Callum (@callumflack) header
Callum (@callumflack) profile picture

design + code @vana | folly ~ persist | mise en scheme | @idiomata_

Northernmost South
Joined February 2009
Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)Photo by Callum (@callumflack)
The instant wherein that supreme quality of beauty, the clear radiance of the esthetic image, is apprehended luminously by the mind which has been arrested by its wholeness and fascinated by its harmony is the luminous silent stasis of esthetic pleasure. — James Joyce
the world is magic if you pay attention
6
305
1
3,796
104,853
When John Boyd said "do something or be somebody" he understood what Girard called metaphysical desire
1
7
143
A surprising number of people don't actually want excellence. They want the identity of someone pursuing excellence.
1
3
47
the Aristotelian twist is that "do something" is itself a way of becoming somebody. ie. desire is not bad. you can't hide from it, it just is. thus it depends on what and who you're paying tribute to: "our hearts are restless until they rest in You" (St Augustine)
1
24
Callum retweeted
Make sure to direct your energy towards things that are truly yours.
24
54
6
830
20,183
[POST] "It is from the oath—or, better, from perjury—that magic and spells are born…" Quick notes on magic, faith, and oaths from Agamben's excellent Sacrament of Language Large language models make the oath visible again. A model can produce the words of a promise, but it has no life in the world to stake on keeping it. Someone has to answer for what gets done.
1
71
High trust societies are more innovative and dynamic. Trust is about a belief that in the future my collaborator won't screw me. That we all believe in something bigger than a transactional zero sum win. When everyone believes, magic is real.
23
That DFW internet meme about fish in water where he quips "what the hell is water?". Clearly he was implicitly saying to us "what the hell is language?"
74
The improviser has to understand that his first skill lies in releasing his partner’s imagination. — Keith Johnstone, Impro
4
251
Callum retweeted
A few years ago I wrote a popular series on tacit knowledge. One big idea in that series was that tacit knowledge may be acquired through osmosis — and in fact it's the most common way to acquire such knowledge. This IS how the master-apprentice model works after all!
2
6
83
3,978
You can just ignore things.
1
2
8
310
The world runs on headlines, but scenes run on idioms that unfold into infinite tokens
How to capture attention: Fifteen years ago when we were building RethinkDB it was on top of Hacker News all the time. To this day ppl remember this and maybe once a month someone asks me for help with launching their project. It worked like this. I would think of an HN headline first, then we'd build the next product version to do whatever the headline promised. We'd submit to HN and it would either rise to the top or it wouldn't. Then we'd do it again. This loop taught me a few things which I use to this day: 1. It RL'ed me to generate good headlines. It's a skill you can develop through trial and error. I can maybe distill it to some rules of thumb, but a lot of it is, does it sound right? Is the rhythm right? Does the headline “hit the spot”? Not easy to explain. 2. I became headline-pilled. The world runs on headlines. People will grant you maybe 15 tokens of attention. Unless they feel there is some irreducible essence captured in these 15 tokens, they’ll move onto something else. This is true of your boss, your investors, your colleagues, your employees, your customers, social media audiences, even old acquaintances you randomly bump into. “So… what’s been going on in your life?” You only have 15 tokens, i.e. a headline, to answer this question. 3. Unless you already think in headlines, you can't build something and come up with a good headline post-factum. It just doesn't work out well. If you do that, either the headline will be true but boring, or it will be enticing but not credible. You've got to come up with a headline first and build towards it. 4. Working this way prevents feature creep. You build the minimum feature set necessary to make the headline credible. If smtg doesn't serve the headline, it's out. Once you have enough to make the headline credible, you ship. And headlines are by definition short, so your development cycle becomes very nimble and efficient. 5. It makes time-boxing easy. "Headline goes out by Sep 15th (or whatever), we gotta build enough to credibly share it with the world. Ready, set, go." This preempts all the debate about sprints, estimates, methodologies, prioritization, and so on. You just loop: headline -> build -> ship, headline -> build -> ship. It makes the development process really smooth. In the age of Codex when building is cheap, this becomes even _more_ relevant. People are DDoS'ed with information, and it will only get worse. So a headline is all you get. You can make much more ambitious headlines come true now, but you still only get 15 tokens before ppl scroll past you. Btw, once you master this idea a whole world opens up. You can play with violating these rules in a hundred ways and still capture attention. But not easy to do that until you've mastered thinking in headlines first.
1
1
175
This mid 20 something loves Bouvard retweets, and has been working on an idea people interested in Adam’s work or GA might find useful: github.com/baartmans2/origin… (this is mostly vibe coded, and with my startup taking most of my time, collaboration would be great).
There’s a whole contingent of mid 20 somethings on this site that is absolutely foaming at the mouth for a bouvard retweet. Center this center that, if you centered on yourself, then the real Center would find you
2
3
1
7
730
In the future, everyone will be famous for 15 tokens "A headline is 15 tokens; that's all you've got" @spakhm That is, you have about 5-10 words
Replying to @spakhm
Related: the tokenomics of coordination lesswrong.com/posts/4ZvJab25…
1
95
[Post] Pursuing a quality directly can undermine the very thing that allows it to arise. Example: trying to be safe can interrupt the attention that keeps one safe.
1
3
3
177
This came out of recent readings + logging fragmentary notes & thoughts: nitter.gq/callumflack/status/211…
Language can guide understanding, but is not a substitute for it (many ramifications): “Having antifragility is good. Aiming for it is bad.” “The way out of mimetic theory is to stop thinking about it so dang much” “The single most important thing is not to look for the single most important thing”
1
2
36