Jeff's views (@buttonholed) header
Jeff's views (@buttonholed) profile picture

A Unicycling Glass Cutter / Literary Fiction Blogger / Globetrotter Visitant through the pages of author’s minds ~ (here/not here)

Ohio U.S.A. ☆彡 🦅
Joined May 2013
Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)Photo by Jeff's views (@buttonholed)
“For my whole life, my favorite activity was reading. It's not the most social pastime.” ― Audrey Hepburn
1
32
1
53
Jeff's views retweeted
Just finished this different but nice little story by @joe_hill. I liked it!
1
1
26
675
Jeff's views retweeted
I’m gonna make a couple of observations about yesterday’s election. If you’re not interested…scroll on. There comes a point in every argument when someone finally asks the question that should have been asked at the beginning: “Are we going to do anything about this?” I suspect a great many Americans reached that point long before yesterday’s election. For months, we’ve endured the familiar spectacle of American politics. The accusations. The counteraccusations. The endless parade of talking heads explaining why everything wrong with the country is somebody else’s fault. The carefully rehearsed outrage. The promises that everything will change if we’ll just give one party or the other another chance. And yesterday, the voters spoke. Political analysts will dissect the numbers, examine demographic shifts, and assign blame. Republicans will conduct their postmortems. Democrats will celebrate. But I wonder whether they’re all missing something. The American electorate is becoming less interested in who wins the argument and more interested in who fixes the problem. So, the Democrats have won. Now what? Already, we’re hearing the familiar sounds of political combat. Investigations are being promised. Subpoenas are being discussed. California Congressman Robert Garcia, poised to chair the House Oversight Committee, greeted the election results with two words: “Lawyer up.” There may well be legitimate matters requiring investigation. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to exercise oversight, and no president or administration should be exempt from accountability. But accountability and political vengeance are not the same thing. If Democrats interpret yesterday’s election primarily as permission to spend the next two years pursuing Trump and his Republican colleagues, they may discover that voters have considerably less patience for political theater than they imagine. Because this election wasn’t simply a referendum on Donald Trump. It was also an assignment handed to the Democrats. And assignments come with expectations. The family struggling to pay its mortgage doesn’t particularly care which congressional committee produces the most embarrassing headline. The small-business owner trying to survive rising operating costs isn’t waiting breathlessly for the next televised confrontation between political adversaries. The elderly widow choosing between prescriptions and groceries isn’t especially interested in which party constructs the most devastating campaign advertisement. These people have problems. Real problems. And they’re entitled to expect the people they elect to do something about them. The distance from the White House to MY house grows ever greater, and I wonder whether the political establishment has any idea how exhausted Americans have become with the endless culture wars. I have friends who are Democrats, Republicans, and independents. We disagree about plenty of things. Sometimes profoundly. But increasingly, I hear a common frustration: Enough with the labels. Enough with the ideological purity tests. Enough with reducing every disagreement to accusations of racism, fascism, socialism, bigotry, or whatever other convenient epithet happens to be fashionable this week. Not every disagreement is evidence of moral depravity. Not every political opponent is an enemy of the republic. And not every problem facing America can be solved by finding somebody to blame. If I could address the Democrats who won yesterday, along with those already holding office, I’d tell them: “You’ve been given an opportunity. Do NOT mistake it for entitlement.” Because if the next two years produce little more than investigations, recriminations, partisan obstruction, and another exhausting cycle of political warfare, following the next election the Democrats may find themselves stumbling around in a daze asking the same question Republicans are asking this morning. “What happened?” And to the Republicans who lost yesterday: the voters have told you something, too. You might want to listen. The celebration will end. The television cameras will move on. The campaign signs will come down. But life goes on. Millions of Americans will continue getting up, going to work, paying their bills, caring for their families, and trying to make ends meet. Just as they did before the election. Just as they will today, tomorrow, and the day after. And they will be watching. Political power is borrowed. I sincerely hope that fact isn’t lost on either party. Because in a democratic republic, power does not belong to the people who hold office. It belongs to the citizens who temporarily entrust them with it. And those citizens retain the right to take it back. The argument is over. Now fix something!
66
34
10
204
12,802
Jeff's views retweeted
Get out there and kick Trump in the balls with your vote!
1
3
20
390
Jeff's views retweeted
Our granddaughter who can fly
972
979
52
33,186
242,205
Ginger Snap Louise Playing nurse ~
8
Jeff's views retweeted
26
17
4
261
3,770
Chillin’ in my backyard Finished mowing ~
14
HOPE TO SEE YOU! Will be adding dates soon for Bel Air Barnes & Noble and Odd Bird Books. Also more appearances for late October/early November. If your local bookseller is interested in hosting me, please ask them to email [email protected]. Thanks!
