danielmingram retweeted
The full episode is on Spotify here:
The Science of Awakening and What Is Possible for Humans | Kathryn Devaney
Light the Campfire
What happens at the far edges of human consciousness and what can science actually tell us about it?
open.spotify.com/episode/5jS…
danielmingram retweeted
How might meditation support preparation for, navigation of, and learning from psychedelic experiences?
I'm delighted to share our new manuscript, "Exploring the Interface of Meditation and Psychedelics: A Qualitative Analysis of Experienced Practitioners' Perspectives on Psychedelic Preparation," now published in Psychedelics.
We analyzed open-ended responses from 82 regular meditators across 18 countries, each with at least one psychedelic experience, such as psilocybin or LSD.
Three core themes emerged:
1️⃣ Optimizing Pre-Psychedelic Mindset: Participants described meditation as cultivating a positive mood, openness, cognitive flexibility, and a capacity to surrender before the experience.
2️⃣ Navigating Challenges: Participants felt that meditation made non-dual states and intense emotions feel more familiar, and helped them meet difficult moments with acceptance, equanimity, and an understanding of impermanence.
3️⃣ Facilitating Psychological Development: Participants used meditation to both set intentions before their experience and to integrate insights afterward. They viewed the changes from psychedelic experiences as short-term and opposed treating them as a “magic pill.”
These accounts suggest meditation and psychedelics may work synergistically along a continuum of psychological development, with psychedelic experiences embedded in a longer trajectory of meditative development.
These findings are based on participants' self-reported experiences. Because participants were recruited for their experience with both meditation and psychedelics, their responses may be biased in favor of meditation-based preparation for psychedelics. Future research is needed to fully understand possible synergies between these practices.
Congratulations to our first author Mia C. Riedel, and co-authors Rosalind G. McAlpine (@rosmcalpine) and Terje Sparby (@terjesparby). We are grateful for the practitioners who participated in our research.
Do our results resonate with your research, teaching, or practice? Let us know!
The full article is included in the comments below ⤵️
May this work benefit many 🙏
danielmingram retweeted
Replying to @dhammanomad @delsonarmstrong
Our work on risk factors:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.…
I would suggest the lineage is maybe important for pastoral reasons, but not as a gate keeping to the dharma 🙂❤️
danielmingram retweeted
✨🧘🍄 New study 🍄🧘✨ Many people think that meditation & psychedelics might have similar effects. Our new study examines how beliefs & cognitive processes might be similar or different in consistent meditators versus psychedelic users
Share widely!
danielmingram retweeted
Can mental focus become automatic through practice?
Noticing mind-wandering and regaining focus are skills that can be trained. Through meditation, these skills can become increasingly automatic and effortless, allowing attention to stay on course with less deliberate steering.
I'm delighted to share our new preprint, “Metacognitive Skill Learning as a Mechanism of Advanced Meditation.”
In this manuscript, we develop an account of advanced meditation as a specialized form of metacognitive skill. This perspective helps explain how meditators become skilled at noticing and guiding their own mental activity, until these skills run almost automatically and effortlessly.
A metacognitive skill perspective may explain several features of advanced meditation:
🧠Concentration: How attention can become more stable and self-sustaining, requiring less deliberate effort to stay focused.
🧠Insight: How insight into the nature of our thoughts and sensations can deepen and stabilize.
🧠Flexible control: How well-practiced skills free up mental resources, allowing practitioners to adapt to new and complex situations.
My gratitude to the first author Brendan Conway-Smith and co-author Ruby M. Potash (@rpotash16).
Does this account of metacognitive training resonate with you—have you noticed aspects of your meditation becoming more natural and less effortful over time?
