA. A reminder that when these interchange reductions/changes do eventually occur, they will likely be beneficial (at least temporarily) for PSPs and acquirers, especially those serving unsophisticated SMBs. Example: $XYZ Square charges a flat rate to many of its merchants and takes risk on the composition of spend. With interchange rates moving lower, Square will have a lower COGS, which will allow them to ‘lower’ the rate for their customers. In reality, it will yield a higher net take rate because they will lower their rate by a smaller amount than the decline in interchange. Eventually, it will be competed away, but historically it provides a near-term boost. Something to consider.
$V $MA. Positive on Merchant Litigation Settlement. Judge Brian Cogan granted prelim approaval of new settlement (addresses court's prior 2024 rejection). New terms, V/MA would lower US credit interchange by ~10bps over 5 yrs and cap, as well as loosen Honor All Cards/surcharging rules. "The Amended Settlement offers further relief: it would cap posted interchange rates on standard consumer credit cards at 125 basis points for at least eight years, marking a 62-basispoint reduction from the current average posted rate on standard cards" Significant update in wallets. "The Settlements would require the Networks to modify the Honor All Wallets rules to allow merchants to accept some digital wallets (e.g., Apple Wallet) and decline others (e.g., Google Wallet), subject to several restrictions" Settlements would allow all merchants to surcharge at the brand or product level up to 3% of transaction. Opinion storage.courtlistener.com/re…
1
2
11
5,087
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Replying to @DurableCreators
$V and $MA have been under 'attack' for decades. Nothing about their businesses, including actual results, has changed all that much. Of course, from time to time, concerns emerge that hit the stocks. It's a natural reaction b/c multiples are (typically) high (rightfully so) and concerns represent 'unknowns' even though they've successfully managed through all of these 'unknowns' so far. A couple of examples. In 2010, when the Durbin Amendment passed and debit interchange was slashed in the U.S., the market believed $V and $MA would be hurt (badly) b/c issuers would demand steep reductions in the fees they paid to the networks b/c of their lost interchange revenue. While $V and $MA did offer issuers relief, they balanced it by adding fees to merchants (who benefited greatly from lower debit interchange), reflecting the value networks bring to both merchants and issuers. Similarly, with BNPL. Post-pandemic, the market sensed a threat as BNPL providers were set to move credit outside traditional network rails. Fast forward to today, and the fastest growing product for BNPL providers is a network-branded card. Why? Because they realized the quickest way to gain broad acceptance was to partner with the networks and not establish a direct integration merchant-by-merchant. $V and $MA have endured b/c they've built a system with trust, broad acceptance, and habituation. I think it's going to serve them well whether agents or humans are paying, or if fiat currency is being used to pay or another digital asset (like stablecoins).
7
5
60
4,332
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Just listened to $XYZ at the JPMorgan conference. I think it’s a really interesting study in contrasts. Jack is very futuristic, describing $XYZ as a company that will one day (in the not too distant future) ‘stream intelligence’ to its customers, allowing them to build whatever product or feature they want with a simple voice command. That’s great, and very exciting. But one could argue that’s what contributed most (or meaningfully) to getting $XYZ ‘moving in the right direction’ is some fairly basic stuff: putting feet on the street to sell @Square (field sales and partner channel) and offering common sense incentives for users to engage more frequently with Cash App. I think it’s going to take some combination of the two to be successful moving forward.
1
1
1
19
3,882
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
BNPL Scorecard $AFRM $KLAR $SEZL $ZIP $XYZ $PYPL
1
23
2,800
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
As we head into earnings season, a quick reminder: @bobspaysubstack and I publish "The Public Ledger", a weekly @twifintech newsletter on publicly traded fintech companies. Give it a read and let me know what you think! Follow the link in the reply 👇🏻
1
3
11
1,859
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Replying to @ottavi_
Stripe buying $PYPL would essentially be the $FOUR playbook on steroids
1
2
4
1,323
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Wait, did I read…Thoma Bravo’s SaaS businesses are accelerating?
