Pinned Tweet
The documentary I'm putting together is VERY long, + is really more like a freshman-level university course on scientific controversies. First of its kind. Will include curated reading materials, short videos, thought-provoking conversations + some relevant comedy.
Controversies of Science retweeted
All this event serves to PROVE is the government now has a demonstrated capability to freeze billions in crypto assets instantly.
stable-coins have centralized kill switches. 🚨
They expect you to believe a DevOps Laptop
submit unauthorized withdrawal transactions across eight blockchain networks in 15 minutes moving $6.3 billion across 8 networks from a single DevOps laptop without triggering internal tier-1 alarms, multi-signature requirements, and withdrawal limits. Binance is not a lemonade stand 🤦♂️
Moving that kind of liquidity needs the highest level of hardware security modules (HSMs) and multi-party computation (MPC). Blaming a DevOps laptop is the laziest, most transparent scapegoat in the corporate playbook.🚨
This is not a hack. This is an inside job orchestrated by Binance leadership itself to execute a massive, coordinated short squeeze and liquidity grab, masked as a North Korean cyberattack. 🚨
The faked the $6.3B "hack," so they crash the market (Bitcoin drops 5% to $77,000, smaller caps drop 10%). They freeze $3B of "stolen" assets (effectively locking up competitor liquidity or their own user funds to prevent a bank run). Meanwhile, the "unfrozen" $2.4 billion (which is actually just Binance internal wallets moving funds) is swept into untraceable off-shore entities or used to short the market right before the crash. They absorb a fake $6.3B liability on paper, which gives them an excuse to delay withdrawals, deny certain withdrawal requests, and restructure their balance sheet without admitting insolvency. The "SAFU covers it" lie gives users false confidence so they don't pull their money out. The "North Korean hackers" narrative gives them geopolitical cover nobody can sue North Korea, and the FBI/CIA will just nod along because blaming North Korea is the convenient boogeyman for every major crypto failure since 2017.🚨
It's an internally engineered liquidity crisis masking mechanism and a massive market manipulation short. Binance is using the "North Korean hack" to freeze user assets, crash the market to buy the dip, and hide their own insolvency or fractional reserve practices.🚨
They have a massive internal liquidity crisis.
Sky News says $6.3 billion stolen, the largest heist in history But the on-chain data tracked by analysts shows only about $3.3 billion in total assets actually moved across the eight blockchain networks
this entire event is an engineered market manipulation and fractional-resve obfuscation. Binance is facing a silent insolvency issue due to bad debts or over-leveraged internal trading desks. 🚨🚨
So for them to survive a bank run, they need to freeze user assets and crash the market to buy back cheap. They move $3.3 billion internally to a wallet labeled 0x5227 and then onward to 0x8532. 🚨🚨
They label it a TraderTraitor North Korean hack because that group already has an FBI fingerprint from the Bybit hack, making it the perfect scapegoat.🚨
By freezing $3 billion of user funds on-chain under the guise of stopping the hackers, they lock up their own customers' liquidity, preventing a massive withdrawal run.
They crash Bitcoin 5 percent down to $77,000 and smaller assets 10 percent, allowing their internal trading desks to short the market or buy the dip at a massive discount.🚨
login.yahoo.com/?noPrompt=1&…
wsj.com/business/polymarket-…
If you are trying to figure out who is on the better trajectory - Ben Davidson or the Thunderbolts Group - the best thing you could do is to learn everything you can about the red sand deserts.
Replying to @controscience
The Surprising Way in Which Red-Colored Sands Get their Hue Suggests an Extraterrestrial Origin for the Earth's Massive Deposits of Red-Colored Sands
The red color is just a thin varnish of iron-oxide glued to the quartz grain w clay!
indiana.edu/~hydrogeo/Penn,%…
Friendly warning for people who have been persuaded to worry about an impending "micronova" event: Catastrophism has not historically been a doomsday movement, + have you considered that this is happening primarily bc these same people rejected climate doomsday fear?
"Something immense happened [thousands of years ago] which changed the Earth and wiped our memories, and the New World Order ... the Illuminati, they're using that to their advantage. Our amnesia is being used to their advantage."
youtube.com/watch?v=sW4PeQQz…
Controversies of Science retweeted
Why Feb 7? Why not just wait until the French election is over? Why force the EU to pick a successor before the election? Your term was supposed to end in Oct 2027.🚨🚨
The establishment is deliberately setting up Le Pen to fail. They want her to win the presidency but inherit a financial straightjacket. By sacrificing Lagarde now, they lock in the monetary policy for the next 8 years.🚨🚨
What Lagarde is doing is rigging the system so that the democratic choice of the French people is neutralized before they even make it. She is using unelected, unaccountable central bank appointments to block the policies that the voters actually want.🚨🚨
Look at the simultaneous departures. Schnabel (Jan), Lagarde (Feb), Lane (May). The entire top echelon of the ECB is being decapitated and replaced simultaneously right before the French election
Shes leaving now because If she waited until October 2027, and Le Pen won in Spring 2027, Le Pen would have massive influence over who the next ECB president is. By resigning now, effective Feb 7, she forces the current establishment (Macron, Costa, the traditional EU machinery) to appoint Knot or De Cos both rigid, orthodox, anti-inflation hawks before Le Pen takes power.🚨🚨
Shes going to the WEF to continue political warfare from the outside, while the ECB is handed to TECHNOCRATIC hawks who will refuse to print money for Le Pen's France.🚨🚨
🇫🇷 Le Pen's entire economic policy relies on ECB submission (monetizing debt, lowering French borrowing costs). So by orchestrating a mass exodus and locking in anti-debt hawks before the election, the EU establishment is checkmating Le Pen before she even takes office. When Le Pen wins and demands the ECB ease rates, Knot or De Cos will simply say, "We are independent, our mandate is inflation, we cannot buy your debt." Le Pen will be politically trapped, forced to either capitulate or trigger a French sovereign debt crisis that she will be blamed for.🚨🚨
the European elite telling the public that their votes do not matter. The ECB is supposed to serve the people of Europe. Instead it is being weaponized to protect the establishment from the people.
