“most-recorded clarinet soloist of our time” —Fanfare Clarinetist/Conductor-Software Dev-AI & Climate Scientist 🇺🇸 https://xitter.cf/t.co/ZsSqKGhpwY https://xitter.cf/t.co/TiXR6dk7Uk
Lexington, MA
Joined June 2009
- Tweets16.2K
- Following9.2K
- Followers15.6K
- Likes13.4K
Pinned Tweet
THE BIGGEST LIE EVER TOLD
The IPCC has nothing.
Forty years of civilizational alarm. Trillions of dollars redirected. Energy systems dismantled. Farmers crushed. Children taught to fear the sky. Political freedom surrendered. Reproductive choices second-guessed. Entire economies rewired.
For nothing.
There is no empirical finding underneath any of it. None. Not one measurement, standing on its own, that would move a reasonable person to alarm.
The entire structure is manufactured.
Ask for one item. True without a model. Significant without a redefinition. Measured without extrapolation. Able to stand alone and matter to a parent, a farmer, a shipowner, an engineer, a legislator.
The honest inventory is three measurements. Not one of them means anything by itself.
CO₂ rose from 315 to 425 ppm since 1958. Plants grew better. Nothing bad happened that follows from the number.
Humans emit about 10 GtC/yr from combustion. A flux figure. By itself it tells you nothing.
CO₂ absorbs infrared on known bands. Water vapor absorbs far more. A spectroscopic line is not a consequence.
That is it. The entire empirical pile. Three measurements. Zero significance.
Everything else they have told you is one of three tricks.
Model output passed off as observation. Climate sensitivity. Airborne fraction read as retention. Revelle-limited uptake. Millennial persistence. Attribution of warming to forcing. Catastrophic projection. None of this is measured. All of it is what model code returns when they turn its crank. Model output is the model's assumptions integrated forward. It is not testimony from nature. It never was.
Definitional sleight-of-hand. Global mean surface temperature called a physical quantity. It is not. It is an area-weighted arithmetic mean of intensive readings with no thermodynamic referent. The 44 percent ratio of annual growth to annual emission relabeled as an airborne fraction and sold as retention. It carries zero information about retention. Fossil "dominance" quietly redefined from "nearly all" to "a bare majority" so the claim survives data that killed the real version.
Extrapolation sold as measurement. Tide gauges spliced to altimetry and projected as acceleration. Local pH drift at a handful of stations generalized to a planetary crisis. Arctic ice loss broadcast while Antarctic stability is dropped. Retreating glaciers paraded. Advancing ones hidden.
Strip the models. Strip the redefinitions. Strip the extrapolations. The pile is empty.
This is the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
The civilizational emergency has no empirical content. It was built by running trivial measurements through model chains and definitional swaps until the output read as apocalypse. Then it was broadcast as settled science. Then dissent was criminalized. Then careers were destroyed. Then children were terrified. Then nations were restructured.
For nothing.
The emperor has no clothes.
The pile is empty.
The alarm is a fabrication.
The greatest lie ever told to the human species was told in the name of saving the planet from a trace gas that feeds every green thing that lives.
That is the headline.
That is the story.
That is what you were never supposed to notice.
Now you know.
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Where are the conservatives on Wikipedia? They don't exist because conservative media is deliberately, systematically banned on Wikipedia.
Johan Rockström (@jrockstrom) is a LIAR.
Stefan Rahmstorf (@rahmstorf) is a LIAR.
The CTV News post is false. Johan Rockström’s claim that “global warming is accelerating” and Stefan Rahmstorf’s paper claiming a statistically significant acceleration both rest on the same nonexistent quantity.
There is no global temperature. Temperature is a local property that exists only inside a system that is in thermodynamic equilibrium. Averaging thermometer readings from stations and ocean buoys produces a number, but that number is not the temperature of the Earth. No law of thermodynamics defines a single global temperature for a planet with oceans, atmosphere, ice, and land that are not in equilibrium with one another. Different ways of averaging the same data give different numbers. None of those numbers is a physical temperature. Claims that this number is “accelerating,” or that its changes are “global warming,” are statements about something that does not exist.
