
👷🏾♂️x👨🏾💻 Building @GlobalPVP_
Ethereum
Joined June 2017
- Tweets4.3K
- Following429
- Followers1.7K
- Likes13.1K
How does the same attack happen, 3 times over 3 weeks?
Like wtf are we doing?
Sad new today. 1h ago I got drained for ~5k.
I think there's something wrong going on with Predictfun and I am not the only victim.
All the victims seems to be related to predictfun as well.
The funds are already gone (on Tornado cash)
This is the address receiving the money
0x8b001D7378DBc19C1c62E39c0fC9FFAD84182fBa
My takeaway is - ‘8 years later as the 3rd employee and got a measly $10m in shares for one of the fastest growing unicorns’
Either bollocks or corporate scammed himself.
Early retail investors got better returns for doing zero work.
In 2018 I tried to cut my Revolut salary to £0.
I’d just been promoted to VP. We’d just closed Series C. 3 years in, I had full conviction Revolut would become a $1T company. I didn’t want cash. I wanted shares.
My general counsel wouldn’t let me go below minimum wage. It was against the law. So I took minimum wage and the rest in equity.
I had ~£20k in the bank from university side hustles. I built a simple runway model and I had about two years before I went broke. LFG.
So I rented a 300 sq ft studio five minutes from the office and ate free company food to keep costs down.
Today those shares are worth $10M+.
There’s so many alternative pads that don’t bum you with predatory fees, but I learned a couple years ago that in casino & crypto industry, that people genuinely like being 🍇’d
Then factor in ‘sunk cost fallacy’ - people would prefer to ‘beat the platform’ than accept defeat.
There are Skins Casino’s with 40-60% RTP, that people willingly choose to play on, also familiarity with a venue becomes a trap.
It’s madness to those that aren’t familiar with the neurological and emotional drivers.
Deployers of these projects are so stupid, because why do they think that having ‘no dev supply’ is bullish?
You have zero incentive to build, so why would anyone support it?
Just be honest if you accumulated supply on side wallets.
Shady 1k buy from a fresh wallet with zero prior transactions at a 4k mcap. Address: 0x348a498e0604c397827ff08a3c7bddd89d16417b
Almost certainly dev-related. Nobody in their right mind drops 1k on a 30 sec old coin out of nowhere. Dev denying they hold supply tells you everything you need to know about where this is heading.
@HookshadeRH
$HOOKSHADE 0x12524323c2ee0e89166cc895d5d369c5d76ce9f7
The performance of OHM is very misunderstood.
It trades at a 264m Marketcap today.
Ignore the volume and liquidity, I just went on the first pair I found.
The answer to the question is yes, its survived multiple cycles.
$NET can replicate this, but holders need to know they can redeem for NAV, in order for it to be truly backed by NAV and they also need to be able to have a say in onchain governance over the Treasury.
It’s true.
The repricing will come, there’s some easy unlocks and catalysts that I think we should push for though.
Making $NET an ownership coin by definition; give the holders guaranteed ownership of the protocol.
- Enabling redemptions of the underlying with a spread, would increase NAV and reduce supply.
- Guardrails for pTEAM and handover to a governance contract and Timelock
$NET is one of the clearest mispricings on Robinhood right now🤯
~2 months ago, when $NET first hit $600, the treasury was valued below $2M
now, $NET’s circulating mcap is roughly 10x below the treasury it holds
buyback activity has nearly doubled since october 19, yet $NET is still trading around $160
sometimes the market is just stupid at pricing fundamentals. this is where the opportunity sits
everyone will buy at the price they deserve
Brother you're not seeing that back, just look forward.
How about (if you have enabled it) - you change the fee recipient and allocate it to the community and encourage a Takeover.
Or
Do nothing and a different ethereum:0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 token off the launchpad gets the mindshare.
A statement on the ZC team.
The ZC team has decided to shut down their project / token. Shortly after we ended ZC's 10% fee share, they blocked us on X and deleted their Telegram, so we have no private way to reach them. That is why we are saying this publicly.
Every team has the right to end its project. What we don't accept is how this was handled.
While ZC held a 10% fee share on Stockereum, its foundation wallet (0x984A7bB0809c0b8809Ca9D8a744fE4564023304b) received 12.66 ETH.
That ETH was paid to support ZC project and its holders. With the project shut down, it no longer serves that purpose.
We are asking the ZC team to return the 12.66 ETH. All of it will go to the teams that are still building on Stockereum.
