
Drone enthusiast. Tech policy nerd. VP of Policy & Gov Relations @BostonDynamics. Former VP of Policy at DJI. Personal views only. Also find me @RobotPolicy
Joined August 2013
- Tweets17.1K
- Following393
- Followers17.5K
- Likes10.2K
Pinned Tweet
It takes a team, of course, but here is a nice video about my work from @DJIGlobal
xitter.cf/djiglobal/status/78874…
Seems safe 🤨
A helicopter was shooting off pyrotechnics and making daring maneuvers around trees at the Newport Beach Country Club. trib.al/Smuujqr
Fun pepper sauce and drone story here
Remember that Sriracha shortage during covid? Apparently the company screwed their only pepper grower of 28 years. After they recorded how he grew the peppers with a drone and handed it off to other growers they terminated their deal and sued him for $1.4 million.
He counter sued and got $23 million. And sriracha has never been the same since. The new guys cant grow the peppers to the same size and ripeness like the old farmer.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
Why will Boston Dynamics win the humanoid robotics race? We've already commercialized autonomous mobile robots, creating markets with Spot and Stretch. Now we're doing it again with Atlas: learning in real environments, designing for manufacturing at scale, and introducing a new era of physical intelligence.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
Today is my final day as President & CEO of @AUVSI .
I’m proud of what we accomplished, grateful for the team, Board, members & partners who made it possible, and confident AUVSI’s best days are ahead.
A few final reflections: auvsi.org/a-final-note-of-gr…
Brendan Schulman retweeted
Spent the past five years explaining to government leaders and communities that advanced robots are not the Terminator 🤷🏻♂️
Lodi, NJ Drone Ban is Preempted, Judge Rules
Via @DroneXL1
dronexl.co/2026/09/29/lodi-n…
Brendan Schulman retweeted
NJ Ct. denies govt's motion to dismiss holding ordinance prohibiting certain "drone" ops was unenforceable under both field & conflict preemption, but no TRO for plaintiff in the absence of irreparable harm. buff.ly/tP95yq3
Brendan Schulman retweeted
On this day in 1982, one of, if not the greatest TV intro was launched!
Knight Rider celebrates its first air date....
Brendan Schulman retweeted
One of the most haunting visualizations of September 11, 2001: watch as the skies over the United States suddenly empty as the FAA grounds all flights.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
A drone light show featuring one drone for every life lost on 9/11 lit up the New York City sky in a powerful tribute to the victims. 🇺🇸
What a beautiful tribute. 🙏🏾
Brendan Schulman retweeted
I posted yesterday about the Airlink flypast in Cape Town and like many professional pilots, I was aghast.
The reaction to this flypast has been fascinating.
For some, it was spectacular. A moment of national pride, flown by experienced South African aviators and apparently carefully planned, rehearsed and approved.
I understand that.
But here’s why so many professional aviators are uncomfortable with what we saw.
Aviation is extraordinarily safe precisely because we question ourselves.
We debrief. We challenge. We report. We investigate. And sometimes, even when something was legal, authorised and went exactly as planned, we still ask…
Was that really a good idea?
That isn’t negativity. It isn’t disrespect. And it certainly isn’t an attack on South African aviation.
It’s mature safety culture.
The lead aircraft reportedly cleared the stadium roof by around 40–50 feet. Hundreds of professional aviators around the world have looked at those images and expressed concern.
That deserves more than “nothing to see here”.
Perhaps the eventual conclusion will be that everything was conducted entirely within the approved parameters. But a mature safety culture should still be capable of saying: we planned it, we approved it, we flew it, and with hindsight, perhaps the margins were tighter than they needed to be.
Because aviation didn’t become one of the safest forms of transport by defending everything that worked.
It became safe by relentlessly examining the things that nearly didn’t. And this is wholeheartedly one of those times.
Every time pilots challenge something, file a report, admit an error or question an accepted practice, somebody flying tomorrow is a little safer because of it.
That’s why professional aviators can sometimes sound overly cautious. The flypast fun police!!
We’re not trying to take the spectacle out of aviation. Quite the opposite in fact.
We’re trying to make sure everyone gets to enjoy it again tomorrow.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
In the US, 14 CFR 91.119 “500 feet from any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. This is not 500’ - not even close. South Africa has a more restrictive version with 1000’ separation.