The further claim that fossil-fuel emissions are driving the rise in atmospheric CO₂ is also false. The isotopic signature of the carbon added to the atmosphere has stayed near −13‰ for centuries, including across the instrumental record. Fossil carbon has a signature near −28‰. Simple mass-balance arithmetic on those measured values shows that fossil carbon accounts for a negligible fraction of the net addition—effectively zero once the long-term stability of the signature is taken into account. The standard datasets and the standard end-member values used by the carbon-cycle literature itself force this result.
Rockström’s conference remarks and Rahmstorf’s 2026 paper in Geophysical Research Letters both treat the nonexistent global-temperature series as a physical fact and both attribute its changes to fossil emissions. Neither the temperature construct nor the fossil attribution holds.
The story reports false claims about quantities that do not exist.
For the TRUTH see:
papers.jcohler.com/ptt
papers.jcohler.com/keeling
Global warming is accelerating, leading climate scientist Rockström says ctvnews.ca/climate-and-envir…
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Fossil fuel combustion drove essentially NONE of the atmospheric CO2 growth
Tom Nelson Podcast #427
youtu.be/xuEdCaS7Gqs
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
The always full-of-it Senator Outhouse embraces the "ozone hole" hoax, too even though the available data show no rhyme or reason for the harmless and localized thinning of the stratospheric ozone over the Antarctic.
The obvious difference is that the malignant and corrupting fossil fuel industry did not deploy its lies-and-dark-money apparatus against controlling HFCs. Please pay attention.
nytimes.com/2026/10/15/clima…
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Johan Rockström (@jrockstrom) is a LIAR.
Stefan Rahmstorf (@rahmstorf) is a LIAR.
The CTV News post is false. Johan Rockström’s claim that “global warming is accelerating” and Stefan Rahmstorf’s paper claiming a statistically significant acceleration both rest on the same nonexistent quantity.
There is no global temperature. Temperature is a local property that exists only inside a system that is in thermodynamic equilibrium. Averaging thermometer readings from stations and ocean buoys produces a number, but that number is not the temperature of the Earth. No law of thermodynamics defines a single global temperature for a planet with oceans, atmosphere, ice, and land that are not in equilibrium with one another. Different ways of averaging the same data give different numbers. None of those numbers is a physical temperature. Claims that this number is “accelerating,” or that its changes are “global warming,” are statements about something that does not exist.
The further claim that fossil-fuel emissions are driving the rise in atmospheric CO₂ is also false. The isotopic signature of the carbon added to the atmosphere has stayed near −13‰ for centuries, including across the instrumental record. Fossil carbon has a signature near −28‰. Simple mass-balance arithmetic on those measured values shows that fossil carbon accounts for a negligible fraction of the net addition—effectively zero once the long-term stability of the signature is taken into account. The standard datasets and the standard end-member values used by the carbon-cycle literature itself force this result.
Rockström’s conference remarks and Rahmstorf’s 2026 paper in Geophysical Research Letters both treat the nonexistent global-temperature series as a physical fact and both attribute its changes to fossil emissions. Neither the temperature construct nor the fossil attribution holds.
The story reports false claims about quantities that do not exist.
For the TRUTH see:
papers.jcohler.com/ptt
papers.jcohler.com/keeling
Global warming is accelerating, leading climate scientist Rockström says ctvnews.ca/climate-and-envir…
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Strike one word from your vocabulary. Warming.
The planet does not have one temperature. A thing with no single temperature cannot have a rising single temperature. The entire IPCC vocabulary points to a quantity that does not exist.
On this lie, plus one more (that our CO2 lingers for centuries, when the atmosphere clears it in about four years), the United Nations is engineering the biggest planned theft in human history. $100 to $300 trillion by 2050. Your electric bill. Your groceries. Your mortgage. Your pension. Your kid’s homework.
Both lies fall to a thermometer and a basic chemistry test. Any honest high-schooler can see through them in an afternoon.
I name the architects. I show you what the lies cost your family every day. I give you the elementary questions that end the argument. Ask them of anyone in authority and watch the silence.
Full article ⬇️
They Lied. They Are Lying. They Will Keep Lying Unless We Stop Them.
xitter.cf/cohler/status/21129621…
Fossil fuel combustion drove essentially NONE of the atmospheric CO2 growth
Tom Nelson Podcast #427: Jonathan Cohler: “ Fossil fuel combustion drove essentially none of the atmospheric CO2 growth” is now published. @cohler
Jonathan Cohler presents a newly submitted paper using mass conservation, isotopic signatures (delta 13C), and multiple datasets to apply the Keeling relation and infer a consistent intercept near -13.2‰ across sites and time spans. He argues this makes fossil fuels (signature ~-28‰) at most 26% of net atmospheric CO2 change and, using preindustrial constraints, essentially ~0–1.3%, contradicting claims by IPCC, NASA, NOAA, EPA, and the CO2 Coalition. He says CO2 residence time is ~3.8 years and attributes rising CO2 to natural temperature-driven ocean/soil outgassing. He criticizes the CO2 Coalition for conflating accounting identities with causation, describes harassment, and says he resigned.
