heidi loves liberty (@cnnsbroken) header
heidi loves liberty (@cnnsbroken) profile picture

The most hysterical voices crying about “fascism” are exactly the same people who yearn to dominate & control every aspect of your life & take all your stuff.

AZ USA
Joined February 2017
Photo by heidi loves liberty (@cnnsbroken)Photo by heidi loves liberty (@cnnsbroken)Photo by heidi loves liberty (@cnnsbroken)Photo by heidi loves liberty (@cnnsbroken)
Replying to @DineshDSouza
Charlie Kirk's work should not be smeared by profiteering, Jew demonizing evil that claim to be on the right ~ nitter.gq/yoshithepatriot/status…
1
7
7
854
heidi loves liberty retweeted
How AI helped dems win Swing Left’s Private Briefings Detail Dems AI Operation 5 leadership decks, unmask the instructions behind AI voter profiling nataliegwinters.substack.com…
1
1
1
39
heidi loves liberty retweeted
👏🏾👏🏾
Americanism must win. I can’t have my kids grow up in the dystopian self-loathing communist future that’s being created now.
6
47
1,020
heidi loves liberty retweeted
I took it upon myself to make a documentary about Iran. I wanted to help people understand why the freedom of the Iranian people is so important to the world. I explain the history and why Reza Pahlavi is so pivotal in ending this demonic Islamic regime. It’s now out on my YouTube channel. If you feel so inclined, please show it some love by watching and sharing it. It’s my contribution in helping people understand. It’s also a love letter to my Iranian brothers and sisters who are fighting for freedom. I also heard the news about the regime threatening to cause harm in Frankfurt, if Reza Pahlavi speaks at the event he was scheduled to speak at. It’s a disgrace that Germany is bowing to these threats. Having said that, I’m not disheartened by this. It just reveals the truth: the Islamic regime is TERRIFIED of what the Crown Prince represents… A free Iran!
75
444
13
1,192
7,656
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Bomb the regime. End them. Completely. No more games.
22
178
3
1,546
12,788
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Replying to @StephenM
Could 'color revolution' midterm fraud be exposed via AI? DOJ could use AI to match millions of new voter registrations to actual persons who cast ballots? kunstler.com/p/color-revolut…
3
3
21
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Newsom gave clemency to these monsters.
Dear Governor, Just over 12 years ago, Sacramento County Sheriff’s Deputy Danny Oliver and Placer County Sheriff’s Detective Michael Davis Jr. were brutally executed by Luis Bracamontes. Bracamontes was a convicted drug dealer in the midst of a crime spree with his girlfriend when he opened fire on Danny as he approached his vehicle. Bracamontes fled, carjacked several vehicles, shot a civilian before fatally shooting Detective Michael Davis Jr. with a rifle and seriously wounding Davis’ partner, Deputy Jeff Davis. I went to that crime scene and remember every detail vividly. I also remember watching Bracamontes laugh in court while their families, including Danny’s two young daughters, had to sit and watch. Bracamontes was convicted of murder by a jury of his peers, who then sentenced him to death. Deputy Danny Oliver and Detective Michael Davis Jr. should be alive today, enjoying long and healthy lives with their families. Instead, the man who murdered them has now escaped his sentence. Governor, I urge you to reconsider any proposal to commute the death sentences of all 548 people on death row, especially that of Luis Bracamontes. This isn’t just about the death penalty. It’s about accountability, honoring the decisions of juries, respecting the will of California voters, and standing with the families of victims who have already suffered unimaginable loss.
1,644
6,225
133
29,688
464,733
heidi loves liberty retweeted
.@POTUS: "I think it's largely true because it drove the gasoline up... At the same time, if I had to do it again, I'd have to do it again because long-term, it's the only answer. You can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon."