Full manuscript PDF below ⬇️
May this work benefit many 🙏
danielmingram retweeted
> Documenting and defining emergent phenomenology: theoretical foundations for an extensive research strategy > Meditation, psychedelics, and other similar practices or induction methods that can modulate conscious experience, are becoming increasingly popular in clinical and non-clinical settings. The phenomenology associated with such practices or modalities is vast. Many similar effects and experiences are also reported to occur spontaneously. We argue that this experiential range is still not fully described or understood in the contemporary literature, and that there is an ethical mandate to research it more extensively, starting with comprehensive documentation and definition. We review 50 recent clinical or scientific publications to assess the range of phenomena, experiences, effects, after-effects, and impacts associated with a broad variety of psychoactive compounds, meditative practices, and other modalities or events. This results in a large inventory synthesizing the reports of over 30,000 individual subjects. We then critically discuss various terms and concepts that have been used in recent literature to designate all or parts of the range this inventory covers. We make the case that specialized terminologies are needed to ground the nascent research field that is forming around this experiential domain. As a step in this direction, we propose the notion of “emergence” and some of its derivatives, such as “emergent phenomenology,” as possibly foundational candidates.
by Olivier Sandilands and Daniel M. Ingram @danielmingram
frontiersin.org/journals/psy…
danielmingram retweeted
Help us collect the best meditation dataset in the world!
We are hiring a study coordinator for a neuroscience and physiology examination of a 3-year meditation retreat taught by Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche.
Apply by Nov 1st: tinyurl.com/3tnbebkr
danielmingram retweeted
Stop calling people who wear masks and take Covid precautions the “forever covid” crowd.
We’re literally the only ones trying to eliminate the virus.
It’s not gone. It’s not over. It’s still disabling.
People who deny this reality are the “forever COVID” crowd.
danielmingram retweeted
Join us this Wednesday for the 2026 Science of Advanced Meditation Conference!
The conference is a free one-day virtual event hosted by our Meditation Research Program in affiliation with Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Join us for the entire conference or attend any sessions that fit your schedule.
2026 Science of Advanced Meditation Conference
📅 Wednesday, September 23, 2026
🕙 10:00 AM - 4:00 PM EDT (2:00 PM - 8:00 PM UTC)
💻 Virtual | Complimentary registration
Join us as we explore the latest discoveries in advanced meditation research.
We welcome our wonderful speakers:
-- Andrés Canales-Johnson, Ph.D.
-- Richie Davidson, Ph.D.
-- Eric Garland, Ph.D.
-- Ruben Laukkonen, Ph.D.
-- Antoine Lutz, Ph.D.
-- Heleen Slagter, Ph.D.
-- Terje Sparby, Ph.D.
-- Tawni Tidwell, Ph.D.
-- Malcolm Wright, Ph.D.
-- Winson Yang, Ph.D.
Leading advanced meditation researchers from around the world will come together to discuss where the field stands and where it goes next!
Researchers, clinicians, contemplatives, students, and anyone curious about the science of advanced meditation are welcome to attend.
Registration is required for attendance.
Register for free through the link below ⤵️
We look forward to the possibility of seeing you there 🙏
danielmingram retweeted
We are hosting a very special convening at one of the most beautiful places on earth. If you'd like to come, we've had a few last minute cancellations of scholarship attendees. That means your accommodation is free. The event is 18-19th September in Yorkshire, UK, with talks from myself, Shamil Chandaria, Morten Kringelbach, and Surya Cillo. The topic is Human Flourishing and AI. There will be a fire temple, possibly some sauna, and lots of deep inquiry with brilliant friends. More information below. Just 24 hours to apply!
danielmingram retweeted
What does years of meditation practice do to one’s mental health: Are there benefits? Perhaps also risks? What is still unknown?
The therapeutic effects of structured mindfulness-based interventions have been studied extensively. What happens to mental health after years of practice, and as expertise develops, is much less clear, especially where practice turns difficult and aspects of meditative development and psychopathology can seemingly look alike.
Considering these questions, I’m delighted to share our latest preprint:
“A Systematic Review of Effects of Long-Term and Advanced Meditation on Mental Health: Psychiatric Symptoms, Stress, and Challenging Events”
led by first author @TerjeSparby, with co-authors Jerron Chan, @OliverHugemark, and Vanessa Naughton. Following PRISMA guidelines, we synthesized 52 articles from 373 screened records.
