Sheenagh ๐ฎ๐ช ๐ ๐ต๐ธ retweeted
Canโt post my Leap Scarecrow photos cos Iโm pitching an article on it. One rejection already cos no room for it at this point this week.. Any publication want it? Itโd be funny. I hope.
#westcork #leap #scarecrowfestival
Do any of yiz watch this guy on Insta? God he makes me roar. ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
instagram.com/reel/De9egUMoLโฆ
Sheenagh ๐ฎ๐ช ๐ ๐ต๐ธ retweeted
Replying to @DarranMarshall
So MoN who hasn't been charged, prosecuted or found quilty of any criminal charges "has to go"........
But Jim Shannon faces charges of assault of a woman is perfectly ok to sit in Parliament with his DUP party colleagues...... ๐ค
Really ???
Sheenagh ๐ฎ๐ช ๐ ๐ต๐ธ retweeted
Replying to @JamieBrysonLLB
Jamie, you show an immaturity and an extraordinary ignorance of the word โsupremacy.โ you might want to invest in a dictionary.
Chris Donnelly makes a perfectly reasonable and historically accurate point. The Orange Order is an exclusively Protestant institution with a long history of sectarian exclusion, political privilege and contentious marches. Yet Orange parades are accommodated across nationalist communities throughout NI, often without controversy.
And your response? โNationalist supremacy.โ Jesus wept, Have you even a notion what supremacy means? Let me give you a wee leg up , my legal eagle chum.
Supremacy: the condition of having superior power, authority or status over others. Now, letโs apply that definition to NIโs history, shall we?
Who presided over a state in which Catholics experienced systematic discrimination in housing, employment and political representation? Who defended a political system built around permanent unionist control? Who enjoyed privileged access to political power while nationalist communities struggled for equal treatment? And which exclusively Protestant institution became so closely intertwined with that political establishment? So do you want to phone a friend?
Unionist political dominance and the Orange Orderโs historical relationship with it are textbook examples of institutional privilege and a supremacist political structure. You can Google that also
And letโs not forget that the Orange Orderโs membership has included individuals associated with loyalist paramilitary organisations, the police and the defence forces. Yet you would have us believe this historically powerful institution is somehow being oppressed because residents object to its members marching through their neighbourhoods.
Then thereโs your ridiculous comparison with the Catholic Church. Seriously? The Catholic Church exists primarily as a religious institution. The Orange Order is a religious, cultural and political fraternity with a long history of involvement in unionist politics. Religious exclusivity alone does not make an institution sectarian. Its conduct, rules and treatment of others matter.
Nobody is denying Orangemen their religion, their British identity, their traditions or their right to assemble peacefully.
What they are being denied is the supposed entitlement to exercise those rights wherever they please, regardless of the rights, wishes and historical experiences of the people living there.
Not sure you get the distinction you continually and conveniently refuse to acknowledge.
And hereโs the part you really need to understand, Jamie.
NI operated under a political system in which unionism held institutional power and nationalism was treated as subordinate. The civil rights movement challenged precisely that inequality.
The GFA established principles of equality, parity of esteem and respect for both traditions. It did not replace unionist supremacy with nationalist supremacy. It rejected the principle that either community should dominate the other.
Equality isnโt nationalist supremacy, Jamie. Itโs the rejection of supremacy altogether.
And perhaps thatโs what troubles you and people of your ilk most. When youโve grown accustomed to one tradition enjoying all that privilege, having to respect the equal rights of another can apparently feel like oppression.
Chris Donnelly understands that distinction perfectly well.
You, on the other hand, appear to be confusing the loss of historical privilege with the loss of human rights. And that, Jamie, says considerably more about your understanding of equality than it does about Chris Donnelly.