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
614
1,429
180
10,294
986,491
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Read this and share it…
Everyone wants to weigh in with their Most Astute Take™ on the midterms. But no one wants to even factor in the glaringly obvious: the US has been under the most sustained information attack by foreign states in decades, if not generations. Foreign adversaries have learned to weaponize the very protections and safeguards – First Amendment, Section 230, privacy laws – that make discourse online possible. They use our shield as their weapon. These actors have learned that they don't need to "hack Facebook" — as the press claimed Russia did in 2016. (In fact, that had no measurable impact.) They found that they don't need to infiltrate voting systems. Instead, they have learned to focus on seeding poisonous narratives into virtually every open information system online. It's not only effective, but it's remarkably efficient. The influence happens in various ways: 1. Bot manipulation – Accounts/shows that see enormous engagement surges on particular issues are motivated to double down on the messaging that the bot swarms respond to. 2. Direct incentives – Money and influence. This comes in the form of corporate financing, advertising deals materially larger than their market value. (Did Hasan Piker go to China just for kicks?) 3. Information poisoning – Bringing fringe narratives into the mainstream by seeding them into open, trusted platforms (e.g. Wikipedia). 4. Discourse radicalization – Actors tied to foreign adversarial states pull the discourse further to the fringe. There is no accountability mechanism, so these actors are free to not just say, but endlessly repeat, the most extreme, toxic, and false claims. 5. Network building – As one example: the Singham Network can build, fund, and run ideological networks with alarming success rates. These are broad categories; they break down into thousands of smaller tactics. Further, they innovate. Foreign adversaries have an ability to test and experiment, since state budgets are virtually unlimited relative to the cost. Even more damagingly, there is almost no mainstream journalistic reporting on, or investigation into, malign influence by foreign actors in information spaces. Can we name a single public investigation into information operations by US adversaries like China in recent months? (It's as if, after a decade of "Russia, Russia, Russia," the press simply forgot this is a thing.) Even in the rare cases where we catch and expose these activities, there is almost never consequences: Example 1 - Recall the right-wing influencer taking $10m per year from the Russian government, whose posts seemed design to sowed division? Far from consequences, this individual was entirely let off the hook and even invited back into the country. Example 2 – Al Jazeera's digital network, AJ+, was ordered by DOJ to register as a foreign agent – and simply ignored the order. Were they shut down? Did their operation even slow down? Example 3 – Chinese operatives work in plain site on social platforms, disclosing their affiliations while dragging the discourse into the anti-American fringe. Example 4 – The CCP-linked Singham Network, which funds groups like Code Pink, was exposed in recent months and still functions seamlessly. Example 5 – Influencers and podcasters traveled to Cuba, apparently coordinating with the Cuban government, and are caught doing so. Have any one of them ceased or even decreased their activities? WHAT REALLY MATTERS This is the core imbalance: autocratic states running these operations have no – literally zero – checks on their capabilities: + They face no domestic journalistic investigation. + There is no Oversight Committee demanding answers. + There is no FOIA process to produce information. + There is no consequence in rare cases of exposure. Total freedom to maneuver on the information battlefield. We think, naively, that because these platforms are owned by US companies and regulated by American bodies that they are "ours." Nothing could be further from the truth.
42
349
4
1,695
88,087
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Replying to @LeaderJohnThune
Hey, at least McConnell is proud of your useless role for past 2 years Resign, traitor
4
3
23
heidi loves liberty retweeted
The results in Texas make no sense and now we know why. Massive Corruption in #Texas TEXAS did NOT SHIFT BLUE in EVERY COUNTY. It's impossible Nearly 3 Million Voters Added to Voter Rolls Without Proof of Citizenship joehoft.com/breaking-massive…
1
1
67
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Everyone wants to weigh in with their Most Astute Take™ on the midterms. But no one wants to even factor in the glaringly obvious: the US has been under the most sustained information attack by foreign states in decades, if not generations. Foreign adversaries have learned to weaponize the very protections and safeguards – First Amendment, Section 230, privacy laws – that make discourse online possible. They use our shield as their weapon. These actors have learned that they don't need to "hack Facebook" — as the press claimed Russia did in 2016. (In fact, that had no measurable impact.) They found that they don't need to infiltrate voting systems. Instead, they have learned to focus on seeding poisonous narratives into virtually every open information system online. It's not only effective, but it's remarkably efficient. The influence happens in various ways: 1. Bot manipulation – Accounts/shows that see enormous engagement surges on particular issues are motivated to double down on the messaging that the bot swarms respond to. 2. Direct incentives – Money and influence. This comes in the form of corporate financing, advertising deals materially larger than their market value. (Did Hasan Piker go to China just for kicks?) 