CaseCiter retweeted
๐
๐ค Made with AI
GIRISHBHAI NATWARLAL PATEL v. GAUTAM PUNJABHAI PALKHIWALA (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
๐
๐ค Made with AI
SANTHOSH KUMAR N.P. v. STATE-STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRUR POLICE, TELLICHERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Criminal law cannot be used as munitions to settle personal scores, #SupremeCourt tells all men and women ๐
SANTHOSH KUMAR N.P. v. STATE-STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRUR POLICE, TELLICHERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
This #SupremeCourt judgment by Justice BV Nagarathna must be referred by every lawyer defending a man who is accused of rape/deceit/fraud merely because he withdrew from a relationship:
SANTHOSH KUMAR N.P. v. STATE-STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRUR POLICE, TELLICHERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
SANTHOSH KUMAR N.P. v. STATE-STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRUR POLICE, TELLICHERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
"Here we have a Tribunal โinnovating at pleasureโ" !
Damodar Valley Corporation v. Maithan Alloys Limited & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
"The decisions of the highest court of the land to be followed, without which there will be mayhem."
#SupremeCourt says it is conscious of the criticism that its decisions are supreme not because it is infallible but only because it is the final Court.
However, finality and closure is the expedient need in litigation, the Court added.
Damodar Valley Corporation v. Maithan Alloys Limited & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Damodar Valley Corporation v. Maithan Alloys Limited & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
#SupremeCourt reiterates principles governing the grant of leave to appeal to a person who was not a party to the original proceedings:
GIRISHBHAI NATWARLAL PATEL v. GAUTAM PUNJABHAI PALKHIWALA (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Who all can file First Appeal under S.96 CPC?
GIRISHBHAI NATWARLAL PATEL v. GAUTAM PUNJABHAI PALKHIWALA (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
A stranger to a compromise decree is not barred from filing an appeal and can seek leave to appeal, holds #SupremeCourt !
GIRISHBHAI NATWARLAL PATEL v. GAUTAM PUNJABHAI PALKHIWALA (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
GIRISHBHAI NATWARLAL PATEL v. GAUTAM PUNJABHAI PALKHIWALA (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Is Section 37 jurisdiction as broad as Section 34 Jurisdiction?
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Yet another saga of an arbitral award sailing into rough seas. ๐
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Can a Court consider admissions made by a party in the course of proceedings in other suits relating to the same subject matter?
#SupremeCourt discusses it here:
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Shreeram Builders v. Upendra Kantilal Thanawala and others caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
Revenue entries made without any authority or jurisdiction constitute an act of nullity: #SupremeCourt !
BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. v. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
BANDARI RAMCHANDER & ORS. v. MAITRI COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
A public interest litigant cannot move for withdrawal of the petition on the principle of dominus litis, without the leave of the Court, holds #SupremeCourt !
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ
CaseCiter retweeted
#SupremeCourt expresses a little bit of surprise and a lot more alarm, about a judgment of Karnataka High Court; Says it threw to the winds every tenet of law and is bordering on the absurd.
SRINIVASA T. & ORS. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/dโฆ