13
19
9
357
74,516
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
PayPal $PYPL: A deep numbers dive I spent the last week (yes, I’ll never get that time back) pulling apart PayPal’s financials. What did I find? At least 16 different volume streams, all with unique growth and margin profiles. Some are rarely mentioned, others discussed frequently. Yes, there are good parts of PayPal. High growth, high(er) margin products, like BNPL, Pay with Venmo and debit make up its foundational base, providing 4 points of PayPal’s targeted 7-9% underlying transaction margin dollar growth. Other parts of the business continue to struggle, most notably core checkout (i.e., PayPal Pay Now online checkout), which I estimate will grow TPV only 2.5% during 2025, down about 2 points from 2023 and 2024. While the upgrade to its modern checkout experience drags on, other digital wallets chip away. Braintree remains a wild card. The return of price discipline sets it up for profitable growth, but how fast and durable can it be against strong competitors like Adyen $ADYEN and Stripe? From my perspective, 2025 was a solid year for PayPal, but much of the growth came from pricing and robust credit expansion, which are unlikely to recur to the same degree during 2026. Add lower rates and stepped-up investments, and I expect reported transaction margin dollars to grow less than 3% in 2026. I don’t believe PayPal is a melting ice cube, but there’s much work to be done: stabilize core checkout, monetize Venmo, accelerate BNPL, develop advertising and exploit new opportunities, including agentic and stablecoins. Yes, the stock is cheap, and the balance sheet is in great shape. Downside is likely limited, but nothing makes me want to go out and buy the stock today. You can find all that and much more at the link below: open.substack.com/pub/bobham…
8
7
2
52
7,011
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Replying to @nataninvesting
Yes. $PYPL started 2025 trading 17.4x original 2025E EPS of $4.89. It now trades 10.4x 2026E EPS of $5.81. So the multiple contracted 60%, current 2026E EPS is 19% above original 2025E, stock down 30%. Bet that doesn’t happen too often.
4
1
13
1,843
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Meaningful opportunity for $PYPL to ramp SMB lending. They've done just $30B in originations since 2013. Block $XYZ will do ~$7B just this year. $PYPL processes $235B of SMB volume annually vs. $250B for $XYZ. PayPal Applies to Establish Bank wsj.com/finance/banking/payp… via @WSJ
1
2
947
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Long post incoming… There was a recent post on $XYZ on reddit with a lengthy reply that highlighted a lot of skeptical points about Block. I tried addressing on reddit but don’t have proper posting rights on the forum (or I’m a reddit noob and didn’t do it right, you be the judge). In any case I thought the points were worth addressing in some forum, so here it is. Onto the rebuttal to the rebuttal… Jack is, in my opinion, a design and network-structure savant. I spent a decade investing in fintech before joining Block. I haven’t met anyone else who sees the world or designs systems the way he does. His ability to create simple interfaces, build networks, and structure ecosystems is unmatched. He is also the only person who has founded and been CEO of 2 S&P 500 companies. That is an extraordinary accomplishment. He seeded Cash App and created the environment for its success and was early in recognizing Bitcoin’s potential. I think Jack’s track record is really under-appreciated. On capital allocation, I don’t think anyone would argue we’ve maximized the value of Tidal yet. But it’s also not a meaningful investment today after scaling the business down last year and the team has some cool stuff in the hopper. More importantly, capital allocation cuts both ways. Anyone who criticizes Tidal should also acknowledge that scaling Cash App was one of the best capital allocation decisions in the history of the industry. Scaling the P2P network from scratch was expensive and the team faced internal and external pressure early on to cut spending back. Had leadership listened, Block would have missed one of the most successful “act twos” in fintech history. People did not believe in Cash App in the moment. Those people were wrong, and now Cash App is more than half the gross profit of Block. That was capital allocation and execution. FWIW, I hear skepticism about Proto that echoes the skepticism Cash App received 8–9 years ago. As Square has grown up market, we've done so profitably, with 5-6 quarter paybacks and marginal ROIs of 250%+. We’ve gone from 0 to ~150 field sales people over the past year to move up market and we’re moving up market fast while generating healthy LTVs. We’ve grown Cash App gross profit