3. Information poisoning – Bringing fringe narratives into the mainstream by seeding them into open, trusted platforms (e.g. Wikipedia). 4. Discourse radicalization – Actors tied to foreign adversarial states pull the discourse further to the fringe. There is no accountability mechanism, so these actors are free to not just say, but endlessly repeat, the most extreme, toxic, and false claims. 5. Network building – As one example: the Singham Network can build, fund, and run ideological networks with alarming success rates. These are broad categories; they break down into thousands of smaller tactics. Further, they innovate. Foreign adversaries have an ability to test and experiment, since state budgets are virtually unlimited relative to the cost. Even more damagingly, there is almost no mainstream journalistic reporting on, or investigation into, malign influence by foreign actors in information spaces. Can we name a single public investigation into information operations by US adversaries like China in recent months? (It's as if, after a decade of "Russia, Russia, Russia," the press simply forgot this is a thing.) Even in the rare cases where we catch and expose these activities, there is almost never consequences: Example 1 - Recall the right-wing influencer taking $10m per year from the Russian government, whose posts seemed design to sowed division? Far from consequences, this individual was entirely let off the hook and even invited back into the country. Example 2 – Al Jazeera's digital network, AJ+, was ordered by DOJ to register as a foreign agent – and simply ignored the order. Were they shut down? Did their operation even slow down? Example 3 – Chinese operatives work in plain site on social platforms, disclosing their affiliations while dragging the discourse into the anti-American fringe. Example 4 – The CCP-linked Singham Network, which funds groups like Code Pink, was exposed in recent months and still functions seamlessly. Example 5 – Influencers and podcasters traveled to Cuba, apparently coordinating with the Cuban government, and are caught doing so. Have any one of them ceased or even decreased their activities? WHAT REALLY MATTERS This is the core imbalance: autocratic states running these operations have no – literally zero – checks on their capabilities: + They face no domestic journalistic investigation. + There is no Oversight Committee demanding answers. + There is no FOIA process to produce information. + There is no consequence in rare cases of exposure. Total freedom to maneuver on the information battlefield. We think, naively, that because these platforms are owned by US companies and regulated by American bodies that they are "ours." Nothing could be further from the truth.
221
1,398
152
4,526
306,607
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Finishing strong, @RonDeSantis. 🐊💪🇺🇸
🚨 BREAKING: CAIR just SUSPENDED all Florida operations after DeSantis hit them with a terrorist designation. Their Tampa office has officially shut down. Florida is showing the rest of the nation how to lead. Massive win. Good riddance! 👋
52
504
8
4,405
49,246
heidi loves liberty retweeted
I warned you Chump. No, I mean Chuck. No, I mean Chump.
DSA’s Sen. Troy Jackson (D-ME) says he wants to see Chuck Schumer removed from Senate Leadership Chuck Schumer’s PACs spent $67M to help get him elected.
39
206
6
1,438
32,367
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Replying to @JDVance
No, Mr. @JDVance Israel isn’t why you lost. You lost because you let radical Islamic voices take over your universities, schools and the minds of your youth. You lost because you let them dictate the narrative on Israel, convince Americans their tax dollars fund Israel while ignoring the billions sent to enemies of the United States , from Afghanistan to the Palestinian Authority. You lost because you allowed anti-American radicalism to flourish in the name of free speech, infiltrate your institutions and poison the next generation. You chose appeasement over leadership. What was easy over what was right. You haven’t just lost an election. You’ve surrendered the country you were supposed to lead.
401
799
41
9,535
373,955
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Replying to @JDVance
Name the “data analysts on our side” so we can evaluate their credibility. Because you have no credibility with the American people. You jock ride Tucker Carlson, Dan Jr, and the leader of Pakistan’s military. The way you handled this disastrous MOU lost more support for Republicans than President Trump ever has.
36
168
4
1,577
29,289
heidi loves liberty retweeted
JD Vance worked with Tucker Carlson to draft his anti-Israel, pro-Islam statement yesterday. We were expected to believe the White House helped him concoct a statement, throwing President Trump overboard? 😂😂😂
A White House source tells me that contrary to reports, JD Vance did not work with White House officials to draft his X post yesterday, it was more like an “FYI I’m sending this” and he did it without asking for feedback or permission.
34
109
2
516
5,493
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Another @Heritage Trustee slamming President Trump and his base. She’s just another mouthpiece for Democrats and Iran. Heritage Foundation is rotten at the top.
55
61
8
355
11,210
heidi loves liberty retweeted
Patriot
At the War Department: We Stand. We Fight. We Defend the Republic.
8
14
150
1,648