00:00 New Paper Claim
01:29 Three Inputs Setup
03:25 Isotope Signatures 101
06:05 Keeling Relation Explained
10:17 Datasets And Intercepts
13:38 Solving For Fossil Fraction
22:22 Why Fossil Dominance Fails
25:16 Rejecting The Conclusion
28:04 Carbon Cycle Turnover
31:45 What Drives CO2 Rise
33:56 Ancient CO2 And Whataboutism
36:53 CO2 Coalition Errors Teaser
37:38 Accounting vs Causation
39:23 Feynman on Conservation
40:37 What Proves Causality
41:37 Atmospheric Balance Equation
42:53 Coalition Paper Misreads
46:25 Molecules Not Labeled
48:08 Residuals Aren't Attribution
49:56 Isotopes Discriminate Sources
51:27 Airborne Fraction Fallacy
53:41 Retention and Cycle Time
56:02 Harassment and Resignation
01:03:18 CO2 Forcing and Policy Costs
01:08:51 X Feedback and Contact
01:13:38 Wrap Up and Links
Fossil fuel combustion drove essentially NONE of the atmospheric CO2 growth
Tom Nelson Podcast #427
youtu.be/xuEdCaS7Gqs
Strike one word from your vocabulary. Warming.
The planet does not have one temperature. A thing with no single temperature cannot have a rising single temperature. The entire IPCC vocabulary points to a quantity that does not exist.
On this lie, plus one more (that our CO2 lingers for centuries, when the atmosphere clears it in about four years), the United Nations is engineering the biggest planned theft in human history. $100 to $300 trillion by 2050. Your electric bill. Your groceries. Your mortgage. Your pension. Your kid’s homework.
Both lies fall to a thermometer and a basic chemistry test. Any honest high-schooler can see through them in an afternoon.
I name the architects. I show you what the lies cost your family every day. I give you the elementary questions that end the argument. Ask them of anyone in authority and watch the silence.
Full article ⬇️
They Lied. They Are Lying. They Will Keep Lying Unless We Stop Them.
xitter.cf/cohler/status/21129621…
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Two HUGE problems with your post.
1) most folks don’t know what IPCC stands for
2) making the king look like Trump is a big mistake
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
I truly can't imagine a more destructive president than you have been. A vacuous empty suit spewing platitudinous shite all day long. You are an enemy of the foundational principles of the United States. I say that with all due respect of course. #BLM
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
“Close your Borders and take control, before it is too late!” - President DONALD J. TRUMP
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
When Trump came down the escalator, the first thing he did was to identify the traitors in this party
Bush and Rove were at the top of that list
Now, both are supporting Democrats in Texas
It's official now.... Trump was right, from day one
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Import the third world, become the third world. This is on you.
Aucune place pour la violence dans notre République.
Ceux qui ont cassé, attaqué les préfectures comme les commerces, pillé jusqu’à nos mairies, seront poursuivis et punis.
Aux forces de l’ordre, garantes du droit à manifester, je dis le soutien de la Nation.
Nous ferons tous bloc face aux semeurs de chaos, qui ne cherchent qu’à abattre nos institutions et empêchent ceux qui expriment pacifiquement leurs revendications de le faire.
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
TRUMP JUST SAID WHAT EUROPE IS TOO SCARED TO SAY.
France is burning, and President Trump called it exactly what it is. When you open the doors to huge numbers of people who have no interest in your culture or your laws, you shouldn't act shocked when the streets go up in flames.
Macron and the European elites spent years calling anyone who warned them a bigot. Their cities are on fire now, and they're still pretending it has nothing to do with who they let in.
America came way too close to the same road with four years of wide open borders under Biden. Close the border, deport the illegals, and never apologize for protecting your own country.
Jonathan Cohler retweeted
Dear Trump Voters:
If you stay home to "send a message," this is what Democrats will import into America.