This is an obvious open air assembly - and this is a no brainer of a violation.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
Earlier today, Airlink performed a pre-match flyover at DHL Stadium in Cape Town.
Our lowest recorded ADS-B altitude was 50 ft at standard pressure, or approximately 205–210 ft AMSL when corrected for the local QNH of 1019 hPa. With DHL Stadium standing about 164 ft tall near sea level, that puts the aircraft roughly 41–46 ft (12.5–14 m) above the top of the stadium.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
I’m not sure what to think about this.
I’m sure they planned it carefully, briefed it & got approval. They didn’t just show up – this was a planned event.
You *can* fly low safely. KC-10 instructors used to do a “Landing Attitude Demo” where we skimmed the runway at about 10’ with the landing gear down, holding the flare attitude so students could see what it looks like. We’d do that until there was something like 4,000’ of runway left, then power out & go-around.
Ideally, you don’t touch the ground. But we did. Once you got really good at it, you could almost never touch the ground, but even then, sometimes you’d kiss the pavement just a little.
So, it can be done, but did these guys practice to that extent? Same goes for formation – I’m not sure what #2 is doing in the last few seconds of video, but it looks like turning away from lead while already above…a good way to go “blind”. Maybe in response to lead aggressively pulling up, suddenly putting the two jets on a collision course.
I’m not too worried about flying through the fireworks or smoke or whatever, but I doubt that was the plan. I can’t imagine putting that on paper to get approval, but who knows?
Anyway, I have a lot of questions here and this is really unusual. You don’t see this with bigger jets.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
WATCH: Two Airlink Embraer 190's just flew dangerously low over DHL Stadium in Cape Town
Brendan Schulman retweeted
Six weeks before a TWA 727 flew into a Virginia mountain and killed all 92 people on board, a United crew made the exact same mistake on the exact same approach and missed the ridge by a few hundred feet. United wrote it up internally. Nobody outside United ever saw the memo.
The crash was December 1, 1974. The controller said "cleared for the approach." The TWA crew took that as permission to descend to 1,800 feet. The controller assumed they knew to stay high until the published approach began. Pilots and controllers across the country were using the same words to mean different things, and the plane hit Mount Weather at 1,670 feet.
When the NTSB found the United near miss sitting in a company file, the question wrote itself. Why did the second crew have to die to learn what the first crew already knew?
Incentives. A pilot who admitted a mistake to the FAA was handing the regulator evidence against his own license. So nobody admitted anything. Every airline kept its own quiet incident folder, and none of them talked to each other.
The fix, launched in April 1976, is the strangest institution in American transportation. The FAA handed the confession box to NASA, a completely different agency, because pilots would never trust the cop. File a report within 10 days of screwing up and the FAA cannot use it against you. No fine, no suspension. NASA strips your name before anyone at the FAA reads a word.
Fifty years in, the system has taken more than 2 million reports and never leaked a single identity. Close to 100,000 arrive every year. Wrong altitudes, missed clearances, two planes nearly sharing a runway, fatigue nobody wants on their record. NASA reads all of it, spots the patterns, and pushes alerts back out to every carrier before the pattern kills anyone.
That is the machine behind the chart. 6,581 deaths per billion passengers in 1970. 42 in 2023. At the 1970 rate, 2023's passengers would have produced around 29,000 funerals. The actual number was under 200.
Every industry says it wants people to report their mistakes. Aviation is the one that made confessing cheaper than hiding.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
An Amazon customer in Texas was not enthused when her first drone-delivered order was dropped into her swimming pool. After hearing the loud buzzing of the drone arriving, she ran outside to record the delivery, and to her surprise, it landed in her pool.
Brendan Schulman retweeted
The UK Ministry of Defense has discovered that the Royal Navy’s new fleet of spy drones, being operated by elements of the Royal Marines since March, have been secretly transmitting information from the drone’s primary camera to China, according to an investigation from The Telegraph.
Components of the camera on the K3 Scout, a 27-foot-long multirole uncrewed surface vessel (drone boat) built by Kraken Technology in the United Kingdom, were produced in and secretly transmitting data to a device in China. An investigation into the drones revealed that the cameras were transmitting “heartbeat communications” – data to confirm they were online and functioning normally – to an IP address in China.



