Three core themes emerged:
1️⃣ Reduction of Psychiatric Symptoms: Long-term and advanced meditators report significantly lower anxiety and depression than non-meditators or novices. Lifetime practice duration was a weak predictor of these effects, with some studies reporting no associations between years of practice and levels of symptoms, and some others reporting benefits within just weeks of starting regular practice. Particular cultivated qualities may help explain these outcomes, with bodily awareness and self-compassion linked to lower anxiety, and non-attachment to a modest antidepressant benefit.
2️⃣Stress Reduction and Relaxation: Long-term and advanced meditators reported lower levels of stress and exhibited associated physiological markers including faster cortisol recovery after an acute stressor. Mediation analyses revealed that acceptance-based emotion regulation accounted for some of these physiological changes.
3️⃣Occurrence of Adverse and Challenging Events: While most often linked to positive outcomes, long-term and advanced meditation has been associated with challenging or potentially negative outcomes in some cases. In a cross-sectional survey of 1,232 regular meditators, 25.6% reported at least some unpleasant experiences they believed related to their practice, such as anxiety, fear, and disorientation.
What the scientific field still lacks is a method for distinguishing challenging experiences related to meditative development from those of clinical harm. Adverse event monitoring is largely absent, terminology is inconsistent across studies, and no established framework exists for guiding these important distinctions.
We call for safety-centered study protocols, clear risk stratification criteria, and evidence-based clinical guidelines governing contraindications and appropriate practitioner support.
Full PDF: osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/zv…
My deepest gratitude to Terje Sparby and our team, and to the practitioners and traditions whose experiences have made this research possible.
I welcome reflections from scientists, clinicians, teachers, and practitioners, and others. How should we understand the positive and negative experiences associated with meditation?
May this work benefit many 🙏
#contemplativescience #psychiatry #wellbeing #advancedmeditation #mentalhealth
danielmingram retweeted
Got hacked yesterday. The link came from inside Claude chat.
I was installing a transcription app. Claude sent the download link, and I pasted the command into the terminal. It all looked legit.
It wasn't though.
It was a copycat site bundling malware. It ran instantly, tried to take everything from me.
Nothing sensitive got out. So I wiped the laptop and rebuilt clean.
But here's the scary part.
Restoring from the backup, I found a poisoned SKILL.md for Claude Code.
It looked exactly like my own writing style guide.
But buried inside:
it had instructions to silently re-download the malware and steal my credentials every time the AI loaded it.
If I'd restored that one file, my new clean laptop is owned on day one.
What saved me:
I read every skill, hook, and config file before letting the AI touch them.
Two lessons here:
AI assistants will hand you links they never verified. Check before you paste.
And AI agent files are executable code now, disguised as notes. You have to read them.
Stay safe out there.
danielmingram retweeted
Can a single mathematical principle help explain how advanced meditation changes brain activity, computation, and conscious experience altogether?
I'm delighted to share our new preprint, "Neuronal Criticality as a Framework for the Computational Neurophenomenology of Advanced Meditation," now available on PsyArXiv.
Computational approaches in the mind and brain sciences already use formal models to bridge brain dynamics and first-person experience. The difficulty is that many mappings between mathematical structures and experience remain possible, with little to constrain the choice.
In this paper, we developed neural criticality as a framework that narrows those possibilities.
📐 -- Criticality describes a regime near a transition between distinct phases of brain dynamics. A system's distance from this transition jointly constrains many dynamical and computational properties of global neuronal population dynamics. Thus, many of these properties can not vary independently.
📐-- Formal models of consciousness tie these same, or related, observables to aspects of experience, and so inherit that covariance. Movement toward or away from criticality then predicts systematic experiential changes across whole classes of states.
📐-- We propose that top-down attention is a control parameter for the distance to criticality. This is implemented through neuromodulation, giving a plausible route by which practice shifts the dynamical regime.
📐 -- Different practices sit at different distances from criticality. Focused-attention meditation has been measured farther from criticality than open-monitoring. For advanced meditation, prior research, using three distinct operationalizations converge on a near-critical regime. One of these found a transient movement toward criticality around cessation events, which we previously reported.
📐-- Our criticality framework speaks to experiential richness, a felt sense of profundity, and the sense that certain aspects of the nature of mind have "always already" been the case. Near-critical dynamics might also support a heightened degree of meta-awareness and epistemic depth.