at a 21% CAGR over the past ~2.5 years and guided to growing Cash App gross profit at a high teens compounded growth rate over the next 3 years. Last quarter we grew actives to 58 million and guided to growing at a low single digit rate going forward. The breadth of our ecosystem across P2P, commerce tools, banking, investing, savings, borrowing, and bitcoin is unmatched in my opinion in the industry. As of October we had 8.7M primary banking actives in Cash App. That is before any benefit from our new Cash App Green status program and before we launched any lending functionality aimed squarely at this audience. When we bring an active from P2P to Primary Banking status we see ~10x increase in gross profit per active. We have a lot of runway here. Afterpay BNPL losses remain around 1% of GMV (there was a stat in the post that 41% of BNPL is paid late which is not at all reflective of our data). Cash App Borrow has held loss rates under 3% even while scaling massively . In aggregate our consumer lending volume grew about 50% last quarter, margins as a % of originations have stayed stable through time at about 2%, and return on invested capital (ROIC) was 28% in Q3. I do not think there is another fintech platform with that combination of growth, margins, risk loss stability or returns on capital. If you find one let me know. Our proprietary data and our incredible team of engineers and technologists in risk drive our ability to lend effectively to our customers. As Nick Molnar said, lending is a superpower at Block. The data bears this out. Our 3 year strategy is quite clear in my eyes: We plan to expand Square as a standalone ecosystem by investing meaningfully in new distribution channels, including field sales and partnerships, to move up market and grow internationally. We plan to do so while growing gross profit roughly in line with GPV, and we’ll increasingly power Square sellers through Managerbot. We plan to grow Cash App actives and deepen engagement with our Primary Banking strategy. Driving faster product innovation into a larger and larger actives bases drives our expectation for strong growth at scale (Cash App Card is already the 4th largest debit program in the US). We plan to connect Square and Cash App through our Neighborhoods product, and use each part of the Block ecosystem to drive strength in the other. We haven’t executed here in the past, I believe deeply in the product structure that exists to connect them now. We plan to drive all of this with AI functionality for sellers (Managerbot) and consumers (Moneybot) built on our proprietary internal agentic AI platform goose. I’d encourage you all to play around with Moneybot in Cash App in the coming weeks/months as all our customers get access to it. AI is going to be the next major shift in how we invent intuitive interfaces for our customers. I haven’t seen anything like Moneybot out in the market. I think the backward looking frustration is reasonable. But we also have a forward looking plan that I deeply believe in that calls for us to grow gross profit at a mid-teens compounding rate over the next 3 years while we expand margins, driving >30% Adjusted Operating Income growth and >30% Adjusted EPS growth. There aren’t many companies at our scale delivering that growth profile. Now it’s time to execute.
22
23
4
105
21,359
Bob's Payment Stock Substack retweeted
Mastercard $MA and Visa $V are ranked numbers one and two, respectively, on my list of the Top Ten Businesses in #Payments and #FinTech Much of the debate in payments today centers on ecosystem players: Will Fiserv’s $FISV decision to rescind fees for Clover step-up price competition across the industry? Are modern platforms (Adyen $ADYEN and Stripe) and best-in-class SaaS companies (Shopify $SHOP and Toast $TOST) eventually going to take most of the volume away from legacy players? Can Apple Pay and Shop Pay further erode PayPal’s $PYPL digital wallet dominance? How many deposits will the neobanks, including Chime $CHYM, SoFi $SOFI, Cash App $XYZ and Venmo, win from traditional financial institutions? All great questions. All irrelevant to Visa and Mastercard. Why? Because all roads lead to Visa and Mastercard. Visa and Mastercard operate classic toll bridge business models: they collect a small fee every time data (a car) moves across their technology network (the bridge); there is no credit risk; competition is rational; and market share moves very little over time. Even though there are clunkers and hot rods moving across their bridges each day, it makes no difference to Visa and Mastercard, because all value accrues to them. Using another metaphor, Visa and Mastercard have many lieutenants in their war on cash and checks; they don’t care who they are, only that they fight. bobhammel.substack.com/p/all…
1
1
9
3,186