I had another meeting with Joeโs Social Worker this morning. I have decided to bring some positivity to the situation. I told her I know where Joe is going next year and itโs just up to the Trust to get there. It will happen itโs just a process they have to go through. ๐
Good morning all! I am nearly afraid to say it but I think the meds I am on for my heart failure have finally kicked in. My energy has improved significantly over the past few weeks. I am focusing on my walking and my sleep has improved. I am feeling better than I have in years.
Make sure to vote for our John and Katya on #Strictly tonight before 9pm!
I bought myself a bottle or two for the lamb shanks tomorrow. But decided to try a glass to celebrate Joeโs birthday. Pray for me! ๐คช
Happy 19th birthday to Joe today. We have just come back from the cinema. I think thatโs the first time in long many a year actually doing something for his birthday. He is growing up into a fine young man going at his own pace. ๐ ๐
With pleasure.
BBC NI: End the imbalance on The Nolan Show and publish the guest figures - Sign the Petition! c.org/YTzc29fhfm
Itโs 10.55pm and I have found a tiny bottle of gin and a can of tonic in the fridge. I have YouTube on 80โs music and I am going to pretend I am out going crazy like I am 26! Happy birthday to Joe tomorrow! I hope I am not sick! ๐คข ๐คฃ๐
If ever there was a night I want to get dressed up go out and get hammered and smoke 20 fags tonight is the night! Feck a curse on it I have given all those things up. What the feck am I supposed to do now?
๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
Replying to @duponline @paulgivan
Paul , the breathtaking hypocrisy of this would be almost comical if the subject weren't so serious.
So let's get this right before we assume too much: you want unionism to stop looking inwards and focus exclusively on Sinn Fรฉin's alleged lawbreaking? Seriously, Paul? With the DUP's record?
Let's refresh your memory. Your former party leader was recently convicted of appalling sexual offences and sentenced to 15 years in prison. Let's not forget William Ball, Former DUP councillor, convicted of historical sexual offences; oh, and Thomas Hogg, Former DUP mayor, convicted of attempting to incite a 15-year-old boy to engage in sexual activity. What about Ian Stevenson, Former DUP councillor and mayor, convicted of sexual assault, and William Wilkinson, Former DUP councillor, convicted of rape.
And then there is Desmond Stewart, former DUP mayor, jailed for electoral fraud involving care-home votes. Jeysus Paul, Quite the collection of criminal convictions for a party whose representatives seem perpetually determined to lecture everyone else about law and order. And we're not finished, Paul.
Gavin Robinson, your CURRENT party leader, has faced police scrutiny over alleged unlawful road obstruction at Ballybeen. Have you convicted him in your Kangaroo court, just like you have Michelle O'Neill and Mary lou McDonald, given tht they are the same thing?
Sammy Wilson has faced a parliamentary standards investigation over an alleged failure to declare an interest and Gregory Campbell has faced an investigation concerning parliamentary office spending.
Neither parliamentary investigation should be mistaken for a criminal conviction, but surely scrutiny and accountability matter regardless of political allegiance?And how could we forget Iris Robinson, former DUP MP and MLA, at the centre of the notorious ยฃ50,000 financial scandal involving her former lover? Accountability matters, correct? And we haven't even mentioned RHI and Arlene Foster, the sectarian remarks and slander over the decades from party leaders and MPs from within the DUP directly demoinsing catholics
Yet your message to unionism is effectively, Don't look at any of that. Keep pointing at Sinn Fรฉin. You couldn't invent this stuff. When you demand sanctions for political opponents while actively discouraging scrutiny within your own political tradition, you're inviting some very uncomfortable questions about double standards.
Perhaps the most revealing part of your statement is the suggestion that examining unionism's own conduct somehow amounts to punishing unionists. No, Paul. It's called accountability.
The rule of law is not a DUP pick-and-mix where republicans get the lectures and unionists get the benefit of political solidarity.
If you genuinely believe nobody is above the law, demonstrate it consistently.
Because demanding accountability from everyone else while telling your own side to stop looking in the mirror isn't principled leadership. It's political double standards dressed up as moral authority.