All transfers are public and anyone can verify them on-chain. We hope the ZC team does the right thing.
@zipcoincash / @0xstanczyk
Just rotate your keys, it’s not that complicated.
I’ll literally coordinate a takeover myself.
$ZC literally does not have to die this way, just seems like a cop out of an exit
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
If the stolen funds are allegedly frozen, how does Duelbits expect them to keep 2m, let alone send back 5m?
Making progress with the hacked 7M.
Have some funds frozen on some websites / exchanges.
I’m coming for the hacker. I want my money back.
Make both of our jobs easier, keep 2M send me back 5M, we will call it even. Or I’m gonna find you and get it all back and more.
Send 5M to hot wallet and nothing will be spoken about again.
Dexscreener should not support the garbo coins, this is the Top 4 Trending and this is why we can't have nice things.
Actual tokens delivering back revenue share or backing NAV like $NET gets <10% of this volume currently.
Traders are incentivising bundlers and extraction right now, its retarded.
Yea so I just checked your api by the way:
api.metric.xyz/public/v1/evm…
Why the heck do you take 5-25x more from LPs than Pancakeswap?
15% of the LPs profits its currently set to and you can configure it to 50%?
Metric is launching its DEX on @BNBCHAIN.
Active Pools and propAMM infrastructure, built for one of the largest onchain markets for tokenized stocks and RWAs.
Everything onchain, priced to reality. Soon metric.xyz
The reason the market was so much more PVE in the last cyles, is because the barrier to entry to be a 'dev' was so much higher, you actually had to know something.
Now you can larp as a dev and rely on AI or just bundle tokens on launchpads.
Replying to @camdenInCrypto
Wish there was a way to shutdown the launchpads or number of shitcoins they launch.
Why are so many people crashing out, like it’s 10/10 2025.
Markets down like 6% on the week lol.
Also, you literally got the $NET floor in and it’s up like 20% from the bottom.
What do I attribute the value of $LOSE to?
Like does it represent a share of something?
Am I missing something?
Shareholders,
In-app incentives are always so boring. Points for volume, a leaderboard, an airdrop at the end that everyone farms with the same wallet script. The reward is for doing what the app wanted you to do anyway, and you wait months to find out what it was worth.
So we made one for losing, and you get it on the spot.
$LOSE is minted when you lose money on NET LONG or on the FUTURES desk. Lose a dollar, get LOSE, in the same transaction that records the loss. It lands in your wallet as a normal token with a live pool. No lockup, no vesting, no claim page, no snapshot, no season. You can sell it before the position that earned it has finished closing.
The mint rate decays with every dollar lost, so early losers get the most per dollar and later ones get less and less.
Every transfer pays 5%. 2% burns $LOSE, 3% is sold for USDG and lands in the NetNet Treasury.
More Soon.
ᄃΛMDΣП retweeted
Why so bearish you ask?? I see $2.90 for ethereum:0xa27ec0006e59f245217ff08cd52a7e8b169e62d2 as just the first target.
Plenty of reasons to be bullish tho:
1) AI vs privacy is an arms race. As AI grows, privacy infra becomes necessary for coordination across humans, agents, and both. Buying privacy now is the equivalent bet of buying defense stocks before a major conflict.
2) Once you can mix private and public logic in the same smart contract and execute locally without anyone knowing, you open a design space that didn't exist before. It's a Pandora's box we have no framework to price today.
3) Aztec's core moat is that it is decentralized. In a world where AI builds most software and decides which tools and solutions get used, unstoppable private smart contracts become the real differentiator, which fuels a reflexive growth of anonymity sets in a winner-takes-most market.
4) Aztec has the most experienced privacy team. What others are trying now, they already tried it years ago. It's a deep research company that pushed science whose breakthroughs are only now becoming usable.
We're still pre-explosion, like mRNA research before COVID, the hard science was done, but the real full impact hadn't unlocked yet.
5) If this usage materializes, value accrues directly to the token: fees are paid in AZTEC and burned. Higher usage leads to more fees burned, which creates a direct link between network activity and token supply reduction (price appreciation)
This would have crazy utilisation if it was deployed on Robinhood Chain.
Imagine putting $NET's RWA Sleeve to work, earning passive yield on Aave
Wen?
Well, this is going to change
Stocks on @aave now earn yield
The most interesting aspect is that the yield is more than the current borrow rate (let's see how long for)

