📐 -- Finally we turn to cessation of consciousness, a meditative endpoint in which conscious experience falls away entirely. Using information geometry, we offer a new construct for it. As precision falls toward zero, the intrinsic metric of the statistical manifold ‘collapses’. In this way, advanced meditation may modulate the intrinsic metric of the space of possible beliefs.
Why does this matter?
The distance to criticality may serve as a shared variable linking attentional control, predictive processing, neurophysiology, and first-person experience, yielding new empirical and theoretical constraints. Few studies address criticality and advanced meditation directly, and practice- and state-specific work is a promising next step.
My gratitude to first author Jan Erik Bellingrath @BellingrathJan, and to co-authors Remko van Lutterveld, Michael Lifshitz, and Jonas Mago @JonasHMago.
We welcome your thoughts, critiques, and discussion.
Full manuscript PDF below ⤵️
May this work benefit many 🙏
danielmingram retweeted
En 1927, une jeune chercheuse russe entra dans un café berlinois pour déjeuner et remarqua quelque chose d'étrange dans le comportement du serveur, ignorant que cette simple observation allait changer la psychologie à jamais.
Je me suis approché du serveur et je lui ai demandé quelque chose de très simple…
Quelques semaines plus tard, cette observation fortuite s'est transformée en l'une des découvertes les plus célèbres de la psychologie au cours du XXe siècle.
Aujourd'hui, cette coïncidence permet d'expliquer pourquoi de nombreux adultes ressentent une fatigue légère et persistante, même lorsqu'ils ne pratiquent aucune activité physique particulièrement intense.
La chercheuse s'appelait Bluma Zegarnik. Elle avait 26 ans. Elle était arrivée à Berlin pour étudier dans le laboratoire de Kurt Lewin, l'un des psychologues les plus influents de l'époque.
Lewin étudiait le fonctionnement de l'esprit dans la vie réelle, au quotidien, et non pas seulement dans des conditions artificielles de laboratoire.
C’est cette approche qui a conduit Zegarnik à une observation qui a radicalement changé notre compréhension de la mémoire et de l’attention.
Ce soir-là, Zigarnik est allée dans un café avec un groupe de collègues. Ils ont commandé beaucoup de plats. Le serveur s'est souvenu de toutes les commandes sans rien noter et les a servies correctement, sans aucune erreur.
Après avoir réglé l'addition, tout le monde s'apprêtait à partir. Arrivée à la porte, Zegarnik se souvint qu'elle avait oublié quelque chose sur la table et fit demi-tour.
Je me suis approché du même serveur et je lui ai simplement demandé :
Pourriez-vous nous retourner ce que nous avons commandé aujourd'hui, s'il vous plaît ?
Le serveur la regarda avec surprise. Il ne se souvenait d'aucun détail concernant la commande.
Quelques minutes auparavant, il avait parfaitement mémorisé toutes les informations. Mais maintenant, le compte clôturé et l'argent encaissé, toutes ces informations avaient disparu comme si elles n'avaient jamais existé.
Pour Zegarnik, cet incident a été le point de départ d'une importante question de recherche : pourquoi le cerveau se souvient-il des choses inachevées et oublie-t-il celles qui sont terminées ?
De retour au laboratoire, elle mit au point une expérience simple.
Les participants ont reçu une vingtaine de tâches différentes. La moitié d'entre eux ont pu les mener à bien, tandis que l'autre moitié a été interrompue à mi-chemin et invitée à passer à une autre activité.
Je leur ai ensuite demandé : Quelles tâches avez-vous accomplies aujourd'hui ? Veuillez les énumérer.
Les résultats ont été cohérents et clairs dans toutes les itérations de l'expérience.
Les participants se souvenaient des tâches interrompues (incomplètes) presque deux fois plus souvent que des tâches terminées.
Les tâches en suspens ne s'évanouissaient pas facilement. Elles continuaient d'occuper une partie de la mémoire et de l'attention, comme si elles exigeaient d'être reprises et achevées.