I have just informed my colleagues that I will step down as @ECB President on 7 February 2027.
It has been a source of great pride to serve this institution.
I thank all of those who have supported me on this journey over the past seven years.
Controversies of Science retweeted
Did you know…
2014: the candidate who ran against Lula’s party died.
2018: the candidate who ran against Lula’s party was stabbed and nearly killed.
2022: the candidate who ran against Lula’s party is serving a 27-year sentence for a “coup” that never happened.
2026: Flávio Bolsonaro, the candidate who ran against Lula, is in exile.
What are the odds? Just huge coincidences.
And Lula wants us to believe he won the election fairly?
Controversies of Science retweeted
Prediction: When California eliminates gas plants on Dec. 31, blackouts will become more common, and California Democrats will blame Trump.
The gas plant goodbye
politi.co/4eB3JjF via @politico
Controversies of Science retweeted
On target Jason! ❤️🔥
@JasonChristoff6
Controversies of Science retweeted
The prestigious periodical British Archeaology in 1997 in the article titled Comets and Disasters in the Bronze Age reads-
"At some time around 2300 BC, give or take a century...a large number of the major civilizations of this world collapsed simultaneously it seems. The Akkadian empire in Mesopotamia, the Old Kingdom in Egypt, the Early Bronze Age civilization in Israel, Anatolia and Greece, as well as the Indus Valley civilization in India, the Hilmand civilization of Afghanistan, and the Hongshan culture of China-the first urban civilizations in the world-all fell into ruin at more or less the same time."
This article lists the reasons as abrupt climate change, sudden sea level changes, catastrophic inundations, widespread seismic activity and evidence for massive volcanic activity. G. Ernest Wright wrote that the Early Bronze Age destruction was so violent "...that scarcely a vestige survived."
The scientific estimate of approximately 2300 BCE +/-100 years is a bulls'eye for the well-documented Deluge date of 2239 BCE. This major cataclysm and its dating is the conclusion of investigators who did not rely on old books, chronologies and traditions, but excavated their evidences and successfully extrapolated whole pictures from mere pieces.
Controversies of Science retweeted
My dad often says, "Most people don't think."
Whilst I want him to be wrong, my life experience tells me that he is right.
Controversies of Science retweeted
Carroll County, Kentucky, residents play data center noise at a Fiscal Court meeting to make a point about the noise pollution they now live with.
They are met with incredulous and condescending remarks.
Controversies of Science retweeted
Whats interesting is physics is waiting for another Einstein to come along and find or advance the next big breakthrough proving the universe works the way we think it does.
The real gold in the hills may be someone coming along and proving that it doesn't work the way we thought it did, despite our super successful mathmatical frameworks.
Perhaps the universe is not as fundamentally complex and impossible to understand.
Controversies of Science retweeted
Ever notice that in Dune humans fly spaceships between planets but don't use a single computer?
That's not a plot hole. It's completely on purpose. The movies barely explain why, but once you know, almost everything else in Dune starts to make sense.
About 10,000 years before Paul Atreides, humans did exactly what we're doing right now. They built thinking machines to make life easier. They let the machines do their work and make their decisions, hoping it would set them free.
Instead, the people who controlled those machines gained the power to enslave everyone else.
Humanity eventually fought back in a holy war called the Butlerian Jihad, and won. The thinking machines were destroyed.
To make sure it would never happen again, they made one rule sacred: "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."
But getting rid of computers created a problem: who would do their work? The answer was humans.
Mentats are trained from childhood to think like computers. Navigators use the spice to glimpse the future and steer ships safely through space. The Bene Gesserit spend generations pushing the human mind and body to their limits.
Every superpower in Dune exists for one reason: there are no computers.
That's my favorite thing about Dune. It's also the most terrifying. Dune isn't a future without AI. It's the future after AI.
Frank Herbert wrote that in 1965.
🤝 Paid partnership
2017: Former Stanford Provost Warns Students about the Threat from Within
(original link terminated)
web.archive.org/web/20230714…
"... But we all need worthy opponents to challenge us in our search for truth. It is absolutely essential to the quality of our enterprise ..."






























