MD, PhD Mammography-induced cancers Medical science whistleblower https://nitter.gq/t.co/OrggmGwu0r https://nitter.gq/t.co/pDaq6Oavuc
Paris
Joined April 2018
- Tweets49.1K
- Following399
- Followers8.4K
- Likes42.1K
Pinned Tweet
Mammography-induced cancers. First publication in the New England Journal of Medicine. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3187…
The response to Covid in Western developed nations was influenced by the American Anthony Fauci (who was responsible for the origin of the epidemic).
Only one country refused to be swayed, Sweden, which was unanimously criticized by Western media.
In which country did the response cause the most damage? In which country was there the least?
Daniel Corcos retweeted
Elif Eralp möchte Regierende Bürgermeisterin Berlins werden. Doch in einem internen Vermerk zeigt die Linkenpolitikerin, dass sie sich vor Terrorsympathisanten mit Kontakten zur Hamas fürchtet. Kann so jemand für die Sicherheit in der Hauptstadt verantwortlich… Link in X-Bio.
Daniel Corcos retweeted
Women should be insisting on a SAFE screening modality for breast cancer
Women of X -please ask gur this open debate and discussion take place in screening mammography
Doctors and Scientists are silent and the Evidence is being suppressed
as though we have learned nothing from Covid
mammograms are inducing approx as many breast cancers as they detect
Tragedy -safe modalities already exist -but there is no will or $$$$incentive to implement them as long as the myth -lie that mammograms are “ safe” persists
@daniel_corcos welcomes the opportunity to debate and discuss on @DrLizaMD X space
Help find someone qualified to take the other side
The reason the overdiagnosis gang refuses to debate me is that they use the same type of data that I do—specifically, data on incidence and mortality following mass screening. And these data clearly support the conclusion that the persistent excess of breast cancer cases observed after screening is linked to cancers whose emergence is delayed in relation to the mammograms.
The reason the overdiagnosis gang refuses to debate me is that they use the same type of data that I do—specifically, data on incidence and mortality following mass screening. And these data clearly support the conclusion that the persistent excess of breast cancer cases observed after screening is linked to cancers whose emergence is delayed in relation to the mammograms.
Daniel Corcos retweeted
I remember the time where the Science was under attack. Back then, the Science was Fauci.
Do you wish to replace him in that role?
In my view, science is under attack when scientists are censored and debates are prohibited. You have a long way to go before you can claim to be a defender of science.
It is high time to open a debate on the cancers caused by mammographic screening.
It is now clear that those who refuse to engage in debate have your favor.
Links in the following post.
Please share.
1/2
Watch online➡️ videocast.nih.gov/watch/a2cb…
Daniel Corcos retweeted
When I received a message from a former Trump administration official in August, asking me to meet with his team at a prestigious think-tank, I never could have imagined I was conversing with an Iranian intelligence agent.
It was the start of a two-month sting - described by ASIO chief Mike Burgess as "sophisticated and targeted" - that ended with the notorious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps gaining access to my personal emails and details in a major security breach.
The message from a former senior Trump administration contact I forged through my Wuhan reporting, who has a prominent profile with hundreds of thousands of followers, came on August 18 this year.
I had worked with him on my investigation into the origins of Covid-19. I trusted him and had met him in person during one of his visits to Australia.
Unbeknownst to either of us, his genuine X account had been infiltrated by an Iranian operative, using the ‘delegate feature’ on X, which gives a third party access to manage and operate your account.
Full story here:
news24.com.au/politics/austr…
The Mind-Boggling Story of the The Remdesivir Cartel and the Gilead Team Inside the NIH Hospital COVID Protocols mothersarms.substack.com/p/t…
I remember the time where the Science was under attack. Back then, the Science was Fauci.
Do you wish to replace him in that role?
In my view, science is under attack when scientists are censored and debates are prohibited. You have a long way to go before you can claim to be a defender of science.
It is high time to open a debate on the cancers caused by mammographic screening.
It is now clear that those who refuse to engage in debate have your favor.
Links in the following post.
Please share.
1/2
Watch online➡️ videocast.nih.gov/watch/a2cb…
@PGtzsche1 claims to be a truth seeker
and yet refuses to address the Evidence that Screening Mammography programs are inducing Approx as many Breast cancers as they detect
This is a field he is very familiar with
@DrLizaMD has said she will has an X space for an open civil debate and discussion between you and @PGtzsche1
Daniel Corcos retweeted
. @AshleyRindsberg (writing for his @NPOVmedia) is back with another exposé of wiki-corruption. The 200-page report is damning.
It proves in detail how despicably abusive one group of Wikipedia editors have been in pushing their revisionist propaganda.
Thread 👀🧵
Daniel Corcos retweeted
@PGtzsche1
@daniel_corcos
What say you both???
Women need the facts
Women need a safe screening test
Why hasn't this debate and discussion on the evidence happened yet?????
@DrJMarine
@sethmhardy
@LocasaleLab
please publicize
Daniel Corcos retweeted
I would like to hear a civil discussion about this topic & would be willing to host a space that covers both sides.
@PGtzsche1 claims to be a truth seeker
and yet refuses to address the Evidence that Screening Mammography programs are inducing Approx as many Breast cancers as they detect
This is a field he is very familiar with
@DrLizaMD has said she will has an X space for an open civil debate and discussion between you and @PGtzsche1
Daniel Corcos retweeted
@DrLizaMD
@camjenglish
@daniel_corcos has agreed to a debate and discussion on your wonderful science X spaces
on the topic of Screening mammography -ionizing radiation -the evidence that they are inducing approx as many breast cancers as they detect
Open challenge to @PGtzsche1 -who knows this field well -and published about Overdiagnosis as the problem with mammograms
I am open to this debate.
Please share widely.
#mammographycausescancer
@PGtzsche1 claims to be a truth seeker
and yet refuses to address the Evidence that Screening Mammography programs are inducing Approx as many Breast cancers as they detect
This is a field he is very familiar with
@DrLizaMD has said she will has an X space for an open civil debate and discussion between you and @PGtzsche1
He does not want to debate. That makes him a liar.
way past time to debate and discuss the solid and elegant work of @daniel_corcos on mammography( ionizing radiation -a potent and undisputed carcinogen) inducing approx as many breast cancers as it detects
The tragedy ??? that safe screening modalities already exist
we need you voice
Just a reminder that Peter Gotzsche @PGtzsche1 is a liar.
nitter.gq/daniel_corcos/status/1…
P.Gotzsche is organizing a meeting with @carlheneghan on #scientificfreedom
Before paying £300 you must know what @PGtzsche1 means by scientific freedom
@deb_cohen @HealthSenseUK @thackerpd @pash22 @adamcifu @susan_bewley @ReneePellerin @MartinFierro769 @petersasieni
THREAD
1/
Daniel Corcos retweeted
How Wikipedia Buried the Truth About Covid
Inside Wikipedia’s six-year editorial battle to frame lab leak as a partisan ‘conspiracy,’ and to manufacture consensus about one of the most important scientific questions of our time
piratewires.com/p/how-wikipe…