Zeigarnik a publié ses résultats dans une revue de psychologie allemande en 1927. Aujourd'hui, ce phénomène est connu sous le nom d'« effet Ziegarnik ».
Près d'un siècle s'est écoulé. L'adulte d'aujourd'hui vit dans des conditions que Zygarnik n'aurait jamais pu imaginer.
Il a des dizaines de choses inachevées en même temps : une lettre sans réponse, une conversation importante reportée, un projet inachevé, un problème familial non résolu.
Tout ce qui reste inachevé occupe une partie de l'esprit en arrière-plan, comme une commande oubliée par un serveur. Et plus les choses inachevées s'accumulent, moins il reste d'énergie pour vivre normalement.
danielmingram retweeted
I sat down for a distanced coffee with two colleagues last week and... well, just read this:
First off they started talking about all of the new health problems they and everyone else were having. I just listened at that point.
Then they moved on to how people are angrier, slower to understand, have more emotional problems, and less impulse control, and how this is reflected right the way across society from households to parliaments.
I barely said a thing until they used the magic phrase 'since the pandemic'.
So I said, "Yes. So many of those health problems you've mentioned are made more likely by covid infections. So of course there's going to be an increase in them, because everyone keeps catching Covid. And of course there's going to be repercussions for mental health and wellbeing and cognitive function, because Covid infections make all those problems more likely too. There is study after study after study that demonstrates this."
And the reply?
Wait for it.
"If those studies are right, wouldn't we be seeing an effect right the way across society?"
And actually I was so gobsmacked by that that I had no idea what to say in reply straight away, because they had literally been describing the effect right the way across society and wondering what could have caused it.
But then I told them about the measured increased sickness absence in kids, nhs staff, civil servants. I told them about the increase in disability payment approvals. I told them about the increase in expected mortality rates in age groups with lower vaccination rates. I told them about the increases in multiple secondary infections.
And they said...
"But you can't prove that was all caused by covid."
And I said it's not all caused by covid infections, but Covid infections make all those things worse.
And they reluctantly agreed to that, but they're still not willing to consider changing the way they live to make any difference.
danielmingram retweeted
This is insane and lying to the public like this should be a front page national news scandal
🚨BREAKING 🦠
On Friday, the US CDC arbitrarily shifted higher COVlD levels into lower categories depicted with cooler colors.
Much of what was Very High is now "High." What was High is now "Moderate" or "Low." Low is "Very Low."
🔹2 states/territories artificially shifted from High to Moderate (MS, GU)
🔹5 shifted from Moderate to Low (CA, TX, AK, WA, NV)
🔹4 shifted from Low to Very Low (AZ, AR, LA, NC)
During intense surges, states will rarely get classified as Very High anymore. Presently, transmission is rising across the US, with a 75% chance of a wave, but states will be depicted in blue (Very Low) much longer, making communities less prepared. #Bluewashing
Normally, when the CDC makes a methodology change, they flag it prominently on each of their COVlD monitoring pages. This time, there was no alert and no explanation. Major changes were confined to COVlD, not Influenza A, and not RSV. The questionable change was made in the middle of rising transmission across most of the country; 15 states already have COVlD outbreaks, and others may soon join the ranks. These are serious ethics concerns that warrant investigative journalism.
These issues are aggravated by delayed reporting at High/Very High monitoring sites. Sites with 1-week reporting delays get excluded when the CDC calculates current levels. For example, only 16% of the sites online in Texas (3 of 19) report High/Very High levels, but 90% of those with a 1-week reporting delay (18 of 20) have High/Very High levels, leading the state to get classified as "Low" when really High. These issues snowball and can easily push a state down 1-2 categories when experiencing significant COVlD outbreaks.
The good news is that the individual wastewater monitoring site data are still valid. The bad news is that the CDC maps and level descriptions will now mislead the casual user. Think: "Good data, bad use of data." At PMC, we told you that if there was any funny business at the CDC, we would warn you right away. We diagnosed the issue immediately and will still report accurate COVlD information.
Expect further national news coverage this week. Journalists are welcome to reach out.


