6
3
22
2,007
Jeff's views retweeted
Obama really had zero chill as President😍😍
87
1,273
65
12,054
383,729
interesting that Hemingway is so often seen with cats, never with a dog. it's delightful to visit the Hemingway House in Key West where beautiful confident cats roam at will, & visitors are allowed to pet them. upstairs, a (manual) typewriter at a standing desk. how forlorn the writing life truly is, & how much more lonely & pointless it would be without cats.
Hemingway with one of his many cats.
34
67
7
946
25,098
Jeff's views retweeted
R.I.P. Tim Curry (Pennywise) who’s entered The Clearing at the End of the Path.
2
8
2
65
1,127
Jeff's views retweeted
Está lo que llaman fotogenia y luego tenemos a Audrey Hepburn rompiendo todos los moldes.
30
169
2
1,531
71,395
Want to deliver KILLING THE BOOGEYMAN promo items to your local bookstore(s)? Email [email protected]. Thanks!
4
1
10
1,439
Jeff's views retweeted
An unforgettable finale awaits, constant readers. The last book in the Talisman Trilogy, the #1 New York Times bestselling collaboration between @StephenKing and Peter Straub, OTHER WORLDS THAN THESE is out October 6. In this video from Stephen King, he shares a little about the story behind the story and what readers can expect. @skdotcom_news bit.ly/4vOZ8AJ
5
16
5
107
4,171
6
5
44
2,006
Jeff's views retweeted
ICYMI: I'll be picking a winner on Monday 17th, so still time to enter! x
My new novel, Serenity Falls, publishes on Sept 10th - which also marks TEN years since I got my first publishing deal for The Chalk Man. To celebrate, I'm giving away signed, limited edition copies of ALL seven of my books to one lucky winner. Just like and RT to win! 😃
6
28
5
93
2,784
Jeff's views retweeted
My new novel, Serenity Falls, publishes on Sept 10th - which also marks TEN years since I got my first publishing deal for The Chalk Man. To celebrate, I'm giving away signed, limited edition copies of ALL seven of my books to one lucky winner. Just like and RT to win! 😃
123
528
20
654
26,855
Jeff's views retweeted
Candy Dulfer’s saxophone technique stands out for its seamless blend of funk, smooth jazz, and rock, delivering a warm, emotional sound that feels alive and full of energy, especially in live settings. She primarily plays the alto saxophone. As a child she started on the soprano because her father’s tenor felt too heavy, then switched to the alto and has stayed with it ever since. Largely self-taught, she absorbed deep influence from her father Hans Dulfer as well as legends like Maceo Parker, David Sanborn, Charlie Parker, and Sonny Rollins. That mix of sources gives her playing both accessibility and a clear personal stamp. What defines her sound most is its warmth, depth, and soul. Her notes rarely feel purely technical; they seem to sing, carrying a quiet sense of life and character. She has excellent dynamic control, moving easily from a soft yet full-bodied tone ideal for ballads to a sharper, cutting edge that slices through dense pop or funk arrangements. Her articulation is precise and nuanced, particularly in funk contexts where intricate rhythms and constant sixteenth-note subdivisions keep her tightly locked with the rhythm section. These subtle details are hard to capture fully on paper, which is why the best way to absorb her approach is by careful listening and transcription of her performances. In improvisation she favors a melodic path. Solos often grow from pentatonic scales—especially minor pentatonic—combined with chord tones and short motifs that she repeats and gently varies. Many of her lines begin in the lower register of the alto and gradually climb, building intensity. She tends to play reactively, listening to the band first and then responding, rather than always leading the way as Maceo Parker does. On the famous track “Lily Was Here,” she treats the saxophone almost like a vocal line: simple, memorable, and emotionally direct. On stage the energy rises further; she aims to get audiences on their feet and dancing. Her practice habits are practical rather than academic. She admits she does not spend much time on long tones or classical scales. When she needs to reset her embouchure she simply works soft-to-loud-to-soft phrases. More often she plays along with Maceo Parker records or works through tunes with tricky chord progressions to stay sharp and inspired. For many years she relied on a classic Selmer Mark VI, prized for its dark, complex tone. Later she moved to a handmade Amsterdam Free Wind saxophone that keeps the same warmth while offering easier intonation and stronger high notes, better suited to both jazz and more contemporary styles. Overall, Candy Dulfer’s technique avoids rigid classical paths. Instead it weaves jazz, funk, and rock into something natural and inviting. The result is playing that feels technically solid yet always approachable, which is why her live performances continue to draw listeners in with such lasting energy and appeal.
10
50
4
429
25,793