
Heading up Vulnerability Management @chainguard_dev
Alexandria, VA
Joined February 2011
- Tweets1.1K
- Following389
- Followers489
- Likes4.5K
Dan Luhring retweeted
🚀 New episode of Ship It!
📌 Tars all the way down
🤩 featuring @jonjonsonjr
⚡️ with @rothgar & @autumn808
🗃️ #tar #devops #linux
🎧 shipit.show/105
One thing I’ve learned working on vulnerability workflow tooling at Chainguard: make sure to keep mock data nearby. Vulnerabilities disappear so fast that it wastes time trying to find them in arbitrary build artifacts.
Dan Luhring retweeted
Thanks, @danluhring, and for everyone else, here’s a link to download @arcinternet , the browser he was telling me about!
arc.net/gift/1666230d
Dan Luhring retweeted
I'm finally ready to break my silence.
chainguard.dev/unchained/the…
Thankful for the time to focus on my family, and excited now to strap back into the @chainguard_dev rocket ship! 🚀
Dan Luhring retweeted
Cramming AI into your product really cheapens the experience. Understand your users and use AI to get out of their way.
Dan Luhring retweeted
New release! ❄️ Freeze: a CLI tool to generate terminal screenshots of code and ANSI output. Run a single command to generate PNGs and SVGs of terminals with program output or syntax-highlighted code. Use it in READMEs to show off code and CLI output.
github.com/charmbracelet/fre…
Dan Luhring retweeted
Newly discovered vuln in Apple M-series chips lets attackers extract secret keys from Macs. "The flaw—a side channel allowing end-to-end key extractions when Apple chips run...widely used cryptographic protocols—can’t be patched" arstechnica.com/security/202…
What is it called when you run out of ice so you combine espresso with whipped cream and some milk? I just made one of those
I really wish Go had a "zero" keyword for non-pointer return values. Being forced to switch to pointer return types just to have the elegance of a type-agnostic keyword (`nil`) throughout your function body is an awkward tradeoff
It'd be cool if @GitHubCopilot (including chat) could run your tests to validate its suggestions first 🤔
Maybe as a toggleable feature. I find sometimes I like the raw brainstorming, but sometimes I'd rather do it myself unless it has a provably good solution








